SlideShare ist ein Scribd-Unternehmen logo
1 von 6
Downloaden Sie, um offline zu lesen
Evaluation Results
Author: Eldon Ray
Date Evaluated: 04/27/2016 06:45:37 PM (PDT)
DRF template: 4 Credit B.S. Elementary Education
Program: Elementary v. 2012 BACHELOR
Evaluation Method: Using Rubric
Evaluation Summary for STUDENT TEACHING: EED 480NA/EED 480NB: Evaluation #3 (Collaborative
Observation from GCU Supervisor)
Final Score: 4.00 (out of 4)
Distinguished
Overall comments: Eldon does a great job in the classroom and will be a valuable member of the
teaching profession...
Detailed Results (Rubric used: 2011_Evaluation #2_#3_ RV Aug)
Standard #1: Learner Development: The teacher candidate creates developmentally appropriate instruction that
takes into account individual learners’ strengths, interests, and needs and that enables each learner to advance and
accelerate his/her learning. 
(1) Unsatisfactory (2) Basic (3) Proficient (4) Distinguished
Does not meet expectations
for a student teacher. 
Occasionally observed;
minimally meets expectations
for a student teacher. 
Frequently observed; meets,
sometimes exceeds,
expectations for a student
teacher. 
Consistently observed;
consistently exceeds
expectations for a student
teacher. 
Criterion Score: 4.00 (Distinguished)
Comments on this criterion (op: Eldon does a really good job in creating developmentally appropriate instruction...
Standard #1: Learner Development: The teacher candidate collaborates with families, communities, colleagues, and
other professionals to promote learner growth and development. 
(1) Unsatisfactory (2) Basic (3) Proficient (4) Distinguished
Does not meet expectations
for a student teacher. 
Occasionally observed;
minimally meets expectations
for a student teacher. 
Frequently observed; meets,
sometimes exceeds,
expectations for a student
teacher. 
Consistently observed;
consistently exceeds
expectations for a student
teacher. 
Criterion Score: Not Applicable
Standard #2: Learning Differences: The teacher candidate designs, adapts, and delivers instruction to address each
student’s diverse learning strengths and needs and creates opportunities for students to demonstrate their learning
in different ways. 
(1) Unsatisfactory (2) Basic (3) Proficient (4) Distinguished
Does not meet expectations
for a student teacher. 
Occasionally observed;
minimally meets expectations
for a student teacher. 
Frequently observed; meets,
sometimes exceeds,
expectations for a student
teacher. 
Consistently observed;
consistently exceeds
expectations for a student
teacher. 
 
Printed on: 04/27/2016 10:35:26 PM (EST)
Criterion Score: 4.00 (Distinguished)
Comments on this criterion (op: Eldon is really good at adapting instruction to the different learning modalities of
students...
Standard #2: Learning Differences: The teacher candidate incorporates tools of language development into planning
and instruction, including strategies for making content accessible to English language learners and for evaluating
and supporting their development of English proficiency. 
(1) Unsatisfactory (2) Basic (3) Proficient (4) Distinguished
Does not meet expectations
for a student teacher. 
Occasionally observed;
minimally meets expectations
for a student teacher. 
Frequently observed; meets,
sometimes exceeds,
expectations for a student
teacher. 
Consistently observed;
consistently exceeds
expectations for a student
teacher. 
Criterion Score: 4.00 (Distinguished)
Comments on this criterion (op: I observed many different types of learning activities throughout the class...
Standard #2: Learning Differences: The teacher candidate accesses resources, supports, and specialized assistance
and services to meet particular learning differences or needs. 
(1) Unsatisfactory (2) Basic (3) Proficient (4) Distinguished
Does not meet expectations
for a student teacher. 
Occasionally observed;
minimally meets expectations
for a student teacher. 
Frequently observed; meets,
sometimes exceeds,
expectations for a student
teacher. 
Consistently observed;
consistently exceeds
expectations for a student
teacher. 
Criterion Score: 4.00 (Distinguished)
Comments on this criterion (op: Eldon used a variety of different learning resources during the lesson to help get the
learning material successfully to the student...
Standard #3: Learning Environments: The teacher candidate manages the learning environment to actively and
equitably engage learners by organizing, allocating, and coordinating the resources of time, space, and learners’
attention. 
(1) Unsatisfactory (2) Basic (3) Proficient (4) Distinguished
Does not meet expectations
for a student teacher. 
Occasionally observed;
minimally meets expectations
for a student teacher. 
Frequently observed; meets,
sometimes exceeds,
expectations for a student
teacher. 
Consistently observed;
consistently exceeds
expectations for a student
teacher. 
Criterion Score: 4.00 (Distinguished)
Comments on this criterion (op: Eldon has excellent classroom management practices as the learners were focused on
the material at hand...
Standard #3: Learning Environments: The teacher candidate communicates verbally and nonverbally in ways that
demonstrate respect for and responsiveness to the cultural backgrounds and differing perspectives learners bring to
the learning environment. 
(1) Unsatisfactory (2) Basic (3) Proficient (4) Distinguished
Does not meet expectations
for a student teacher. 
Occasionally observed;
minimally meets expectations
for a student teacher. 
Frequently observed; meets,
sometimes exceeds,
expectations for a student
teacher. 
Consistently observed;
consistently exceeds
expectations for a student
teacher. 
Criterion Score: 4.00 (Distinguished)
Comments on this criterion (op: Eldon has excellent verbal and non verbal communication...both are non threatening....
Standard #4: Content Knowledge: The teacher candidate stimulates learner reflection on prior content knowledge,
links new concepts to familiar concepts, and makes connections to learners’ experiences. 
(1) Unsatisfactory (2) Basic (3) Proficient (4) Distinguished
 
Printed on: 04/27/2016 10:35:26 PM (EST)
Does not meet expectations
for a student teacher. 
Occasionally observed;
minimally meets expectations
for a student teacher. 
Frequently observed; meets,
sometimes exceeds,
expectations for a student
teacher. 
Consistently observed;
consistently exceeds
expectations for a student
teacher. 
Criterion Score: Not Applicable
Standard #4: Content Knowledge: The teacher candidate uses supplementary resources and technologies effectively
to ensure accessibility and relevance for all learners. 
(1) Unsatisfactory (2) Basic (3) Proficient (4) Distinguished
Does not meet expectations
for a student teacher. 
Occasionally observed;
minimally meets expectations
for a student teacher. 
Frequently observed; meets,
sometimes exceeds,
expectations for a student
teacher. 
Consistently observed;
consistently exceeds
expectations for a student
teacher. 
Criterion Score: 4.00 (Distinguished)
Comments on this criterion (op: all classroom activities had supplemental resources that were available for use...
Standard #4: Content Knowledge: The teacher candidate creates opportunities for students to learn, practice, and
master academic language in their content. 
(1) Unsatisfactory (2) Basic (3) Proficient (4) Distinguished
Does not meet expectations
for a student teacher. 
Occasionally observed;
minimally meets expectations
for a student teacher. 
Frequently observed; meets,
sometimes exceeds,
expectations for a student
teacher. 
Consistently observed;
consistently exceeds
expectations for a student
teacher. 
Criterion Score: 4.00 (Distinguished)
Comments on this criterion (op: There were excellent questioning techniques used during the lessons...
Standard #5: Application of Content: The teacher candidate engages learners in applying content knowledge to real
world problems through the lens of interdisciplinary themes (e.g., financial literacy, environmental literacy). 
(1) Unsatisfactory (2) Basic (3) Proficient (4) Distinguished
Does not meet expectations
for a student teacher. 
Occasionally observed;
minimally meets expectations
for a student teacher. 
Frequently observed; meets,
sometimes exceeds,
expectations for a student
teacher. 
Consistently observed;
consistently exceeds
expectations for a student
teacher. 
Criterion Score: Not Applicable
Standard #5: Application of Content: The teacher candidate facilitates learners’ ability to develop diverse social and
cultural perspectives that expand their understanding of local and global issues and create novel approaches to
solving problems. 
(1) Unsatisfactory (2) Basic (3) Proficient (4) Distinguished
Does not meet expectations
for a student teacher. 
Occasionally observed;
minimally meets expectations
for a student teacher. 
Frequently observed; meets,
sometimes exceeds,
expectations for a student
teacher. 
Consistently observed;
consistently exceeds
expectations for a student
teacher. 
Criterion Score: Not Applicable
Standard #6: Assessment: The teacher candidate designs assessments that match learning objectives with
assessment methods and minimizes sources of bias that can distort assessment results. 
(1) Unsatisfactory (2) Basic (3) Proficient (4) Distinguished
Does not meet expectations
for a student teacher. 
Occasionally observed;
minimally meets expectations
Frequently observed; meets,
sometimes exceeds,
Consistently observed;
consistently exceeds
 
Printed on: 04/27/2016 10:35:26 PM (EST)
for a student teacher.  expectations for a student
teacher. 
expectations for a student
teacher. 
Criterion Score: Not Applicable
Standard #6: Assessment: The teacher candidate works independently and collaboratively to examine test and
other performance data to understand each learner’s progress and to guide planning. 
(1) Unsatisfactory (2) Basic (3) Proficient (4) Distinguished
Does not meet expectations
for a student teacher. 
Occasionally observed;
minimally meets expectations
for a student teacher. 
Frequently observed; meets,
sometimes exceeds,
expectations for a student
teacher. 
Consistently observed;
consistently exceeds
expectations for a student
teacher. 
Criterion Score: Not Applicable
Standard #6: Assessment: The teacher candidate prepares all learners for the demands of particular assessment
formats and makes appropriate modifications in assessments or testing conditions especially for learners with
disabilities and language learning needs. 
(1) Unsatisfactory (2) Basic (3) Proficient (4) Distinguished
Does not meet expectations
for a student teacher. 
Occasionally observed;
minimally meets expectations
for a student teacher. 
Frequently observed; meets,
sometimes exceeds,
expectations for a student
teacher. 
Consistently observed;
consistently exceeds
expectations for a student
teacher. 
Criterion Score: Not Applicable
Standard #7: Planning for Instruction: The teacher candidate plans how to achieve each student’s learning goals,
choosing appropriate strategies and accommodations, resources, and materials to differentiate instruction for
individuals and groups of learners. 
(1) Unsatisfactory (2) Basic (3) Proficient (4) Distinguished
Does not meet expectations
for a student teacher. 
Occasionally observed;
minimally meets expectations
for a student teacher. 
Frequently observed; meets,
sometimes exceeds,
expectations for a student
teacher. 
Consistently observed;
consistently exceeds
expectations for a student
teacher. 
Criterion Score: 4.00 (Distinguished)
Comments on this criterion (op: It was observed that different teaching strategies were used for different learning
modalities...
Standard #7: Planning for Instruction: The teacher candidate develops appropriate sequencing of learning
experiences and provides multiple ways to demonstrate knowledge and skill. 
(1) Unsatisfactory (2) Basic (3) Proficient (4) Distinguished
Does not meet expectations
for a student teacher. 
Occasionally observed;
minimally meets expectations
for a student teacher. 
Frequently observed; meets,
sometimes exceeds,
expectations for a student
teacher. 
Consistently observed;
consistently exceeds
expectations for a student
teacher. 
Criterion Score: 4.00 (Distinguished)
Comments on this criterion (op: Eldon does a great job in learning sequences that ties on learning concept to another
with proper transition...
Standard #7: Planning for Instruction: The teacher candidate plans for instruction based on formative and
summative assessment data, prior learner knowledge, and learner interest. 
(1) Unsatisfactory (2) Basic (3) Proficient (4) Distinguished
Does not meet expectations
for a student teacher. 
Occasionally observed;
minimally meets expectations
Frequently observed; meets,
sometimes exceeds,
Consistently observed;
consistently exceeds
 
Printed on: 04/27/2016 10:35:26 PM (EST)
for a student teacher.  minimally meets expectations
for a student teacher. 
sometimes exceeds,
expectations for a student
teacher. 
consistently exceeds
expectations for a student
teacher. 
Criterion Score: 4.00 (Distinguished)
Comments on this criterion (op: Eldon has really great lesson plans tat are effective during the lesson delivery...
Standard #8: Instructional Strategies: The teacher candidate varies his/her role in the instructional process (e.g.,
instructor, facilitator, coach, audience) in relation to the content and purposes of instruction and the needs of
learners. 
(1) Unsatisfactory (2) Basic (3) Proficient (4) Distinguished
Does not meet expectations
for a student teacher. 
Occasionally observed;
minimally meets expectations
for a student teacher. 
Frequently observed; meets,
sometimes exceeds,
expectations for a student
teacher. 
Consistently observed;
consistently exceeds
expectations for a student
teacher. 
Criterion Score: 4.00 (Distinguished)
Comments on this criterion (op: Eldon does a great job in moving from teacher, to coach to facilitator especially in a
grouping situation...
Standard #8: Instructional Strategies: The teacher candidate engages learners in using a range of learning skills
and technology tools to access, interpret, evaluate, and apply information. 
(1) Unsatisfactory (2) Basic (3) Proficient (4) Distinguished
Does not meet expectations
for a student teacher. 
Occasionally observed;
minimally meets expectations
for a student teacher. 
Frequently observed; meets,
sometimes exceeds,
expectations for a student
teacher. 
Consistently observed;
consistently exceeds
expectations for a student
teacher. 
Criterion Score: Not Applicable
Standard #8: Instructional Strategies: The teacher candidate asks questions to stimulate discussion that serves
different purposes (e.g., probing for learner understanding, helping learners articulate their ideas and thinking
processes, stimulating curiosity, and helping learners to question). 
(1) Unsatisfactory (2) Basic (3) Proficient (4) Distinguished
Does not meet expectations
for a student teacher. 
Occasionally observed;
minimally meets expectations
for a student teacher. 
Frequently observed; meets,
sometimes exceeds,
expectations for a student
teacher. 
Consistently observed;
consistently exceeds
expectations for a student
teacher. 
Criterion Score: 4.00 (Distinguished)
Comments on this criterion (op: Eldon is really good at driving appropriate questions to make students think about the
concepts being discussed...
Standard #9: Professional Learning and Ethical Practice: Independently and in collaboration with colleagues, The
teacher candidate uses a variety of data (e.g., systematic observation, information about learners, research) to
evaluate the outcomes of teaching and learning and to adapt planning and practice. 
(1) Unsatisfactory (2) Basic (3) Proficient (4) Distinguished
Does not meet expectations
for a student teacher. 
Occasionally observed;
minimally meets expectations
for a student teacher. 
Frequently observed; meets,
sometimes exceeds,
expectations for a student
teacher. 
Consistently observed;
consistently exceeds
expectations for a student
teacher. 
Criterion Score: Not Applicable
Standard #9: Professional Learning and Ethical Practice: The teacher candidate actively seeks professional,
community, and technological resources, within and outside the school, as supports for analysis, reflection, and
problem­solving. 
 
Printed on: 04/27/2016 10:35:26 PM (EST)
(1) Unsatisfactory (2) Basic (3) Proficient (4) Distinguished
Does not meet expectations
for a student teacher.. 
Occasionally observed;
minimally meets expectations
for a student teacher. 
Frequently observed; meets,
sometimes exceeds,
expectations for a student
teacher. 
Consistently observed;
consistently exceeds
expectations for a student
teacher. 
Criterion Score: Not Applicable
Standard #10: Leadership and Collaboration: The teacher candidate uses technological tools and a variety of
communication strategies to build local and global learning communities that engage learners, families, and
colleagues. 
(1) Unsatisfactory (2) Basic (3) Proficient (4) Distinguished
Does not meet expectations
for a student teacher. 
Occasionally observed;
minimally meets expectations
for a student teacher. 
Frequently observed; meets,
sometimes exceeds,
expectations for a student
teacher. 
Consistently observed;
consistently exceeds
expectations for a student
teacher. 
Criterion Score: Not Applicable
Standard #10: Leadership and Collaboration: The teacher candidate advocates to meet the needs of learners, to
strengthen the learning environment, and to enact system change. 
(1) Unsatisfactory (2) Basic (3) Proficient (4) Distinguished
Does not meet expectations
for a student teacher. 
Occasionally observed;
minimally meets expectations
for a student teacher. 
Frequently observed; meets,
sometimes exceeds,
expectations for a student
teacher. 
Consistently observed;
consistently exceeds
expectations for a student
teacher. 
Criterion Score: Not Applicable
COLLABORATIVE EVALUATION: This evaluation reflects the results of a collaborative conference including feedback
from the Cooperating Teacher and Teacher Candidate The GCU supervisor and cooperating teacher should
collaboratively review the student teacher’s performance in each category prior to meeting with the student
teacher. 
(1) Unsatisfactory (2) Basic (3) Proficient (4) Distinguished
Did not meet collaboratively.      Collaborative meeting took
place. 
Criterion Score: 4.00 (Distinguished)
Comments on this criterion (op: It is agreed that Eldon will make a valuable asset to the teaching community....
 
Printed on: 04/27/2016 10:35:26 PM (EST)

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Was ist angesagt?

Rachel Cioni - SIP Day In-Service - 2014 - Living Up to the Standard
Rachel Cioni - SIP Day In-Service - 2014 - Living Up to the StandardRachel Cioni - SIP Day In-Service - 2014 - Living Up to the Standard
Rachel Cioni - SIP Day In-Service - 2014 - Living Up to the StandardRachel Cioni
 
MOVs for Teacher 1 to 3
MOVs for Teacher 1 to 3MOVs for Teacher 1 to 3
MOVs for Teacher 1 to 3ZenoSophos
 
Danielson framework overview syracuse new york pptx copy 2.2003 version
Danielson framework overview   syracuse new york pptx copy 2.2003 versionDanielson framework overview   syracuse new york pptx copy 2.2003 version
Danielson framework overview syracuse new york pptx copy 2.2003 versionmtkendrick
 
Programme design
Programme designProgramme design
Programme designTony Mays
 
Spaulding 5 11-25 presentation stofanak
Spaulding 5 11-25 presentation stofanakSpaulding 5 11-25 presentation stofanak
Spaulding 5 11-25 presentation stofanakcompetencyworks
 
UCSD TritonEd Experience Analysis & Design Results
UCSD TritonEd Experience Analysis & Design ResultsUCSD TritonEd Experience Analysis & Design Results
UCSD TritonEd Experience Analysis & Design ResultsChristopher Rice
 
Lowes research
Lowes researchLowes research
Lowes researchkijo13
 
Free Webinar for California Educators: Collaborating for Success
Free Webinar for California Educators: Collaborating for Success Free Webinar for California Educators: Collaborating for Success
Free Webinar for California Educators: Collaborating for Success Ellevation Education
 
ELL Educators & Classroom Teachers: Collaborating for Success
ELL Educators & Classroom Teachers: Collaborating for Success ELL Educators & Classroom Teachers: Collaborating for Success
ELL Educators & Classroom Teachers: Collaborating for Success Ellevation Education
 
Learning Delivery Modalities Course 2:
Learning Delivery Modalities Course 2:Learning Delivery Modalities Course 2:
Learning Delivery Modalities Course 2:maimelda68
 
Course outline
Course outlineCourse outline
Course outlineJs Cheok
 
ENG1 Jan 2015moduleoutline
ENG1 Jan 2015moduleoutlineENG1 Jan 2015moduleoutline
ENG1 Jan 2015moduleoutlineMadeline Liew
 
ELG 30505 Module Outline
ELG 30505 Module OutlineELG 30505 Module Outline
ELG 30505 Module OutlineNatalie Yunxian
 

Was ist angesagt? (17)

Rachel Cioni - SIP Day In-Service - 2014 - Living Up to the Standard
Rachel Cioni - SIP Day In-Service - 2014 - Living Up to the StandardRachel Cioni - SIP Day In-Service - 2014 - Living Up to the Standard
Rachel Cioni - SIP Day In-Service - 2014 - Living Up to the Standard
 
Fp example
Fp exampleFp example
Fp example
 
MOVs for Teacher 1 to 3
MOVs for Teacher 1 to 3MOVs for Teacher 1 to 3
MOVs for Teacher 1 to 3
 
Danielson framework overview syracuse new york pptx copy 2.2003 version
Danielson framework overview   syracuse new york pptx copy 2.2003 versionDanielson framework overview   syracuse new york pptx copy 2.2003 version
Danielson framework overview syracuse new york pptx copy 2.2003 version
 
Programme design
Programme designProgramme design
Programme design
 
Spaulding 5 11-25 presentation stofanak
Spaulding 5 11-25 presentation stofanakSpaulding 5 11-25 presentation stofanak
Spaulding 5 11-25 presentation stofanak
 
UCSD TritonEd Experience Analysis & Design Results
UCSD TritonEd Experience Analysis & Design ResultsUCSD TritonEd Experience Analysis & Design Results
UCSD TritonEd Experience Analysis & Design Results
 
Lowes research
Lowes researchLowes research
Lowes research
 
Step by Step Guide to Propose Course on MLP
Step by Step Guide to Propose Course on MLPStep by Step Guide to Propose Course on MLP
Step by Step Guide to Propose Course on MLP
 
Free Webinar for California Educators: Collaborating for Success
Free Webinar for California Educators: Collaborating for Success Free Webinar for California Educators: Collaborating for Success
Free Webinar for California Educators: Collaborating for Success
 
ELL Educators & Classroom Teachers: Collaborating for Success
ELL Educators & Classroom Teachers: Collaborating for Success ELL Educators & Classroom Teachers: Collaborating for Success
ELL Educators & Classroom Teachers: Collaborating for Success
 
Learning Delivery Modalities Course 2:
Learning Delivery Modalities Course 2:Learning Delivery Modalities Course 2:
Learning Delivery Modalities Course 2:
 
Course outline
Course outlineCourse outline
Course outline
 
ENG1 Jan 2015moduleoutline
ENG1 Jan 2015moduleoutlineENG1 Jan 2015moduleoutline
ENG1 Jan 2015moduleoutline
 
ELG 30505 Module Outline
ELG 30505 Module OutlineELG 30505 Module Outline
ELG 30505 Module Outline
 
Weac
WeacWeac
Weac
 
e-portfolio
e-portfolioe-portfolio
e-portfolio
 

Andere mochten auch

class schedule and grades 2
class schedule and grades 2class schedule and grades 2
class schedule and grades 2Eldon Ray
 
Sistemas de Información
Sistemas de Información Sistemas de Información
Sistemas de Información francisco19819
 
Natural forces reflection
Natural forces reflectionNatural forces reflection
Natural forces reflectiongrade4biss
 
El viejo jardinero cuentacuentos colección nº1
El viejo jardinero cuentacuentos colección nº1El viejo jardinero cuentacuentos colección nº1
El viejo jardinero cuentacuentos colección nº1Francisco José López Frá
 
Salud, sanidad y financiación.
Salud, sanidad y financiación.Salud, sanidad y financiación.
Salud, sanidad y financiación.javithink
 
PRMIA_CCRM_Introduction
PRMIA_CCRM_IntroductionPRMIA_CCRM_Introduction
PRMIA_CCRM_IntroductionMarkus Krebsz
 
Analisis dan perancangan basis data
Analisis dan perancangan basis dataAnalisis dan perancangan basis data
Analisis dan perancangan basis dataFadil Muhammad
 
IG2 Task 1 Work Sheet Terence Byrne
IG2 Task 1 Work Sheet Terence ByrneIG2 Task 1 Work Sheet Terence Byrne
IG2 Task 1 Work Sheet Terence Byrneterry96
 
Land Use and Transport Integrated Policies in Peripheral Areas
Land Use and Transport Integrated Policies in Peripheral AreasLand Use and Transport Integrated Policies in Peripheral Areas
Land Use and Transport Integrated Policies in Peripheral AreasHenar Salas-Olmedo
 
IAALD 2010 Closing Session Report: New tools and Repositories
IAALD 2010 Closing Session Report: New tools and RepositoriesIAALD 2010 Closing Session Report: New tools and Repositories
IAALD 2010 Closing Session Report: New tools and RepositoriesIAALD Community
 
MERA MEDICARE PRESENTATION
MERA MEDICARE PRESENTATIONMERA MEDICARE PRESENTATION
MERA MEDICARE PRESENTATIONShrey Singh
 
Tercer taller_contar y sumar si
Tercer  taller_contar y sumar siTercer  taller_contar y sumar si
Tercer taller_contar y sumar sialvert82
 

Andere mochten auch (18)

class schedule and grades 2
class schedule and grades 2class schedule and grades 2
class schedule and grades 2
 
Great Lengths_Kontaktabzug_Bonnie Strange.pdf
Great Lengths_Kontaktabzug_Bonnie Strange.pdfGreat Lengths_Kontaktabzug_Bonnie Strange.pdf
Great Lengths_Kontaktabzug_Bonnie Strange.pdf
 
Azhd 13 2011
Azhd 13 2011Azhd 13 2011
Azhd 13 2011
 
Sistemas de Información
Sistemas de Información Sistemas de Información
Sistemas de Información
 
Natural forces reflection
Natural forces reflectionNatural forces reflection
Natural forces reflection
 
El viejo jardinero cuentacuentos colección nº1
El viejo jardinero cuentacuentos colección nº1El viejo jardinero cuentacuentos colección nº1
El viejo jardinero cuentacuentos colección nº1
 
Salud, sanidad y financiación.
Salud, sanidad y financiación.Salud, sanidad y financiación.
Salud, sanidad y financiación.
 
PRMIA_CCRM_Introduction
PRMIA_CCRM_IntroductionPRMIA_CCRM_Introduction
PRMIA_CCRM_Introduction
 
Analisis dan perancangan basis data
Analisis dan perancangan basis dataAnalisis dan perancangan basis data
Analisis dan perancangan basis data
 
Pressevorschau_November.pdf
Pressevorschau_November.pdfPressevorschau_November.pdf
Pressevorschau_November.pdf
 
Película la ola
Película la olaPelícula la ola
Película la ola
 
IG2 Task 1 Work Sheet Terence Byrne
IG2 Task 1 Work Sheet Terence ByrneIG2 Task 1 Work Sheet Terence Byrne
IG2 Task 1 Work Sheet Terence Byrne
 
Land Use and Transport Integrated Policies in Peripheral Areas
Land Use and Transport Integrated Policies in Peripheral AreasLand Use and Transport Integrated Policies in Peripheral Areas
Land Use and Transport Integrated Policies in Peripheral Areas
 
Get started with dropbox
Get started with dropboxGet started with dropbox
Get started with dropbox
 
IAALD 2010 Closing Session Report: New tools and Repositories
IAALD 2010 Closing Session Report: New tools and RepositoriesIAALD 2010 Closing Session Report: New tools and Repositories
IAALD 2010 Closing Session Report: New tools and Repositories
 
Ley 43 de 1990 t
Ley 43 de 1990 tLey 43 de 1990 t
Ley 43 de 1990 t
 
MERA MEDICARE PRESENTATION
MERA MEDICARE PRESENTATIONMERA MEDICARE PRESENTATION
MERA MEDICARE PRESENTATION
 
Tercer taller_contar y sumar si
Tercer  taller_contar y sumar siTercer  taller_contar y sumar si
Tercer taller_contar y sumar si
 

Ähnlich wie Evaluation #3 for Eldon Ray

Evaluation #2 for Eldon
Evaluation #2 for EldonEvaluation #2 for Eldon
Evaluation #2 for EldonEldon Ray
 
Evaluation #1 for Eldon Ray
Evaluation #1 for Eldon RayEvaluation #1 for Eldon Ray
Evaluation #1 for Eldon RayEldon Ray
 
Techlogic presentation walker
Techlogic presentation walkerTechlogic presentation walker
Techlogic presentation walkerEMC-DE
 
PERA & SB 7 Principal Work
PERA & SB 7 Principal WorkPERA & SB 7 Principal Work
PERA & SB 7 Principal WorkRichard Voltz
 
T&l inset sept 2016
T&l inset sept 2016T&l inset sept 2016
T&l inset sept 2016petski
 
CATHERINE-Mid-Year-Review-FormT1-T3-2023-2024.docx
CATHERINE-Mid-Year-Review-FormT1-T3-2023-2024.docxCATHERINE-Mid-Year-Review-FormT1-T3-2023-2024.docx
CATHERINE-Mid-Year-Review-FormT1-T3-2023-2024.docxCatherineRamosCalasa
 
Tuning process in education
Tuning process in educationTuning process in education
Tuning process in educationsadianaz23
 
3d review-PTHS Jan 26
3d review-PTHS Jan 263d review-PTHS Jan 26
3d review-PTHS Jan 26myersl23
 
Why a programme view? Why TESTA?
Why a programme view? Why TESTA?Why a programme view? Why TESTA?
Why a programme view? Why TESTA?Tansy Jessop
 
Teacher evaluation form for students template
Teacher evaluation form for students templateTeacher evaluation form for students template
Teacher evaluation form for students templateJOHNJOMILRAGASA
 
Slo administive training.jan2014
Slo administive training.jan2014Slo administive training.jan2014
Slo administive training.jan2014Cissy Mecca
 
Teachinglearningtechniquesforeffectiveoutcomebasededucation 190313045402
Teachinglearningtechniquesforeffectiveoutcomebasededucation 190313045402Teachinglearningtechniquesforeffectiveoutcomebasededucation 190313045402
Teachinglearningtechniquesforeffectiveoutcomebasededucation 190313045402Aravindharamanan S
 
Teaching learning techniques for effective outcome based education
Teaching learning techniques for effective outcome based educationTeaching learning techniques for effective outcome based education
Teaching learning techniques for effective outcome based educationReshma Fathima .K
 

Ähnlich wie Evaluation #3 for Eldon Ray (20)

Evaluation #2 for Eldon
Evaluation #2 for EldonEvaluation #2 for Eldon
Evaluation #2 for Eldon
 
Evaluation #1 for Eldon Ray
Evaluation #1 for Eldon RayEvaluation #1 for Eldon Ray
Evaluation #1 for Eldon Ray
 
Techlogic presentation walker
Techlogic presentation walkerTechlogic presentation walker
Techlogic presentation walker
 
PERA & SB 7 Principal Work
PERA & SB 7 Principal WorkPERA & SB 7 Principal Work
PERA & SB 7 Principal Work
 
PPR_End_of_Year_Summary_2013
PPR_End_of_Year_Summary_2013PPR_End_of_Year_Summary_2013
PPR_End_of_Year_Summary_2013
 
T&l inset sept 2016
T&l inset sept 2016T&l inset sept 2016
T&l inset sept 2016
 
Educator evaluation
Educator evaluationEducator evaluation
Educator evaluation
 
CATHERINE-Mid-Year-Review-FormT1-T3-2023-2024.docx
CATHERINE-Mid-Year-Review-FormT1-T3-2023-2024.docxCATHERINE-Mid-Year-Review-FormT1-T3-2023-2024.docx
CATHERINE-Mid-Year-Review-FormT1-T3-2023-2024.docx
 
Student Growth Measures
Student Growth MeasuresStudent Growth Measures
Student Growth Measures
 
SEED observations
SEED observationsSEED observations
SEED observations
 
Tuning process in education
Tuning process in educationTuning process in education
Tuning process in education
 
3d review-PTHS Jan 26
3d review-PTHS Jan 263d review-PTHS Jan 26
3d review-PTHS Jan 26
 
Why a programme view? Why TESTA?
Why a programme view? Why TESTA?Why a programme view? Why TESTA?
Why a programme view? Why TESTA?
 
Design CBE
Design CBEDesign CBE
Design CBE
 
M4
M4M4
M4
 
CBA-Reporting-Tools.pdf
CBA-Reporting-Tools.pdfCBA-Reporting-Tools.pdf
CBA-Reporting-Tools.pdf
 
Teacher evaluation form for students template
Teacher evaluation form for students templateTeacher evaluation form for students template
Teacher evaluation form for students template
 
Slo administive training.jan2014
Slo administive training.jan2014Slo administive training.jan2014
Slo administive training.jan2014
 
Teachinglearningtechniquesforeffectiveoutcomebasededucation 190313045402
Teachinglearningtechniquesforeffectiveoutcomebasededucation 190313045402Teachinglearningtechniquesforeffectiveoutcomebasededucation 190313045402
Teachinglearningtechniquesforeffectiveoutcomebasededucation 190313045402
 
Teaching learning techniques for effective outcome based education
Teaching learning techniques for effective outcome based educationTeaching learning techniques for effective outcome based education
Teaching learning techniques for effective outcome based education
 

Evaluation #3 for Eldon Ray

  • 1. Evaluation Results Author: Eldon Ray Date Evaluated: 04/27/2016 06:45:37 PM (PDT) DRF template: 4 Credit B.S. Elementary Education Program: Elementary v. 2012 BACHELOR Evaluation Method: Using Rubric Evaluation Summary for STUDENT TEACHING: EED 480NA/EED 480NB: Evaluation #3 (Collaborative Observation from GCU Supervisor) Final Score: 4.00 (out of 4) Distinguished Overall comments: Eldon does a great job in the classroom and will be a valuable member of the teaching profession... Detailed Results (Rubric used: 2011_Evaluation #2_#3_ RV Aug) Standard #1: Learner Development: The teacher candidate creates developmentally appropriate instruction that takes into account individual learners’ strengths, interests, and needs and that enables each learner to advance and accelerate his/her learning.  (1) Unsatisfactory (2) Basic (3) Proficient (4) Distinguished Does not meet expectations for a student teacher.  Occasionally observed; minimally meets expectations for a student teacher.  Frequently observed; meets, sometimes exceeds, expectations for a student teacher.  Consistently observed; consistently exceeds expectations for a student teacher.  Criterion Score: 4.00 (Distinguished) Comments on this criterion (op: Eldon does a really good job in creating developmentally appropriate instruction... Standard #1: Learner Development: The teacher candidate collaborates with families, communities, colleagues, and other professionals to promote learner growth and development.  (1) Unsatisfactory (2) Basic (3) Proficient (4) Distinguished Does not meet expectations for a student teacher.  Occasionally observed; minimally meets expectations for a student teacher.  Frequently observed; meets, sometimes exceeds, expectations for a student teacher.  Consistently observed; consistently exceeds expectations for a student teacher.  Criterion Score: Not Applicable Standard #2: Learning Differences: The teacher candidate designs, adapts, and delivers instruction to address each student’s diverse learning strengths and needs and creates opportunities for students to demonstrate their learning in different ways.  (1) Unsatisfactory (2) Basic (3) Proficient (4) Distinguished Does not meet expectations for a student teacher.  Occasionally observed; minimally meets expectations for a student teacher.  Frequently observed; meets, sometimes exceeds, expectations for a student teacher.  Consistently observed; consistently exceeds expectations for a student teacher.    Printed on: 04/27/2016 10:35:26 PM (EST)
  • 2. Criterion Score: 4.00 (Distinguished) Comments on this criterion (op: Eldon is really good at adapting instruction to the different learning modalities of students... Standard #2: Learning Differences: The teacher candidate incorporates tools of language development into planning and instruction, including strategies for making content accessible to English language learners and for evaluating and supporting their development of English proficiency.  (1) Unsatisfactory (2) Basic (3) Proficient (4) Distinguished Does not meet expectations for a student teacher.  Occasionally observed; minimally meets expectations for a student teacher.  Frequently observed; meets, sometimes exceeds, expectations for a student teacher.  Consistently observed; consistently exceeds expectations for a student teacher.  Criterion Score: 4.00 (Distinguished) Comments on this criterion (op: I observed many different types of learning activities throughout the class... Standard #2: Learning Differences: The teacher candidate accesses resources, supports, and specialized assistance and services to meet particular learning differences or needs.  (1) Unsatisfactory (2) Basic (3) Proficient (4) Distinguished Does not meet expectations for a student teacher.  Occasionally observed; minimally meets expectations for a student teacher.  Frequently observed; meets, sometimes exceeds, expectations for a student teacher.  Consistently observed; consistently exceeds expectations for a student teacher.  Criterion Score: 4.00 (Distinguished) Comments on this criterion (op: Eldon used a variety of different learning resources during the lesson to help get the learning material successfully to the student... Standard #3: Learning Environments: The teacher candidate manages the learning environment to actively and equitably engage learners by organizing, allocating, and coordinating the resources of time, space, and learners’ attention.  (1) Unsatisfactory (2) Basic (3) Proficient (4) Distinguished Does not meet expectations for a student teacher.  Occasionally observed; minimally meets expectations for a student teacher.  Frequently observed; meets, sometimes exceeds, expectations for a student teacher.  Consistently observed; consistently exceeds expectations for a student teacher.  Criterion Score: 4.00 (Distinguished) Comments on this criterion (op: Eldon has excellent classroom management practices as the learners were focused on the material at hand... Standard #3: Learning Environments: The teacher candidate communicates verbally and nonverbally in ways that demonstrate respect for and responsiveness to the cultural backgrounds and differing perspectives learners bring to the learning environment.  (1) Unsatisfactory (2) Basic (3) Proficient (4) Distinguished Does not meet expectations for a student teacher.  Occasionally observed; minimally meets expectations for a student teacher.  Frequently observed; meets, sometimes exceeds, expectations for a student teacher.  Consistently observed; consistently exceeds expectations for a student teacher.  Criterion Score: 4.00 (Distinguished) Comments on this criterion (op: Eldon has excellent verbal and non verbal communication...both are non threatening.... Standard #4: Content Knowledge: The teacher candidate stimulates learner reflection on prior content knowledge, links new concepts to familiar concepts, and makes connections to learners’ experiences.  (1) Unsatisfactory (2) Basic (3) Proficient (4) Distinguished   Printed on: 04/27/2016 10:35:26 PM (EST)
  • 3. Does not meet expectations for a student teacher.  Occasionally observed; minimally meets expectations for a student teacher.  Frequently observed; meets, sometimes exceeds, expectations for a student teacher.  Consistently observed; consistently exceeds expectations for a student teacher.  Criterion Score: Not Applicable Standard #4: Content Knowledge: The teacher candidate uses supplementary resources and technologies effectively to ensure accessibility and relevance for all learners.  (1) Unsatisfactory (2) Basic (3) Proficient (4) Distinguished Does not meet expectations for a student teacher.  Occasionally observed; minimally meets expectations for a student teacher.  Frequently observed; meets, sometimes exceeds, expectations for a student teacher.  Consistently observed; consistently exceeds expectations for a student teacher.  Criterion Score: 4.00 (Distinguished) Comments on this criterion (op: all classroom activities had supplemental resources that were available for use... Standard #4: Content Knowledge: The teacher candidate creates opportunities for students to learn, practice, and master academic language in their content.  (1) Unsatisfactory (2) Basic (3) Proficient (4) Distinguished Does not meet expectations for a student teacher.  Occasionally observed; minimally meets expectations for a student teacher.  Frequently observed; meets, sometimes exceeds, expectations for a student teacher.  Consistently observed; consistently exceeds expectations for a student teacher.  Criterion Score: 4.00 (Distinguished) Comments on this criterion (op: There were excellent questioning techniques used during the lessons... Standard #5: Application of Content: The teacher candidate engages learners in applying content knowledge to real world problems through the lens of interdisciplinary themes (e.g., financial literacy, environmental literacy).  (1) Unsatisfactory (2) Basic (3) Proficient (4) Distinguished Does not meet expectations for a student teacher.  Occasionally observed; minimally meets expectations for a student teacher.  Frequently observed; meets, sometimes exceeds, expectations for a student teacher.  Consistently observed; consistently exceeds expectations for a student teacher.  Criterion Score: Not Applicable Standard #5: Application of Content: The teacher candidate facilitates learners’ ability to develop diverse social and cultural perspectives that expand their understanding of local and global issues and create novel approaches to solving problems.  (1) Unsatisfactory (2) Basic (3) Proficient (4) Distinguished Does not meet expectations for a student teacher.  Occasionally observed; minimally meets expectations for a student teacher.  Frequently observed; meets, sometimes exceeds, expectations for a student teacher.  Consistently observed; consistently exceeds expectations for a student teacher.  Criterion Score: Not Applicable Standard #6: Assessment: The teacher candidate designs assessments that match learning objectives with assessment methods and minimizes sources of bias that can distort assessment results.  (1) Unsatisfactory (2) Basic (3) Proficient (4) Distinguished Does not meet expectations for a student teacher.  Occasionally observed; minimally meets expectations Frequently observed; meets, sometimes exceeds, Consistently observed; consistently exceeds   Printed on: 04/27/2016 10:35:26 PM (EST)
  • 4. for a student teacher.  expectations for a student teacher.  expectations for a student teacher.  Criterion Score: Not Applicable Standard #6: Assessment: The teacher candidate works independently and collaboratively to examine test and other performance data to understand each learner’s progress and to guide planning.  (1) Unsatisfactory (2) Basic (3) Proficient (4) Distinguished Does not meet expectations for a student teacher.  Occasionally observed; minimally meets expectations for a student teacher.  Frequently observed; meets, sometimes exceeds, expectations for a student teacher.  Consistently observed; consistently exceeds expectations for a student teacher.  Criterion Score: Not Applicable Standard #6: Assessment: The teacher candidate prepares all learners for the demands of particular assessment formats and makes appropriate modifications in assessments or testing conditions especially for learners with disabilities and language learning needs.  (1) Unsatisfactory (2) Basic (3) Proficient (4) Distinguished Does not meet expectations for a student teacher.  Occasionally observed; minimally meets expectations for a student teacher.  Frequently observed; meets, sometimes exceeds, expectations for a student teacher.  Consistently observed; consistently exceeds expectations for a student teacher.  Criterion Score: Not Applicable Standard #7: Planning for Instruction: The teacher candidate plans how to achieve each student’s learning goals, choosing appropriate strategies and accommodations, resources, and materials to differentiate instruction for individuals and groups of learners.  (1) Unsatisfactory (2) Basic (3) Proficient (4) Distinguished Does not meet expectations for a student teacher.  Occasionally observed; minimally meets expectations for a student teacher.  Frequently observed; meets, sometimes exceeds, expectations for a student teacher.  Consistently observed; consistently exceeds expectations for a student teacher.  Criterion Score: 4.00 (Distinguished) Comments on this criterion (op: It was observed that different teaching strategies were used for different learning modalities... Standard #7: Planning for Instruction: The teacher candidate develops appropriate sequencing of learning experiences and provides multiple ways to demonstrate knowledge and skill.  (1) Unsatisfactory (2) Basic (3) Proficient (4) Distinguished Does not meet expectations for a student teacher.  Occasionally observed; minimally meets expectations for a student teacher.  Frequently observed; meets, sometimes exceeds, expectations for a student teacher.  Consistently observed; consistently exceeds expectations for a student teacher.  Criterion Score: 4.00 (Distinguished) Comments on this criterion (op: Eldon does a great job in learning sequences that ties on learning concept to another with proper transition... Standard #7: Planning for Instruction: The teacher candidate plans for instruction based on formative and summative assessment data, prior learner knowledge, and learner interest.  (1) Unsatisfactory (2) Basic (3) Proficient (4) Distinguished Does not meet expectations for a student teacher.  Occasionally observed; minimally meets expectations Frequently observed; meets, sometimes exceeds, Consistently observed; consistently exceeds   Printed on: 04/27/2016 10:35:26 PM (EST)
  • 5. for a student teacher.  minimally meets expectations for a student teacher.  sometimes exceeds, expectations for a student teacher.  consistently exceeds expectations for a student teacher.  Criterion Score: 4.00 (Distinguished) Comments on this criterion (op: Eldon has really great lesson plans tat are effective during the lesson delivery... Standard #8: Instructional Strategies: The teacher candidate varies his/her role in the instructional process (e.g., instructor, facilitator, coach, audience) in relation to the content and purposes of instruction and the needs of learners.  (1) Unsatisfactory (2) Basic (3) Proficient (4) Distinguished Does not meet expectations for a student teacher.  Occasionally observed; minimally meets expectations for a student teacher.  Frequently observed; meets, sometimes exceeds, expectations for a student teacher.  Consistently observed; consistently exceeds expectations for a student teacher.  Criterion Score: 4.00 (Distinguished) Comments on this criterion (op: Eldon does a great job in moving from teacher, to coach to facilitator especially in a grouping situation... Standard #8: Instructional Strategies: The teacher candidate engages learners in using a range of learning skills and technology tools to access, interpret, evaluate, and apply information.  (1) Unsatisfactory (2) Basic (3) Proficient (4) Distinguished Does not meet expectations for a student teacher.  Occasionally observed; minimally meets expectations for a student teacher.  Frequently observed; meets, sometimes exceeds, expectations for a student teacher.  Consistently observed; consistently exceeds expectations for a student teacher.  Criterion Score: Not Applicable Standard #8: Instructional Strategies: The teacher candidate asks questions to stimulate discussion that serves different purposes (e.g., probing for learner understanding, helping learners articulate their ideas and thinking processes, stimulating curiosity, and helping learners to question).  (1) Unsatisfactory (2) Basic (3) Proficient (4) Distinguished Does not meet expectations for a student teacher.  Occasionally observed; minimally meets expectations for a student teacher.  Frequently observed; meets, sometimes exceeds, expectations for a student teacher.  Consistently observed; consistently exceeds expectations for a student teacher.  Criterion Score: 4.00 (Distinguished) Comments on this criterion (op: Eldon is really good at driving appropriate questions to make students think about the concepts being discussed... Standard #9: Professional Learning and Ethical Practice: Independently and in collaboration with colleagues, The teacher candidate uses a variety of data (e.g., systematic observation, information about learners, research) to evaluate the outcomes of teaching and learning and to adapt planning and practice.  (1) Unsatisfactory (2) Basic (3) Proficient (4) Distinguished Does not meet expectations for a student teacher.  Occasionally observed; minimally meets expectations for a student teacher.  Frequently observed; meets, sometimes exceeds, expectations for a student teacher.  Consistently observed; consistently exceeds expectations for a student teacher.  Criterion Score: Not Applicable Standard #9: Professional Learning and Ethical Practice: The teacher candidate actively seeks professional, community, and technological resources, within and outside the school, as supports for analysis, reflection, and problem­solving.    Printed on: 04/27/2016 10:35:26 PM (EST)
  • 6. (1) Unsatisfactory (2) Basic (3) Proficient (4) Distinguished Does not meet expectations for a student teacher..  Occasionally observed; minimally meets expectations for a student teacher.  Frequently observed; meets, sometimes exceeds, expectations for a student teacher.  Consistently observed; consistently exceeds expectations for a student teacher.  Criterion Score: Not Applicable Standard #10: Leadership and Collaboration: The teacher candidate uses technological tools and a variety of communication strategies to build local and global learning communities that engage learners, families, and colleagues.  (1) Unsatisfactory (2) Basic (3) Proficient (4) Distinguished Does not meet expectations for a student teacher.  Occasionally observed; minimally meets expectations for a student teacher.  Frequently observed; meets, sometimes exceeds, expectations for a student teacher.  Consistently observed; consistently exceeds expectations for a student teacher.  Criterion Score: Not Applicable Standard #10: Leadership and Collaboration: The teacher candidate advocates to meet the needs of learners, to strengthen the learning environment, and to enact system change.  (1) Unsatisfactory (2) Basic (3) Proficient (4) Distinguished Does not meet expectations for a student teacher.  Occasionally observed; minimally meets expectations for a student teacher.  Frequently observed; meets, sometimes exceeds, expectations for a student teacher.  Consistently observed; consistently exceeds expectations for a student teacher.  Criterion Score: Not Applicable COLLABORATIVE EVALUATION: This evaluation reflects the results of a collaborative conference including feedback from the Cooperating Teacher and Teacher Candidate The GCU supervisor and cooperating teacher should collaboratively review the student teacher’s performance in each category prior to meeting with the student teacher.  (1) Unsatisfactory (2) Basic (3) Proficient (4) Distinguished Did not meet collaboratively.      Collaborative meeting took place.  Criterion Score: 4.00 (Distinguished) Comments on this criterion (op: It is agreed that Eldon will make a valuable asset to the teaching community....   Printed on: 04/27/2016 10:35:26 PM (EST)