SlideShare ist ein Scribd-Unternehmen logo
1 von 93
Technostructural
Interventions
Chapter 14: Restructuring Organizations

Chapter 15: Employee Involvement
Chapter 16: Work design

Nurul Amal Shaik Mohd Rodhi (G1126196)
Fairuz Rusdi (G1122444)
PSYC 6220-Organizational Change & Development
Technostructural Interventions
Change programs
focusing on the
technology and structure
of organizations
(Cummings & Worley, 2009)
Restructuring organizations
Organization structure describes how
overall work of the organization is
divided into subunits and how these
subunits are coordinated for task
completion.
Designed to fit at least 4 factors :
environment, organization size, technology &
organization strategy
Common Organizational
Structure
1)

Functional structure
Advantages

Promotes skill
specialization

Facilitate
communication

Reduce duplication of
work

Disadvantages

Reduces communication
& cooperation
between departments


2) Unit Structure / Divisional Structure
Advantages

Provide employees with
opportunities for learning new
skills & expanding knowledge

Recognize key
interdependencies &
coordinate resources toward
an overall outcome

Disadvantages
May not have enough
specialized work to use
people‟s skill and abilities
fully

Specialist may feel
isolated from their
professionals colleagues
& may fail to advance
their career specialty
3) Matrix Structure
Advantages
Allows multiple orientation

Disadvantages
Can cause role conflict for the
individual who can be caught
between the demands of two
managers

Maintains consistency
between different
departments & projects

Very difficult to introduce

Provide mechanisms to deal
with multiple sources of power
in the org

Heavy managerial costs &
support
4) Process Structure
Senior Management Team
Chair and Key Support Process Owners

Developing New Products Process
Process Owner

Cross-Functional Team Members

Acquiring and Filling Customer Orders Process
Process Owner

Cross-Functional Team Members

Supporting Customer Usage Processes
Process Owner

Cross-Functional Team Members
Advantages
The work flow & each
department‟s connections
to the customer are much
clearer to all
organizational members

Disadvantages
Less useful in organizations
that have automated or
outsourced many
processes & thus do not
have job assigned to them
as the structure intends
5) Network Structure
Producer
organization

Designer
organization

Broker
organization

Supplier
organization

Distributor
organization
Advantages

Cost effective &
flexible

Focus the
organization on
its central
purpose

Disadvantages
Can cause
problems when
the organization
must rely on the
performance of
an external
company over
which it may
have little
control
Downsizing
Refers to interventions aimed at
reducing the size of the
organization, accomplished by
decreasing the number of employees
through
layoffs, attrition, redeployment or
early retirement or by reducing
number of organizational units or
managerial levels through
divestiture, outscoring, reorganization
or delayering
(Cummings & Worley, 2009)
Application Stages
Clarify the organization’s strategy

Assess downsizing options &
make relevant choices

Implement the changes
Address the needs of survivors and
those who leave

Follow through with growth
plans
Downsizing tactics
(Cameron et al.,1993)

Tactic
Workforce
reduction
Organization
redesign
Systemic

Characteristics

Examples

• Reduces headcount
• Short-term focus
• Fosters transition

• Attrition
•Retirement/buyout
• Lay-offs

• Changes organization
• Medium-term focus
• Fosters transition and
transformation

• Eliminate functions,
layers,
products
• Merge units
• Redesign tasks

• Changes culture
• Long-term focus
• Fosters transformation

• Change responsibilities
• Foster continuous
improvement
• Downsizing is normal
Reengineering
The fundamental
rethinking & radical
redesign of business
processes to achieve
dramatic improvements in
performance
(Cummings & Worley, 2009)
Characteristics of
Reengineering in Organisations
• Work units change from functional departments to
process teams
• Jobs change from simple tasks to
multidimensional work
• People’s roles change from controlled to
empowered
• The focus of performance measures and
compensation shifts from activities to results
• Organisation structures change from hierarchical
to flat
• Managers change from supervisors to coaches;
executives change from scorekeepers to leaders
Re-engineering Process
•
• Prepare the organisation
• Specify the organisation’s strategy and
objectives
• Fundamentally rethink the way work
gets done
– Identify and analyse core business
processes
– Define performance objectives
– Design new processes
• Restructure the organisation around the
new business processes
Employee Involvement
Seeks to increase members’
input decisions that affect
organization performance
and employee well-being
(Cummings & Worley, 2009)

Lead to quicker, more responsive decisions, continuous
performance improvements & greater employee
flexibility, commitment and satisfaction.
4 key elements

(Cummings & Worley, 2009)

Power

Rewards

EI
Knowledge & skills

Information

:
EI Applications: Parallel
Structures
(Cummings & Worley, 2009)

Provide members with an alternative setting in which
to address problems & to propose innovative
solutions free from the existing, formal organization
structure & culture
2 most common parallel structure:
1)
Cooperative union-management projects
2)
Quality circles
EI Applications: Parallel Structures

1

Define the purpose & scope

2

Form steering committee

3

Communicate with organization
members

4

Create forums for employee
problem solving

5, 6

5)Address the problems & issues
6)Implement & evaluate the changes
EI Applications: Total Quality
Management (TQM)
Quality is achieved when organizational
processes reliably produce products and
services that meet or exceed customer
expectations
(Cummings & Worley, 2009)

Emphasize the concept of quality
Total Quality Management (TQM)
Is a combination of a number of organization
improvement techniques and approaches including
the use of quality circles, statistical quality control,
statistical process control, self-managed teams and
task forces & extensive use of employee
participation.
(French & Bell, 1999)
EI Application: Total Quality
Management (TQM)
Gain long-term senior
management commitment
Train members in quality
methods
Start quality improvement projects

Measure progress
Rewarding accomplishment
EI Application: High-Involvement
organizations (HIOs)
Create organizational conditions that support
high levels of employee participation

Address almost all organizational features (org.
structure, job design, information system, career
system, selection, training, reward
system, personnel policies, physical layout)
(Cummings & Worley, 2009)
Work Design
Focuses on
motivational
theories &
attempts to
enrich the
work
experience

Sociotechnical systems approach

Focuses on
efficiency &
simplification

Motivational approach

Engineering approach

Work design – creating jobs & work groups that
generate high levels of employee fulfillment and
productivity
Focuses to
optimize both
the social &
the technical
aspects of
work systems
The Complete Job Characteristic Model
Hackman & Oldham have provided an
OD approach to work redesign based
on a theoretical model of what job
characteristics lead to the psychological
states that produce “high internal work
motivation”
(French & Bell, 1999)
STRATEGIC
CHANGE
INTERVENTIONS
PSYC 6220-Organizational Change & Development
Understanding the
Introduction
UNDERSTANDING
Balanced Scorecard

STRATEGIC INTERVENTIONS

“Without a strategy, an organisation is like a ship without a
rudder, going round in circles. It’s like a tramp; it has no places
to go.” (Ross and Kami)
What is Strategic Interventions ?

Cummings and Worley (2009) describes Strategic
Interventions as:

“ Interventions that involve managing the
organisation‟s relationship to its external
environment and the internal structure and
process necessary to support a business
strategy”
What is Strategic Interventions ?
Strategic interventions contribute to align
the organization with its environment and
that which links the internal functioning of
the organization to the larger
environment; transforming the
organization to keep pace with changing
conditions.
– Cummings and Worley (2009)
What is Strategic Interventions ?

Strategic intervention help organizations to
gain a better understanding of their
current state, and their environment, that
allow them to better target strategies for
competing or collaborating with other
organizations
– Cummings and Worley (2009)
Transformational Change

1

2
3

Integrated Strategic Change
Organisation Design
Culture Change
Continuous Change
Self-designing Organisatons
Learning Organisation
Built-to-change Organisation
Transorganisational Change
Mergers & Acquisitions
Alliance Intervention
Network Intervention
Understanding the
Part 1
Transformational Change
Balanced Scorecard

“Without a strategy, an organisation is like a ship without a
rudder, going round in circles. It’s like a tramp; it has no places
to go.” (Ross and Kami)
What is Transformational Change?
Organisation transformation implies radical changes from its
members behavior, internal functions, corporate structures, company
values and norms, and the organisational arrangement.
-Cummings and Worley (2009)

Organisational transformation involves creation of a new
organizational vision
(Porras and Silvers as cited in Smither, Houston, &
McIntire, 1996)
A change in which the organisation moves to a radically
different, and sometimes unknown, future state.
(Nelson & Quick, 2011)
Triggered by
Environmental and
Internal Disruption
•Must experience a severe threat to
survival
• Some choose to change even though
not subjected to external pressures
due to seeing business opportunities
•(Dunphy, Griffiths & Benn, 2007).

Change Demands a
New Organizing
Paradigm
Involving gamma types of
change (Bartunek & Louis, as
cited in Cummings and
Worley, 2009) - discontinuous
shifts in mental or
organisational frameworks.

6
Characteristics
of
transformational

change

Change Is Aimed at
Competitive Advantage
• Uniqueness – unique bundle of

resources which represent
completive advantage
• Value – higher-than-average price
or exceptionally low in cost
• Imitation difficulty

Involves Significant Change Is
Learning
Systematic and
• Transformational change Revolutionary
requires learning and
innovation. Members must
learn to enact new
behaviors to implement
new strategic directions

Involves reshaping
organisation‟s design
elements and its entire
nature

Triggered by Senior Executives and
Line Management
play key role in actively leading transformation in
deciding the when, how, who and what
Understanding the
Balanced Scorecard

Integrated Strategic Change
Points on Integrated Strategic
Change

1

Comprehensive OD intervention aimed at
a single organisation or business unit.

2

Business strategy and organisation design
must be aligned, changed together to
respond to external and internal
disruption

3

Helps members manage transition
between current strategic orientation and
the desired future orientation
Integrated Strategic Change Key Features
(Cummings & Worley, 2009)

ISC extends traditional OD process into a highly participative process.
It has 3 key features
Worley, Hitchin, and Ross (as cited in Cummings & Worley, 2009)

1. Unit of analysis: I) Strategy and II) Organisation design =
Organisation’s Strategic Orientation
Strategy and design that supports it must be considered as integrated whole.

2. Creating the strategic plan, gaining commitment and support,
planning implementation and execution is one integrated process
The ability to repeat such a process effectively is rare and difficult.

3. Individuals and groups throughout the organisation are integrated
into the analysis, planning and implementation
This is to create a more achievable plan, maintain strategic focus, direct attention, etc.
Stages of ISC
Plan
Implementation

Strategic Change
Plan
Strategic Choice
Strategic Analysis
ISC Stages
STRATEGY
IMPLEMENTATION

STRATEGIC PLANNING
Strategic
Analysis
• Readiness for
change
• Senior
management’s
willingness to carry
out change
• Understanding
current
organisation
design
• Explain current
performance levels

Exercising
Strategic
Choice
• Once existing
orientation
understood, new
one must be
designed
• “what” of strategic
change, define
products/service
• Markets to be
served, way
outputs will be
produced

Designing the
Strategic
Change Plan
• “How”

• Change plan:
• Types, magnitude,
schedule of
change activities
• Associated costs
• Organisation
Culture
• Power and political
issues

Implementing
the Plan
• Alignment issues
• Teamwork
• Organisational/per
sonal learning
• senior managersinitiate actions,
allocate resources,
set goals, give
feedback
Why is Integrated Strategic
Change Valuable ?
Aligns thinking
Facilitating future
state and needed
changes

Shows distance to
finish line

Strategy helps
the
organisation by
Rationalizes & justifies

Guides actions

a focus on culture

Informs key
relationships
Understanding the
Balanced Scorecard

Organisation Design
Organisation Design
Organisation design is “the process of constructing and adjusting an
organisation‟s structure to achieve its business strategy and goals” (p.
518). Nelson and Quick (2011)

Configures the organisation „s structure, work designs, human resources
practices, management and information systems to guide members
behaviors in strategic direction. Cummings and Worley (2009)

Key notion : “fit”, “congruence” or “alignment” among
elements
The idea that the organisation is designed to support particular
strategy (strategic fit) . Different design elements must be aligned with
each other
Better fits, More effective Lawrence and Larsch (1986)
Organisation Design Model
Organization Strategy
Strategic Fit

Organisation Design
Management and
Information Systems

Structure
Design Fit

Human Resource
Practices

Work Design
Organisation Design Types (Burns & Stalker, 2009; Cummings
& Worley, 2009)

Mechanistic Design
Strategy

Structure

• Cost minimization

Organic Design
• Innovation – competing on new
products

• Formal/hierarchical
• Works best in stable
environment

• Flat, lean, and flexible
•Works best in dynamic and
uncertain environment

Work Design

• Traditional jobs
• Traditional work group

• Enriched jobs
• Self-managed jobs

Human Resource
Practices

• Selection to fit job
• Training only when needs arise
• Job-based pay

• Selection to fit organisation
• Training is continuous
• Skill-based pay

Management and
Information System

• Command and control
• Centralized decision-making
• Closed, exclusive

• Employee involvement
• Decentralized decision-making
• Open, inclusive
Organisation Design Stages
Organisation design follows three broad steps (Galbraith et al., as cited in Cummings and
Worley, 2009):

STRATEGIC PLANNING
Clarifying the
design focus
• Organisation
assessment for
framework
• Gap analysis –
problems to address

Designing the
organisation

STRATEGY
IMPLEMENTATION
Implementing
the design

• Configure design
• Putting into place
• “How”
Designing (practices,
• Upper leadership for
the Strategic structures, systems)
Change Plan Members must be
overall direction
•
• Results in design,
motivated to
component design,
implement
and how to
• Stakeholders must
implement
support
Understanding the
Balanced Scorecard

Culture Change
What is Corporate Culture ?
The shared beliefs and values that organisations pass on to
newcomers, such as accepted ways of behaving, roles and norms
Smither, Houston and McIntire (1996)

The pattern of assumptions, values, and norms that are more or less
shaped by organisation members
(Cummings & Worley, 2009)

A pattern of basic assumptions considered valid and taught to new
members as the way to perceive, think , and feel in the organisation
(Nelson & Quick, 2011)

Schein suggests that organisation culture has three levels : (1) visible
artifacts, (2) testable values (3) invisible basic assumptions
(as cited in Nelson & Quick, 2011)
Elements of Corporate Culture
(Cummings & Worley, 2009)

Basic
Assumptions

Values

Norms
Artifacts
Organisation Culture and Organisation
Effectiveness
Most theorists regard strong cultures as desirable, since
having employees holding similar views about the
company and its environment can make organisations
more effective (Smither, Houston, & McIntire, 1996).

Culture affects performance indirectly through its influence
on the organisations‟s ability to implement change.
However, certain accounts where change failed due to the
culture not supporting the new strategy.
(Cummings and Worley, 2009)
Guidelines for Cultural Change
(Cummings and Worley 2009; Senior, 2002)

1

Formulate Clear Strategic Vision

3

Display Top Management
Commitment
Model Culture Change at Highest
Levels

4

Modify Organisation to Support
Organisational Change

2

5 Select and Socialize Newcomers
Evaluating Culture Change
Large scale cultural change may be necessary in certain situations such
as if the firm‟s culture does not fit a changing environment or if the
industry is extremely competitive (Cummings and Worley, 2009).

Changing corporate culture is not always easy but at times risky due
to organisational culture, is much less visible and with many layers,
dimensions and types therefore more difficult to change (Senior, 2002).
Failure of culture change efforts due to change introduced to
employees requires them to function in new and different ways which
contradict with powerful norms and values of organisation.
(Smither, Houston, & McIntire, 1996)
Understanding the
Part 2
Continuous Change
Balanced Scorecard

“Without a strategy, an organisation is like a ship without a
rudder, going round in circles. It’s like a tramp; it has no places
to go.” (Ross and Kami)
What is Continuous Change?
Continuous change interventions extends transformational change
into a nonstop process of strategy setting, organisation designing,
and implementing the change
(Lawrence, Dyck, Maitlis, & Mauws, as cited in Cummings and Worley, 2009)

Focus is on learning, changing, and adapting and on how to
produce constant flow of new strategies and designs and not
only transforming existing ones
(Cummings and Worley, 2009)

Continuous learning at individual level : changing behavior of
one‟s skills, knowledge, and worldview
At organisational level: deepening and broadening of
organisational capabilities
(Sessa & London, 2006)
Understanding the
Balanced Scorecard

Self-Designing Organisations
Self-Designing Organisations
Developed by Mohrman and Cummings in response to demands of
organisations in adapting to turbulent environments (adaptive
change).
This approach helps members translate corporate values and
general prescriptions for change into specific structures, processes
and behaviors suited for change
(Cummings and Worley, 2009).

This intervention includes considerable innovation and learning as
organisations gain the capacity to design and implement
significant changes continually (Cummings and Worley, 2009).
Application Stages
The self-design approach is described in three stages (Cummings and Worley, 2009):

STRATEGIC PLANNING
Laying the
foundation
• Acquiring
knowledge about
how the
organisations
function
• Valuing corporate
values that guide
change process
• Diagnosing to
determine what
needs to be
changed

Designing

STRATEGY
IMPLEMENTATION
Implementing
and assessing

• What needs to be
• Involves ongoing
refined and modified
Designing cycle of action
for the change Strategic learning: changing
the
Change Plan structures and
behaviors,
assessing progress
and making
necessary
modifications
The Self Design Strategy enables organisations to
adapt to demands of change from five important
perspectives: (Cummings and Worley, 2009)
Attends to interest of
multiple stakeholders
Constant
organisational
learning
Adaptive
Change
Demands
Occurring at
multiple levels of
the organisation

Systematic
change
process

Dynamic change
process
Understanding the
Balanced Scorecard

Learning Organisations
Learning Organisations
Senge (1990) defines the learning organization as “…organizations where
people continually expand their capacity to create the results they truly
desire, where new and expansive patterns of thinking are nurtured, where
collective aspiration is set free, and where people are continually learning to
see the whole together” (p. 14).

This intervention is aims at helping organisations develop and use
knowledge to change and improve themselves constantly
(Cummings and Worley, 2009).

At the organisational level, learning is demonstrated through
changes in vision, strategy, policies, structure, products or services
(Sessa & London, 2006)
Includes two interrelated change process: (1) Organisation
Learning (OL) and (2) Knowledge Management (KM).
OL Processes
Organisations may apply learning process to three types of
learning:

1

Single-loop learning

2

Double-loop learning

3

Deutero-learning

Improving the status quo

Changing the status quo

Learning how to learn
3 Types of Learning
Single –loop
Learning

• Where an objective or goals is defined
and an individual works out the most
favored way of reaching the goal however
which the goal itself is not questioned
(Argyris, as cited in Senior, 2002).

Double-loop
Learning

• Where error is detected and corrected in ways
determining why the error occurred in the first
place (Sessa & London, 2006).

Deuterolearning

• Where members of an organisation learn
how to carry both single and double loop
learning(Sessa & London, 2006).
How OL Affects Organisation
Performance
Organisational
Learning

Organisation
Characteristics
• Structure
• Information
system
•Human Resources
practice
• Culture
• leadership

Knowledge
Management
Organisation
Learning
Processes:
• Discovery
• Invention
• Production
• Generalization

Competitive
Strategy

Organisation
Knowledge:
• explicit
• tacit

Organisation
Performance
What are Knowledge Management
Interventions ?
KM interventions focuses on tools and
techniques that enable organisations to
collect, organize and translate
information into useful knowledge
(Cummings and Worley, 2009)

Includes formal debriefing sessions, organized learning
programs, attended and supported by senior
managers and executives. Recognition and reward
systems are key ingredients of effective KM process

(Oden, 1999)
Application Stages for KM
Generating
Knowledge

• Identifying the kinds of knowledge
that creates most value

Organizing
Knowledge

• Organizing the valued knowledge into
a form that members can use readily

Distributing
Knowledge

• Creates mechanisms for members to
gain access to needed knowledge
Understanding the
Balanced Scorecard

Built-To-Change Organisations
Built-To-Change (B2C)
Organisations

B2C organisations are
designed for change, not
stability. They are based on
design guidelines that
promote change capability
in the management, reward
systems, structure
information, decision
processes, and leadership
(Cummings and Worley, 2009)

“In a rapidly
changing
environment, this
change capability
can be a source of
sustained
competitive
advantage”
(Cummings and Worley,
2009).
Design Guidelines for
B2C
Managing Talent

Reward System

Selection practices

Enhance employee
motivation level

• Seek quick
learners wanting
to take
initiative, desire
professional
growth and thrives
change

• Key role :
motivating and
reinforcing change

Structure
&
Leadership
Internal Structure
and Leadership
importance

• Flat, lean,
flexible
organisation
structures
• Shared & spread
leadership

Information and
Decision Process
Dynamic flow of
information &
transparency

• Moved
throughout the
organisation,
information is
transparent and
current
B2C Stages
Lawler and Worley (2006)
The following 5 initiatives can help the transition to a B2C organisation :
Create a
ChangeFriendly
Identity
• Addresses
organisation
identity –
core
values, norm
s, beliefs

Build an
Orchestrat
ion
Capability

Pursue
Proximity

• Intervention
looks outward to
gain insight of
environmental
demands
• Seniors
executives commit
time to think about
future paths –
scenario-planning

i.

ii.

iii.

Establish
Strategic
Adjustment as
a Normal
Condition

Skills for
change
developed
among
employees
Organisation
effectiveness
function
created
Members learn
how to apply
change

• Employee
empowerment
practices

Seek
virtuous
spirals

• Periods in
the life of an
organization
• Involves
bringing all
prior
processes
together
The Built to Change Logic
Lawler and Worley (2006)

Organization Design Is the Issue
Change is
Inevitable
and
Normal

Traditional Design
Is a Problem

Human Nature is
Not
The Problem

Competitive Advantage
is Change
Understanding the
Part 3
Transorganizational
Balanced Scorecard

Change

“Without a strategy, an organisation is like a ship without a
rudder, going round in circles. It’s like a tramp; it has no places
to go.” (Ross and Kami)
Transorganizational
Change

Cummings and Worley
(2009) states that
transorganzational change
involves interventions that
move beyond the single
organization to include
merging, allying or
networking with other
organisations.

Transorganizational
strategies allows
organisation to
perform tasks that
are too costly and
complicated for
single organisations
to perform.
(Cummings and Worley,
2009)
Mergers and Acquisition
Mergers and acquisition (M&As) involve the
combination of two organisations
(Cummings and Worley, 2009)

“Merger”

• Integration of two previously independent
organisations into a new organisation

“Acquisition”

• Involves the purchase or “buyout” of one
organisation by another for integration into
the acquiring organisation
Why M&As are Done?
(Cummings and Worley, 2009; Galpin & Herndon, 2009)

1

2

Improve innovation

To gain access to global
markets, technology, etc

3
4

5

To achieve operational
efficiencies

To grow revenue

Resource sharing
Why Do M&As Fail ?
The high failure rate of M&As are the results of serious limitations
in how companies approach it
(Saint-onge & Chatzkel, 2009).
A set of factors has been found to be to be consistently associated with poor M&A
efforts according to Galpin and Herndon (2007):
Cultural
Incompatibility

Lack of
Communication,
Leadership and
Decision-making

People-Related
Issues

Differences in
Management
Styles
M&As Application Stages
(Cummings and Worley, 2009)
1. Pre-combination Phase
Search/Select
Candidate

Create an
M&A Team

Establish
Business
Case

Perform a
Due Diligence
Assessment

Develop
Merger
Integration
Plans

2. Legal combination
Complete financial
negotiations

Close the deal

Announce the
combination

3. Operational combination

Day 1 activities

Organisational &
technical integration
activities

Cultural integration
activities
Recommendations for M&A Success
For M&A efforts to succeed, Galpin and Herndon (2007) have suggested the
following:

Select dedicated,
capable people for
the team

Provide continuous
communication and
feedback

Conduct duediligence
analyses

Strategy for M&A
Success

Determine the
required or desired
degree of
integration

Speed up decisions

Gain support of
senior managers

Select a highly
capable leader
Clearly define
integration
approach
Understanding the
Balanced Scorecard

Strategic Alliance Interventions
Strategic Alliance
Defined
Long-term agreements
between firms that go
beyond normal market
transactions but fall short of
merger. Forms include joint
ventures, licenses, long-term
supply agreements, and
other kinds of inter-firm
relationships
(Porter, 1990).

Roll (2009) describes it
as an approach in which
two or more companies
agree to pool their
resources together to
form a combined force
in the marketplace
different from
mergers, in which does
not involve the
emergence of a new
combined entity.

Child, Faulkner, and Tallman defines strategic alliance as a “formal agreement between
two or more organisations to pursue a set of private and common goals through the sharing
of resources”
(as cited in Cummings and Worley, 2009, p. 568).
Alliance Application Stages
(Cummings and Worley, 2009)

Involves four major stages:

Alliance Strategy
Formulation
• Clarify business
strategy
• Understand why
alliance is
appropriate

Partner
Selection
• Search for
appropriate partner
• Compatible
management styles,
cultures, etc.

Alliance
Structuring
and Start-up
• Structuring
partnership
• Relational quality –
Trust Issues

Alliance
Operation
and
Adjustment
• Diagnosing
strategic alliance
state
• Making
appropriate
adjustments.
The Need for Strategic Alliances
Hamel, Doz and Prahalad (2002)
states the need for collaboration due to the following reasons:

The need to absorb skills of the partner
To reduce costs and avoid investments
To penetrate new markets
To provide short-cuts for some companies
Benefits of the Strategic Alliances
(Soares as cited in IsoraIte, 2009)

1

Ease of market entry

2

Shared risks

3

Shared knowledge and
expertise

4

Synergy & Competitive
Advantage
Understanding the
Balanced Scorecard

Network Interventions
Network interventions help organisations
join together for a common purpose
(Cummings and Worley, 2009).

Two types of change are involved in managing the
development of multiorganisation networks:

Creating the initial network
Managing change within that network
Creating the Network
(Cummings and Worley, 2009)
Involves four major stages:

1. Identification

• Identifying
members
(existing/potential).

2. Convention

• Face-to-face
meeting
• Costs and benefits
• Task perceptions

3. Organization

• Task performance
organization

4. Evaluation

• Assessing how network
is performing
• Feedback
Managing Network Change
Create
Instability in the
Network

• In order for change to occur within a network, relationships
among member organisations' must become unstable
• OD practitioners can facilitate instability by changing
patterns of communication among members.

Manage the
Tipping Point

• Gladwell (as cited in Cummings and Worley, 2009)
suggested the following in facilitating network change:
• The Law of the Few (Connectors, Mavens, Salesperson)
• Stickiness – the memorable impact of ideas or practices
• The Power of Context – relevance and meaningfulness of
a message to network members

Rely on SelfOrganisation

• Networks tend to exhibit “self-organising” behavior
• OD practitioners can rely on this feature to refreeze change
– once change has occurred in the network, variety of
controls can be leveraged to institutionalized it
Actualizing The Network Within
Organization can realize its network and collaborative potential by pursuing
the following path: (Camson, 2010)

1

Be clear about and publicize
common goals and objectives that
can drive network collaboration.
Support high quality
conversations and exchanges and

2

high quality actions to build competencies
and relationships

3

Build competencies and utilize
technology that will support
knowledge flow, relationships,
high quality conversations

4

Identify practices, attitudes and

business models that impede knowledge
flow, relationships, high quality
conversations and exchanges.
References
Burns, T. & Stalker, G. M. (2009). Mechanistic vs. organic organisational structure:
Contingency theory. Retrieved from:
http://www.businessmate.org/Article.php?ArtikelId=44
Camson, B. (2010). Actualizing The Network Within. Retrieved from:
http://www.barrycamson.com/2010/11/actualizing-the-network-within.html#more
Cummings, T. G., & Worley, C. G. (2009). Organization development and change (9th ed.). Ohio:
South-Western Cengage Learning.
Dunphy, D., Griffiths, A., & Benn, S., (2007). Organisational change for corporate
sustainability. New York, NY: Routledge.
French, W. L., Bell, C. H. (1999). Organizational development: Behavioral science intervention
improvement. United States, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
French, W. L., Bell, C. H., & Zawacki, R. A. (2000). Organizational development and
transformation : Managing effective change (5th ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
Galpin, T. J., & Herndon, M. (2007). The complete guide to mergers and
acquisitions: Process tools to support M&A integration at every level. San
Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Hamel, G., Doz, Y. L., & Prahalad, C. K. (2002). Harvard business review on strategic
alliances. In Collaborate with your competitors and win (pp. 1–22).
Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Publishing Corp.
IsoraIte, M. (2009). Importance of strategic alliances in company’s activity. Intellectual
Economics, 1(5), 39–46.
Lawler, E. E. & Worley, C. G. (2006). Built to change: How to achieve sustained organizational
effectiveness. Retrieved from:
213.55.83.52/ebooks/Leadership/Built%20to%20Change.pdf
Nelson, D. L., & Quick, J. C. (2011). Organizational behavior: Science, the real world, and you.
Mason, OH: South-Western Cengage Learning.
Roll, M. (2009). Merger, acquisition, alliance - Which is the best? China Business Philippines.
Retrieved from:
http://chinabusinessphilippines.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=a
rticle&id=249:merger-acquisition-alliancewhich-is-the-best-&catid=31:asian- brandstrategy&Itemid=73.
Saint-Onge, H. & Chatzkel, J. (2009). Beyond the deal: A revolutionary framework for successful
mergers & acquisitions that achieve breakthrough performance gains. USA: McGraw
Hill.
Senior, B. (2002). Organisational change (2nd ed.). London: Financial Times/Prentice Hall
Books.
Sessa, V. I., & London, M. (2006). Continuous learning in organizations: Individual, group,
and organizational perspectives. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum
Associates, Inc.
Smither, R. D., Houston, J. M., & McIntire, S. A. (1996). Organization development:
Strategies for changing environments. New York, NY: Harper Collins.

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Was ist angesagt?

Interpersonal and group process interventions
Interpersonal and group process interventionsInterpersonal and group process interventions
Interpersonal and group process interventionsgaurav jain
 
Organisational development
Organisational developmentOrganisational development
Organisational developmentShillu Blue
 
Organizational development interventions
Organizational development interventionsOrganizational development interventions
Organizational development interventionsDebbie Nell Geronimo
 
Unit 1 od characteristics second generation
Unit 1 od characteristics second generationUnit 1 od characteristics second generation
Unit 1 od characteristics second generationMonika Aggarwal
 
Organisational development techniques & applications
Organisational development techniques & applicationsOrganisational development techniques & applications
Organisational development techniques & applicationsKrishna Kanth
 
Organizational Development Interventions
Organizational Development InterventionsOrganizational Development Interventions
Organizational Development InterventionsRamakrishna Kongalla
 
Organization Development
Organization DevelopmentOrganization Development
Organization DevelopmentAman Arora
 
Oc 6440 organization process approaches
Oc 6440 organization process approachesOc 6440 organization process approaches
Oc 6440 organization process approacheslindseygibsonphd
 
Organization development
Organization developmentOrganization development
Organization developmentJasmin Harina
 
Team intervention od
Team intervention   odTeam intervention   od
Team intervention odsuresh66
 
OD interventions and their implications
OD interventions and their implicationsOD interventions and their implications
OD interventions and their implicationssurabhi agarwal
 
3 the organization development practitioner
3   the organization development practitioner3   the organization development practitioner
3 the organization development practitionerCamille Boitizon
 
Third party peace making team work group OD interventions - Organizational ...
Third party peace making  team work group OD interventions -  Organizational ...Third party peace making  team work group OD interventions -  Organizational ...
Third party peace making team work group OD interventions - Organizational ...manumelwin
 
Structural od intervention - Organizational Change and Development - Manu Me...
Structural od intervention -  Organizational Change and Development - Manu Me...Structural od intervention -  Organizational Change and Development - Manu Me...
Structural od intervention - Organizational Change and Development - Manu Me...manumelwin
 

Was ist angesagt? (20)

Interpersonal and group process interventions
Interpersonal and group process interventionsInterpersonal and group process interventions
Interpersonal and group process interventions
 
Organisational development
Organisational developmentOrganisational development
Organisational development
 
Organizational development interventions
Organizational development interventionsOrganizational development interventions
Organizational development interventions
 
Strategy implementation
Strategy implementationStrategy implementation
Strategy implementation
 
Chapter 3 od pracitioner
Chapter 3 od pracitionerChapter 3 od pracitioner
Chapter 3 od pracitioner
 
Unit 1 od characteristics second generation
Unit 1 od characteristics second generationUnit 1 od characteristics second generation
Unit 1 od characteristics second generation
 
OD Interventions
OD InterventionsOD Interventions
OD Interventions
 
Organisational development techniques & applications
Organisational development techniques & applicationsOrganisational development techniques & applications
Organisational development techniques & applications
 
HRM Interventions
HRM InterventionsHRM Interventions
HRM Interventions
 
Organizational Development Interventions
Organizational Development InterventionsOrganizational Development Interventions
Organizational Development Interventions
 
Performance planning
Performance planningPerformance planning
Performance planning
 
Organizational change
Organizational changeOrganizational change
Organizational change
 
Organization Development
Organization DevelopmentOrganization Development
Organization Development
 
Oc 6440 organization process approaches
Oc 6440 organization process approachesOc 6440 organization process approaches
Oc 6440 organization process approaches
 
Organization development
Organization developmentOrganization development
Organization development
 
Team intervention od
Team intervention   odTeam intervention   od
Team intervention od
 
OD interventions and their implications
OD interventions and their implicationsOD interventions and their implications
OD interventions and their implications
 
3 the organization development practitioner
3   the organization development practitioner3   the organization development practitioner
3 the organization development practitioner
 
Third party peace making team work group OD interventions - Organizational ...
Third party peace making  team work group OD interventions -  Organizational ...Third party peace making  team work group OD interventions -  Organizational ...
Third party peace making team work group OD interventions - Organizational ...
 
Structural od intervention - Organizational Change and Development - Manu Me...
Structural od intervention -  Organizational Change and Development - Manu Me...Structural od intervention -  Organizational Change and Development - Manu Me...
Structural od intervention - Organizational Change and Development - Manu Me...
 

Andere mochten auch

Learning from Evaluation
Learning from EvaluationLearning from Evaluation
Learning from EvaluationOlivier Serrat
 
Strategic intervention
Strategic interventionStrategic intervention
Strategic interventionAbhinav Kp
 
The Social Psychology Of Organizations
The Social Psychology Of OrganizationsThe Social Psychology Of Organizations
The Social Psychology Of Organizationsprince440
 
Evaluation and feedback within the change process
Evaluation and feedback within the change processEvaluation and feedback within the change process
Evaluation and feedback within the change processDani
 

Andere mochten auch (7)

Learning from Evaluation
Learning from EvaluationLearning from Evaluation
Learning from Evaluation
 
Technostructural intervention
Technostructural interventionTechnostructural intervention
Technostructural intervention
 
Strategic intervention
Strategic interventionStrategic intervention
Strategic intervention
 
The Social Psychology Of Organizations
The Social Psychology Of OrganizationsThe Social Psychology Of Organizations
The Social Psychology Of Organizations
 
Organisational analysis
Organisational analysisOrganisational analysis
Organisational analysis
 
Evaluation and feedback within the change process
Evaluation and feedback within the change processEvaluation and feedback within the change process
Evaluation and feedback within the change process
 
Group dynamics
Group dynamicsGroup dynamics
Group dynamics
 

Ähnlich wie Strategic Change Interventions

Unit 7.8 manage continuous
Unit 7.8 manage continuousUnit 7.8 manage continuous
Unit 7.8 manage continuousJ-Ahmedi
 
Organizational Change and Development - Module 4 - MG University - Manu Melwi...
Organizational Change and Development - Module 4 - MG University - Manu Melwi...Organizational Change and Development - Module 4 - MG University - Manu Melwi...
Organizational Change and Development - Module 4 - MG University - Manu Melwi...manumelwin
 
Organizing For Total Quality Management
Organizing For Total Quality ManagementOrganizing For Total Quality Management
Organizing For Total Quality ManagementSz Ali
 
organizingchap9-170216112604.pdf
organizingchap9-170216112604.pdforganizingchap9-170216112604.pdf
organizingchap9-170216112604.pdfEliaAndiRanigiyan
 
WHY SOME ORGANISATIONAL CHANGES PERSIST
WHY SOME ORGANISATIONAL CHANGES PERSISTWHY SOME ORGANISATIONAL CHANGES PERSIST
WHY SOME ORGANISATIONAL CHANGES PERSISTYuri KIRPICHNIKOV
 
1STRATEGIC GROUPING FOR TOYOTA CORPORATION1Milestone 3 .docx
1STRATEGIC GROUPING FOR TOYOTA CORPORATION1Milestone 3 .docx1STRATEGIC GROUPING FOR TOYOTA CORPORATION1Milestone 3 .docx
1STRATEGIC GROUPING FOR TOYOTA CORPORATION1Milestone 3 .docxfelicidaddinwoodie
 
MANAGING CHANGE PART I1MANAGING CHANGE PART I .docx
MANAGING CHANGE PART I1MANAGING CHANGE PART I           .docxMANAGING CHANGE PART I1MANAGING CHANGE PART I           .docx
MANAGING CHANGE PART I1MANAGING CHANGE PART I .docxinfantsuk
 
Organizational Structures (on the basis of functions & Divisions)
Organizational Structures (on the basis of functions & Divisions) Organizational Structures (on the basis of functions & Divisions)
Organizational Structures (on the basis of functions & Divisions) Deepika Malhotra
 
Business Excellence Model
Business Excellence ModelBusiness Excellence Model
Business Excellence ModelLaleh Adl
 
Action Research ModelThe first model that will be discussed is t.docx
Action Research ModelThe first model that will be discussed is t.docxAction Research ModelThe first model that will be discussed is t.docx
Action Research ModelThe first model that will be discussed is t.docxbobbywlane695641
 
Change management
Change managementChange management
Change managementRuhi Beri
 
Chapter 3Organizing the Workplace[These slides .docx
Chapter 3Organizing the Workplace[These slides .docxChapter 3Organizing the Workplace[These slides .docx
Chapter 3Organizing the Workplace[These slides .docxwalterl4
 
Od - organizational structure.
Od - organizational structure.Od - organizational structure.
Od - organizational structure.FEA Fragrancia
 
Organisational change
Organisational changeOrganisational change
Organisational changeSahil Dhanani
 
What is Management of Change?
What is Management of Change?What is Management of Change?
What is Management of Change?timssubscription
 
AbstractTranslate AbstractUndo Translation TranslateUndo Transla.docx
AbstractTranslate AbstractUndo Translation TranslateUndo Transla.docxAbstractTranslate AbstractUndo Translation TranslateUndo Transla.docx
AbstractTranslate AbstractUndo Translation TranslateUndo Transla.docxransayo
 
Analyzing an organization using nadler &tushman’s congruence model
Analyzing an organization using nadler &tushman’s congruence modelAnalyzing an organization using nadler &tushman’s congruence model
Analyzing an organization using nadler &tushman’s congruence modelwritingessayz
 
Pm600 1103 a-02-schwappach-loren-p2-t2
Pm600 1103 a-02-schwappach-loren-p2-t2Pm600 1103 a-02-schwappach-loren-p2-t2
Pm600 1103 a-02-schwappach-loren-p2-t2Loren Schwappach
 

Ähnlich wie Strategic Change Interventions (20)

Coursework Sample
Coursework SampleCoursework Sample
Coursework Sample
 
Unit 7.8 manage continuous
Unit 7.8 manage continuousUnit 7.8 manage continuous
Unit 7.8 manage continuous
 
Organizational Change and Development - Module 4 - MG University - Manu Melwi...
Organizational Change and Development - Module 4 - MG University - Manu Melwi...Organizational Change and Development - Module 4 - MG University - Manu Melwi...
Organizational Change and Development - Module 4 - MG University - Manu Melwi...
 
Organizing For Total Quality Management
Organizing For Total Quality ManagementOrganizing For Total Quality Management
Organizing For Total Quality Management
 
organizingchap9-170216112604.pdf
organizingchap9-170216112604.pdforganizingchap9-170216112604.pdf
organizingchap9-170216112604.pdf
 
WHY SOME ORGANISATIONAL CHANGES PERSIST
WHY SOME ORGANISATIONAL CHANGES PERSISTWHY SOME ORGANISATIONAL CHANGES PERSIST
WHY SOME ORGANISATIONAL CHANGES PERSIST
 
1STRATEGIC GROUPING FOR TOYOTA CORPORATION1Milestone 3 .docx
1STRATEGIC GROUPING FOR TOYOTA CORPORATION1Milestone 3 .docx1STRATEGIC GROUPING FOR TOYOTA CORPORATION1Milestone 3 .docx
1STRATEGIC GROUPING FOR TOYOTA CORPORATION1Milestone 3 .docx
 
MANAGING CHANGE PART I1MANAGING CHANGE PART I .docx
MANAGING CHANGE PART I1MANAGING CHANGE PART I           .docxMANAGING CHANGE PART I1MANAGING CHANGE PART I           .docx
MANAGING CHANGE PART I1MANAGING CHANGE PART I .docx
 
Organizational Structures (on the basis of functions & Divisions)
Organizational Structures (on the basis of functions & Divisions) Organizational Structures (on the basis of functions & Divisions)
Organizational Structures (on the basis of functions & Divisions)
 
Business Excellence Model
Business Excellence ModelBusiness Excellence Model
Business Excellence Model
 
Action Research ModelThe first model that will be discussed is t.docx
Action Research ModelThe first model that will be discussed is t.docxAction Research ModelThe first model that will be discussed is t.docx
Action Research ModelThe first model that will be discussed is t.docx
 
Change management
Change managementChange management
Change management
 
Chapter 3Organizing the Workplace[These slides .docx
Chapter 3Organizing the Workplace[These slides .docxChapter 3Organizing the Workplace[These slides .docx
Chapter 3Organizing the Workplace[These slides .docx
 
Od - organizational structure.
Od - organizational structure.Od - organizational structure.
Od - organizational structure.
 
Organisational change
Organisational changeOrganisational change
Organisational change
 
What is Management of Change?
What is Management of Change?What is Management of Change?
What is Management of Change?
 
AbstractTranslate AbstractUndo Translation TranslateUndo Transla.docx
AbstractTranslate AbstractUndo Translation TranslateUndo Transla.docxAbstractTranslate AbstractUndo Translation TranslateUndo Transla.docx
AbstractTranslate AbstractUndo Translation TranslateUndo Transla.docx
 
Structural Interventions
Structural InterventionsStructural Interventions
Structural Interventions
 
Analyzing an organization using nadler &tushman’s congruence model
Analyzing an organization using nadler &tushman’s congruence modelAnalyzing an organization using nadler &tushman’s congruence model
Analyzing an organization using nadler &tushman’s congruence model
 
Pm600 1103 a-02-schwappach-loren-p2-t2
Pm600 1103 a-02-schwappach-loren-p2-t2Pm600 1103 a-02-schwappach-loren-p2-t2
Pm600 1103 a-02-schwappach-loren-p2-t2
 

Kürzlich hochgeladen

MAHA Global and IPR: Do Actions Speak Louder Than Words?
MAHA Global and IPR: Do Actions Speak Louder Than Words?MAHA Global and IPR: Do Actions Speak Louder Than Words?
MAHA Global and IPR: Do Actions Speak Louder Than Words?Olivia Kresic
 
International Business Environments and Operations 16th Global Edition test b...
International Business Environments and Operations 16th Global Edition test b...International Business Environments and Operations 16th Global Edition test b...
International Business Environments and Operations 16th Global Edition test b...ssuserf63bd7
 
Call Girls in DELHI Cantt, ( Call Me )-8377877756-Female Escort- In Delhi / Ncr
Call Girls in DELHI Cantt, ( Call Me )-8377877756-Female Escort- In Delhi / NcrCall Girls in DELHI Cantt, ( Call Me )-8377877756-Female Escort- In Delhi / Ncr
Call Girls in DELHI Cantt, ( Call Me )-8377877756-Female Escort- In Delhi / Ncrdollysharma2066
 
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Tughlakabad Delhi NCR
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Tughlakabad Delhi NCR8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Tughlakabad Delhi NCR
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Tughlakabad Delhi NCRashishs7044
 
Ten Organizational Design Models to align structure and operations to busines...
Ten Organizational Design Models to align structure and operations to busines...Ten Organizational Design Models to align structure and operations to busines...
Ten Organizational Design Models to align structure and operations to busines...Seta Wicaksana
 
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Saket Delhi NCR
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Saket Delhi NCR8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Saket Delhi NCR
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Saket Delhi NCRashishs7044
 
Memorándum de Entendimiento (MoU) entre Codelco y SQM
Memorándum de Entendimiento (MoU) entre Codelco y SQMMemorándum de Entendimiento (MoU) entre Codelco y SQM
Memorándum de Entendimiento (MoU) entre Codelco y SQMVoces Mineras
 
Call Us 📲8800102216📞 Call Girls In DLF City Gurgaon
Call Us 📲8800102216📞 Call Girls In DLF City GurgaonCall Us 📲8800102216📞 Call Girls In DLF City Gurgaon
Call Us 📲8800102216📞 Call Girls In DLF City Gurgaoncallgirls2057
 
2024 Numerator Consumer Study of Cannabis Usage
2024 Numerator Consumer Study of Cannabis Usage2024 Numerator Consumer Study of Cannabis Usage
2024 Numerator Consumer Study of Cannabis UsageNeil Kimberley
 
Investment in The Coconut Industry by Nancy Cheruiyot
Investment in The Coconut Industry by Nancy CheruiyotInvestment in The Coconut Industry by Nancy Cheruiyot
Investment in The Coconut Industry by Nancy Cheruiyotictsugar
 
Market Sizes Sample Report - 2024 Edition
Market Sizes Sample Report - 2024 EditionMarket Sizes Sample Report - 2024 Edition
Market Sizes Sample Report - 2024 EditionMintel Group
 
Future Of Sample Report 2024 | Redacted Version
Future Of Sample Report 2024 | Redacted VersionFuture Of Sample Report 2024 | Redacted Version
Future Of Sample Report 2024 | Redacted VersionMintel Group
 
Marketplace and Quality Assurance Presentation - Vincent Chirchir
Marketplace and Quality Assurance Presentation - Vincent ChirchirMarketplace and Quality Assurance Presentation - Vincent Chirchir
Marketplace and Quality Assurance Presentation - Vincent Chirchirictsugar
 
India Consumer 2024 Redacted Sample Report
India Consumer 2024 Redacted Sample ReportIndia Consumer 2024 Redacted Sample Report
India Consumer 2024 Redacted Sample ReportMintel Group
 
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Shivaji Enclave Delhi NCR
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Shivaji Enclave Delhi NCR8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Shivaji Enclave Delhi NCR
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Shivaji Enclave Delhi NCRashishs7044
 
IoT Insurance Observatory: summary 2024
IoT Insurance Observatory:  summary 2024IoT Insurance Observatory:  summary 2024
IoT Insurance Observatory: summary 2024Matteo Carbone
 
Intro to BCG's Carbon Emissions Benchmark_vF.pdf
Intro to BCG's Carbon Emissions Benchmark_vF.pdfIntro to BCG's Carbon Emissions Benchmark_vF.pdf
Intro to BCG's Carbon Emissions Benchmark_vF.pdfpollardmorgan
 

Kürzlich hochgeladen (20)

Corporate Profile 47Billion Information Technology
Corporate Profile 47Billion Information TechnologyCorporate Profile 47Billion Information Technology
Corporate Profile 47Billion Information Technology
 
Call Us ➥9319373153▻Call Girls In North Goa
Call Us ➥9319373153▻Call Girls In North GoaCall Us ➥9319373153▻Call Girls In North Goa
Call Us ➥9319373153▻Call Girls In North Goa
 
MAHA Global and IPR: Do Actions Speak Louder Than Words?
MAHA Global and IPR: Do Actions Speak Louder Than Words?MAHA Global and IPR: Do Actions Speak Louder Than Words?
MAHA Global and IPR: Do Actions Speak Louder Than Words?
 
International Business Environments and Operations 16th Global Edition test b...
International Business Environments and Operations 16th Global Edition test b...International Business Environments and Operations 16th Global Edition test b...
International Business Environments and Operations 16th Global Edition test b...
 
Call Girls in DELHI Cantt, ( Call Me )-8377877756-Female Escort- In Delhi / Ncr
Call Girls in DELHI Cantt, ( Call Me )-8377877756-Female Escort- In Delhi / NcrCall Girls in DELHI Cantt, ( Call Me )-8377877756-Female Escort- In Delhi / Ncr
Call Girls in DELHI Cantt, ( Call Me )-8377877756-Female Escort- In Delhi / Ncr
 
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Tughlakabad Delhi NCR
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Tughlakabad Delhi NCR8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Tughlakabad Delhi NCR
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Tughlakabad Delhi NCR
 
Ten Organizational Design Models to align structure and operations to busines...
Ten Organizational Design Models to align structure and operations to busines...Ten Organizational Design Models to align structure and operations to busines...
Ten Organizational Design Models to align structure and operations to busines...
 
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Saket Delhi NCR
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Saket Delhi NCR8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Saket Delhi NCR
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Saket Delhi NCR
 
Memorándum de Entendimiento (MoU) entre Codelco y SQM
Memorándum de Entendimiento (MoU) entre Codelco y SQMMemorándum de Entendimiento (MoU) entre Codelco y SQM
Memorándum de Entendimiento (MoU) entre Codelco y SQM
 
Call Us 📲8800102216📞 Call Girls In DLF City Gurgaon
Call Us 📲8800102216📞 Call Girls In DLF City GurgaonCall Us 📲8800102216📞 Call Girls In DLF City Gurgaon
Call Us 📲8800102216📞 Call Girls In DLF City Gurgaon
 
2024 Numerator Consumer Study of Cannabis Usage
2024 Numerator Consumer Study of Cannabis Usage2024 Numerator Consumer Study of Cannabis Usage
2024 Numerator Consumer Study of Cannabis Usage
 
Investment in The Coconut Industry by Nancy Cheruiyot
Investment in The Coconut Industry by Nancy CheruiyotInvestment in The Coconut Industry by Nancy Cheruiyot
Investment in The Coconut Industry by Nancy Cheruiyot
 
Market Sizes Sample Report - 2024 Edition
Market Sizes Sample Report - 2024 EditionMarket Sizes Sample Report - 2024 Edition
Market Sizes Sample Report - 2024 Edition
 
Future Of Sample Report 2024 | Redacted Version
Future Of Sample Report 2024 | Redacted VersionFuture Of Sample Report 2024 | Redacted Version
Future Of Sample Report 2024 | Redacted Version
 
Marketplace and Quality Assurance Presentation - Vincent Chirchir
Marketplace and Quality Assurance Presentation - Vincent ChirchirMarketplace and Quality Assurance Presentation - Vincent Chirchir
Marketplace and Quality Assurance Presentation - Vincent Chirchir
 
India Consumer 2024 Redacted Sample Report
India Consumer 2024 Redacted Sample ReportIndia Consumer 2024 Redacted Sample Report
India Consumer 2024 Redacted Sample Report
 
Japan IT Week 2024 Brochure by 47Billion (English)
Japan IT Week 2024 Brochure by 47Billion (English)Japan IT Week 2024 Brochure by 47Billion (English)
Japan IT Week 2024 Brochure by 47Billion (English)
 
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Shivaji Enclave Delhi NCR
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Shivaji Enclave Delhi NCR8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Shivaji Enclave Delhi NCR
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Shivaji Enclave Delhi NCR
 
IoT Insurance Observatory: summary 2024
IoT Insurance Observatory:  summary 2024IoT Insurance Observatory:  summary 2024
IoT Insurance Observatory: summary 2024
 
Intro to BCG's Carbon Emissions Benchmark_vF.pdf
Intro to BCG's Carbon Emissions Benchmark_vF.pdfIntro to BCG's Carbon Emissions Benchmark_vF.pdf
Intro to BCG's Carbon Emissions Benchmark_vF.pdf
 

Strategic Change Interventions

  • 1. Technostructural Interventions Chapter 14: Restructuring Organizations Chapter 15: Employee Involvement Chapter 16: Work design Nurul Amal Shaik Mohd Rodhi (G1126196) Fairuz Rusdi (G1122444) PSYC 6220-Organizational Change & Development
  • 2. Technostructural Interventions Change programs focusing on the technology and structure of organizations (Cummings & Worley, 2009)
  • 3. Restructuring organizations Organization structure describes how overall work of the organization is divided into subunits and how these subunits are coordinated for task completion. Designed to fit at least 4 factors : environment, organization size, technology & organization strategy
  • 5. Advantages Promotes skill specialization Facilitate communication Reduce duplication of work Disadvantages Reduces communication & cooperation between departments
  • 6.  2) Unit Structure / Divisional Structure
  • 7. Advantages Provide employees with opportunities for learning new skills & expanding knowledge Recognize key interdependencies & coordinate resources toward an overall outcome Disadvantages May not have enough specialized work to use people‟s skill and abilities fully Specialist may feel isolated from their professionals colleagues & may fail to advance their career specialty
  • 9. Advantages Allows multiple orientation Disadvantages Can cause role conflict for the individual who can be caught between the demands of two managers Maintains consistency between different departments & projects Very difficult to introduce Provide mechanisms to deal with multiple sources of power in the org Heavy managerial costs & support
  • 10. 4) Process Structure Senior Management Team Chair and Key Support Process Owners Developing New Products Process Process Owner Cross-Functional Team Members Acquiring and Filling Customer Orders Process Process Owner Cross-Functional Team Members Supporting Customer Usage Processes Process Owner Cross-Functional Team Members
  • 11. Advantages The work flow & each department‟s connections to the customer are much clearer to all organizational members Disadvantages Less useful in organizations that have automated or outsourced many processes & thus do not have job assigned to them as the structure intends
  • 13. Advantages Cost effective & flexible Focus the organization on its central purpose Disadvantages Can cause problems when the organization must rely on the performance of an external company over which it may have little control
  • 14. Downsizing Refers to interventions aimed at reducing the size of the organization, accomplished by decreasing the number of employees through layoffs, attrition, redeployment or early retirement or by reducing number of organizational units or managerial levels through divestiture, outscoring, reorganization or delayering (Cummings & Worley, 2009)
  • 15. Application Stages Clarify the organization’s strategy Assess downsizing options & make relevant choices Implement the changes Address the needs of survivors and those who leave Follow through with growth plans
  • 16. Downsizing tactics (Cameron et al.,1993) Tactic Workforce reduction Organization redesign Systemic Characteristics Examples • Reduces headcount • Short-term focus • Fosters transition • Attrition •Retirement/buyout • Lay-offs • Changes organization • Medium-term focus • Fosters transition and transformation • Eliminate functions, layers, products • Merge units • Redesign tasks • Changes culture • Long-term focus • Fosters transformation • Change responsibilities • Foster continuous improvement • Downsizing is normal
  • 17. Reengineering The fundamental rethinking & radical redesign of business processes to achieve dramatic improvements in performance (Cummings & Worley, 2009)
  • 18. Characteristics of Reengineering in Organisations • Work units change from functional departments to process teams • Jobs change from simple tasks to multidimensional work • People’s roles change from controlled to empowered • The focus of performance measures and compensation shifts from activities to results • Organisation structures change from hierarchical to flat • Managers change from supervisors to coaches; executives change from scorekeepers to leaders
  • 19. Re-engineering Process • • Prepare the organisation • Specify the organisation’s strategy and objectives • Fundamentally rethink the way work gets done – Identify and analyse core business processes – Define performance objectives – Design new processes • Restructure the organisation around the new business processes
  • 20. Employee Involvement Seeks to increase members’ input decisions that affect organization performance and employee well-being (Cummings & Worley, 2009) Lead to quicker, more responsive decisions, continuous performance improvements & greater employee flexibility, commitment and satisfaction.
  • 21. 4 key elements (Cummings & Worley, 2009) Power Rewards EI Knowledge & skills Information :
  • 22. EI Applications: Parallel Structures (Cummings & Worley, 2009) Provide members with an alternative setting in which to address problems & to propose innovative solutions free from the existing, formal organization structure & culture 2 most common parallel structure: 1) Cooperative union-management projects 2) Quality circles
  • 23. EI Applications: Parallel Structures 1 Define the purpose & scope 2 Form steering committee 3 Communicate with organization members 4 Create forums for employee problem solving 5, 6 5)Address the problems & issues 6)Implement & evaluate the changes
  • 24. EI Applications: Total Quality Management (TQM) Quality is achieved when organizational processes reliably produce products and services that meet or exceed customer expectations (Cummings & Worley, 2009) Emphasize the concept of quality
  • 25. Total Quality Management (TQM) Is a combination of a number of organization improvement techniques and approaches including the use of quality circles, statistical quality control, statistical process control, self-managed teams and task forces & extensive use of employee participation. (French & Bell, 1999)
  • 26. EI Application: Total Quality Management (TQM) Gain long-term senior management commitment Train members in quality methods Start quality improvement projects Measure progress Rewarding accomplishment
  • 27. EI Application: High-Involvement organizations (HIOs) Create organizational conditions that support high levels of employee participation Address almost all organizational features (org. structure, job design, information system, career system, selection, training, reward system, personnel policies, physical layout) (Cummings & Worley, 2009)
  • 28. Work Design Focuses on motivational theories & attempts to enrich the work experience Sociotechnical systems approach Focuses on efficiency & simplification Motivational approach Engineering approach Work design – creating jobs & work groups that generate high levels of employee fulfillment and productivity Focuses to optimize both the social & the technical aspects of work systems
  • 29. The Complete Job Characteristic Model
  • 30. Hackman & Oldham have provided an OD approach to work redesign based on a theoretical model of what job characteristics lead to the psychological states that produce “high internal work motivation” (French & Bell, 1999)
  • 32. Understanding the Introduction UNDERSTANDING Balanced Scorecard STRATEGIC INTERVENTIONS “Without a strategy, an organisation is like a ship without a rudder, going round in circles. It’s like a tramp; it has no places to go.” (Ross and Kami)
  • 33. What is Strategic Interventions ? Cummings and Worley (2009) describes Strategic Interventions as: “ Interventions that involve managing the organisation‟s relationship to its external environment and the internal structure and process necessary to support a business strategy”
  • 34. What is Strategic Interventions ? Strategic interventions contribute to align the organization with its environment and that which links the internal functioning of the organization to the larger environment; transforming the organization to keep pace with changing conditions. – Cummings and Worley (2009)
  • 35. What is Strategic Interventions ? Strategic intervention help organizations to gain a better understanding of their current state, and their environment, that allow them to better target strategies for competing or collaborating with other organizations – Cummings and Worley (2009)
  • 36. Transformational Change 1 2 3 Integrated Strategic Change Organisation Design Culture Change Continuous Change Self-designing Organisatons Learning Organisation Built-to-change Organisation Transorganisational Change Mergers & Acquisitions Alliance Intervention Network Intervention
  • 37. Understanding the Part 1 Transformational Change Balanced Scorecard “Without a strategy, an organisation is like a ship without a rudder, going round in circles. It’s like a tramp; it has no places to go.” (Ross and Kami)
  • 38. What is Transformational Change? Organisation transformation implies radical changes from its members behavior, internal functions, corporate structures, company values and norms, and the organisational arrangement. -Cummings and Worley (2009) Organisational transformation involves creation of a new organizational vision (Porras and Silvers as cited in Smither, Houston, & McIntire, 1996) A change in which the organisation moves to a radically different, and sometimes unknown, future state. (Nelson & Quick, 2011)
  • 39. Triggered by Environmental and Internal Disruption •Must experience a severe threat to survival • Some choose to change even though not subjected to external pressures due to seeing business opportunities •(Dunphy, Griffiths & Benn, 2007). Change Demands a New Organizing Paradigm Involving gamma types of change (Bartunek & Louis, as cited in Cummings and Worley, 2009) - discontinuous shifts in mental or organisational frameworks. 6 Characteristics of transformational change Change Is Aimed at Competitive Advantage • Uniqueness – unique bundle of resources which represent completive advantage • Value – higher-than-average price or exceptionally low in cost • Imitation difficulty Involves Significant Change Is Learning Systematic and • Transformational change Revolutionary requires learning and innovation. Members must learn to enact new behaviors to implement new strategic directions Involves reshaping organisation‟s design elements and its entire nature Triggered by Senior Executives and Line Management play key role in actively leading transformation in deciding the when, how, who and what
  • 41. Points on Integrated Strategic Change 1 Comprehensive OD intervention aimed at a single organisation or business unit. 2 Business strategy and organisation design must be aligned, changed together to respond to external and internal disruption 3 Helps members manage transition between current strategic orientation and the desired future orientation
  • 42. Integrated Strategic Change Key Features (Cummings & Worley, 2009) ISC extends traditional OD process into a highly participative process. It has 3 key features Worley, Hitchin, and Ross (as cited in Cummings & Worley, 2009) 1. Unit of analysis: I) Strategy and II) Organisation design = Organisation’s Strategic Orientation Strategy and design that supports it must be considered as integrated whole. 2. Creating the strategic plan, gaining commitment and support, planning implementation and execution is one integrated process The ability to repeat such a process effectively is rare and difficult. 3. Individuals and groups throughout the organisation are integrated into the analysis, planning and implementation This is to create a more achievable plan, maintain strategic focus, direct attention, etc.
  • 43. Stages of ISC Plan Implementation Strategic Change Plan Strategic Choice Strategic Analysis
  • 44. ISC Stages STRATEGY IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIC PLANNING Strategic Analysis • Readiness for change • Senior management’s willingness to carry out change • Understanding current organisation design • Explain current performance levels Exercising Strategic Choice • Once existing orientation understood, new one must be designed • “what” of strategic change, define products/service • Markets to be served, way outputs will be produced Designing the Strategic Change Plan • “How” • Change plan: • Types, magnitude, schedule of change activities • Associated costs • Organisation Culture • Power and political issues Implementing the Plan • Alignment issues • Teamwork • Organisational/per sonal learning • senior managersinitiate actions, allocate resources, set goals, give feedback
  • 45. Why is Integrated Strategic Change Valuable ? Aligns thinking Facilitating future state and needed changes Shows distance to finish line Strategy helps the organisation by Rationalizes & justifies Guides actions a focus on culture Informs key relationships
  • 47. Organisation Design Organisation design is “the process of constructing and adjusting an organisation‟s structure to achieve its business strategy and goals” (p. 518). Nelson and Quick (2011) Configures the organisation „s structure, work designs, human resources practices, management and information systems to guide members behaviors in strategic direction. Cummings and Worley (2009) Key notion : “fit”, “congruence” or “alignment” among elements The idea that the organisation is designed to support particular strategy (strategic fit) . Different design elements must be aligned with each other Better fits, More effective Lawrence and Larsch (1986)
  • 48. Organisation Design Model Organization Strategy Strategic Fit Organisation Design Management and Information Systems Structure Design Fit Human Resource Practices Work Design
  • 49. Organisation Design Types (Burns & Stalker, 2009; Cummings & Worley, 2009) Mechanistic Design Strategy Structure • Cost minimization Organic Design • Innovation – competing on new products • Formal/hierarchical • Works best in stable environment • Flat, lean, and flexible •Works best in dynamic and uncertain environment Work Design • Traditional jobs • Traditional work group • Enriched jobs • Self-managed jobs Human Resource Practices • Selection to fit job • Training only when needs arise • Job-based pay • Selection to fit organisation • Training is continuous • Skill-based pay Management and Information System • Command and control • Centralized decision-making • Closed, exclusive • Employee involvement • Decentralized decision-making • Open, inclusive
  • 50. Organisation Design Stages Organisation design follows three broad steps (Galbraith et al., as cited in Cummings and Worley, 2009): STRATEGIC PLANNING Clarifying the design focus • Organisation assessment for framework • Gap analysis – problems to address Designing the organisation STRATEGY IMPLEMENTATION Implementing the design • Configure design • Putting into place • “How” Designing (practices, • Upper leadership for the Strategic structures, systems) Change Plan Members must be overall direction • • Results in design, motivated to component design, implement and how to • Stakeholders must implement support
  • 52. What is Corporate Culture ? The shared beliefs and values that organisations pass on to newcomers, such as accepted ways of behaving, roles and norms Smither, Houston and McIntire (1996) The pattern of assumptions, values, and norms that are more or less shaped by organisation members (Cummings & Worley, 2009) A pattern of basic assumptions considered valid and taught to new members as the way to perceive, think , and feel in the organisation (Nelson & Quick, 2011) Schein suggests that organisation culture has three levels : (1) visible artifacts, (2) testable values (3) invisible basic assumptions (as cited in Nelson & Quick, 2011)
  • 53. Elements of Corporate Culture (Cummings & Worley, 2009) Basic Assumptions Values Norms Artifacts
  • 54. Organisation Culture and Organisation Effectiveness Most theorists regard strong cultures as desirable, since having employees holding similar views about the company and its environment can make organisations more effective (Smither, Houston, & McIntire, 1996). Culture affects performance indirectly through its influence on the organisations‟s ability to implement change. However, certain accounts where change failed due to the culture not supporting the new strategy. (Cummings and Worley, 2009)
  • 55. Guidelines for Cultural Change (Cummings and Worley 2009; Senior, 2002) 1 Formulate Clear Strategic Vision 3 Display Top Management Commitment Model Culture Change at Highest Levels 4 Modify Organisation to Support Organisational Change 2 5 Select and Socialize Newcomers
  • 56. Evaluating Culture Change Large scale cultural change may be necessary in certain situations such as if the firm‟s culture does not fit a changing environment or if the industry is extremely competitive (Cummings and Worley, 2009). Changing corporate culture is not always easy but at times risky due to organisational culture, is much less visible and with many layers, dimensions and types therefore more difficult to change (Senior, 2002). Failure of culture change efforts due to change introduced to employees requires them to function in new and different ways which contradict with powerful norms and values of organisation. (Smither, Houston, & McIntire, 1996)
  • 57. Understanding the Part 2 Continuous Change Balanced Scorecard “Without a strategy, an organisation is like a ship without a rudder, going round in circles. It’s like a tramp; it has no places to go.” (Ross and Kami)
  • 58. What is Continuous Change? Continuous change interventions extends transformational change into a nonstop process of strategy setting, organisation designing, and implementing the change (Lawrence, Dyck, Maitlis, & Mauws, as cited in Cummings and Worley, 2009) Focus is on learning, changing, and adapting and on how to produce constant flow of new strategies and designs and not only transforming existing ones (Cummings and Worley, 2009) Continuous learning at individual level : changing behavior of one‟s skills, knowledge, and worldview At organisational level: deepening and broadening of organisational capabilities (Sessa & London, 2006)
  • 60. Self-Designing Organisations Developed by Mohrman and Cummings in response to demands of organisations in adapting to turbulent environments (adaptive change). This approach helps members translate corporate values and general prescriptions for change into specific structures, processes and behaviors suited for change (Cummings and Worley, 2009). This intervention includes considerable innovation and learning as organisations gain the capacity to design and implement significant changes continually (Cummings and Worley, 2009).
  • 61. Application Stages The self-design approach is described in three stages (Cummings and Worley, 2009): STRATEGIC PLANNING Laying the foundation • Acquiring knowledge about how the organisations function • Valuing corporate values that guide change process • Diagnosing to determine what needs to be changed Designing STRATEGY IMPLEMENTATION Implementing and assessing • What needs to be • Involves ongoing refined and modified Designing cycle of action for the change Strategic learning: changing the Change Plan structures and behaviors, assessing progress and making necessary modifications
  • 62. The Self Design Strategy enables organisations to adapt to demands of change from five important perspectives: (Cummings and Worley, 2009) Attends to interest of multiple stakeholders Constant organisational learning Adaptive Change Demands Occurring at multiple levels of the organisation Systematic change process Dynamic change process
  • 64. Learning Organisations Senge (1990) defines the learning organization as “…organizations where people continually expand their capacity to create the results they truly desire, where new and expansive patterns of thinking are nurtured, where collective aspiration is set free, and where people are continually learning to see the whole together” (p. 14). This intervention is aims at helping organisations develop and use knowledge to change and improve themselves constantly (Cummings and Worley, 2009). At the organisational level, learning is demonstrated through changes in vision, strategy, policies, structure, products or services (Sessa & London, 2006) Includes two interrelated change process: (1) Organisation Learning (OL) and (2) Knowledge Management (KM).
  • 65. OL Processes Organisations may apply learning process to three types of learning: 1 Single-loop learning 2 Double-loop learning 3 Deutero-learning Improving the status quo Changing the status quo Learning how to learn
  • 66. 3 Types of Learning Single –loop Learning • Where an objective or goals is defined and an individual works out the most favored way of reaching the goal however which the goal itself is not questioned (Argyris, as cited in Senior, 2002). Double-loop Learning • Where error is detected and corrected in ways determining why the error occurred in the first place (Sessa & London, 2006). Deuterolearning • Where members of an organisation learn how to carry both single and double loop learning(Sessa & London, 2006).
  • 67. How OL Affects Organisation Performance Organisational Learning Organisation Characteristics • Structure • Information system •Human Resources practice • Culture • leadership Knowledge Management Organisation Learning Processes: • Discovery • Invention • Production • Generalization Competitive Strategy Organisation Knowledge: • explicit • tacit Organisation Performance
  • 68. What are Knowledge Management Interventions ? KM interventions focuses on tools and techniques that enable organisations to collect, organize and translate information into useful knowledge (Cummings and Worley, 2009) Includes formal debriefing sessions, organized learning programs, attended and supported by senior managers and executives. Recognition and reward systems are key ingredients of effective KM process (Oden, 1999)
  • 69. Application Stages for KM Generating Knowledge • Identifying the kinds of knowledge that creates most value Organizing Knowledge • Organizing the valued knowledge into a form that members can use readily Distributing Knowledge • Creates mechanisms for members to gain access to needed knowledge
  • 71. Built-To-Change (B2C) Organisations B2C organisations are designed for change, not stability. They are based on design guidelines that promote change capability in the management, reward systems, structure information, decision processes, and leadership (Cummings and Worley, 2009) “In a rapidly changing environment, this change capability can be a source of sustained competitive advantage” (Cummings and Worley, 2009).
  • 72. Design Guidelines for B2C Managing Talent Reward System Selection practices Enhance employee motivation level • Seek quick learners wanting to take initiative, desire professional growth and thrives change • Key role : motivating and reinforcing change Structure & Leadership Internal Structure and Leadership importance • Flat, lean, flexible organisation structures • Shared & spread leadership Information and Decision Process Dynamic flow of information & transparency • Moved throughout the organisation, information is transparent and current
  • 73. B2C Stages Lawler and Worley (2006) The following 5 initiatives can help the transition to a B2C organisation : Create a ChangeFriendly Identity • Addresses organisation identity – core values, norm s, beliefs Build an Orchestrat ion Capability Pursue Proximity • Intervention looks outward to gain insight of environmental demands • Seniors executives commit time to think about future paths – scenario-planning i. ii. iii. Establish Strategic Adjustment as a Normal Condition Skills for change developed among employees Organisation effectiveness function created Members learn how to apply change • Employee empowerment practices Seek virtuous spirals • Periods in the life of an organization • Involves bringing all prior processes together
  • 74. The Built to Change Logic Lawler and Worley (2006) Organization Design Is the Issue Change is Inevitable and Normal Traditional Design Is a Problem Human Nature is Not The Problem Competitive Advantage is Change
  • 75. Understanding the Part 3 Transorganizational Balanced Scorecard Change “Without a strategy, an organisation is like a ship without a rudder, going round in circles. It’s like a tramp; it has no places to go.” (Ross and Kami)
  • 76. Transorganizational Change Cummings and Worley (2009) states that transorganzational change involves interventions that move beyond the single organization to include merging, allying or networking with other organisations. Transorganizational strategies allows organisation to perform tasks that are too costly and complicated for single organisations to perform. (Cummings and Worley, 2009)
  • 77. Mergers and Acquisition Mergers and acquisition (M&As) involve the combination of two organisations (Cummings and Worley, 2009) “Merger” • Integration of two previously independent organisations into a new organisation “Acquisition” • Involves the purchase or “buyout” of one organisation by another for integration into the acquiring organisation
  • 78. Why M&As are Done? (Cummings and Worley, 2009; Galpin & Herndon, 2009) 1 2 Improve innovation To gain access to global markets, technology, etc 3 4 5 To achieve operational efficiencies To grow revenue Resource sharing
  • 79. Why Do M&As Fail ? The high failure rate of M&As are the results of serious limitations in how companies approach it (Saint-onge & Chatzkel, 2009). A set of factors has been found to be to be consistently associated with poor M&A efforts according to Galpin and Herndon (2007): Cultural Incompatibility Lack of Communication, Leadership and Decision-making People-Related Issues Differences in Management Styles
  • 80. M&As Application Stages (Cummings and Worley, 2009) 1. Pre-combination Phase Search/Select Candidate Create an M&A Team Establish Business Case Perform a Due Diligence Assessment Develop Merger Integration Plans 2. Legal combination Complete financial negotiations Close the deal Announce the combination 3. Operational combination Day 1 activities Organisational & technical integration activities Cultural integration activities
  • 81. Recommendations for M&A Success For M&A efforts to succeed, Galpin and Herndon (2007) have suggested the following: Select dedicated, capable people for the team Provide continuous communication and feedback Conduct duediligence analyses Strategy for M&A Success Determine the required or desired degree of integration Speed up decisions Gain support of senior managers Select a highly capable leader Clearly define integration approach
  • 83. Strategic Alliance Defined Long-term agreements between firms that go beyond normal market transactions but fall short of merger. Forms include joint ventures, licenses, long-term supply agreements, and other kinds of inter-firm relationships (Porter, 1990). Roll (2009) describes it as an approach in which two or more companies agree to pool their resources together to form a combined force in the marketplace different from mergers, in which does not involve the emergence of a new combined entity. Child, Faulkner, and Tallman defines strategic alliance as a “formal agreement between two or more organisations to pursue a set of private and common goals through the sharing of resources” (as cited in Cummings and Worley, 2009, p. 568).
  • 84. Alliance Application Stages (Cummings and Worley, 2009) Involves four major stages: Alliance Strategy Formulation • Clarify business strategy • Understand why alliance is appropriate Partner Selection • Search for appropriate partner • Compatible management styles, cultures, etc. Alliance Structuring and Start-up • Structuring partnership • Relational quality – Trust Issues Alliance Operation and Adjustment • Diagnosing strategic alliance state • Making appropriate adjustments.
  • 85. The Need for Strategic Alliances Hamel, Doz and Prahalad (2002) states the need for collaboration due to the following reasons: The need to absorb skills of the partner To reduce costs and avoid investments To penetrate new markets To provide short-cuts for some companies
  • 86. Benefits of the Strategic Alliances (Soares as cited in IsoraIte, 2009) 1 Ease of market entry 2 Shared risks 3 Shared knowledge and expertise 4 Synergy & Competitive Advantage
  • 88. Network interventions help organisations join together for a common purpose (Cummings and Worley, 2009). Two types of change are involved in managing the development of multiorganisation networks: Creating the initial network Managing change within that network
  • 89. Creating the Network (Cummings and Worley, 2009) Involves four major stages: 1. Identification • Identifying members (existing/potential). 2. Convention • Face-to-face meeting • Costs and benefits • Task perceptions 3. Organization • Task performance organization 4. Evaluation • Assessing how network is performing • Feedback
  • 90. Managing Network Change Create Instability in the Network • In order for change to occur within a network, relationships among member organisations' must become unstable • OD practitioners can facilitate instability by changing patterns of communication among members. Manage the Tipping Point • Gladwell (as cited in Cummings and Worley, 2009) suggested the following in facilitating network change: • The Law of the Few (Connectors, Mavens, Salesperson) • Stickiness – the memorable impact of ideas or practices • The Power of Context – relevance and meaningfulness of a message to network members Rely on SelfOrganisation • Networks tend to exhibit “self-organising” behavior • OD practitioners can rely on this feature to refreeze change – once change has occurred in the network, variety of controls can be leveraged to institutionalized it
  • 91. Actualizing The Network Within Organization can realize its network and collaborative potential by pursuing the following path: (Camson, 2010) 1 Be clear about and publicize common goals and objectives that can drive network collaboration. Support high quality conversations and exchanges and 2 high quality actions to build competencies and relationships 3 Build competencies and utilize technology that will support knowledge flow, relationships, high quality conversations 4 Identify practices, attitudes and business models that impede knowledge flow, relationships, high quality conversations and exchanges.
  • 92. References Burns, T. & Stalker, G. M. (2009). Mechanistic vs. organic organisational structure: Contingency theory. Retrieved from: http://www.businessmate.org/Article.php?ArtikelId=44 Camson, B. (2010). Actualizing The Network Within. Retrieved from: http://www.barrycamson.com/2010/11/actualizing-the-network-within.html#more Cummings, T. G., & Worley, C. G. (2009). Organization development and change (9th ed.). Ohio: South-Western Cengage Learning. Dunphy, D., Griffiths, A., & Benn, S., (2007). Organisational change for corporate sustainability. New York, NY: Routledge. French, W. L., Bell, C. H. (1999). Organizational development: Behavioral science intervention improvement. United States, New Jersey: Prentice Hall. French, W. L., Bell, C. H., & Zawacki, R. A. (2000). Organizational development and transformation : Managing effective change (5th ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill. Galpin, T. J., & Herndon, M. (2007). The complete guide to mergers and acquisitions: Process tools to support M&A integration at every level. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Hamel, G., Doz, Y. L., & Prahalad, C. K. (2002). Harvard business review on strategic alliances. In Collaborate with your competitors and win (pp. 1–22). Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Publishing Corp. IsoraIte, M. (2009). Importance of strategic alliances in company’s activity. Intellectual Economics, 1(5), 39–46.
  • 93. Lawler, E. E. & Worley, C. G. (2006). Built to change: How to achieve sustained organizational effectiveness. Retrieved from: 213.55.83.52/ebooks/Leadership/Built%20to%20Change.pdf Nelson, D. L., & Quick, J. C. (2011). Organizational behavior: Science, the real world, and you. Mason, OH: South-Western Cengage Learning. Roll, M. (2009). Merger, acquisition, alliance - Which is the best? China Business Philippines. Retrieved from: http://chinabusinessphilippines.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=a rticle&id=249:merger-acquisition-alliancewhich-is-the-best-&catid=31:asian- brandstrategy&Itemid=73. Saint-Onge, H. & Chatzkel, J. (2009). Beyond the deal: A revolutionary framework for successful mergers & acquisitions that achieve breakthrough performance gains. USA: McGraw Hill. Senior, B. (2002). Organisational change (2nd ed.). London: Financial Times/Prentice Hall Books. Sessa, V. I., & London, M. (2006). Continuous learning in organizations: Individual, group, and organizational perspectives. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. Smither, R. D., Houston, J. M., & McIntire, S. A. (1996). Organization development: Strategies for changing environments. New York, NY: Harper Collins.

Hinweis der Redaktion

  1. Strategic performance management is defined as: the process where steering of the organisation takes place through the systematic definition of mission, strategy and objectives of the organisation, making these measurable through critical success factors and key performance indicators, in order to take corrective actions to keep the organisation on track (Dr. Andre A. De. <?xml:namespace prefix = st1 ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags" />Waal) Read more: http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_is_strategic_performance_management#ixzz1ZbpopCoW
  2. CEOs set bullish performance targets – but can they deliver?New Hay Group performance management research highlights a mismatch between ambition and capability. Businesses need to approach performance management differently if they are to achieve their ambitious growth targets for 2011 and beyond. That’s the message from new Hay Group research among 1660 senior decision makers in large firms across more than 30 countries worldwide. On average, global firms are targeting 5.4 per cent growth in 2011, outstripping local economic forecasts in many markets. With executives remaining cautious about acquisitions, the majority of leaders we spoke to are looking to their workforces for this performance uplift. Yet nearly half think employees are too stretched. As Hay Group’s global head of strategic performance management Bibi Hahn comments: “This level of productivity improvement is a big ask from employees who have worked hard to help their firms through the three difficult years since the worst of the financial crisis. Stuck in crisis mentality, business leaders have become too reliant on the cost lever to stay afloat. It’s time for them refocus on growth by pulling the performance lever.” The leaders in our survey are all too aware of the risks involved in asking stretched employees to deliver more. Employee disengagement and high staff turnover are their top fears. Most respondents are aware of the potential of performance management to address this, yet few firms make the essential connection between performance management, strategy and business culture. As Bibi Hahn points out: “Ninety per cent of firms are failing to align performance management with their strategy and culture. Without an approach that does this, firms will not be in the right shape to deliver the growth expected of them.”
  3. Strategic management is a field that deals with the major intended and emergent initiatives taken by general managers on behalf of owners, involving utilization of resources, to enhance the performance of firms in their external environments.[1] It entails specifying the organization's mission, vision and objectives, developing policies and plans, often in terms of projects and programs, which are designed to achieve these objectives, and then allocating resources to implement the policies and plans, projects and programs. A balanced scorecard is often used to evaluate the overall performance of the business and its progress towards objectives. Recent studies and leading management theorists have advocated that strategy needs to start with stakeholders expectations and use a modified balanced scorecard which includes all stakeholders.Strategic management is a level of managerial activity under setting goals and over Tactics. Strategic management provides overall direction to the enterprise and is closely related to the field of Organization Studies. In the field of business administration it is useful to talk about "strategic alignment" between the organization and its environment or "strategic consistency." According to Arieu (2007), "there is strategic consistency when the actions of an organization are consistent with the expectations of management, and these in turn are with the market and the context." Strategic management includes not only the management team but can also include the Board of Directors and other stakeholders of the organization. It depends on the organizational structure.
  4. CEOs set bullish performance targets – but can they deliver?New Hay Group performance management research highlights a mismatch between ambition and capability. Businesses need to approach performance management differently if they are to achieve their ambitious growth targets for 2011 and beyond. That’s the message from new Hay Group research among 1660 senior decision makers in large firms across more than 30 countries worldwide. On average, global firms are targeting 5.4 per cent growth in 2011, outstripping local economic forecasts in many markets. With executives remaining cautious about acquisitions, the majority of leaders we spoke to are looking to their workforces for this performance uplift. Yet nearly half think employees are too stretched. As Hay Group’s global head of strategic performance management Bibi Hahn comments: “This level of productivity improvement is a big ask from employees who have worked hard to help their firms through the three difficult years since the worst of the financial crisis. Stuck in crisis mentality, business leaders have become too reliant on the cost lever to stay afloat. It’s time for them refocus on growth by pulling the performance lever.” The leaders in our survey are all too aware of the risks involved in asking stretched employees to deliver more. Employee disengagement and high staff turnover are their top fears. Most respondents are aware of the potential of performance management to address this, yet few firms make the essential connection between performance management, strategy and business culture. As Bibi Hahn points out: “Ninety per cent of firms are failing to align performance management with their strategy and culture. Without an approach that does this, firms will not be in the right shape to deliver the growth expected of them.”
  5. CEOs set bullish performance targets – but can they deliver?New Hay Group performance management research highlights a mismatch between ambition and capability. Businesses need to approach performance management differently if they are to achieve their ambitious growth targets for 2011 and beyond. That’s the message from new Hay Group research among 1660 senior decision makers in large firms across more than 30 countries worldwide. On average, global firms are targeting 5.4 per cent growth in 2011, outstripping local economic forecasts in many markets. With executives remaining cautious about acquisitions, the majority of leaders we spoke to are looking to their workforces for this performance uplift. Yet nearly half think employees are too stretched. As Hay Group’s global head of strategic performance management Bibi Hahn comments: “This level of productivity improvement is a big ask from employees who have worked hard to help their firms through the three difficult years since the worst of the financial crisis. Stuck in crisis mentality, business leaders have become too reliant on the cost lever to stay afloat. It’s time for them refocus on growth by pulling the performance lever.” The leaders in our survey are all too aware of the risks involved in asking stretched employees to deliver more. Employee disengagement and high staff turnover are their top fears. Most respondents are aware of the potential of performance management to address this, yet few firms make the essential connection between performance management, strategy and business culture. As Bibi Hahn points out: “Ninety per cent of firms are failing to align performance management with their strategy and culture. Without an approach that does this, firms will not be in the right shape to deliver the growth expected of them.”
  6. CEOs set bullish performance targets – but can they deliver?New Hay Group performance management research highlights a mismatch between ambition and capability. Businesses need to approach performance management differently if they are to achieve their ambitious growth targets for 2011 and beyond. That’s the message from new Hay Group research among 1660 senior decision makers in large firms across more than 30 countries worldwide. On average, global firms are targeting 5.4 per cent growth in 2011, outstripping local economic forecasts in many markets. With executives remaining cautious about acquisitions, the majority of leaders we spoke to are looking to their workforces for this performance uplift. Yet nearly half think employees are too stretched. As Hay Group’s global head of strategic performance management Bibi Hahn comments: “This level of productivity improvement is a big ask from employees who have worked hard to help their firms through the three difficult years since the worst of the financial crisis. Stuck in crisis mentality, business leaders have become too reliant on the cost lever to stay afloat. It’s time for them refocus on growth by pulling the performance lever.” The leaders in our survey are all too aware of the risks involved in asking stretched employees to deliver more. Employee disengagement and high staff turnover are their top fears. Most respondents are aware of the potential of performance management to address this, yet few firms make the essential connection between performance management, strategy and business culture. As Bibi Hahn points out: “Ninety per cent of firms are failing to align performance management with their strategy and culture. Without an approach that does this, firms will not be in the right shape to deliver the growth expected of them.”
  7. CEOs set bullish performance targets – but can they deliver?New Hay Group performance management research highlights a mismatch between ambition and capability. Businesses need to approach performance management differently if they are to achieve their ambitious growth targets for 2011 and beyond. That’s the message from new Hay Group research among 1660 senior decision makers in large firms across more than 30 countries worldwide. On average, global firms are targeting 5.4 per cent growth in 2011, outstripping local economic forecasts in many markets. With executives remaining cautious about acquisitions, the majority of leaders we spoke to are looking to their workforces for this performance uplift. Yet nearly half think employees are too stretched. As Hay Group’s global head of strategic performance management Bibi Hahn comments: “This level of productivity improvement is a big ask from employees who have worked hard to help their firms through the three difficult years since the worst of the financial crisis. Stuck in crisis mentality, business leaders have become too reliant on the cost lever to stay afloat. It’s time for them refocus on growth by pulling the performance lever.” The leaders in our survey are all too aware of the risks involved in asking stretched employees to deliver more. Employee disengagement and high staff turnover are their top fears. Most respondents are aware of the potential of performance management to address this, yet few firms make the essential connection between performance management, strategy and business culture. As Bibi Hahn points out: “Ninety per cent of firms are failing to align performance management with their strategy and culture. Without an approach that does this, firms will not be in the right shape to deliver the growth expected of them.”
  8. Strategic management is a field that deals with the major intended and emergent initiatives taken by general managers on behalf of owners, involving utilization of resources, to enhance the performance of firms in their external environments.[1] It entails specifying the organization's mission, vision and objectives, developing policies and plans, often in terms of projects and programs, which are designed to achieve these objectives, and then allocating resources to implement the policies and plans, projects and programs. A balanced scorecard is often used to evaluate the overall performance of the business and its progress towards objectives. Recent studies and leading management theorists have advocated that strategy needs to start with stakeholders expectations and use a modified balanced scorecard which includes all stakeholders.Strategic management is a level of managerial activity under setting goals and over Tactics. Strategic management provides overall direction to the enterprise and is closely related to the field of Organization Studies. In the field of business administration it is useful to talk about "strategic alignment" between the organization and its environment or "strategic consistency." According to Arieu (2007), "there is strategic consistency when the actions of an organization are consistent with the expectations of management, and these in turn are with the market and the context." Strategic management includes not only the management team but can also include the Board of Directors and other stakeholders of the organization. It depends on the organizational structure.
  9. CEOs set bullish performance targets – but can they deliver?New Hay Group performance management research highlights a mismatch between ambition and capability. Businesses need to approach performance management differently if they are to achieve their ambitious growth targets for 2011 and beyond. That’s the message from new Hay Group research among 1660 senior decision makers in large firms across more than 30 countries worldwide. On average, global firms are targeting 5.4 per cent growth in 2011, outstripping local economic forecasts in many markets. With executives remaining cautious about acquisitions, the majority of leaders we spoke to are looking to their workforces for this performance uplift. Yet nearly half think employees are too stretched. As Hay Group’s global head of strategic performance management Bibi Hahn comments: “This level of productivity improvement is a big ask from employees who have worked hard to help their firms through the three difficult years since the worst of the financial crisis. Stuck in crisis mentality, business leaders have become too reliant on the cost lever to stay afloat. It’s time for them refocus on growth by pulling the performance lever.” The leaders in our survey are all too aware of the risks involved in asking stretched employees to deliver more. Employee disengagement and high staff turnover are their top fears. Most respondents are aware of the potential of performance management to address this, yet few firms make the essential connection between performance management, strategy and business culture. As Bibi Hahn points out: “Ninety per cent of firms are failing to align performance management with their strategy and culture. Without an approach that does this, firms will not be in the right shape to deliver the growth expected of them.”
  10. CEOs set bullish performance targets – but can they deliver?New Hay Group performance management research highlights a mismatch between ambition and capability. Businesses need to approach performance management differently if they are to achieve their ambitious growth targets for 2011 and beyond. That’s the message from new Hay Group research among 1660 senior decision makers in large firms across more than 30 countries worldwide. On average, global firms are targeting 5.4 per cent growth in 2011, outstripping local economic forecasts in many markets. With executives remaining cautious about acquisitions, the majority of leaders we spoke to are looking to their workforces for this performance uplift. Yet nearly half think employees are too stretched. As Hay Group’s global head of strategic performance management Bibi Hahn comments: “This level of productivity improvement is a big ask from employees who have worked hard to help their firms through the three difficult years since the worst of the financial crisis. Stuck in crisis mentality, business leaders have become too reliant on the cost lever to stay afloat. It’s time for them refocus on growth by pulling the performance lever.” The leaders in our survey are all too aware of the risks involved in asking stretched employees to deliver more. Employee disengagement and high staff turnover are their top fears. Most respondents are aware of the potential of performance management to address this, yet few firms make the essential connection between performance management, strategy and business culture. As Bibi Hahn points out: “Ninety per cent of firms are failing to align performance management with their strategy and culture. Without an approach that does this, firms will not be in the right shape to deliver the growth expected of them.”
  11. CEOs set bullish performance targets – but can they deliver?New Hay Group performance management research highlights a mismatch between ambition and capability. Businesses need to approach performance management differently if they are to achieve their ambitious growth targets for 2011 and beyond. That’s the message from new Hay Group research among 1660 senior decision makers in large firms across more than 30 countries worldwide. On average, global firms are targeting 5.4 per cent growth in 2011, outstripping local economic forecasts in many markets. With executives remaining cautious about acquisitions, the majority of leaders we spoke to are looking to their workforces for this performance uplift. Yet nearly half think employees are too stretched. As Hay Group’s global head of strategic performance management Bibi Hahn comments: “This level of productivity improvement is a big ask from employees who have worked hard to help their firms through the three difficult years since the worst of the financial crisis. Stuck in crisis mentality, business leaders have become too reliant on the cost lever to stay afloat. It’s time for them refocus on growth by pulling the performance lever.” The leaders in our survey are all too aware of the risks involved in asking stretched employees to deliver more. Employee disengagement and high staff turnover are their top fears. Most respondents are aware of the potential of performance management to address this, yet few firms make the essential connection between performance management, strategy and business culture. As Bibi Hahn points out: “Ninety per cent of firms are failing to align performance management with their strategy and culture. Without an approach that does this, firms will not be in the right shape to deliver the growth expected of them.”
  12. Strategic management is a field that deals with the major intended and emergent initiatives taken by general managers on behalf of owners, involving utilization of resources, to enhance the performance of firms in their external environments.[1] It entails specifying the organization's mission, vision and objectives, developing policies and plans, often in terms of projects and programs, which are designed to achieve these objectives, and then allocating resources to implement the policies and plans, projects and programs. A balanced scorecard is often used to evaluate the overall performance of the business and its progress towards objectives. Recent studies and leading management theorists have advocated that strategy needs to start with stakeholders expectations and use a modified balanced scorecard which includes all stakeholders.Strategic management is a level of managerial activity under setting goals and over Tactics. Strategic management provides overall direction to the enterprise and is closely related to the field of Organization Studies. In the field of business administration it is useful to talk about "strategic alignment" between the organization and its environment or "strategic consistency." According to Arieu (2007), "there is strategic consistency when the actions of an organization are consistent with the expectations of management, and these in turn are with the market and the context." Strategic management includes not only the management team but can also include the Board of Directors and other stakeholders of the organization. It depends on the organizational structure.
  13. CEOs set bullish performance targets – but can they deliver?New Hay Group performance management research highlights a mismatch between ambition and capability. Businesses need to approach performance management differently if they are to achieve their ambitious growth targets for 2011 and beyond. That’s the message from new Hay Group research among 1660 senior decision makers in large firms across more than 30 countries worldwide. On average, global firms are targeting 5.4 per cent growth in 2011, outstripping local economic forecasts in many markets. With executives remaining cautious about acquisitions, the majority of leaders we spoke to are looking to their workforces for this performance uplift. Yet nearly half think employees are too stretched. As Hay Group’s global head of strategic performance management Bibi Hahn comments: “This level of productivity improvement is a big ask from employees who have worked hard to help their firms through the three difficult years since the worst of the financial crisis. Stuck in crisis mentality, business leaders have become too reliant on the cost lever to stay afloat. It’s time for them refocus on growth by pulling the performance lever.” The leaders in our survey are all too aware of the risks involved in asking stretched employees to deliver more. Employee disengagement and high staff turnover are their top fears. Most respondents are aware of the potential of performance management to address this, yet few firms make the essential connection between performance management, strategy and business culture. As Bibi Hahn points out: “Ninety per cent of firms are failing to align performance management with their strategy and culture. Without an approach that does this, firms will not be in the right shape to deliver the growth expected of them.”
  14. Strategic management is a field that deals with the major intended and emergent initiatives taken by general managers on behalf of owners, involving utilization of resources, to enhance the performance of firms in their external environments.[1] It entails specifying the organization's mission, vision and objectives, developing policies and plans, often in terms of projects and programs, which are designed to achieve these objectives, and then allocating resources to implement the policies and plans, projects and programs. A balanced scorecard is often used to evaluate the overall performance of the business and its progress towards objectives. Recent studies and leading management theorists have advocated that strategy needs to start with stakeholders expectations and use a modified balanced scorecard which includes all stakeholders.Strategic management is a level of managerial activity under setting goals and over Tactics. Strategic management provides overall direction to the enterprise and is closely related to the field of Organization Studies. In the field of business administration it is useful to talk about "strategic alignment" between the organization and its environment or "strategic consistency." According to Arieu (2007), "there is strategic consistency when the actions of an organization are consistent with the expectations of management, and these in turn are with the market and the context." Strategic management includes not only the management team but can also include the Board of Directors and other stakeholders of the organization. It depends on the organizational structure.
  15. CEOs set bullish performance targets – but can they deliver?New Hay Group performance management research highlights a mismatch between ambition and capability. Businesses need to approach performance management differently if they are to achieve their ambitious growth targets for 2011 and beyond. That’s the message from new Hay Group research among 1660 senior decision makers in large firms across more than 30 countries worldwide. On average, global firms are targeting 5.4 per cent growth in 2011, outstripping local economic forecasts in many markets. With executives remaining cautious about acquisitions, the majority of leaders we spoke to are looking to their workforces for this performance uplift. Yet nearly half think employees are too stretched. As Hay Group’s global head of strategic performance management Bibi Hahn comments: “This level of productivity improvement is a big ask from employees who have worked hard to help their firms through the three difficult years since the worst of the financial crisis. Stuck in crisis mentality, business leaders have become too reliant on the cost lever to stay afloat. It’s time for them refocus on growth by pulling the performance lever.” The leaders in our survey are all too aware of the risks involved in asking stretched employees to deliver more. Employee disengagement and high staff turnover are their top fears. Most respondents are aware of the potential of performance management to address this, yet few firms make the essential connection between performance management, strategy and business culture. As Bibi Hahn points out: “Ninety per cent of firms are failing to align performance management with their strategy and culture. Without an approach that does this, firms will not be in the right shape to deliver the growth expected of them.”
  16. Strategic management is a field that deals with the major intended and emergent initiatives taken by general managers on behalf of owners, involving utilization of resources, to enhance the performance of firms in their external environments.[1] It entails specifying the organization's mission, vision and objectives, developing policies and plans, often in terms of projects and programs, which are designed to achieve these objectives, and then allocating resources to implement the policies and plans, projects and programs. A balanced scorecard is often used to evaluate the overall performance of the business and its progress towards objectives. Recent studies and leading management theorists have advocated that strategy needs to start with stakeholders expectations and use a modified balanced scorecard which includes all stakeholders.Strategic management is a level of managerial activity under setting goals and over Tactics. Strategic management provides overall direction to the enterprise and is closely related to the field of Organization Studies. In the field of business administration it is useful to talk about "strategic alignment" between the organization and its environment or "strategic consistency." According to Arieu (2007), "there is strategic consistency when the actions of an organization are consistent with the expectations of management, and these in turn are with the market and the context." Strategic management includes not only the management team but can also include the Board of Directors and other stakeholders of the organization. It depends on the organizational structure.
  17. CEOs set bullish performance targets – but can they deliver?New Hay Group performance management research highlights a mismatch between ambition and capability. Businesses need to approach performance management differently if they are to achieve their ambitious growth targets for 2011 and beyond. That’s the message from new Hay Group research among 1660 senior decision makers in large firms across more than 30 countries worldwide. On average, global firms are targeting 5.4 per cent growth in 2011, outstripping local economic forecasts in many markets. With executives remaining cautious about acquisitions, the majority of leaders we spoke to are looking to their workforces for this performance uplift. Yet nearly half think employees are too stretched. As Hay Group’s global head of strategic performance management Bibi Hahn comments: “This level of productivity improvement is a big ask from employees who have worked hard to help their firms through the three difficult years since the worst of the financial crisis. Stuck in crisis mentality, business leaders have become too reliant on the cost lever to stay afloat. It’s time for them refocus on growth by pulling the performance lever.” The leaders in our survey are all too aware of the risks involved in asking stretched employees to deliver more. Employee disengagement and high staff turnover are their top fears. Most respondents are aware of the potential of performance management to address this, yet few firms make the essential connection between performance management, strategy and business culture. As Bibi Hahn points out: “Ninety per cent of firms are failing to align performance management with their strategy and culture. Without an approach that does this, firms will not be in the right shape to deliver the growth expected of them.”
  18. Strategic management is a field that deals with the major intended and emergent initiatives taken by general managers on behalf of owners, involving utilization of resources, to enhance the performance of firms in their external environments.[1] It entails specifying the organization's mission, vision and objectives, developing policies and plans, often in terms of projects and programs, which are designed to achieve these objectives, and then allocating resources to implement the policies and plans, projects and programs. A balanced scorecard is often used to evaluate the overall performance of the business and its progress towards objectives. Recent studies and leading management theorists have advocated that strategy needs to start with stakeholders expectations and use a modified balanced scorecard which includes all stakeholders.Strategic management is a level of managerial activity under setting goals and over Tactics. Strategic management provides overall direction to the enterprise and is closely related to the field of Organization Studies. In the field of business administration it is useful to talk about "strategic alignment" between the organization and its environment or "strategic consistency." According to Arieu (2007), "there is strategic consistency when the actions of an organization are consistent with the expectations of management, and these in turn are with the market and the context." Strategic management includes not only the management team but can also include the Board of Directors and other stakeholders of the organization. It depends on the organizational structure.
  19. CEOs set bullish performance targets – but can they deliver?New Hay Group performance management research highlights a mismatch between ambition and capability. Businesses need to approach performance management differently if they are to achieve their ambitious growth targets for 2011 and beyond. That’s the message from new Hay Group research among 1660 senior decision makers in large firms across more than 30 countries worldwide. On average, global firms are targeting 5.4 per cent growth in 2011, outstripping local economic forecasts in many markets. With executives remaining cautious about acquisitions, the majority of leaders we spoke to are looking to their workforces for this performance uplift. Yet nearly half think employees are too stretched. As Hay Group’s global head of strategic performance management Bibi Hahn comments: “This level of productivity improvement is a big ask from employees who have worked hard to help their firms through the three difficult years since the worst of the financial crisis. Stuck in crisis mentality, business leaders have become too reliant on the cost lever to stay afloat. It’s time for them refocus on growth by pulling the performance lever.” The leaders in our survey are all too aware of the risks involved in asking stretched employees to deliver more. Employee disengagement and high staff turnover are their top fears. Most respondents are aware of the potential of performance management to address this, yet few firms make the essential connection between performance management, strategy and business culture. As Bibi Hahn points out: “Ninety per cent of firms are failing to align performance management with their strategy and culture. Without an approach that does this, firms will not be in the right shape to deliver the growth expected of them.”