SlideShare ist ein Scribd-Unternehmen logo
1 von 54
U.S. ENERGY INDUSTRY FINDINGS
EDELMAN'S 13TH ANNUAL SURVEY, LARGEST GLOBAL EXPLORATION OF TRUST
2
ONLINE SURVEY
IN 26 COUNTRIES
• 31,000+ respondents
• 5 years in 20+ markets
• 8 years in 10+ markets
GENERAL
POPULATION
• 1000 respondents per
country surveyed
• Ages 18+
• 2 years of data
INFORMED
PUBLICS
• 500 respondents in U.S. and
China & 200 in other
countries
• Ages 25-64
• College-educated
• In top 25% of household
income per age group in
each country
• Report significant media
consumption and
engagement in business
news and public policy
• 13 years of data
2013
RISING INFLUENCE OF NGOS2001
FALL OF THE CELEBRITY CEO2002
EARNED MEDIA MORE CREDIBLE THAN ADVERTISING2003
U.S. COMPANIES IN EUROPE SUFFER TRUST DISCOUNT2004
TRUST SHIFTS FROM “AUTHORITIES” TO PEERS2005
“A PERSON LIKE ME” EMERGES AS CREDIBLE SPOKESPERSON2006
BUSINESS MORE TRUSTED THAN GOVERNMENT AND MEDIA2007
YOUNG INFLUENCERS HAVE MORE TRUST IN BUSINESS2008
BUSINESS MUST PARTNER WITH GOVERNMENT TO REGAIN TRUST2009
TRUST IS NOW AN ESSENTIAL LINE OF BUSINESS2010
RISE OF AUTHORITY FIGURES2011
THE FALL OF GOVERNMENT2012
CRISIS OF LEADERSHIP
EDELMAN TRUST BAROMETER IN RETROSPECT
3
TRUST 2013
ENERGY INDUSTRY DEEP DIVE
THE PATH FORWARD: TRUST BUILDING, TRUSTED SOURCES
AND COMMUNICATION IMPLICATIONS
THE STATE OF TRUST
4
STATE OF TRUST
GLOBAL 57
China 80
Singapore 76
India 71
Mexico 68
Hong Kong 67
UAE 66
Malaysia 64
Canada 62
Indonesia 62
U.S. 59
Netherlands 59
Brazil 55
Germany 55
France 54
Sweden 54
UK 53
Italy 51
Australia 50
Poland 48
S. Korea 47
Ireland 46
Argentina 45
Spain 42
Turkey 42
Japan 41
Russia 36
2011 20132012
DISTRUSTERSTRUSTERSNEUTRAL
GLOBAL 51
China 76
UAE 68
Singapore 67
India 65
Indonesia 63
Mexico 63
Netherlands 61
Hong Kong 61
Canada 58
Malaysia 57
Italy 56
Argentina 54
Australia 53
Brazil 51
Sweden 49
U.S. 49
South Korea 44
Poland 44
U.K. 41
Ireland 41
France 40
Germany 39
Spain 37
Japan 34
Russia 32
EDELMAN’S TRUST INDEX: AFTER A YEAR OF HIGH DISTRUST IN 2012,
SHIFT BACK TO NEUTRAL IN 2013
GLOBAL 55
Brazil 80
UAE 78
Indonesia 74
China 73
Netherlands 73
Mexico 69
Singapore 67
Argentina 62
India 56
Italy 56
Canada 55
South Korea 53
Sweden 52
Japan 51
Australia 51
Spain 51
France 50
Poland 49
Germany 44
U.S. 42
U.K. 40
Russia 40
Ireland 39
Composite score is an average of a country’s trust in all four institutions. Informed Publics ages 25-64 in 20-country global total
6
Big Changes
from 2008
Germany +19
China +18
Canada +14
India +11
Big Changes
from 2012
Germany +16
France +14
UK +12
US +10
2013
7
GLOBAL 57
China 80
Singapore 76
India 71
Mexico 68
Hong Kong 67
UAE 66
Malaysia 64
Canada 62
Indonesia 62
U.S. 59
Netherlands 59
Brazil 55
Germany 55
France 54
Sweden 54
UK 53
Italy 51
Australia 50
Poland 48
S. Korea 47
Ireland 46
Argentina 45
Spain 42
Turkey 42
Japan 41
Russia 36
GLOBAL 48
China 70
India 64
UAE 63
Singapore 63
Indonesia 61
Malaysia 61
Mexico 59
Hong Kong 54
Canada 52
Brazil 51
Netherlands 50
Argentina 48
U.S. 45
Germany 44
UK 43
S. Korea 43
Turkey 43
France 41
Italy 40
Sweden 40
Australia 39
Spain 37
Japan 35
Poland 34
Ireland 33
Russia 30
Composite score is an average of a country’s trust in all four institutions. General population and Informed Publics ages 25-64 in 26 country global total and across 26 countries
Largest Differences between
General & Informed Publics
Poland, US, Sweden: - 14 points
Singapore, Ireland, Hong Kong,
France: - 13 points
General
Population
9 points lower
than Informed
Publics
INFORMED PUBLIC
2013GENERAL PUBLIC
DISTRUSTERSTRUSTERSNEUTRAL
LOWER TRUST AMONG GENERAL POPULATION THAN INFORMED PUBLICS
54%
39%
50%
43%
56%
59%
59%
36%
54%
46%
50%
62%
43%
30%
46%
40%
43%
53%
63%
45%
63%
55%
58%
70%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Energy
Business
Government
NGOs
TRUST IN INSTITUTIONS RISE PAST 2010 HIGHS
TRUST IN INSTITUTIONS – INFORMED PUBLICS AGES 35-64 – U.S.
Q11-14. [TRACKING] Below is a list of institutions. For each one, please indicate how much you trust that institution to do what is right using a 9-point scale where one means
that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal”. (Top 4 Box, Trust) Informed Publics ages 35-64 in US
8
2008
16 point gap
between business &
government trust
2013
Business, energy &
government trust are
all within 9 points
NGOs
Q11-14. [TRACKING] Below is a list of institutions. For each one, please indicate how much you trust that institution to do what is right using a 9-point scale where one
means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal”. (Top 2 Box, Trust a great deal and Top 4 Box, Trust) Informed Publics ages 25-64
in US
TRUST ON THE RISE ACROSS INSTITUTIONS
TRUST IN INSTITUTIONS – U.S.
9
2012
Total Trust
2013
Total Trust
45% 51%
US
2012
Total Trust
2013
Total Trust
58%
70%
US
2012
Total Trust
2013
Total Trust
NGOS
BUSINESS
MEDIA
GOVERNMENT
2012
Total Trust
2013
Total Trust
43%
53%
US
50%
62%
US
ENERGY
2012
Total Trust
2013
Total Trust
56% 59%
59%
82%
64%
49%
74%
56%
81%
44%
56%
52%
44%
40%
62%
56%
47% 48%
63%
58%
48%
61% 60%
77%
44%
58%
65%
74%
31%
50%
41%
33%
19%
47%
30%
57%
20%
35%
32% 32%
29%
53%
47%
40%
43%
60%
58%
48%
62% 63%
82%
49%
65%
73%
81%
44%
Q11-14. [Business in General and Government in General] Below is a list of institutions. For each one, please indicate how much you trust that institution to do what is right using a
9-point scale where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal”. (Top 4 Box, Trust) Informed Publics ages 25-64 in 26-country
global total and across 26 countries
BUSINESS TRUSTED MORE THAN GOVERNMENT IN
16 OF 26 MARKETS SURVEYED
TRUST IN BUSINESS VS. GOVERNMENT - 26 MARKET OVERVIEW
Government
Business
GAP BETWEEN BUSINESS & GOVERNMENT GROWING
Globally, largest gap since 2007*
US Trust in Business: 62%
US Trust in Government: 53%
US Trust in Energy: 59%
10
SLIGHT UPTICKS IN MANY SCORES, INCLUDING ENERGY
TRUST IN INDUSTRIES – U.S.
Q43-60. [TRACKING] Please indicate how much you trust businesses in each of the following industries to do what is right. Again, please use the same 9-point scale where one
means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal”. (Top 4 Box, Trust) Informed Public ages 25-64 in US
11
Q43-60. [TRACKING] Please indicate how much you trust businesses in each of the following industries to do what is right. Again, please use the same 9-point scale where one
means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal”. (Top 4 Box, Trust) Informed Publics ages 25-64 (only industries tracked from 2012 to
2013 shown)
80%
75%
72%
70%
70%
66%
59%
55%
52%
50%
50%
Technology
Brewing and spirits
Food and beverage
Automotive
Consumer packaged goods
Telecommunications
Energy
Pharmaceuticals
Financial services
Banks
Media
20132012
41%
46%
48%
56%
56%
64%
66%
71%
74%
74%
83%
Banks
Financial services
Media
Energy
Pharmaceuticals
Telecommunications
Automotive
Brewing and spirits
Consumer packaged goods
Food and beverage
Technology
Technology #1 in all
markets surveyed
ENERGY INDUSTRY DEEP DIVE
50%
Trust in Business
53%
Trust in the Energy Industry
THE GENERAL PUBLIC IS MORE TRUSTING OF THE ENERGY INDUSTRY THAN
BUSINESS OVERALL
TRUST IN ENERGY INDUSTRY VS. TRUST IN BUSINESS – U.S.
Q11-14. [TRACKING] Below is a list of institutions. For each one, please indicate how much you trust that institution to do what is right using a 9-point scale where one
means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal”.; Q43-60. [TRACKING] Please indicate how much you trust businesses in each
of the following industries to do what is right. Again, please use the same 9-point scale where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you
“trust them a great deal”. (Top 4 Box, Trust) General Population in US
13
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Energy Industry
Trust (53%)
Business Trust
(50%)
14
57%
61%
69%
55%
49%
80%
54%
80%
75%
69%
43% 42%
47%
71%
76%
67%
76%
49%
55%
49%
57%
53%
52%
37%
40%
36% 37%
50%
35%
43%
37%
32%
67%
42%
68%
64%
58%
34% 33%
38%
63%
69%
60%
69%
44%
51%
45%
53%
50%
54%
42%
48%
44%
49%
Energy Industry
Business
ENERGY INDUSTRY MORE TRUSTED THAN BUSINESS IN 21 OF 26 MARKETS;
LARGEST DIFFERENCES SEEN IN SOUTH KOREA AND HONG KONG
TRUST IN ENERGY INDUSTRY VS. BUSINESS IN GENERAL – 26 MARKET OVERVIEW
Q11-1[TRACKING] Below is a list of institutions. For each one, please indicate how much you trust that institution to do what is right using a 9-point scale where one
means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal”.; Q43-60. [TRACKING] Please indicate how much you trust businesses in each
of the following industries to do what is right. Again, please use the same 9-point scale where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you
“trust them a great deal”. (Top 4 Box, Trust) General Population in 26 -country global total and across 26 countries
J
US Trust in Energy :53%
US Trust in Business: 50%
54%
39%
50%
43%
56%
59%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
TRUST IN ENERGY INDUSTRY RISES PAST 2008 PRE-RECESSION LEVELS
TRUST IN ENERGY INDUSTRY – (INFORMED PUBLICS AGES 35-64) – U.S.
15 Q43-60. [TRACKING] Please indicate how much you trust businesses in each of the following industries to do what is right. Again, please use the same 9-point scale where one
means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal”. (Top 4 Box, Trust) Informed Public in US
TRUST AMONG EMERGING MARKETS HIGHER THAN TRUST AMONG
DEVELOPED MARKETS
TRUST IN ENERGY INDUSTRY BY REGION – GLOBAL OVERVIEW
53% 54%
62% 61% 61%
58%
43%
57%
53%
70%
67% 66%
61%
45%
Global US BRIC Latin America APAC North America EU
16 Q43-60. [TRACKING] Please indicate how much you trust businesses in each of the following industries to do what is right. Again, please use the same 9-point scale where one
means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal”. (Top 4 Box, Trust) General Population in 26 -country global total and across APAC, BRIC,
Latin America, North America and EU region
2012 2013
53%
68%
74%
66% 66%
65%
68%
64%
68%
69%
56%
52%
54%
50%
54%
52%
58%
43%
38%
43%
37%
46%
30% 29% 30%
41%
57%
80% 80%
76% 76% 75%
71%
69% 69%
67%
61%
57%
55% 55%
54% 53%
52%
49%
49% 49%
47%
43%
42% 40%
37% 37% 36%
2012 2013
50%
Q43-60. [TRACKING] Please indicate how much you trust businesses in each of the following industries to do what is right. Again, please use the same 9-point scale where one means
that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal”. (Top 4 Box, Trust) General Population in 26 -country global total and across 26 countries
OVER THE PAST YEAR, TRUST IN THE ENERGY INDUSTRY SIGNIFICANTLY INCREASED IN
SEVERAL MARKETS WITH GREATEST INCREASES SEEN IN INDIA AND JAPAN
2012 VS. 2013 TRUST IN ENERGY INDUSTRY– 26 MARKET OVERVIEW
17
n/a
2012 US Trust in Energy :54%
2013 US Trust in Energy: 53%
57%
80% 80%
76% 76% 75%
71%
69% 69% 67%
61%
57%
55% 55%
54%
53% 52%
49% 49% 49%
47%
43% 42%
40%
37% 37% 36%
23%
7% 8%
13%
9%
7%
12%
16%
12%
8%
14%
23%
25% 25%
29%
26%
23%
31%
28%
21%
33%
35% 34% 34%
40% 41%
42%
Trust in Energy Industry
Distrust in Energy Industry
Q43-60. [TRACKING] Please indicate how much you trust businesses in each of the following industries to do what is right. Again, please use the same 9-point scale where one means
that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal”. (Top 4 Box, Trust and Bottom 4 Box, Distrust) General Population in 26 -country global total and
across 26 countries
TRUST HIGHER THAN DISTRUST IN MAJORITY OF MARKETS;
DISTRUST HIGHEST IN UK, GERMANY AND AUSTRALIA
TRUST IN ENERGY INDUSTRY VS. DISTRUST IN ENERGY INDUSTRY – 26 MARKET OVERVIEW
18
US Trust in Energy: 53%
US Distrust in Energy: 26%
53%
65%
54% 53%
35%
Energy Industry Renewables Natural Gas Utilities Oil
Q61C-64C. [SPLIT SAMPLE] Now thinking about specific sectors within the energy industry, please indicate how much you trust businesses in each of the following sectors to do what
is right. Again, please use the same 9-point scale where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal”. General Population in US
TRUSTED AMONG ENERGY SECTORS –
RENEWABLES MOST TRUSTED; OIL LEAST TRUSTED
TRUST IN ENERGY INDUSTRY SECTORS – U.S.
19
68%
84% 84%
79% 77% 76% 76% 75%
73%72% 71% 71% 70% 70%
68%68% 65%
65% 64% 64%
61% 60% 59% 59% 57%
55% 53%
50%
20
TRUST IN ENERGY INDUSTRY SECTORS – RENEWABLES
IN ALL 26 COUNTRIES SURVEYED, OVER HALF TRUST THE RENEWABLES
SECTOR
Q61C-64C. [SPLIT SAMPLE] Now thinking about specific sectors within the energy industry, please indicate how much you trust businesses in each of the following sectors to do what
is right. Again, please use the same 9-point scale where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal”. General Population in 26 -
country global total and across 26 countries
U.S. Trust in Renewables: 65%
58%
85%
80%
74% 72% 72% 71% 70% 70%
65% 65%
60%
56%55% 54% 53% 53% 53%
49%
47% 46% 45% 45%
43% 43%
37% 37%
50%
21
TRUST IN ENERGY SECTORS – NATURAL GAS
CHINA AND INDIA MOST TRUSTING OF THE NATURAL GAS SECTOR; TRUST
LOWEST IN GERMANY AND IRELAND
Q61C-64C. [SPLIT SAMPLE] Now thinking about specific sectors within the energy industry, please indicate how much you trust businesses in each of the following sectors to do what
is right. Again, please use the same 9-point scale where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal”. General Population in 26 -
country global total and across 26 countries
U.S. Trust in Natural Gas: 54%
49%
77% 77%
74% 73% 72%
69% 69%
66%
62%
52%
49%
47%
42% 41%
39% 37%
35%
35%
33% 33% 33%
30% 30% 30% 29% 28%
50%
22
TRUST IN ENERGY SECTORS – OIL
COUNTRIES CLEARLY DIVIDED OVER TRUST IN THE OIL SECTOR; TRUST HIGHEST IN
EMERGING AND ASIAN MARKETS ONCE AGAIN
Q61C-64C. [SPLIT SAMPLE] Now thinking about specific sectors within the energy industry, please indicate how much you trust businesses in each of the following sectors to do what
is right. Again, please use the same 9-point scale where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal”. General Population in 26 -
country global total and across 26 countries
U.S. Trust in Oil: 35%
53%
78%
75%
74% 73%
69% 69% 68% 68%
64%
57%
54% 54%53% 53%
50% 47%
40% 40% 40% 40% 39% 38%
36% 36% 35%
18%
50%
23
TRUST IN ENERGY INDUSTRY SECTORS – UTILITIES
EMERGING MARKETS TEND TO BE MOST TRUSTING OF THE UTILITIES SECTOR;
RUSSIA OUTLIER WITH ONLY ONE IN FIVE RUSSIANS TRUSTING THE SECTOR
Q61C-64C. [SPLIT SAMPLE] Now thinking about specific sectors within the energy industry, please indicate how much you trust businesses in each of the following sectors to do what
is right. Again, please use the same 9-point scale where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal”. General Population in 26 -
country global total and across 26 countries
U.S. Trust in Utilities: 53%
TRUST BUILDING
BUILDING TRUST – KEY PERFORMANCE CLUSTERS
COMMUNICATES FREQUENTLY AND HONESTLY ON THE STATE OF ITS BUSINESS
LISTENS TO CUSTOMER NEEDS AND FEEDBACK
TREATS EMPLOYEES WELL
PLACES CUSTOMERS AHEAD OF PROFITS
INTEGRITY
TAKES RESPONSIBLE ACTIONS TO ADDRESS AN ISSUE OR CRISIS
HAS TRANSPARENT AND OPEN BUSINESS PRACTICES
HAS ETHICAL BUSINESS PRACTICES
PURPOSE
OPERATIONS
DELIVERS CONSISTENT FINANCIAL RETURNS TO INVESTORS
HAS HIGHLY-REGARDED AND WIDELY ADMIRED TOP LEADERSHIP
RANKS ON A GLOBAL LIST OF TOP COMPANIES
PRODUCTS & SERVICES
IS AN INNOVATOR OF NEW PRODUCTS, SERVICES OR IDEAS
OFFERS HIGH QUALITY PRODUCTS OR SERVICES
WORKS TO PROTECT AND IMPROVE THE ENVIRONMENT
ADDRESSES SOCIETY’S NEEDS IN ITS EVERYDAY BUSINESS
CREATES PROGRAMS THAT POSITIVELY IMPACT THE LOCAL COMMUNITY
PARTNERS WITH NGOs, GOVERNMENT AND 3RD PARTIES TO ADDRESS SOCIETAL NEEDS
ENGAGEMENT
Edelman Trust Barometer
research reveals 16 SPECIFIC
ATTRIBUTES which build trust.
These can be grouped into
FIVE PERFORMANCE CLUSTERS
listed here in rank order of
importance.
25
THE EVOLUTION OF TRUST – WHAT MOVES THE NEEDLE
INTEGRITY (58%)
PURPOSE (47%)
OPERATIONS (39%)
PRODUCTS & SERVICES (54%)
ENGAGEMENT (59%)
Edelman Trust Barometer’s
2013 TRUST PERFORMANCE CLUSTERS
Edelman Trust Barometer’s
2008 TRUST DRIVERS*
OPERATIONS
(76%)
Reputation as a place to work (81%)
Financial performance (76%)
Respected CEO or leader (71%)
26
*Data used includes Informed Publics ages 35-64 only in 18-country global total
37%
45%
42%
52%
46%
55%
62%
57%
65%
72%
74%
72%
55%
71%
74%
74%
41%
49%
50%
55%
59%
63%
65%
68%
69%
69%
70%
72%
72%
76%
77%
77%
PARTNERS WITH NGOS, GOVERNMENT AND THIRD PARTIES TO
ADDRESS SOCIETAL ISSUES
DELIVERS CONSISTENT FINANCIAL RETURNS TO INVESTORS
RANKS ON A GLOBAL LIST OF TOP COMPANIES, SUCH AS BEST
COMPANIES TO WORK FOR OR MOST ADMIRED COMPANIES
HAS HIGHLY-REGARDED AND WIDELY ADMIRED TOP LEADERSHIP
IS AN INNOVATOR OF NEW PRODUCTS, SERVICES OR IDEAS
ADDRESSES SOCIETY'S NEEDS IN ITS EVERYDAY BUSINESS
HAS TRANSPARENT AND OPEN BUSINESS PRACTICES
CREATES PROGRAMS THAT POSITIVELY IMPACT THE LOCAL
COMMUNITY IN WHICH THE COMPANY OPERATES
COMMUNICATES FREQUENTLY & HONESTLY ON STATE OF ITS
BUSINESS
TREATS EMPLOYEES WELL
HAS ETHICAL BUSINESS PRACTICES
OFFERS HIGH QUALITY PRODUCTS OR SERVICES
WORKS TO PROTECT AND IMPROVE THE ENVIRONMENT
PLACES CUSTOMERS AHEAD OF PROFITS
TAKES RESPONSIBLE ACTIONS TO ADDRESS AN ISSUE OR A CRISIS
LISTENS TO CUSTOMER NEEDS AND FEEDBACK
2013 ENERGY INDUSTRY IMPORTANCE VS. BUSINESS IMPORTANCE – U.S.
TRUST BUILDING ATTRIBUTES – WHAT MATTERS FOR ENERGY
Gap
+3
+3
+5
+17
-
-4
-3
+4
+11
+3
+8
+13
+3
+8
+4
+4
ENERGY
BUSINESS
27
28
40%
27%
29%
25%
39%
36%
41%
35%
27%
38%
27%
49%
23%
33%
40%
31%
38%
44%
45%
46%
54%
54%
55%
57%
65%
66%
69%
70%
71%
73%
74%
76%
PARTNERS WITH NGOS, GOVERNMENT AND THIRD PARTIES TO ADDRESS SOCIETAL
ISSUES
IS AN INNOVATOR OF NEW PRODUCTS, SERVICES OR IDEAS
RANKS ON A GLOBAL LIST OF TOP COMPANIES, SUCH AS 'BEST COMPANIES TO
WORK FOR' OR 'MOST ADMIRED COMPANIES'
WORKS TO PROTECT AND IMPROVE THE ENVIRONMENT
DELIVERS CONSISTENT FINANCIAL RETURNS TO INVESTORS
HAS HIGHLY-REGARDED AND WIDELY ADMIRED TOP LEADERSHIP
CREATES PROGRAMS THAT POSITIVELY IMPACT THE LOCAL COMMUNITY IN WHICH
THE COMPANY OPERATES
ADDRESSES SOCIETY'S NEEDS IN ITS EVERYDAY BUSINESS
HAS TRANSPARENT AND OPEN BUSINESS PRACTICES
OFFERS HIGH QUALITY PRODUCTS OR SERVICES
COMMUNICATES FREQUENTLY AND HONESTLY ON THE STATE OF ITS BUSINESS
TREATS EMPLOYEES WELL
TAKES RESPONSIBLE ACTIONS TO ADDRESS AN ISSUE OR A CRISIS
PLACES CUSTOMERS AHEAD OF PROFITS
LISTENS TO CUSTOMER NEEDS AND FEEDBACK
HAS ETHICAL BUSINESS PRACTICES -45
-34
-40
-48
-21
-42
-28
-38
-22
-14
-18
-15
-21
-16
-17
+2
Q70-85/Q86-101. Please think about businesses in the Energy Industry. How important is each of the following actions to building your trust in businesses in the Energy Industry?
Please use a nine-point scale where one means that action is 'not at all important to building your trust' and nine means it is 'extremely important to building your trust'. [Top 2
Box, Trust - Very Important (8-9)], General Population, Global 25-Country Total (Excludes Don’t Know) ;Q114-Q129. Please rate [INSERT COMPANY] on how well you think they
are performing on each of the following attributes. Use a nine-point scale where one means they are performing “extremely poorly” and nine means they are performing
“extremely well”. (Top 2 Box, Performing Very/ Extremely Well) General Population in US
*Importance attribute data used here is from the 2012 Trust Barometer
2012 ENERGY INDUSTRY IMPORTANCE VS. 2013 BLINDED ENERGY COMPANY PERFORMANCE – US (FOR ILLUSTRATION PURPOSES)
Gap
Importance
Performance
TRUST BUILDING ATTRIBUTES – LARGE GAP IN EXPECTATION VS. PERFORMANCE
29
PRODUCTS
& SERVICES
ENGAGEMENT
INTEGRITY
PURPOSE
OPERATIONS
Trust-Building
Opportunity Quadrant
PRIORITIZING CLUSTERS BY IMPACT POTENTIAL
Q114-Q129. Please rate [INSERT COMPANY] on how well you think they are performing on each of the following attributes. Use a nine-point scale where one means they are
performing “extremely poorly” and nine means they are performing “extremely well”. (Top 2 Box, Performing Very/ Extremely Well) General Population in 26-country
global total
*Energy importance attributes data was asked in the 2012 Trust Barometer
INTEGRITY
UNDER-PERFORMING ON HIGH PRIORITIES PERFORMING
Quality
Society
Communicates
Customers
PERCEIVED PERFORMANCE
STATEDIMPORTANCE
LOW PERFORMANCE ON LOWER EXPECTATIONS OVER-PERFORMING ON LOWER PRIORITIES
ENGAGEMENT
PRODUCTS & SERVICES
PURPOSE
OPERATIONS
2012 ENERGY IMPORTANCE VS. BLINDED ENERGY COMPANY PERFORMANCE (FOR ILLUSTRATION PURPOSES)
TRUSTED SOURCES AND
COMMUNICATIONS IMPLICATIONS
58% 58%
43% 41% 40%
51%
47%
32%
26%
30%
65%
71%
56% 58%
52%52% 51%
38%
28% 27%
TRADITIONAL MEDIA ONLINE SEARCH
ENGINES
HYBRID MEDIA SOCIAL MEDIA OWNED MEDIA
Global Developed Emerging US
Q178-182. When looking for general news and information, how much would you trust each type of source for general news and information? Please use a 9-point scale where one
means that you "do not trust it at all" and nine means that you "trust it a great deal". (Top 4 Box, Trust) General Population in 26-country global total, Developed vs. Emerging
Markets; Age breakdown for general population in 26-country global total
MAINSTREAM MEDIA REIGNS IN DEVELOPED MARKETS,
EQUIVALENCE AMONG SOURCES IN EMERGING MARKETS
YOUTH TRUSTS, OLDER GENERATIONS DISTRUST NON-TRADITIONAL MEDIA – GLOBAL OVERVIEW
59%
61%
49% 47% 44%
61% 60%
48%
45% 43%
56% 56%
40%
37% 37%
54%
49%
29% 29% 31%
TRADITIONAL MEDIA ONLINE SEARCH
ENGINES
HYBRID MEDIA SOCIAL MEDIA OWNED MEDIA
18-29 30-44 45-64 65+
GLOBAL AGE BREAKDOWN
31
Q178-182. When looking for general news and information, how much would you trust each type of source for general news and information? Please use a 9-point scale where one
means that you "do not trust it at all" and nine means that you "trust it a great deal". (Top 4 Box, Trust)Informed Publics ages 25-64 in US, General Population in US
SEARCH AND TRADITIONAL MEDIA CONTINUOUSLY PROVE MOST TRUSTED
AMONG THE INFORMED AND GENERAL PUBLIC
TRUST IN MEDIA SOURCES – U.S.
32
2013
62% 62%
51%
39%
34%
51% 52%
38%
28% 27%
ONLINE SEARCH
ENGINES
TRADITIONAL MEDIA HYBRID MEDIA SOCIAL MEDIA OWNED MEDIA
TRUSTED SOURCES ARE EXPERTS AND PEERS
CREDIBLE SPOKESPEOPLE – U.S.
29%
37%
50%
52%
61%
66%
68%
67%
31%
34%
47%
58%
62%
68%
71%
74%
Government official or regulator
CEO
Financial or industry analyst
NGO representative
Regular employee
A technical expert
A person like yourself
Academic or expert
2012
Q130-143. [TRACKING] Below is a list of people. In general, when forming an opinion of a company, if you heard information about a company from each person, how
credible would the information be--extremely credible, very credible, somewhat credible, or not credible at all? (Top 2 Box, Very/ Extremely Credible) Informed publics
ages 25-64 in US, General Population US33
74%
69%
63%
56%
54%
52%
43%
41%
24%
21%
69%
66%
57%
57%
48%
49%
39%
30%
17%
16%
Academic or expert
Technical expert in the company
A person like yourself
Regular employee
NGO representative
Financial or industry analyst
CEO
Government official or regulator
Blogger
Entertainer/athlete
TRUSTED SOURCES ARE EXPERTS AND PEERS
CREDIBLE SPOKESPEOPLE – U.S.
2013
Q130-143. [TRACKING] Below is a list of people. In general, when forming an opinion of a company, if you heard information about a company from each person, how
credible would the information be--extremely credible, very credible, somewhat credible, or not credible at all? (Top 2 Box, Very/ Extremely Credible) Informed publics
ages 25-64 in US, General Population US34
66% 66% 67%
74% 74%
25%
19%
31%
34% 34%
43%
62%
45%
40%
32%
71%
63%
25% 26%
32%
28%
31%
41%
45%
34%
32%
23%
62%
56%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
An academic or expert on company issues CEO
A person like yourself Government official/regulator
Regular employee
TRUSTED SPOKESPEOPLE SOLIDIFYING RANK ORDER
CREDIBILITY OF SPOKESPEOPLE – U.S. INFORMED PUBLICS AGES 35-64
Q130-143. [TRACKING] Below is a list of people. In general, when forming an opinion of a company, if you heard information about a company from each person, how credible
would the information be--extremely credible, very credible, somewhat credible, or not credible at all? (Top 2 Box, Very/ Extremely Credible) Informed publics ages 35-64 in US
35
Who is Trusted MOST to provide you with
credible and honest information about:
Company’s
CEO
Company’s
Employee
Passionate or
Activist
Consumer
Academic
Media
Spokesperson
A company’s employee programs, benefits & working
conditions
15% 71% 16% 12% 8%
How a company serves its customers and prioritizes
customer needs ahead of company profits
14% 30% 46% 19% 15%
A company’s situation in a time of crisis 32% 26% 21% 23% 25%
A company’s innovation efforts and new product
development
28% 39% 26% 24% 11%
How a company uses its resources and influence to
support the environment
18% 26% 36% 27% 12%
How a company supports programs that positively
impact the local community
18% 27% 39% 19% 25%
Partnerships with NGO’s and effort to address societal
issues
23% 17% 31% 27% 14%
A company’s financial earnings & operational
performance
29% 26% 20% 27% 11%
A company’s business practices, both positive & negative 16% 40% 31% 23% 13%
Accomplishments about a company’s senior leadership 32% 34% 21% 20% 17%
Q197-201(Global Summary). We would now like you to think about different types of information you may read, see or hear about a company. For each topic, please select which
person you trust MOST to provide you with credible and honest information about a company. General Population in US
INFLUENCER MESSAGE MAPPING – U.S.
ENGAGEMENT
INTEGRITY
PRODUCTS
OPERATIONS
PURPOSE
36
50%
Q130-143. [TRACKING] (Credibility of CEOs and Government officials/regulators) Below is a list of people. In general, when forming an opinion of a company, if you heard
information about a company from each person, how credible would the information be--extremely credible, very credible, somewhat credible, or not credible at all? (Top 2 Box,
Very/ Extremely Credible) Informed publics ages 25-64 in 26 -country global total and across 26 markets (only spokespeople tracked from 2012 to 2013 included in analysis)
2013 CREDIBILITY OF CEOS VS. GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS/REGULATORS – 26 MARKET OVERVIEW
Government official or
regulator Credibility
CEO Credibility
37
MAJORITY OF MARKETS FIND BOTH GOVERNMENT AND BUSINESS LEADERS
BELOW 50% IN THEIR CREDIBILITY RATING
45%
52%
70%
55%
52%
73%
41%
52%
34%
36%
62%
55%
42%
22%
37%
39%
43%
27% 28%
56%
37%
34%
54%
26%
40%
35%
48%
38%
18%
36%
22%
32%
54%
23%
35%
22% 25%
54%
48%
35%
15%
31%
36%
41%
25%
27%
55%
37% 36%
56%
32%
47%
45%
60%
US CEO Credibility: 43%
US Gov’t Official/Regulator Credibility: 41%
14%
24%
13% 15%
SOLVE SOCIAL OR SOCIETAL
ISSUES
CORRECT ISSUES WITHIN
INDUSTRIES THAT ARE
EXPERIENCING PROBLEMS
MAKE ETHICAL AND MORAL
DECISIONS
TELL YOU THE TRUTH,
REGARDLESS OF HOW COMPLEX
OR UNPOPULAR IT IS
TRUST IN BUSINESS AND GOVERNMENT – A CRISIS OF LEADERSHIP
US TRUST BUSINESS AND GOVERNMENT LEADERS TO DO THE FOLLOWING:
13% 13% 11% 10%
SOLVE SOCIAL OR SOCIETAL
ISSUES
CORRECT ISSUES WITHIN
INDUSTRIES THAT ARE
EXPERIENCING PROBLEMS
MAKE ETHICAL AND MORAL
DECISIONS
TELL YOU THE TRUTH,
REGARDLESS OF HOW COMPLEX
OR UNPOPULAR IT IS
GOVERNMENT LEADERS
38
BUSINESS LEADERS
Q144A-147A. [SPLIT SAMPLE] How much do you trust business leaders to do the following? (Top Box- Trust A great Deal) General
population in US
6%
7%
20%
20%
45%
LACK OF REGULATION OR CONTROL
TRANSPARENCY ISSUES
WRONG INCENTIVES DRIVING POLICIES
CORRUPTION OR FRAUD
POOR PERFORMANCE/ INCOMPETENCE
4%
10%
11%
35%
36%
TRANSPARENCY ISSUES
POOR PERFORMANCE/
INCOMPETENCE
LACK OF REGULATION OR CONTROL
CORRUPTION OR FRAUD
WRONG INCENTIVES DRIVING
BUSINESS DECISIONS
CORRUPTION/FRAUD IS A KEY REASON FOR DISTRUST IN BUSINESS AND GOVERNMENT,
INCOMPETENCE IS A LEADING FACTOR FOR GOVERNMENT – U.S.
REASONS FOR DECREASED BUSINESS AND GOVERNMENT TRUST
(AMONG THOSE WHO REPORTED TRUSTING BUSINESS OR GOVERNMENT LESS OVER THE PAST YEAR)
Q22. [ASK IF TRUST GOVERNMENTLESS IN Q18] Which of the following is the main reason why your trust in government decreased over the last year?; Q24. [ASK IF TRUST BUSINESS
LESS IN Q20] Which of the following is the main reason why your trust in business decreased over the last year? General Population in US
REASONS FOR TRUSTING
GOVERNMENT LESS
REASONS FOR TRUSTING
BUSINESS LESS
71% 65%
39
8%
6%
10%
20%
24%
13%
33%
38%
38%
55%
71%
41%
France
Germany
US
India
China
Global
Trust in Government
Trust Government Leaders to tell the truth
10%
13%
15%
34%
32%
18%
37%
42%
50%
68%
67%
50%
France
Germany
US
India
China
Global
Trust in Business
Trust Business Leaders to tell the Truth
LEADERSHIP TRUST GAP
GAP IN TRUST IN INSTITUTION VS. TRUST IN LEADERSHIP – SELECT COUNTRY OVERVIEW
Q11 -14. Below is a list of institutions. For each one, please indicate how much you trust that institution to do what is right using a 9-point scale where one means that you 'do not trust
them at all' and nine means that you 'trust them a great deal'. Q130-143. Below is a list of people. In general, when forming an opinion of a company, if you heard information about a
company from each person, how credible would the information be--extremely credible, very credible, somewhat credible, or not credible at all? General Population
-32
-35
-34
-35
-27
-28
-47
-35
-28
-25
-29
-32
40
GENERAL POPULATION
CEO
BOARD OF
DIRECTORS
ACADEMICS
TECHNICAL EXPERTS
ELITE MEDIA
Vertical Flow &
Controlled Information
PYRAMID of AUTHORITY
41
OLD MODELS
NO LONGER
WORK
IN ISOLATION
GENERAL POPULATION
EMPLOYEES
ACTION CONSUMERS
SOCIAL ACTIVISTS
Power of Peer-to-Peer &
Horizontal Communications
PYRAMID of COMMUNITY
New models
are firmly
established
42
THE NEW DYNAMICS OF ENGAGEMENT
LESSONS FOR LEADERS
44
Observe re-ordering of authority
Old values are not sufficient
Clear opportunity for business
Trust is fragile and perceived behaviors are an anchor
On the cover credits: HSBC: REUTERS/ Bobby Yip; UBS: REUTERS/Luke MacGregor; Bob Diamond: REUTERS/ Luke MacGregor; Bo Xilai: REUTERS/ Cheryl Ravelo ; Lance
Armstrong: by Sebastian David Tingkær; Angela Merkel: REUTERS/ Sebastien Pirlet; Rajat Gupta: REUTERS/ Brendan McDermid; George Entwistle: Associated Press/ Rex Featu
APPENDIX
INCLUDES INFORMED PUBLIC OR GENERAL PUBLIC VERSIONS OF SELECT SLIDES
TRUST AMONG EMERGING MARKETS HIGHER THAN TRUST AMONG
DEVELOPED MARKETS
TRUST IN ENERGY INDUSTRY BY REGION – GLOBAL OVERVIEW
53%
56%
67% 65% 63%
60%
42%
59% 59%
74%
64%
69%
64%
49%
Global US BRIC Latin America APAC North America EU
47 Q43-60. [TRACKING] Please indicate how much you trust businesses in each of the following industries to do what is right. Again, please use the same 9-point scale where one
means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal”. (Top 4 Box, Trust) Informed Public in 26 -country global total and across APAC, BRIC,
Latin America, North America and EU region
2012 2013
53%
78%
76%
72% 71%
67%
76%
67% 66%
71%
59%
56%
51%
47%
56%
51%
65%
45%
29%
39%
37%
49%
31% 31%
24%
52%
59%
86%
84%
75%
84%
81%
69% 71% 70%
72%
66%
45%
57% 56%
55%
59%
47%
60%
53%
49% 48%
54%
45% 45%
38% 38%
33%
2012 2013
50%
Q43-60. [TRACKING] Please indicate how much you trust businesses in each of the following industries to do what is right. Again, please use the same 9-point scale where one means
that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal”. (Top 4 Box, Trust) Informed Publlic in 26 -country global total and across 26 countries
OVER THE PAST YEAR, TRUST IN THE ENERGY INDUSTRY SIGNIFICANTLY INCREASED IN
SEVERAL MARKETS WITH GREATEST INCREASES SEEN IN JAPAN AND POLAND
2012 VS. 2013 TRUST IN ENERGY INDUSTRY– 26 MARKET OVERVIEW
48
n/a
2012 US Trust in Energy :56%
2013 US Trust in Energy: 59%
57% 56%
40%
35%
32%
51% 52%
38%
28% 27%
ONLINE SEARCH
ENGINES
TRADITIONAL MEDIA HYBRID MEDIA SOCIAL MEDIA OWNED MEDIA
Q178-182. When looking for general news and information, how much would you trust each type of source for general news and information? Please use a 9-point scale where one
means that you "do not trust it at all" and nine means that you "trust it a great deal". (Top 4 Box, Trust) General Population in US
SEARCH AND TRADITIONAL MEDIA CONTINUOUSLY PROVE MOST TRUSTED
AMONG THE GENERAL PUBLIC
TRUST IN MEDIA SOURCES – U.S.
49
2012 2013
61%
59%
46%
37% 36%
62% 62%
51%
39%
34%
TRADITIONAL MEDIA ONLINE SEARCH
ENGINES
HYBRID MEDIA SOCIAL MEDIA OWNED MEDIA
Q178-182. When looking for general news and information, how much would you trust each type of source for general news and information? Please use a 9-point scale where one
means that you "do not trust it at all" and nine means that you "trust it a great deal". (Top 4 Box, Trust) Informed Publics in US
TRADITIONAL MEDIA AND SEARCH CONTINUOUSLY PROVE MOST TRUSTED
AMONG INFORMED PUBLICS
TRUST IN MEDIA SOURCES – U.S.
50
2012 2013
TRUSTED SOURCES ARE EXPERTS AND PEERS
CREDIBLE SPOKESPEOPLE – U.S.
Q130-143. [TRACKING] Below is a list of people. In general, when forming an opinion of a company, if you heard information about a company from each person, how
credible would the information be--extremely credible, very credible, somewhat credible, or not credible at all? (Top 2 Box, Very/ Extremely Credible) General Population
in US
51
2012 2013
29%
37%
50%
52%
61%
66%
67%
68%
Government official or regulator
CEO
Financial or industry analyst
NGO representative
Regular employee
A technical expert
An academic or expert
A person like yourself 69%
66%
57%
57%
49%
48%
39%
30%
Academic or expert
Technical expert
A person like yourself
Regular employee
Financial or industry
analyst
NGO representative
CEO
Government official or
regulator
74%
69%
63%
56%
54%
52%
43%
41%
Academic or expert
Technical expert in the
company
A person like yourself
Regular employee
NGO representative
Financial or industry
analyst
CEO
Government official or
regulator
TRUSTED SOURCES ARE EXPERTS AND PEERS
CREDIBLE SPOKESPEOPLE – U.S.
31%
34%
47%
58%
62%
68%
71%
74%
Government official or regulator
CEO
Financial or industry analyst
NGO representative
Regular employee
A technical expert
A person like yourself
Academic or expert
20132012
Q130-143. [TRACKING] Below is a list of people. In general, when forming an opinion of a company, if you heard information about a company from each person, how
credible would the information be--extremely credible, very credible, somewhat credible, or not credible at all? (Top 2 Box, Very/ Extremely Credible) Informed publics
ages 25-64 in US52
Q43-60. [TRACKING] Please indicate how much you trust businesses in each of the following industries to do what is right. Again, please use the same 9-point scale
where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal”. (Top 4 Box, Trust) General Population in US
70%
67%
64%
62%
61%
61%
60%
57%
57%
55%
54%
53%
53%
48%
44%
43%
43%
38%
Technology
Consumer Electronics…
Food and Beverage
Brewing and Spirits
Aerospace & Defense
Automotive
Consumer Packaged Goods
Food Manufacturing
Metals Industry
Telecommunications
Consumer Health Companies
Energy
Entertainment
Pharmaceuticals
Chemicals
Banks
Financial Services
Media
TIED WITH THE ENTERTAINMENT INDUSTRY THIS YEAR, TRUST IN THE
ENERGY INDUSTRY RANKS NEAR THE BOTTOM
TRUST IN INDUSTRIES – U.S.
53
20132012
78%
70%
64%
60%
59%
58%
54%
51%
42%
41%
40%
Technology
Food & Beverage
Consumer Packaged
Goods
Automotive
Brewing & Spirits
Telecommunications
Energy
Pharmaceuticals
Banks
Financial Services
Media
Technology #1 in US
Technology #1 in US
SLIGHT UPTICKS IN MANY SCORES, INCLUDING ENERGY
TRUST IN INDUSTRIES – U.S.
20132012
Q43-60. [TRACKING] Please indicate how much you trust businesses in each of the following industries to do what is right. Again, please use the same 9-point scale where one
means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal”. (Top 4 Box, Trust) Informed Public ages 25-64 in US
54
80%
76%
75%
72%
71%
70%
70%
70%
69%
66%
64%
62%
59%
55%
55%
52%
50%
50%
Technology
Consumer electronics manufacturing
Brewing and spirits
Food and beverage4
Aerospace and defense
Metals industry
Automotive
Consumer packaged goods3
Food manufacturing
Telecommunications
Consumer health companies
Entertainment
Energy
Pharmaceuticals
Chemicals
Financial services
Banks
Media
41%
46%
48%
56%
56%
64%
66%
71%
74%
74%
83%
Banks
Financial services
Media
Energy
Pharmaceuticals
Telecommunications
Automotive
Brewing and spirits
Consumer packaged
goods
Food and beverage
Technology

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Was ist angesagt?

2015 Edelman Trust Barometer - Global Results
2015 Edelman Trust Barometer - Global Results2015 Edelman Trust Barometer - Global Results
2015 Edelman Trust Barometer - Global Results
Edelman
 

Was ist angesagt? (20)

2014 Edelman Trust Barometer - Global Results
2014 Edelman Trust Barometer - Global Results2014 Edelman Trust Barometer - Global Results
2014 Edelman Trust Barometer - Global Results
 
2015 Edelman Trust Barometer - Financial Services Results
2015 Edelman Trust Barometer - Financial Services Results2015 Edelman Trust Barometer - Financial Services Results
2015 Edelman Trust Barometer - Financial Services Results
 
2015 Edelman Trust Barometer - Energy Sector Results
2015 Edelman Trust Barometer - Energy Sector Results2015 Edelman Trust Barometer - Energy Sector Results
2015 Edelman Trust Barometer - Energy Sector Results
 
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer - Technology Results
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer - Technology Results2016 Edelman Trust Barometer - Technology Results
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer - Technology Results
 
Edelman Trust Barometer 2017 - UK Results
Edelman Trust Barometer 2017 - UK ResultsEdelman Trust Barometer 2017 - UK Results
Edelman Trust Barometer 2017 - UK Results
 
Predictive Data & Ambient Intelligence
Predictive Data & Ambient IntelligencePredictive Data & Ambient Intelligence
Predictive Data & Ambient Intelligence
 
Edelman Trust Barometer 2015 - UK Results
Edelman Trust Barometer 2015 - UK Results Edelman Trust Barometer 2015 - UK Results
Edelman Trust Barometer 2015 - UK Results
 
Edelman Trust Barometer 2016 - Ireland
Edelman Trust Barometer 2016 - IrelandEdelman Trust Barometer 2016 - Ireland
Edelman Trust Barometer 2016 - Ireland
 
2015 Edelman Trust Barometer: Canadian Results
2015 Edelman Trust Barometer: Canadian Results2015 Edelman Trust Barometer: Canadian Results
2015 Edelman Trust Barometer: Canadian Results
 
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer New Zealand
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer New Zealand2016 Edelman Trust Barometer New Zealand
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer New Zealand
 
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer - Healthcare Sector Results
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer - Healthcare Sector Results2016 Edelman Trust Barometer - Healthcare Sector Results
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer - Healthcare Sector Results
 
CFA Institute & Edelman Investor Trust Study
CFA Institute & Edelman Investor Trust StudyCFA Institute & Edelman Investor Trust Study
CFA Institute & Edelman Investor Trust Study
 
Edelman Trust Barometer 2016 Indonesia
Edelman Trust Barometer 2016 IndonesiaEdelman Trust Barometer 2016 Indonesia
Edelman Trust Barometer 2016 Indonesia
 
2014 Edelman Trust Barometer: Canadian Findings
2014 Edelman Trust Barometer: Canadian Findings2014 Edelman Trust Barometer: Canadian Findings
2014 Edelman Trust Barometer: Canadian Findings
 
Our Changing Relationship with Brands - The Inversion of Influence
Our Changing Relationship with Brands - The Inversion of InfluenceOur Changing Relationship with Brands - The Inversion of Influence
Our Changing Relationship with Brands - The Inversion of Influence
 
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Singapore
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Singapore2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Singapore
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Singapore
 
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer - Energy Results
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer - Energy Results2016 Edelman Trust Barometer - Energy Results
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer - Energy Results
 
Edelman Trust Barometer 2015 - Food & Beverage - European Results
Edelman Trust Barometer 2015 - Food & Beverage - European ResultsEdelman Trust Barometer 2015 - Food & Beverage - European Results
Edelman Trust Barometer 2015 - Food & Beverage - European Results
 
2015 Edelman Trust Barometer - Global Results
2015 Edelman Trust Barometer - Global Results2015 Edelman Trust Barometer - Global Results
2015 Edelman Trust Barometer - Global Results
 
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Korea
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Korea2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Korea
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Korea
 

Andere mochten auch

Ahmed_SAMIR_cv[1-1]
Ahmed_SAMIR_cv[1-1]Ahmed_SAMIR_cv[1-1]
Ahmed_SAMIR_cv[1-1]
ahmedcmi
 
ENJ-400 Mejora Contínua al Programa Formación de Derecho Civil
ENJ-400 Mejora Contínua al Programa Formación de Derecho CivilENJ-400 Mejora Contínua al Programa Formación de Derecho Civil
ENJ-400 Mejora Contínua al Programa Formación de Derecho Civil
ENJ
 
ENJ-300 Atribuciones Penales Del Juzgado De Paz
ENJ-300 Atribuciones Penales Del Juzgado De PazENJ-300 Atribuciones Penales Del Juzgado De Paz
ENJ-300 Atribuciones Penales Del Juzgado De Paz
ENJ
 

Andere mochten auch (20)

Big data minute privacy
Big data minute privacyBig data minute privacy
Big data minute privacy
 
Applic group michel tassen
Applic group michel tassenApplic group michel tassen
Applic group michel tassen
 
Java 2016- projects list
Java   2016- projects listJava   2016- projects list
Java 2016- projects list
 
Ahmed_SAMIR_cv[1-1]
Ahmed_SAMIR_cv[1-1]Ahmed_SAMIR_cv[1-1]
Ahmed_SAMIR_cv[1-1]
 
Ps 2016- projects list
Ps  2016- projects listPs  2016- projects list
Ps 2016- projects list
 
ANALYTIC QUERIES OVER GEOSPATIAL TIME-SERIES DATA USING DISTRIBUTED HASH TABLES
ANALYTIC QUERIES OVER GEOSPATIAL TIME-SERIES DATA USING DISTRIBUTED HASH TABLESANALYTIC QUERIES OVER GEOSPATIAL TIME-SERIES DATA USING DISTRIBUTED HASH TABLES
ANALYTIC QUERIES OVER GEOSPATIAL TIME-SERIES DATA USING DISTRIBUTED HASH TABLES
 
Rapidminer: Important Elements
Rapidminer: Important ElementsRapidminer: Important Elements
Rapidminer: Important Elements
 
Dm gillio
Dm gillioDm gillio
Dm gillio
 
Intracto
IntractoIntracto
Intracto
 
A parallel patient treatment time prediction algorithm and its applications i...
A parallel patient treatment time prediction algorithm and its applications i...A parallel patient treatment time prediction algorithm and its applications i...
A parallel patient treatment time prediction algorithm and its applications i...
 
Embedded system
Embedded systemEmbedded system
Embedded system
 
Automatically mining facets for queries from their search results
Automatically mining facets for queries from their search resultsAutomatically mining facets for queries from their search results
Automatically mining facets for queries from their search results
 
L'observatoire des millennials
L'observatoire des millennialsL'observatoire des millennials
L'observatoire des millennials
 
Cloud centric multi-level authentication as a service for secure public safet...
Cloud centric multi-level authentication as a service for secure public safet...Cloud centric multi-level authentication as a service for secure public safet...
Cloud centric multi-level authentication as a service for secure public safet...
 
ENJ-400 Mejora Contínua al Programa Formación de Derecho Civil
ENJ-400 Mejora Contínua al Programa Formación de Derecho CivilENJ-400 Mejora Contínua al Programa Formación de Derecho Civil
ENJ-400 Mejora Contínua al Programa Formación de Derecho Civil
 
RAPIDMINER: Rapidminerproducts
RAPIDMINER: RapidminerproductsRAPIDMINER: Rapidminerproducts
RAPIDMINER: Rapidminerproducts
 
Rapid miner
Rapid minerRapid miner
Rapid miner
 
Sociologie de l'alimentation: L'espace social alimentaire : un concept pour é...
Sociologie de l'alimentation: L'espace social alimentaire : un concept pour é...Sociologie de l'alimentation: L'espace social alimentaire : un concept pour é...
Sociologie de l'alimentation: L'espace social alimentaire : un concept pour é...
 
Protection of big data privacy
Protection of big data privacyProtection of big data privacy
Protection of big data privacy
 
ENJ-300 Atribuciones Penales Del Juzgado De Paz
ENJ-300 Atribuciones Penales Del Juzgado De PazENJ-300 Atribuciones Penales Del Juzgado De Paz
ENJ-300 Atribuciones Penales Del Juzgado De Paz
 

Ähnlich wie Edelman Trust Barometer: U.S. Energy Industry

2013 Edelman Trust Barometer Global
2013 Edelman Trust Barometer Global2013 Edelman Trust Barometer Global
2013 Edelman Trust Barometer Global
Edelman APACMEA
 
2013 Edelman Trust Barometer APAC
2013 Edelman Trust Barometer APAC2013 Edelman Trust Barometer APAC
2013 Edelman Trust Barometer APAC
Edelman APACMEA
 
2013 edelman-trust-barometer-china-deck-en
2013 edelman-trust-barometer-china-deck-en2013 edelman-trust-barometer-china-deck-en
2013 edelman-trust-barometer-china-deck-en
DJECHINA
 
Trust 2014 indonesia and global
Trust 2014   indonesia and globalTrust 2014   indonesia and global
Trust 2014 indonesia and global
Edelman Indonesia
 
Edelman Ireland 2014 Trust Barometer
Edelman Ireland 2014 Trust BarometerEdelman Ireland 2014 Trust Barometer
Edelman Ireland 2014 Trust Barometer
Edelman
 
2014 trust barometer china final-en -0216
2014 trust barometer china final-en -02162014 trust barometer china final-en -0216
2014 trust barometer china final-en -0216
DJECHINA
 
2014 Edelman Trust Barometer: Singapore Results
2014 Edelman Trust Barometer: Singapore Results2014 Edelman Trust Barometer: Singapore Results
2014 Edelman Trust Barometer: Singapore Results
David Brain
 
2013 Emerging Markets Supplement to the Edelman Trust Barometer
2013 Emerging Markets Supplement to the Edelman Trust Barometer2013 Emerging Markets Supplement to the Edelman Trust Barometer
2013 Emerging Markets Supplement to the Edelman Trust Barometer
Edelman APACMEA
 

Ähnlich wie Edelman Trust Barometer: U.S. Energy Industry (20)

2013 Edelman Trust Barometer Global
2013 Edelman Trust Barometer Global2013 Edelman Trust Barometer Global
2013 Edelman Trust Barometer Global
 
2013 Edelman Trust Barometer APAC
2013 Edelman Trust Barometer APAC2013 Edelman Trust Barometer APAC
2013 Edelman Trust Barometer APAC
 
Edelman Global Trust Barometer Results - How it Matters to Your Business
Edelman Global Trust Barometer Results - How it Matters to Your BusinessEdelman Global Trust Barometer Results - How it Matters to Your Business
Edelman Global Trust Barometer Results - How it Matters to Your Business
 
2013 edelman-trust-barometer-china-deck-en
2013 edelman-trust-barometer-china-deck-en2013 edelman-trust-barometer-china-deck-en
2013 edelman-trust-barometer-china-deck-en
 
2015 Edelman Trust Barometer Malaysia
2015 Edelman Trust Barometer Malaysia2015 Edelman Trust Barometer Malaysia
2015 Edelman Trust Barometer Malaysia
 
Trust 2014 indonesia and global
Trust 2014   indonesia and globalTrust 2014   indonesia and global
Trust 2014 indonesia and global
 
Edelman Ireland 2014 Trust Barometer
Edelman Ireland 2014 Trust BarometerEdelman Ireland 2014 Trust Barometer
Edelman Ireland 2014 Trust Barometer
 
2014 Edelman Trust Barometer: Brazil Findings
2014 Edelman Trust Barometer: Brazil Findings2014 Edelman Trust Barometer: Brazil Findings
2014 Edelman Trust Barometer: Brazil Findings
 
2015 Edelman Trust Barometer Indonesia
2015 Edelman Trust Barometer Indonesia2015 Edelman Trust Barometer Indonesia
2015 Edelman Trust Barometer Indonesia
 
The Edelman Trust Barometer 2015 Global & Indonesia Results
The Edelman Trust Barometer 2015 Global & Indonesia ResultsThe Edelman Trust Barometer 2015 Global & Indonesia Results
The Edelman Trust Barometer 2015 Global & Indonesia Results
 
2014 trust barometer china final-en -0216
2014 trust barometer china final-en -02162014 trust barometer china final-en -0216
2014 trust barometer china final-en -0216
 
Asef speech 030613
Asef speech  030613Asef speech  030613
Asef speech 030613
 
2016 Edelman TRUST BAROMETER - Global Results
2016 Edelman TRUST BAROMETER - Global Results2016 Edelman TRUST BAROMETER - Global Results
2016 Edelman TRUST BAROMETER - Global Results
 
Barómetro sobre CONFIANZA de Edelman 2016
Barómetro sobre CONFIANZA de Edelman 2016Barómetro sobre CONFIANZA de Edelman 2016
Barómetro sobre CONFIANZA de Edelman 2016
 
2016 trust barometer global master deck woolf institute
2016 trust barometer global master deck   woolf institute2016 trust barometer global master deck   woolf institute
2016 trust barometer global master deck woolf institute
 
2014 Edelman Trust Barometer: Singapore Results
2014 Edelman Trust Barometer: Singapore Results2014 Edelman Trust Barometer: Singapore Results
2014 Edelman Trust Barometer: Singapore Results
 
Trust Barometer 2014 Hong Kong Launch Presentation
Trust Barometer 2014 Hong Kong Launch PresentationTrust Barometer 2014 Hong Kong Launch Presentation
Trust Barometer 2014 Hong Kong Launch Presentation
 
2013 Emerging Markets Supplement to the Edelman Trust Barometer
2013 Emerging Markets Supplement to the Edelman Trust Barometer2013 Emerging Markets Supplement to the Edelman Trust Barometer
2013 Emerging Markets Supplement to the Edelman Trust Barometer
 
Edelman Trust Barometer 2016: Ergebnisse Financial Services
Edelman Trust Barometer 2016: Ergebnisse Financial ServicesEdelman Trust Barometer 2016: Ergebnisse Financial Services
Edelman Trust Barometer 2016: Ergebnisse Financial Services
 
2013 Emerging Markets Supplement: Edelman Trust Barometer
2013 Emerging Markets Supplement: Edelman Trust Barometer2013 Emerging Markets Supplement: Edelman Trust Barometer
2013 Emerging Markets Supplement: Edelman Trust Barometer
 

Mehr von Edelman

Mehr von Edelman (20)

2020 Edelman-LinkedIn B2B Thought Leadership Impact Study_U.S.
2020 Edelman-LinkedIn B2B Thought Leadership Impact Study_U.S.2020 Edelman-LinkedIn B2B Thought Leadership Impact Study_U.S.
2020 Edelman-LinkedIn B2B Thought Leadership Impact Study_U.S.
 
2020 Edelman-LinkedIn B2B Thought Leadership Impact Study_GLOBAL
2020 Edelman-LinkedIn B2B Thought Leadership Impact Study_GLOBAL2020 Edelman-LinkedIn B2B Thought Leadership Impact Study_GLOBAL
2020 Edelman-LinkedIn B2B Thought Leadership Impact Study_GLOBAL
 
2019 Edelman-LinkedIn B2B Thought Leadership Impact Study
2019 Edelman-LinkedIn B2B Thought Leadership Impact Study2019 Edelman-LinkedIn B2B Thought Leadership Impact Study
2019 Edelman-LinkedIn B2B Thought Leadership Impact Study
 
2018 Federal Cabinet Shuffle
2018 Federal Cabinet Shuffle2018 Federal Cabinet Shuffle
2018 Federal Cabinet Shuffle
 
The Edelman Perspective - 2018 Federal Cabinet Shuffle
The Edelman Perspective - 2018 Federal Cabinet ShuffleThe Edelman Perspective - 2018 Federal Cabinet Shuffle
The Edelman Perspective - 2018 Federal Cabinet Shuffle
 
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer: Attitudes Toward Energy in a Polarized World
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer: Attitudes Toward Energy in a Polarized World 2018 Edelman Trust Barometer: Attitudes Toward Energy in a Polarized World
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer: Attitudes Toward Energy in a Polarized World
 
Edelman Trust Barometer – U.S. Natural Gas Industry Perceptions
Edelman Trust Barometer – U.S. Natural Gas Industry PerceptionsEdelman Trust Barometer – U.S. Natural Gas Industry Perceptions
Edelman Trust Barometer – U.S. Natural Gas Industry Perceptions
 
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer Special Report: Institutional Investors
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer Special Report: Institutional Investors2017 Edelman Trust Barometer Special Report: Institutional Investors
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer Special Report: Institutional Investors
 
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer Special Report: Investor Trust Executive Summary
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer Special Report: Investor Trust Executive Summary2017 Edelman Trust Barometer Special Report: Investor Trust Executive Summary
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer Special Report: Investor Trust Executive Summary
 
8 Trends That Will Shape Travel in 2018
8 Trends That Will Shape Travel in 20188 Trends That Will Shape Travel in 2018
8 Trends That Will Shape Travel in 2018
 
The Edelman Perspective - Ontario Budget 2018
The Edelman Perspective - Ontario Budget 2018The Edelman Perspective - Ontario Budget 2018
The Edelman Perspective - Ontario Budget 2018
 
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer Special Report: Trust in Brand China
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer Special Report:  Trust in Brand China2018 Edelman Trust Barometer Special Report:  Trust in Brand China
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer Special Report: Trust in Brand China
 
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Italy Report
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Italy Report 2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Italy Report
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Italy Report
 
Tendências em Viagens e Turismo na América Latina em 2018
Tendências em Viagens e Turismo na América Latina em 2018Tendências em Viagens e Turismo na América Latina em 2018
Tendências em Viagens e Turismo na América Latina em 2018
 
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - UAE
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - UAE2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - UAE
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - UAE
 
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Malaysia Report
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Malaysia Report2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Malaysia Report
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Malaysia Report
 
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Australia Results
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Australia Results2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Australia Results
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Australia Results
 
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Africa Report
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Africa Report2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Africa Report
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Africa Report
 
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Brasil Report
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Brasil Report2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Brasil Report
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Brasil Report
 
Edelman 2018 Federal Budget Update
Edelman 2018 Federal Budget UpdateEdelman 2018 Federal Budget Update
Edelman 2018 Federal Budget Update
 

Kürzlich hochgeladen

Cloud Frontiers: A Deep Dive into Serverless Spatial Data and FME
Cloud Frontiers:  A Deep Dive into Serverless Spatial Data and FMECloud Frontiers:  A Deep Dive into Serverless Spatial Data and FME
Cloud Frontiers: A Deep Dive into Serverless Spatial Data and FME
Safe Software
 
Architecting Cloud Native Applications
Architecting Cloud Native ApplicationsArchitecting Cloud Native Applications
Architecting Cloud Native Applications
WSO2
 

Kürzlich hochgeladen (20)

Corporate and higher education May webinar.pptx
Corporate and higher education May webinar.pptxCorporate and higher education May webinar.pptx
Corporate and higher education May webinar.pptx
 
Introduction to Multilingual Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG)
Introduction to Multilingual Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG)Introduction to Multilingual Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG)
Introduction to Multilingual Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG)
 
TrustArc Webinar - Unlock the Power of AI-Driven Data Discovery
TrustArc Webinar - Unlock the Power of AI-Driven Data DiscoveryTrustArc Webinar - Unlock the Power of AI-Driven Data Discovery
TrustArc Webinar - Unlock the Power of AI-Driven Data Discovery
 
How to Troubleshoot Apps for the Modern Connected Worker
How to Troubleshoot Apps for the Modern Connected WorkerHow to Troubleshoot Apps for the Modern Connected Worker
How to Troubleshoot Apps for the Modern Connected Worker
 
DBX First Quarter 2024 Investor Presentation
DBX First Quarter 2024 Investor PresentationDBX First Quarter 2024 Investor Presentation
DBX First Quarter 2024 Investor Presentation
 
Web Form Automation for Bonterra Impact Management (fka Social Solutions Apri...
Web Form Automation for Bonterra Impact Management (fka Social Solutions Apri...Web Form Automation for Bonterra Impact Management (fka Social Solutions Apri...
Web Form Automation for Bonterra Impact Management (fka Social Solutions Apri...
 
Mcleodganj Call Girls 🥰 8617370543 Service Offer VIP Hot Model
Mcleodganj Call Girls 🥰 8617370543 Service Offer VIP Hot ModelMcleodganj Call Girls 🥰 8617370543 Service Offer VIP Hot Model
Mcleodganj Call Girls 🥰 8617370543 Service Offer VIP Hot Model
 
Cloud Frontiers: A Deep Dive into Serverless Spatial Data and FME
Cloud Frontiers:  A Deep Dive into Serverless Spatial Data and FMECloud Frontiers:  A Deep Dive into Serverless Spatial Data and FME
Cloud Frontiers: A Deep Dive into Serverless Spatial Data and FME
 
"I see eyes in my soup": How Delivery Hero implemented the safety system for ...
"I see eyes in my soup": How Delivery Hero implemented the safety system for ..."I see eyes in my soup": How Delivery Hero implemented the safety system for ...
"I see eyes in my soup": How Delivery Hero implemented the safety system for ...
 
Vector Search -An Introduction in Oracle Database 23ai.pptx
Vector Search -An Introduction in Oracle Database 23ai.pptxVector Search -An Introduction in Oracle Database 23ai.pptx
Vector Search -An Introduction in Oracle Database 23ai.pptx
 
Exploring Multimodal Embeddings with Milvus
Exploring Multimodal Embeddings with MilvusExploring Multimodal Embeddings with Milvus
Exploring Multimodal Embeddings with Milvus
 
Rising Above_ Dubai Floods and the Fortitude of Dubai International Airport.pdf
Rising Above_ Dubai Floods and the Fortitude of Dubai International Airport.pdfRising Above_ Dubai Floods and the Fortitude of Dubai International Airport.pdf
Rising Above_ Dubai Floods and the Fortitude of Dubai International Airport.pdf
 
presentation ICT roal in 21st century education
presentation ICT roal in 21st century educationpresentation ICT roal in 21st century education
presentation ICT roal in 21st century education
 
Architecting Cloud Native Applications
Architecting Cloud Native ApplicationsArchitecting Cloud Native Applications
Architecting Cloud Native Applications
 
Six Myths about Ontologies: The Basics of Formal Ontology
Six Myths about Ontologies: The Basics of Formal OntologySix Myths about Ontologies: The Basics of Formal Ontology
Six Myths about Ontologies: The Basics of Formal Ontology
 
Connector Corner: Accelerate revenue generation using UiPath API-centric busi...
Connector Corner: Accelerate revenue generation using UiPath API-centric busi...Connector Corner: Accelerate revenue generation using UiPath API-centric busi...
Connector Corner: Accelerate revenue generation using UiPath API-centric busi...
 
Apidays New York 2024 - Scaling API-first by Ian Reasor and Radu Cotescu, Adobe
Apidays New York 2024 - Scaling API-first by Ian Reasor and Radu Cotescu, AdobeApidays New York 2024 - Scaling API-first by Ian Reasor and Radu Cotescu, Adobe
Apidays New York 2024 - Scaling API-first by Ian Reasor and Radu Cotescu, Adobe
 
Strategize a Smooth Tenant-to-tenant Migration and Copilot Takeoff
Strategize a Smooth Tenant-to-tenant Migration and Copilot TakeoffStrategize a Smooth Tenant-to-tenant Migration and Copilot Takeoff
Strategize a Smooth Tenant-to-tenant Migration and Copilot Takeoff
 
Apidays New York 2024 - Passkeys: Developing APIs to enable passwordless auth...
Apidays New York 2024 - Passkeys: Developing APIs to enable passwordless auth...Apidays New York 2024 - Passkeys: Developing APIs to enable passwordless auth...
Apidays New York 2024 - Passkeys: Developing APIs to enable passwordless auth...
 
DEV meet-up UiPath Document Understanding May 7 2024 Amsterdam
DEV meet-up UiPath Document Understanding May 7 2024 AmsterdamDEV meet-up UiPath Document Understanding May 7 2024 Amsterdam
DEV meet-up UiPath Document Understanding May 7 2024 Amsterdam
 

Edelman Trust Barometer: U.S. Energy Industry

  • 2. EDELMAN'S 13TH ANNUAL SURVEY, LARGEST GLOBAL EXPLORATION OF TRUST 2 ONLINE SURVEY IN 26 COUNTRIES • 31,000+ respondents • 5 years in 20+ markets • 8 years in 10+ markets GENERAL POPULATION • 1000 respondents per country surveyed • Ages 18+ • 2 years of data INFORMED PUBLICS • 500 respondents in U.S. and China & 200 in other countries • Ages 25-64 • College-educated • In top 25% of household income per age group in each country • Report significant media consumption and engagement in business news and public policy • 13 years of data
  • 3. 2013 RISING INFLUENCE OF NGOS2001 FALL OF THE CELEBRITY CEO2002 EARNED MEDIA MORE CREDIBLE THAN ADVERTISING2003 U.S. COMPANIES IN EUROPE SUFFER TRUST DISCOUNT2004 TRUST SHIFTS FROM “AUTHORITIES” TO PEERS2005 “A PERSON LIKE ME” EMERGES AS CREDIBLE SPOKESPERSON2006 BUSINESS MORE TRUSTED THAN GOVERNMENT AND MEDIA2007 YOUNG INFLUENCERS HAVE MORE TRUST IN BUSINESS2008 BUSINESS MUST PARTNER WITH GOVERNMENT TO REGAIN TRUST2009 TRUST IS NOW AN ESSENTIAL LINE OF BUSINESS2010 RISE OF AUTHORITY FIGURES2011 THE FALL OF GOVERNMENT2012 CRISIS OF LEADERSHIP EDELMAN TRUST BAROMETER IN RETROSPECT 3
  • 4. TRUST 2013 ENERGY INDUSTRY DEEP DIVE THE PATH FORWARD: TRUST BUILDING, TRUSTED SOURCES AND COMMUNICATION IMPLICATIONS THE STATE OF TRUST 4
  • 6. GLOBAL 57 China 80 Singapore 76 India 71 Mexico 68 Hong Kong 67 UAE 66 Malaysia 64 Canada 62 Indonesia 62 U.S. 59 Netherlands 59 Brazil 55 Germany 55 France 54 Sweden 54 UK 53 Italy 51 Australia 50 Poland 48 S. Korea 47 Ireland 46 Argentina 45 Spain 42 Turkey 42 Japan 41 Russia 36 2011 20132012 DISTRUSTERSTRUSTERSNEUTRAL GLOBAL 51 China 76 UAE 68 Singapore 67 India 65 Indonesia 63 Mexico 63 Netherlands 61 Hong Kong 61 Canada 58 Malaysia 57 Italy 56 Argentina 54 Australia 53 Brazil 51 Sweden 49 U.S. 49 South Korea 44 Poland 44 U.K. 41 Ireland 41 France 40 Germany 39 Spain 37 Japan 34 Russia 32 EDELMAN’S TRUST INDEX: AFTER A YEAR OF HIGH DISTRUST IN 2012, SHIFT BACK TO NEUTRAL IN 2013 GLOBAL 55 Brazil 80 UAE 78 Indonesia 74 China 73 Netherlands 73 Mexico 69 Singapore 67 Argentina 62 India 56 Italy 56 Canada 55 South Korea 53 Sweden 52 Japan 51 Australia 51 Spain 51 France 50 Poland 49 Germany 44 U.S. 42 U.K. 40 Russia 40 Ireland 39 Composite score is an average of a country’s trust in all four institutions. Informed Publics ages 25-64 in 20-country global total 6 Big Changes from 2008 Germany +19 China +18 Canada +14 India +11 Big Changes from 2012 Germany +16 France +14 UK +12 US +10
  • 7. 2013 7 GLOBAL 57 China 80 Singapore 76 India 71 Mexico 68 Hong Kong 67 UAE 66 Malaysia 64 Canada 62 Indonesia 62 U.S. 59 Netherlands 59 Brazil 55 Germany 55 France 54 Sweden 54 UK 53 Italy 51 Australia 50 Poland 48 S. Korea 47 Ireland 46 Argentina 45 Spain 42 Turkey 42 Japan 41 Russia 36 GLOBAL 48 China 70 India 64 UAE 63 Singapore 63 Indonesia 61 Malaysia 61 Mexico 59 Hong Kong 54 Canada 52 Brazil 51 Netherlands 50 Argentina 48 U.S. 45 Germany 44 UK 43 S. Korea 43 Turkey 43 France 41 Italy 40 Sweden 40 Australia 39 Spain 37 Japan 35 Poland 34 Ireland 33 Russia 30 Composite score is an average of a country’s trust in all four institutions. General population and Informed Publics ages 25-64 in 26 country global total and across 26 countries Largest Differences between General & Informed Publics Poland, US, Sweden: - 14 points Singapore, Ireland, Hong Kong, France: - 13 points General Population 9 points lower than Informed Publics INFORMED PUBLIC 2013GENERAL PUBLIC DISTRUSTERSTRUSTERSNEUTRAL LOWER TRUST AMONG GENERAL POPULATION THAN INFORMED PUBLICS
  • 8. 54% 39% 50% 43% 56% 59% 59% 36% 54% 46% 50% 62% 43% 30% 46% 40% 43% 53% 63% 45% 63% 55% 58% 70% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Energy Business Government NGOs TRUST IN INSTITUTIONS RISE PAST 2010 HIGHS TRUST IN INSTITUTIONS – INFORMED PUBLICS AGES 35-64 – U.S. Q11-14. [TRACKING] Below is a list of institutions. For each one, please indicate how much you trust that institution to do what is right using a 9-point scale where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal”. (Top 4 Box, Trust) Informed Publics ages 35-64 in US 8 2008 16 point gap between business & government trust 2013 Business, energy & government trust are all within 9 points NGOs
  • 9. Q11-14. [TRACKING] Below is a list of institutions. For each one, please indicate how much you trust that institution to do what is right using a 9-point scale where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal”. (Top 2 Box, Trust a great deal and Top 4 Box, Trust) Informed Publics ages 25-64 in US TRUST ON THE RISE ACROSS INSTITUTIONS TRUST IN INSTITUTIONS – U.S. 9 2012 Total Trust 2013 Total Trust 45% 51% US 2012 Total Trust 2013 Total Trust 58% 70% US 2012 Total Trust 2013 Total Trust NGOS BUSINESS MEDIA GOVERNMENT 2012 Total Trust 2013 Total Trust 43% 53% US 50% 62% US ENERGY 2012 Total Trust 2013 Total Trust 56% 59%
  • 10. 59% 82% 64% 49% 74% 56% 81% 44% 56% 52% 44% 40% 62% 56% 47% 48% 63% 58% 48% 61% 60% 77% 44% 58% 65% 74% 31% 50% 41% 33% 19% 47% 30% 57% 20% 35% 32% 32% 29% 53% 47% 40% 43% 60% 58% 48% 62% 63% 82% 49% 65% 73% 81% 44% Q11-14. [Business in General and Government in General] Below is a list of institutions. For each one, please indicate how much you trust that institution to do what is right using a 9-point scale where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal”. (Top 4 Box, Trust) Informed Publics ages 25-64 in 26-country global total and across 26 countries BUSINESS TRUSTED MORE THAN GOVERNMENT IN 16 OF 26 MARKETS SURVEYED TRUST IN BUSINESS VS. GOVERNMENT - 26 MARKET OVERVIEW Government Business GAP BETWEEN BUSINESS & GOVERNMENT GROWING Globally, largest gap since 2007* US Trust in Business: 62% US Trust in Government: 53% US Trust in Energy: 59% 10
  • 11. SLIGHT UPTICKS IN MANY SCORES, INCLUDING ENERGY TRUST IN INDUSTRIES – U.S. Q43-60. [TRACKING] Please indicate how much you trust businesses in each of the following industries to do what is right. Again, please use the same 9-point scale where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal”. (Top 4 Box, Trust) Informed Public ages 25-64 in US 11 Q43-60. [TRACKING] Please indicate how much you trust businesses in each of the following industries to do what is right. Again, please use the same 9-point scale where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal”. (Top 4 Box, Trust) Informed Publics ages 25-64 (only industries tracked from 2012 to 2013 shown) 80% 75% 72% 70% 70% 66% 59% 55% 52% 50% 50% Technology Brewing and spirits Food and beverage Automotive Consumer packaged goods Telecommunications Energy Pharmaceuticals Financial services Banks Media 20132012 41% 46% 48% 56% 56% 64% 66% 71% 74% 74% 83% Banks Financial services Media Energy Pharmaceuticals Telecommunications Automotive Brewing and spirits Consumer packaged goods Food and beverage Technology Technology #1 in all markets surveyed
  • 13. 50% Trust in Business 53% Trust in the Energy Industry THE GENERAL PUBLIC IS MORE TRUSTING OF THE ENERGY INDUSTRY THAN BUSINESS OVERALL TRUST IN ENERGY INDUSTRY VS. TRUST IN BUSINESS – U.S. Q11-14. [TRACKING] Below is a list of institutions. For each one, please indicate how much you trust that institution to do what is right using a 9-point scale where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal”.; Q43-60. [TRACKING] Please indicate how much you trust businesses in each of the following industries to do what is right. Again, please use the same 9-point scale where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal”. (Top 4 Box, Trust) General Population in US 13 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Energy Industry Trust (53%) Business Trust (50%)
  • 14. 14 57% 61% 69% 55% 49% 80% 54% 80% 75% 69% 43% 42% 47% 71% 76% 67% 76% 49% 55% 49% 57% 53% 52% 37% 40% 36% 37% 50% 35% 43% 37% 32% 67% 42% 68% 64% 58% 34% 33% 38% 63% 69% 60% 69% 44% 51% 45% 53% 50% 54% 42% 48% 44% 49% Energy Industry Business ENERGY INDUSTRY MORE TRUSTED THAN BUSINESS IN 21 OF 26 MARKETS; LARGEST DIFFERENCES SEEN IN SOUTH KOREA AND HONG KONG TRUST IN ENERGY INDUSTRY VS. BUSINESS IN GENERAL – 26 MARKET OVERVIEW Q11-1[TRACKING] Below is a list of institutions. For each one, please indicate how much you trust that institution to do what is right using a 9-point scale where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal”.; Q43-60. [TRACKING] Please indicate how much you trust businesses in each of the following industries to do what is right. Again, please use the same 9-point scale where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal”. (Top 4 Box, Trust) General Population in 26 -country global total and across 26 countries J US Trust in Energy :53% US Trust in Business: 50%
  • 15. 54% 39% 50% 43% 56% 59% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 TRUST IN ENERGY INDUSTRY RISES PAST 2008 PRE-RECESSION LEVELS TRUST IN ENERGY INDUSTRY – (INFORMED PUBLICS AGES 35-64) – U.S. 15 Q43-60. [TRACKING] Please indicate how much you trust businesses in each of the following industries to do what is right. Again, please use the same 9-point scale where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal”. (Top 4 Box, Trust) Informed Public in US
  • 16. TRUST AMONG EMERGING MARKETS HIGHER THAN TRUST AMONG DEVELOPED MARKETS TRUST IN ENERGY INDUSTRY BY REGION – GLOBAL OVERVIEW 53% 54% 62% 61% 61% 58% 43% 57% 53% 70% 67% 66% 61% 45% Global US BRIC Latin America APAC North America EU 16 Q43-60. [TRACKING] Please indicate how much you trust businesses in each of the following industries to do what is right. Again, please use the same 9-point scale where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal”. (Top 4 Box, Trust) General Population in 26 -country global total and across APAC, BRIC, Latin America, North America and EU region 2012 2013
  • 17. 53% 68% 74% 66% 66% 65% 68% 64% 68% 69% 56% 52% 54% 50% 54% 52% 58% 43% 38% 43% 37% 46% 30% 29% 30% 41% 57% 80% 80% 76% 76% 75% 71% 69% 69% 67% 61% 57% 55% 55% 54% 53% 52% 49% 49% 49% 47% 43% 42% 40% 37% 37% 36% 2012 2013 50% Q43-60. [TRACKING] Please indicate how much you trust businesses in each of the following industries to do what is right. Again, please use the same 9-point scale where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal”. (Top 4 Box, Trust) General Population in 26 -country global total and across 26 countries OVER THE PAST YEAR, TRUST IN THE ENERGY INDUSTRY SIGNIFICANTLY INCREASED IN SEVERAL MARKETS WITH GREATEST INCREASES SEEN IN INDIA AND JAPAN 2012 VS. 2013 TRUST IN ENERGY INDUSTRY– 26 MARKET OVERVIEW 17 n/a 2012 US Trust in Energy :54% 2013 US Trust in Energy: 53%
  • 18. 57% 80% 80% 76% 76% 75% 71% 69% 69% 67% 61% 57% 55% 55% 54% 53% 52% 49% 49% 49% 47% 43% 42% 40% 37% 37% 36% 23% 7% 8% 13% 9% 7% 12% 16% 12% 8% 14% 23% 25% 25% 29% 26% 23% 31% 28% 21% 33% 35% 34% 34% 40% 41% 42% Trust in Energy Industry Distrust in Energy Industry Q43-60. [TRACKING] Please indicate how much you trust businesses in each of the following industries to do what is right. Again, please use the same 9-point scale where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal”. (Top 4 Box, Trust and Bottom 4 Box, Distrust) General Population in 26 -country global total and across 26 countries TRUST HIGHER THAN DISTRUST IN MAJORITY OF MARKETS; DISTRUST HIGHEST IN UK, GERMANY AND AUSTRALIA TRUST IN ENERGY INDUSTRY VS. DISTRUST IN ENERGY INDUSTRY – 26 MARKET OVERVIEW 18 US Trust in Energy: 53% US Distrust in Energy: 26%
  • 19. 53% 65% 54% 53% 35% Energy Industry Renewables Natural Gas Utilities Oil Q61C-64C. [SPLIT SAMPLE] Now thinking about specific sectors within the energy industry, please indicate how much you trust businesses in each of the following sectors to do what is right. Again, please use the same 9-point scale where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal”. General Population in US TRUSTED AMONG ENERGY SECTORS – RENEWABLES MOST TRUSTED; OIL LEAST TRUSTED TRUST IN ENERGY INDUSTRY SECTORS – U.S. 19
  • 20. 68% 84% 84% 79% 77% 76% 76% 75% 73%72% 71% 71% 70% 70% 68%68% 65% 65% 64% 64% 61% 60% 59% 59% 57% 55% 53% 50% 20 TRUST IN ENERGY INDUSTRY SECTORS – RENEWABLES IN ALL 26 COUNTRIES SURVEYED, OVER HALF TRUST THE RENEWABLES SECTOR Q61C-64C. [SPLIT SAMPLE] Now thinking about specific sectors within the energy industry, please indicate how much you trust businesses in each of the following sectors to do what is right. Again, please use the same 9-point scale where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal”. General Population in 26 - country global total and across 26 countries U.S. Trust in Renewables: 65%
  • 21. 58% 85% 80% 74% 72% 72% 71% 70% 70% 65% 65% 60% 56%55% 54% 53% 53% 53% 49% 47% 46% 45% 45% 43% 43% 37% 37% 50% 21 TRUST IN ENERGY SECTORS – NATURAL GAS CHINA AND INDIA MOST TRUSTING OF THE NATURAL GAS SECTOR; TRUST LOWEST IN GERMANY AND IRELAND Q61C-64C. [SPLIT SAMPLE] Now thinking about specific sectors within the energy industry, please indicate how much you trust businesses in each of the following sectors to do what is right. Again, please use the same 9-point scale where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal”. General Population in 26 - country global total and across 26 countries U.S. Trust in Natural Gas: 54%
  • 22. 49% 77% 77% 74% 73% 72% 69% 69% 66% 62% 52% 49% 47% 42% 41% 39% 37% 35% 35% 33% 33% 33% 30% 30% 30% 29% 28% 50% 22 TRUST IN ENERGY SECTORS – OIL COUNTRIES CLEARLY DIVIDED OVER TRUST IN THE OIL SECTOR; TRUST HIGHEST IN EMERGING AND ASIAN MARKETS ONCE AGAIN Q61C-64C. [SPLIT SAMPLE] Now thinking about specific sectors within the energy industry, please indicate how much you trust businesses in each of the following sectors to do what is right. Again, please use the same 9-point scale where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal”. General Population in 26 - country global total and across 26 countries U.S. Trust in Oil: 35%
  • 23. 53% 78% 75% 74% 73% 69% 69% 68% 68% 64% 57% 54% 54%53% 53% 50% 47% 40% 40% 40% 40% 39% 38% 36% 36% 35% 18% 50% 23 TRUST IN ENERGY INDUSTRY SECTORS – UTILITIES EMERGING MARKETS TEND TO BE MOST TRUSTING OF THE UTILITIES SECTOR; RUSSIA OUTLIER WITH ONLY ONE IN FIVE RUSSIANS TRUSTING THE SECTOR Q61C-64C. [SPLIT SAMPLE] Now thinking about specific sectors within the energy industry, please indicate how much you trust businesses in each of the following sectors to do what is right. Again, please use the same 9-point scale where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal”. General Population in 26 - country global total and across 26 countries U.S. Trust in Utilities: 53%
  • 25. BUILDING TRUST – KEY PERFORMANCE CLUSTERS COMMUNICATES FREQUENTLY AND HONESTLY ON THE STATE OF ITS BUSINESS LISTENS TO CUSTOMER NEEDS AND FEEDBACK TREATS EMPLOYEES WELL PLACES CUSTOMERS AHEAD OF PROFITS INTEGRITY TAKES RESPONSIBLE ACTIONS TO ADDRESS AN ISSUE OR CRISIS HAS TRANSPARENT AND OPEN BUSINESS PRACTICES HAS ETHICAL BUSINESS PRACTICES PURPOSE OPERATIONS DELIVERS CONSISTENT FINANCIAL RETURNS TO INVESTORS HAS HIGHLY-REGARDED AND WIDELY ADMIRED TOP LEADERSHIP RANKS ON A GLOBAL LIST OF TOP COMPANIES PRODUCTS & SERVICES IS AN INNOVATOR OF NEW PRODUCTS, SERVICES OR IDEAS OFFERS HIGH QUALITY PRODUCTS OR SERVICES WORKS TO PROTECT AND IMPROVE THE ENVIRONMENT ADDRESSES SOCIETY’S NEEDS IN ITS EVERYDAY BUSINESS CREATES PROGRAMS THAT POSITIVELY IMPACT THE LOCAL COMMUNITY PARTNERS WITH NGOs, GOVERNMENT AND 3RD PARTIES TO ADDRESS SOCIETAL NEEDS ENGAGEMENT Edelman Trust Barometer research reveals 16 SPECIFIC ATTRIBUTES which build trust. These can be grouped into FIVE PERFORMANCE CLUSTERS listed here in rank order of importance. 25
  • 26. THE EVOLUTION OF TRUST – WHAT MOVES THE NEEDLE INTEGRITY (58%) PURPOSE (47%) OPERATIONS (39%) PRODUCTS & SERVICES (54%) ENGAGEMENT (59%) Edelman Trust Barometer’s 2013 TRUST PERFORMANCE CLUSTERS Edelman Trust Barometer’s 2008 TRUST DRIVERS* OPERATIONS (76%) Reputation as a place to work (81%) Financial performance (76%) Respected CEO or leader (71%) 26 *Data used includes Informed Publics ages 35-64 only in 18-country global total
  • 27. 37% 45% 42% 52% 46% 55% 62% 57% 65% 72% 74% 72% 55% 71% 74% 74% 41% 49% 50% 55% 59% 63% 65% 68% 69% 69% 70% 72% 72% 76% 77% 77% PARTNERS WITH NGOS, GOVERNMENT AND THIRD PARTIES TO ADDRESS SOCIETAL ISSUES DELIVERS CONSISTENT FINANCIAL RETURNS TO INVESTORS RANKS ON A GLOBAL LIST OF TOP COMPANIES, SUCH AS BEST COMPANIES TO WORK FOR OR MOST ADMIRED COMPANIES HAS HIGHLY-REGARDED AND WIDELY ADMIRED TOP LEADERSHIP IS AN INNOVATOR OF NEW PRODUCTS, SERVICES OR IDEAS ADDRESSES SOCIETY'S NEEDS IN ITS EVERYDAY BUSINESS HAS TRANSPARENT AND OPEN BUSINESS PRACTICES CREATES PROGRAMS THAT POSITIVELY IMPACT THE LOCAL COMMUNITY IN WHICH THE COMPANY OPERATES COMMUNICATES FREQUENTLY & HONESTLY ON STATE OF ITS BUSINESS TREATS EMPLOYEES WELL HAS ETHICAL BUSINESS PRACTICES OFFERS HIGH QUALITY PRODUCTS OR SERVICES WORKS TO PROTECT AND IMPROVE THE ENVIRONMENT PLACES CUSTOMERS AHEAD OF PROFITS TAKES RESPONSIBLE ACTIONS TO ADDRESS AN ISSUE OR A CRISIS LISTENS TO CUSTOMER NEEDS AND FEEDBACK 2013 ENERGY INDUSTRY IMPORTANCE VS. BUSINESS IMPORTANCE – U.S. TRUST BUILDING ATTRIBUTES – WHAT MATTERS FOR ENERGY Gap +3 +3 +5 +17 - -4 -3 +4 +11 +3 +8 +13 +3 +8 +4 +4 ENERGY BUSINESS 27
  • 28. 28 40% 27% 29% 25% 39% 36% 41% 35% 27% 38% 27% 49% 23% 33% 40% 31% 38% 44% 45% 46% 54% 54% 55% 57% 65% 66% 69% 70% 71% 73% 74% 76% PARTNERS WITH NGOS, GOVERNMENT AND THIRD PARTIES TO ADDRESS SOCIETAL ISSUES IS AN INNOVATOR OF NEW PRODUCTS, SERVICES OR IDEAS RANKS ON A GLOBAL LIST OF TOP COMPANIES, SUCH AS 'BEST COMPANIES TO WORK FOR' OR 'MOST ADMIRED COMPANIES' WORKS TO PROTECT AND IMPROVE THE ENVIRONMENT DELIVERS CONSISTENT FINANCIAL RETURNS TO INVESTORS HAS HIGHLY-REGARDED AND WIDELY ADMIRED TOP LEADERSHIP CREATES PROGRAMS THAT POSITIVELY IMPACT THE LOCAL COMMUNITY IN WHICH THE COMPANY OPERATES ADDRESSES SOCIETY'S NEEDS IN ITS EVERYDAY BUSINESS HAS TRANSPARENT AND OPEN BUSINESS PRACTICES OFFERS HIGH QUALITY PRODUCTS OR SERVICES COMMUNICATES FREQUENTLY AND HONESTLY ON THE STATE OF ITS BUSINESS TREATS EMPLOYEES WELL TAKES RESPONSIBLE ACTIONS TO ADDRESS AN ISSUE OR A CRISIS PLACES CUSTOMERS AHEAD OF PROFITS LISTENS TO CUSTOMER NEEDS AND FEEDBACK HAS ETHICAL BUSINESS PRACTICES -45 -34 -40 -48 -21 -42 -28 -38 -22 -14 -18 -15 -21 -16 -17 +2 Q70-85/Q86-101. Please think about businesses in the Energy Industry. How important is each of the following actions to building your trust in businesses in the Energy Industry? Please use a nine-point scale where one means that action is 'not at all important to building your trust' and nine means it is 'extremely important to building your trust'. [Top 2 Box, Trust - Very Important (8-9)], General Population, Global 25-Country Total (Excludes Don’t Know) ;Q114-Q129. Please rate [INSERT COMPANY] on how well you think they are performing on each of the following attributes. Use a nine-point scale where one means they are performing “extremely poorly” and nine means they are performing “extremely well”. (Top 2 Box, Performing Very/ Extremely Well) General Population in US *Importance attribute data used here is from the 2012 Trust Barometer 2012 ENERGY INDUSTRY IMPORTANCE VS. 2013 BLINDED ENERGY COMPANY PERFORMANCE – US (FOR ILLUSTRATION PURPOSES) Gap Importance Performance TRUST BUILDING ATTRIBUTES – LARGE GAP IN EXPECTATION VS. PERFORMANCE
  • 29. 29 PRODUCTS & SERVICES ENGAGEMENT INTEGRITY PURPOSE OPERATIONS Trust-Building Opportunity Quadrant PRIORITIZING CLUSTERS BY IMPACT POTENTIAL Q114-Q129. Please rate [INSERT COMPANY] on how well you think they are performing on each of the following attributes. Use a nine-point scale where one means they are performing “extremely poorly” and nine means they are performing “extremely well”. (Top 2 Box, Performing Very/ Extremely Well) General Population in 26-country global total *Energy importance attributes data was asked in the 2012 Trust Barometer INTEGRITY UNDER-PERFORMING ON HIGH PRIORITIES PERFORMING Quality Society Communicates Customers PERCEIVED PERFORMANCE STATEDIMPORTANCE LOW PERFORMANCE ON LOWER EXPECTATIONS OVER-PERFORMING ON LOWER PRIORITIES ENGAGEMENT PRODUCTS & SERVICES PURPOSE OPERATIONS 2012 ENERGY IMPORTANCE VS. BLINDED ENERGY COMPANY PERFORMANCE (FOR ILLUSTRATION PURPOSES)
  • 31. 58% 58% 43% 41% 40% 51% 47% 32% 26% 30% 65% 71% 56% 58% 52%52% 51% 38% 28% 27% TRADITIONAL MEDIA ONLINE SEARCH ENGINES HYBRID MEDIA SOCIAL MEDIA OWNED MEDIA Global Developed Emerging US Q178-182. When looking for general news and information, how much would you trust each type of source for general news and information? Please use a 9-point scale where one means that you "do not trust it at all" and nine means that you "trust it a great deal". (Top 4 Box, Trust) General Population in 26-country global total, Developed vs. Emerging Markets; Age breakdown for general population in 26-country global total MAINSTREAM MEDIA REIGNS IN DEVELOPED MARKETS, EQUIVALENCE AMONG SOURCES IN EMERGING MARKETS YOUTH TRUSTS, OLDER GENERATIONS DISTRUST NON-TRADITIONAL MEDIA – GLOBAL OVERVIEW 59% 61% 49% 47% 44% 61% 60% 48% 45% 43% 56% 56% 40% 37% 37% 54% 49% 29% 29% 31% TRADITIONAL MEDIA ONLINE SEARCH ENGINES HYBRID MEDIA SOCIAL MEDIA OWNED MEDIA 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ GLOBAL AGE BREAKDOWN 31
  • 32. Q178-182. When looking for general news and information, how much would you trust each type of source for general news and information? Please use a 9-point scale where one means that you "do not trust it at all" and nine means that you "trust it a great deal". (Top 4 Box, Trust)Informed Publics ages 25-64 in US, General Population in US SEARCH AND TRADITIONAL MEDIA CONTINUOUSLY PROVE MOST TRUSTED AMONG THE INFORMED AND GENERAL PUBLIC TRUST IN MEDIA SOURCES – U.S. 32 2013 62% 62% 51% 39% 34% 51% 52% 38% 28% 27% ONLINE SEARCH ENGINES TRADITIONAL MEDIA HYBRID MEDIA SOCIAL MEDIA OWNED MEDIA
  • 33. TRUSTED SOURCES ARE EXPERTS AND PEERS CREDIBLE SPOKESPEOPLE – U.S. 29% 37% 50% 52% 61% 66% 68% 67% 31% 34% 47% 58% 62% 68% 71% 74% Government official or regulator CEO Financial or industry analyst NGO representative Regular employee A technical expert A person like yourself Academic or expert 2012 Q130-143. [TRACKING] Below is a list of people. In general, when forming an opinion of a company, if you heard information about a company from each person, how credible would the information be--extremely credible, very credible, somewhat credible, or not credible at all? (Top 2 Box, Very/ Extremely Credible) Informed publics ages 25-64 in US, General Population US33
  • 34. 74% 69% 63% 56% 54% 52% 43% 41% 24% 21% 69% 66% 57% 57% 48% 49% 39% 30% 17% 16% Academic or expert Technical expert in the company A person like yourself Regular employee NGO representative Financial or industry analyst CEO Government official or regulator Blogger Entertainer/athlete TRUSTED SOURCES ARE EXPERTS AND PEERS CREDIBLE SPOKESPEOPLE – U.S. 2013 Q130-143. [TRACKING] Below is a list of people. In general, when forming an opinion of a company, if you heard information about a company from each person, how credible would the information be--extremely credible, very credible, somewhat credible, or not credible at all? (Top 2 Box, Very/ Extremely Credible) Informed publics ages 25-64 in US, General Population US34
  • 35. 66% 66% 67% 74% 74% 25% 19% 31% 34% 34% 43% 62% 45% 40% 32% 71% 63% 25% 26% 32% 28% 31% 41% 45% 34% 32% 23% 62% 56% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 An academic or expert on company issues CEO A person like yourself Government official/regulator Regular employee TRUSTED SPOKESPEOPLE SOLIDIFYING RANK ORDER CREDIBILITY OF SPOKESPEOPLE – U.S. INFORMED PUBLICS AGES 35-64 Q130-143. [TRACKING] Below is a list of people. In general, when forming an opinion of a company, if you heard information about a company from each person, how credible would the information be--extremely credible, very credible, somewhat credible, or not credible at all? (Top 2 Box, Very/ Extremely Credible) Informed publics ages 35-64 in US 35
  • 36. Who is Trusted MOST to provide you with credible and honest information about: Company’s CEO Company’s Employee Passionate or Activist Consumer Academic Media Spokesperson A company’s employee programs, benefits & working conditions 15% 71% 16% 12% 8% How a company serves its customers and prioritizes customer needs ahead of company profits 14% 30% 46% 19% 15% A company’s situation in a time of crisis 32% 26% 21% 23% 25% A company’s innovation efforts and new product development 28% 39% 26% 24% 11% How a company uses its resources and influence to support the environment 18% 26% 36% 27% 12% How a company supports programs that positively impact the local community 18% 27% 39% 19% 25% Partnerships with NGO’s and effort to address societal issues 23% 17% 31% 27% 14% A company’s financial earnings & operational performance 29% 26% 20% 27% 11% A company’s business practices, both positive & negative 16% 40% 31% 23% 13% Accomplishments about a company’s senior leadership 32% 34% 21% 20% 17% Q197-201(Global Summary). We would now like you to think about different types of information you may read, see or hear about a company. For each topic, please select which person you trust MOST to provide you with credible and honest information about a company. General Population in US INFLUENCER MESSAGE MAPPING – U.S. ENGAGEMENT INTEGRITY PRODUCTS OPERATIONS PURPOSE 36
  • 37. 50% Q130-143. [TRACKING] (Credibility of CEOs and Government officials/regulators) Below is a list of people. In general, when forming an opinion of a company, if you heard information about a company from each person, how credible would the information be--extremely credible, very credible, somewhat credible, or not credible at all? (Top 2 Box, Very/ Extremely Credible) Informed publics ages 25-64 in 26 -country global total and across 26 markets (only spokespeople tracked from 2012 to 2013 included in analysis) 2013 CREDIBILITY OF CEOS VS. GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS/REGULATORS – 26 MARKET OVERVIEW Government official or regulator Credibility CEO Credibility 37 MAJORITY OF MARKETS FIND BOTH GOVERNMENT AND BUSINESS LEADERS BELOW 50% IN THEIR CREDIBILITY RATING 45% 52% 70% 55% 52% 73% 41% 52% 34% 36% 62% 55% 42% 22% 37% 39% 43% 27% 28% 56% 37% 34% 54% 26% 40% 35% 48% 38% 18% 36% 22% 32% 54% 23% 35% 22% 25% 54% 48% 35% 15% 31% 36% 41% 25% 27% 55% 37% 36% 56% 32% 47% 45% 60% US CEO Credibility: 43% US Gov’t Official/Regulator Credibility: 41%
  • 38. 14% 24% 13% 15% SOLVE SOCIAL OR SOCIETAL ISSUES CORRECT ISSUES WITHIN INDUSTRIES THAT ARE EXPERIENCING PROBLEMS MAKE ETHICAL AND MORAL DECISIONS TELL YOU THE TRUTH, REGARDLESS OF HOW COMPLEX OR UNPOPULAR IT IS TRUST IN BUSINESS AND GOVERNMENT – A CRISIS OF LEADERSHIP US TRUST BUSINESS AND GOVERNMENT LEADERS TO DO THE FOLLOWING: 13% 13% 11% 10% SOLVE SOCIAL OR SOCIETAL ISSUES CORRECT ISSUES WITHIN INDUSTRIES THAT ARE EXPERIENCING PROBLEMS MAKE ETHICAL AND MORAL DECISIONS TELL YOU THE TRUTH, REGARDLESS OF HOW COMPLEX OR UNPOPULAR IT IS GOVERNMENT LEADERS 38 BUSINESS LEADERS Q144A-147A. [SPLIT SAMPLE] How much do you trust business leaders to do the following? (Top Box- Trust A great Deal) General population in US
  • 39. 6% 7% 20% 20% 45% LACK OF REGULATION OR CONTROL TRANSPARENCY ISSUES WRONG INCENTIVES DRIVING POLICIES CORRUPTION OR FRAUD POOR PERFORMANCE/ INCOMPETENCE 4% 10% 11% 35% 36% TRANSPARENCY ISSUES POOR PERFORMANCE/ INCOMPETENCE LACK OF REGULATION OR CONTROL CORRUPTION OR FRAUD WRONG INCENTIVES DRIVING BUSINESS DECISIONS CORRUPTION/FRAUD IS A KEY REASON FOR DISTRUST IN BUSINESS AND GOVERNMENT, INCOMPETENCE IS A LEADING FACTOR FOR GOVERNMENT – U.S. REASONS FOR DECREASED BUSINESS AND GOVERNMENT TRUST (AMONG THOSE WHO REPORTED TRUSTING BUSINESS OR GOVERNMENT LESS OVER THE PAST YEAR) Q22. [ASK IF TRUST GOVERNMENTLESS IN Q18] Which of the following is the main reason why your trust in government decreased over the last year?; Q24. [ASK IF TRUST BUSINESS LESS IN Q20] Which of the following is the main reason why your trust in business decreased over the last year? General Population in US REASONS FOR TRUSTING GOVERNMENT LESS REASONS FOR TRUSTING BUSINESS LESS 71% 65% 39
  • 40. 8% 6% 10% 20% 24% 13% 33% 38% 38% 55% 71% 41% France Germany US India China Global Trust in Government Trust Government Leaders to tell the truth 10% 13% 15% 34% 32% 18% 37% 42% 50% 68% 67% 50% France Germany US India China Global Trust in Business Trust Business Leaders to tell the Truth LEADERSHIP TRUST GAP GAP IN TRUST IN INSTITUTION VS. TRUST IN LEADERSHIP – SELECT COUNTRY OVERVIEW Q11 -14. Below is a list of institutions. For each one, please indicate how much you trust that institution to do what is right using a 9-point scale where one means that you 'do not trust them at all' and nine means that you 'trust them a great deal'. Q130-143. Below is a list of people. In general, when forming an opinion of a company, if you heard information about a company from each person, how credible would the information be--extremely credible, very credible, somewhat credible, or not credible at all? General Population -32 -35 -34 -35 -27 -28 -47 -35 -28 -25 -29 -32 40
  • 41. GENERAL POPULATION CEO BOARD OF DIRECTORS ACADEMICS TECHNICAL EXPERTS ELITE MEDIA Vertical Flow & Controlled Information PYRAMID of AUTHORITY 41 OLD MODELS NO LONGER WORK IN ISOLATION
  • 42. GENERAL POPULATION EMPLOYEES ACTION CONSUMERS SOCIAL ACTIVISTS Power of Peer-to-Peer & Horizontal Communications PYRAMID of COMMUNITY New models are firmly established 42
  • 43. THE NEW DYNAMICS OF ENGAGEMENT
  • 44. LESSONS FOR LEADERS 44 Observe re-ordering of authority Old values are not sufficient Clear opportunity for business Trust is fragile and perceived behaviors are an anchor
  • 45. On the cover credits: HSBC: REUTERS/ Bobby Yip; UBS: REUTERS/Luke MacGregor; Bob Diamond: REUTERS/ Luke MacGregor; Bo Xilai: REUTERS/ Cheryl Ravelo ; Lance Armstrong: by Sebastian David Tingkær; Angela Merkel: REUTERS/ Sebastien Pirlet; Rajat Gupta: REUTERS/ Brendan McDermid; George Entwistle: Associated Press/ Rex Featu
  • 46. APPENDIX INCLUDES INFORMED PUBLIC OR GENERAL PUBLIC VERSIONS OF SELECT SLIDES
  • 47. TRUST AMONG EMERGING MARKETS HIGHER THAN TRUST AMONG DEVELOPED MARKETS TRUST IN ENERGY INDUSTRY BY REGION – GLOBAL OVERVIEW 53% 56% 67% 65% 63% 60% 42% 59% 59% 74% 64% 69% 64% 49% Global US BRIC Latin America APAC North America EU 47 Q43-60. [TRACKING] Please indicate how much you trust businesses in each of the following industries to do what is right. Again, please use the same 9-point scale where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal”. (Top 4 Box, Trust) Informed Public in 26 -country global total and across APAC, BRIC, Latin America, North America and EU region 2012 2013
  • 48. 53% 78% 76% 72% 71% 67% 76% 67% 66% 71% 59% 56% 51% 47% 56% 51% 65% 45% 29% 39% 37% 49% 31% 31% 24% 52% 59% 86% 84% 75% 84% 81% 69% 71% 70% 72% 66% 45% 57% 56% 55% 59% 47% 60% 53% 49% 48% 54% 45% 45% 38% 38% 33% 2012 2013 50% Q43-60. [TRACKING] Please indicate how much you trust businesses in each of the following industries to do what is right. Again, please use the same 9-point scale where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal”. (Top 4 Box, Trust) Informed Publlic in 26 -country global total and across 26 countries OVER THE PAST YEAR, TRUST IN THE ENERGY INDUSTRY SIGNIFICANTLY INCREASED IN SEVERAL MARKETS WITH GREATEST INCREASES SEEN IN JAPAN AND POLAND 2012 VS. 2013 TRUST IN ENERGY INDUSTRY– 26 MARKET OVERVIEW 48 n/a 2012 US Trust in Energy :56% 2013 US Trust in Energy: 59%
  • 49. 57% 56% 40% 35% 32% 51% 52% 38% 28% 27% ONLINE SEARCH ENGINES TRADITIONAL MEDIA HYBRID MEDIA SOCIAL MEDIA OWNED MEDIA Q178-182. When looking for general news and information, how much would you trust each type of source for general news and information? Please use a 9-point scale where one means that you "do not trust it at all" and nine means that you "trust it a great deal". (Top 4 Box, Trust) General Population in US SEARCH AND TRADITIONAL MEDIA CONTINUOUSLY PROVE MOST TRUSTED AMONG THE GENERAL PUBLIC TRUST IN MEDIA SOURCES – U.S. 49 2012 2013
  • 50. 61% 59% 46% 37% 36% 62% 62% 51% 39% 34% TRADITIONAL MEDIA ONLINE SEARCH ENGINES HYBRID MEDIA SOCIAL MEDIA OWNED MEDIA Q178-182. When looking for general news and information, how much would you trust each type of source for general news and information? Please use a 9-point scale where one means that you "do not trust it at all" and nine means that you "trust it a great deal". (Top 4 Box, Trust) Informed Publics in US TRADITIONAL MEDIA AND SEARCH CONTINUOUSLY PROVE MOST TRUSTED AMONG INFORMED PUBLICS TRUST IN MEDIA SOURCES – U.S. 50 2012 2013
  • 51. TRUSTED SOURCES ARE EXPERTS AND PEERS CREDIBLE SPOKESPEOPLE – U.S. Q130-143. [TRACKING] Below is a list of people. In general, when forming an opinion of a company, if you heard information about a company from each person, how credible would the information be--extremely credible, very credible, somewhat credible, or not credible at all? (Top 2 Box, Very/ Extremely Credible) General Population in US 51 2012 2013 29% 37% 50% 52% 61% 66% 67% 68% Government official or regulator CEO Financial or industry analyst NGO representative Regular employee A technical expert An academic or expert A person like yourself 69% 66% 57% 57% 49% 48% 39% 30% Academic or expert Technical expert A person like yourself Regular employee Financial or industry analyst NGO representative CEO Government official or regulator
  • 52. 74% 69% 63% 56% 54% 52% 43% 41% Academic or expert Technical expert in the company A person like yourself Regular employee NGO representative Financial or industry analyst CEO Government official or regulator TRUSTED SOURCES ARE EXPERTS AND PEERS CREDIBLE SPOKESPEOPLE – U.S. 31% 34% 47% 58% 62% 68% 71% 74% Government official or regulator CEO Financial or industry analyst NGO representative Regular employee A technical expert A person like yourself Academic or expert 20132012 Q130-143. [TRACKING] Below is a list of people. In general, when forming an opinion of a company, if you heard information about a company from each person, how credible would the information be--extremely credible, very credible, somewhat credible, or not credible at all? (Top 2 Box, Very/ Extremely Credible) Informed publics ages 25-64 in US52
  • 53. Q43-60. [TRACKING] Please indicate how much you trust businesses in each of the following industries to do what is right. Again, please use the same 9-point scale where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal”. (Top 4 Box, Trust) General Population in US 70% 67% 64% 62% 61% 61% 60% 57% 57% 55% 54% 53% 53% 48% 44% 43% 43% 38% Technology Consumer Electronics… Food and Beverage Brewing and Spirits Aerospace & Defense Automotive Consumer Packaged Goods Food Manufacturing Metals Industry Telecommunications Consumer Health Companies Energy Entertainment Pharmaceuticals Chemicals Banks Financial Services Media TIED WITH THE ENTERTAINMENT INDUSTRY THIS YEAR, TRUST IN THE ENERGY INDUSTRY RANKS NEAR THE BOTTOM TRUST IN INDUSTRIES – U.S. 53 20132012 78% 70% 64% 60% 59% 58% 54% 51% 42% 41% 40% Technology Food & Beverage Consumer Packaged Goods Automotive Brewing & Spirits Telecommunications Energy Pharmaceuticals Banks Financial Services Media Technology #1 in US
  • 54. Technology #1 in US SLIGHT UPTICKS IN MANY SCORES, INCLUDING ENERGY TRUST IN INDUSTRIES – U.S. 20132012 Q43-60. [TRACKING] Please indicate how much you trust businesses in each of the following industries to do what is right. Again, please use the same 9-point scale where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal”. (Top 4 Box, Trust) Informed Public ages 25-64 in US 54 80% 76% 75% 72% 71% 70% 70% 70% 69% 66% 64% 62% 59% 55% 55% 52% 50% 50% Technology Consumer electronics manufacturing Brewing and spirits Food and beverage4 Aerospace and defense Metals industry Automotive Consumer packaged goods3 Food manufacturing Telecommunications Consumer health companies Entertainment Energy Pharmaceuticals Chemicals Financial services Banks Media 41% 46% 48% 56% 56% 64% 66% 71% 74% 74% 83% Banks Financial services Media Energy Pharmaceuticals Telecommunications Automotive Brewing and spirits Consumer packaged goods Food and beverage Technology