SlideShare ist ein Scribd-Unternehmen logo
1 von 48
Downloaden Sie, um offline zu lesen
2016 California
Trust Survey
2
GLOBAL TRUST SURVEYS IN RETROSPECT
Rising Influence of
NGOs
2001
Business Must
Partner with
Government to
Regain Trust
2009
Fall of the
Celebrity CEO
2002
Earned Media
More Credible
Than Advertising
2003
U.S. Companies in
Europe Suffer
Trust Discount
2004
Trust Shifts from
“Authorities” to
Peers
2005
“A Person Like
Me” Emerges as
Credible
Spokesperson
2006
Business More
Trusted Than
Government
and Media
2007
Young Influencers
Have More Trust in
Business
2008
Trust is Now an
Essential Line
of Business
2010
Rise of
Authority
Figures
2011
Fall of Government
2012
Crisis of
Leadership
2013
Business to
Lead the Debate
for Change
2014
Trust is
Essential to
Innovation
2015
Growing
Inequality of
Trust
2016
For more information on Edelman’s Global Trust survey, please visit http://www.edelman.com/insights/intellectual-property/2016-edelman-trust-barometer/
3
Informed Public
‣ 8 years in 20+ markets
‣ Represents 15% of total global population
‣ 500 respondents in U.S. and China; 200 in all other countries
Must meet 4 criteria:
‣ Ages 25-64
‣ College educated
‣ In top 25% of household income per age group in each country
‣ Report significant media consumption and engagement in business news
General Online Population
‣ 5 years in 25+ markets
‣ Ages 18+
‣ 1,150 respondents per country
GLOBAL TRUST
METHODOLOGY
28-country global data margin of error: General Population +/-0.6% (N=32,200), Informed Public +/- 1.2% (N=6,200), Mass Population +/- 0.6% (26,000).
Country-specific data margin of error: General Population +/- 2.9 ( N=1,150), Informed Public +/- 6.9% (N = min 200, varies by country), China and U.S. +/- 4.4%
(N=500), Mass Population +/- 3.0 to 3.6 (N =min 740, varies by country), half sample Global General Online Population +/- 0.8 (N=16,100).
‣ 16 years of data
‣ 33,000+ respondents total
‣ All fieldwork was conducted between October
13th and November 16th, 2015
Online Survey in 28 Countries
Mass Population
‣ All population not including Informed Public
‣ Represents 85% of total global population
STATE OF TRUST
5
51
48
45
41
55 53
47
42
63
57
51
48
67 63
57
51
GLOBALLY, TRUST RISING
Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Q11-14. Below is a list of institutions. For each one, please indicate how much you trust that institution to do what is
right using a nine-point scale, where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal.” (Top 4 Box, Trust) Informed
Public and General Population, 27-country global total.
PERCENT TRUST IN THE FOUR INSTITUTIONS OF GOVERNMENT, BUSINESS, MEDIA AND NGOS, 2015 VS. 2016
NGOs Business Media Government
+4 +6 +6 +3
Informed
Public
General
Population
2015 2016
+4 +5 +2 +1
TRUST
INEQUALITY
7
53
58
56 56
60
44
47
46 46
48
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
A SIGNIFICANT DIVIDE
Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Q11-14. Below is a list of institutions. For each one, please indicate how much you trust that institution to do what is right using
a nine-point scale, where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal.” (Top 4 Box, Trust) Informed Public and Mass
Population, 25-country global total.
GDP 5 = U.S., China, Japan, Germany, U.K.
PERCENT TRUST IN THE FOUR INSTITUTIONS OF GOVERNMENT, BUSINESS, MEDIA AND NGOS, 2012 TO 2016,
ACROSS 25 COUNTRIES
Informed
Public
Mass
Population
12pt
Gap
9pt
Gap
in trust inequality--which
jumps to a
5-point increase among
the GDP5
3-point increase
8
A GLOBAL PHENOMENON
Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer. The Trust Index is an average of a country’s trust in the institutions of government, business, media and NGOs,
28-country global total.
TRUST INDEX, INFORMED PUBLIC VS. MASS POPULATION, 15 COUNTRIES WITH DOUBLE-DIGIT TRUST GAPS IN 2016
Country
Informed
Public
Mass
Population Gap
U.S. 64 45 19
U.K. 57 40 17
France 55 39 16
India 78 62 16
Australia 63 47 16
Mexico 72 57 15
Italy 58 47 11
China 82 71 11
Brazil 58 48 10
Ireland 49 39 10
Netherlands 62 52 10
Sweden 46 36 10
S. Africa 54 44 10
S. Korea 50 40 10
Singapore 72 62 10
INVERSION OF
INFLUENCE
10
Mass
Population
THE INVERSION OF INFLUENCE
Authority
& Influence
Influence
Authority
Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Q11-14. Below is a list of institutions. For each one, please indicate how much you trust that institution to do what is right using
a nine-point scale, where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal.” (Top 4 Box, Trust) Informed Public and Mass
Population, 28-country global total.
85%
of
population
48 Trust Index
15%
of
population
60 Trust Index
Informed
Public
11
63 64
57
50
48
41
50
39
33
67
64 63
53 52
49 48
44
35
PEERS, EMPLOYEES MORE CREDIBLE THAN LEADERS
Source: 2016 Edelman. Trust Barometer Q130-587. Below is a list of people. In general, when forming an opinion of a company, if you heard information about a
company from each person, how credible would the information be—extremely credible, very credible, somewhat credible, or not credible at all? (Top 2 Box,
Very/Extremely Credible) General Population, 27-country global total.
PERCENT WHO RATE EACH SPOKESPERSON AS EXTREMELY/VERY CREDIBLE
2015 2016
+8
Technical
expert
Academic
expert
A person
like yourself
Financial
industry
analyst
Employee CEO NGO
representative
Board of
Directors
Government
official/regulator
CEO credibility
increased the most
General
Population
+6
AN OPPORTUNITY
FOR BUSINESS
13
BUSINESS MUST LEAD TO SOLVE PROBLEMS
Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Q249. Please indicate how much you agree or disagree with the following statement? (Top 4 Box, Agree). General
Population, 27-country global total, question asked of half the sample.
.
80% agree
“A company can take specific
actions that both increase
profits and improve the
economic and social
conditions in the community
where it operates.”
up from 74% in 2015
General
Population
14
15
Informed Public N: 244; MOE: ±6.3%
Mass Population N: 1,294; MOE: ±2.7%
METHODOLOGY | 2016 CA SURVEY
*We conducted an online statewide survey of 1,538 California residents. The results were weighted to Census data to be representative of the CA adult population.
California Regions Surveyed
San Francisco Bay Area
N: 503
MOE: ±4.4%
% of State: 21%
LA Area
N: 523
MOE: ±4.3%
% of State: 48%
Rest of State
N: 570
MOE: ±4.1%
% of State: 31%
TOTAL N: 1,538; MOE: ±2.5%
*Informed Public definition: top household income, college educated, significant media consumption. Represents ~10% of population
*Mass population definition: not informed public, ~90% of population
Other groups
January 17-25, 2016
1,538 adults 18+
16
CA KEY FINDINGS
Trust
• Tech, ag, and retail most trusted industries in CA
• CA more distrustful of institutions than US across the board; particularly skeptical about the media
• Ag and “sharing economy” have improved their image, while real estate and pharmaceuticals face a more apprehensive public
• Trust linked to positive impact on community rather than economic stimulus
CA Issues
• Drought concerns up, now above the economy
• Housing costs are a significant threat to CA growth – far outpacing all other threats (especially in the Bay Area)
Inequality
• Inequality is rising and success is becoming seen as out of reach for more and more
17
CA KEY FINDINGS
Business role
• License to lead on societal issues - business most trusted entity
• However, public-private partnership preferred over going it alone
• Highest interest in business getting involved on issues relevant to the business or its workers (i.e. economy, inequality, housing,
and transportation)
CEOs
• CEOs have lost their sheen
• Most widely seen as greedy, arrogant and phony – but Tech CEOs, like their industry, seen more positively
• Tech CEOs provide a lesson to all CEOs: honesty and sincerity are critical…and lacking among many CEOs
Media
18
TRUST
19
Q11G: Please indicate how much you trust businesses in each of the following industries to do what is right. Again, please use the same 9-point scale where one means that you “do not trust them at all”
and nine means that you “trust them a great deal”. Full industry description: Telecommunications (telephone, wireless, internet, and cable service providers), Consumer Electronics Manufacturing (includes
companies that make equipment intended for everyday use in entertainment, communications and offices, including personal computers, mobile devices, digital cameras, gaming consoles, e-readers, DVD
players and MP3 players), The “sharing economy” (peer to peer businesses like Uber, Lyft, and Airbnb, which are built on individuals sharing or renting unused resources to other individuals); Retail
(including both stores with physical locations and online-only retailers). Population: California adults
66%
65%
63%
59%
56%
55%
54%
53%
53%
53%
51%
49%
46%
45%
43%
Technology
Agriculture
Retail
Consumer Electronics Manufacturing
Startup companies
Transportation and Infrastructure
Telecommunications
Energy
Biotech/life sciences
Healthcare
Entertainment
The “sharing economy”
Financial services
Real Estate
Pharmaceuticals
BIOTECH & HEALTHCARE 10PTS HIGHER THAN PHARMA
TECH MOST TRUSTED IN CA, AG AND RETAIL CLOSE
20
TRUST DECREASES AS TIME IN CA INCREASES
CALIFORNIANS ARE SKEPTICS, ESPECIALLY ABOUT THE MEDIA
Q3: Below is a list of institutions and people. For each one, please indicate how much you trust that institution or person to do what is right using a 9-point scale where 1 means that you “do not trust them
at all” and 9 means that you “trust them a great deal”. Shown: % Trust 6-9. Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Q11-14. Below is a list of institutions. For each one, please indicate how much you
trust that institution to do what is right using a nine-point scale, where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal.” (Top 4 Box, Trust) General
Population, U.S. and 28-country global total.
48% 46%
37%
33%
51%
57%
39%
47%
53% 55%
42%
48%
Business NGOs Government Media
CA
US
Global
Time in CA
<20 yrs: 40%
20+ yrs: 32%
CA’s most
trusted
institution
21
AMONG CALIFORNIANS WHOSE TRUST IN BUSINESS DECLINED,
EXCESSIVE FOCUS ON PROFIT CITED
Among those whose trust in each institution decreased:
QN2. Earlier, you stated that your trust in government in general has declined over the last year. Which is the larger reason your trust in government in general has declined over the last year?
QN3. Earlier, you stated that your trust in business in general has declined over the last year. Which is the largest reason your trust in business in general has declined over the last year?
Population: California adults
41%
33%
15%
10%
2%
Businesses are too focused on
profit, rather than focused on
customers or quality
CEOs and shareholders are
making record profits but
paying their workers little
Data security and
hacking/personal information is
not safe
Businesses are not contributing
to the greater good
Some other reason
22
Q5: Please indicate how much you think each of the following industries is fueling the economy in your area of California. A great deal, Some, A little, None, Don’t know
Full industry description: Telecommunications (telephone, wireless, internet, and cable service providers), Consumer Electronics Manufacturing (includes companies that make equipment intended for
everyday use in entertainment, communications and offices, including personal computers, mobile devices, digital cameras, gaming consoles, e-readers, DVD players and MP3 players), The “sharing
economy” (peer to peer businesses like Uber, Lyft, and Airbnb, which are built on individuals sharing or renting unused resources to other individuals), 2016 ONLY: Retail (including both stores with physical
locations and online-only retailers). Population: California adults
WHILE STILL TRAILING ESTABLISHED INDUSTRIES, “SHARING ECONOMY” PICKING UP
ECONOMIC STEAM IN CA
24%
33%
22%
26%
21%
20%
26%
24%
20%
15%
15%
16%
13%
13%
12%
41%
29%
39%
35%
40%
36%
28%
30%
31%
34%
34%
31%
27%
28%
27%
65%
62%
62%
61%
61%
56%
54%
54%
51%
50%
49%
46%
41%
41%
39%
Retail
Technology
Real Estate
Telecommunications
Healthcare
Energy
Agriculture
Entertainment
Consumer Electronics Manufacturing
Financial services
Transportation and infrastructure
Pharmaceuticals
The “sharing economy”
Biotech/life sciences
Startup companies
A Great Deal Some
n/a
-3
+1
-1
+3
-3
+1
+1
+0
+0
-1
+3
+6
-3
-2
Δ Since 2015
23
TOP 2 INDUSTRIES FUELING ECONOMY VARY GREATLY
Q5: Please indicate how much you think each of the following industries is fueling the economy in your area of California. A great deal, Some, A little, None, Don’t know
Full industry description: Telecommunications (telephone, wireless, internet, and cable service providers), Consumer Electronics Manufacturing (includes companies that make equipment intended for
everyday use in entertainment, communications and offices, including personal computers, mobile devices, digital cameras, gaming consoles, e-readers, DVD players and MP3 players), The “sharing
economy” (peer to peer businesses like Uber, Lyft, and Airbnb, which are built on individuals sharing or renting unused resources to other individuals), 2016 ONLY: Retail (including both stores with
physical locations and online-only retailers). Shown: great deal + some.
CALIFORNIA’S ECONOMIC DIVERSITY SHOWS THROUGH
Bay Area
Tech
Real Estate
LA Area
Retail
Entertainment
Rest of State
Retail
Agriculture
Full list and
percentages in
appendix
24
HIGHEST NEGATIVE IMPACT AND LOOMING THREAT: REAL ESTATE
Q25: For each industry, please indicate whether, on the whole, that industry is currently having a positive or negative impact on the state of California and its communities. Very positive, Somewhat positive,
Somewhat negative, Very negative, Don’t know. Population: California adults
TECH SIGNIFICANTLY BEATING OTHER INDUSTRIES ON POSITIVE IMPACT
Pharma, 39%
Financial services, 40%
Real Estate, 42%
Health care, 39%
Transport & Infrastructure, 31%
Energy, 32%
Biotech/ life sciences, 19%
The “sharing economy”, 26%
Entertain, 26%
Agriculture, 23%
Startup companies, 20%
Telecom, 25%
Consumer Electr Mfg, 19%
Retail, 19%
Technology, 14%
45%
45%
47%
51%
56%
57%
58%
59%
64%
64%
64%
65%
67%
71%
78%
Negative Positive
Δ Since 2015
+2
+1
+1
+6
+5
n/a
0
-1
-1
-1
-1
-5
-5
-4
-6
25
Q25: For each industry, please indicate whether, on the whole, that industry is currently having a positive or negative impact on the state of California and its communities. Very positive, Somewhat positive,
Somewhat negative, Very negative, Don’t know. Population: California adults
AG NEEDED TO (AND DID) PROVE WORTH TO FEND OFF DROUGHT RESTRICTIONS;
SHARING ECON INCREASINGLY REVEALING POSITIVE IMPACT BUT ROOM TO GROW
6%
5%
-5% -5%
-6%
Agriculture The “sharing
economy”
Energy Real Estate Pharmaceuticals
INDUSTRIES AT THE BOTTOM ARE GETTING WORSE...SUGGESTING A GROWING TRUST GAP FOR SOME
26
WEAK RELATIONSHIP
FUELING ECONOMY
TRUST
ONLY A WEAK LINK BETWEEN ECONOMIC IMPACT & TRUST
STRONG LINK BETWEEN COMMUNITY IMPACT & TRUST
Q5CA: Please indicate how much you think each of the following industries is fueling the economy in your area of California. A great deal, Some, A little, None, Don’t know
Q11G: Please indicate how much you trust businesses in each of the following industries to do what is right. Again, please use the same 9-point scale where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and
nine means that you “trust them a great deal”. Q25CA: For each industry, please indicate whether, on the whole, that industry is currently having a positive or negative impact on the state of California and its
communities. Very positive, Somewhat positive, , Somewhat negative, Very negative, Don’t know. Population: California adults
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80%
TRUST
POSITIVE IMPACT ON COMMUNITY
CLEAR RELATIONSHIP
27
CALIFORNIA ISSUES
28Q2: Which of the following state issues do you think is the most important for California’s Governor and State Legislature to address? Population: California adults
THE DROUGHT LOOMS LARGE IN CA POLITICS, SURPASSING THE ECONOMY
19%
18%
9%
7%
7%
6%
6%
5%
5%
4%
3%
3%
3%
2%
2%
1%
Water/drought
The economy
Immigration
The state budget
Education
Taxes
Homelessness
Health care
Crime
Housing
Income inequality
Infrastructure
Public trust in law enforcement
Other
Mental illness
Innovation
+8 since 2015
Economy < drought because
few in the Bay Area cite the
economy as a problem to fix,
while drought concerns are
high across the board
ECONOMY PERCEIVED TO BE MORE PROBLEMATIC OUTSIDE THE BAY AREA
29
BAY AREA NOTABLY DIFFERENT THAN LA OR OTHER AREAS OF CA
Q4: Which of the following issues do you think is the most important for your local government to address? Population: California adults
LOCALLY, HOMELESSNESS AND HOUSING ALSO STAND OUT
14%
11%
15%
16%
13%
11%
14% 15%
12%
10%
12%
13%
Total Bay Area LA Area Rest of State
Economy
Drought
Economy
Homeless Homeless
Drought
Drought
Drought
Homeless
Economy
Housing
Education
Twice as many want local
government to address
homelessness vs state
government (6%)
30
Q8. Which of the following do you think is the most likely to hold back California’s economy and hamper growth? Not shown: Lack of innovation by businesses (3%), Not enough trained workers (3%),
Other (7%), Don’t know (4%). Population: California adults
COST OF LIVING POSES SERIOUS THREAT TO CA GROWTH
28%
15%
9% 9%
7% 6%
4% 4%
38%
13%
7%
8% 8%
6%
5%
2%
28%
14%
10%
9%
7% 7%
3% 4%
20%
19%
10% 11%
6% 6%
4% 5%
Total Bay Area LA Area Rest of State
Crime
/security
High housing
costs
The drought Lack of affordable
higher education/
college debt
High health care
costs
Failing schools Transportation
system
overloaded
Problems in
agriculture/inability to
grow food
Housing costs
nearly 2x
next threat
(3x in Bay Area)
31
INEQUALITY
A GLOBAL PHENOMENON
Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer. The Trust Index is an average of a country’s trust in the institutions of government, business, media and NGOs,
28-country global total. 3
Trust Index, Informed Public vs. Mass Population,
15 countries with double-digit trust gaps in 2016
Country
Informed
Public
Mass
Population Gap
U.S. 64 45 19
U.K. 57 40 17
France 55 39 16
India 78 62 16
Australia 63 47 16
Mexico 72 57 15
Italy 58 47 11
China 82 71 11
Brazil 58 48 10
Ireland 49 39 10
Netherlands 62 52 10
Sweden 46 36 10
S. Africa 54 44 10
S. Korea 50 40 10
Singapore 72 62 10
33
THE INEQUALITY OF TRUST; CA EVEN MORE DIVIDED THAN THE US
CA: Q3: Below is a list of institutions and people. For each one, please indicate how much you trust that institution or person to do what is right using a 9-point scale where 1 means that you “do not trust
them at all” and 9 means that you “trust them a great deal”. Shown: % Trust 6-9.
US Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Q11-14. Below is a list of institutions. For each one, please indicate how much you trust that institution to do what is right using a nine-point scale, where one
means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal.” (Top 4 Box, Trust) Informed Public and Mass Population, U.S.
67% 66%
55%
49%
45% 44%
35%
32%
Business NGOs Government Media
+22 +22 +20 +17
Informed
Public
Mass
Population
Avg Gap
+20
+19
34
10%59%31%
N27. Which best describes your financial situation? (n=1,538) Population: California adults
FEW IN CA BELIEVE THEY ARE GETTING AHEAD
Falling Behind
INFORMED PUBLIC AND THE WEALTHY ARE MUCH MORE LIKELY TO BELIEVE THEY ARE GETTING AHEAD
Keeping Up Getting Ahead
9%
Informed Public Mass Pop.
5%
$100k+ <50k
35
N28. Compared to 5 years ago… Is it now easier or harder to get ahead than it was 5 years ago? (Millennilas n= 508; Gen X n= 508; Baby Boomers n= 633)
Q445G. Thinking about the economic prospects for yourself and your family, how do you think you and your family will be doing in five years’ time? (Millennilas n= 508; Gen X n= 508; Baby Boomers n= 633)
Population: California adults
MOST BELIEVE THAT THE STRUGGLE HAS ONLY GOTTEN MORE DIFFICULT
AND FEWER THAN HALF SEE A BRIGHTER FUTURE
17%
23%
60%
Among All
Harder
About the same
Easier
47%
36%
17%
Among All
Worse off
About the same/
not sure
Better off
56% of Millennials
show a youthful
optimism for the future
(vs. just 33% of Baby
Boomers)
YOUNGER GENERATIONS ARE MORE OPTIMISTIC
36
UNEVEN DISTRIBUTION OF TECH SECTOR BENEFITS IN CA, AND THE
MIDDLE CLASS AND POOR ARE PAYING THE PRICE
HARMED
QN1. Please indicate whether the growth of the technology sector in California has benefited, harmed, or had no impact on people in each of the following groups. (n=1,538) Population: California adults
Wealthy
76%Believe the growth of
technology has benefited
the wealthy
Middle Class
Poor
32%
19%Believe the growth of
technology has
benefited the poor
51%Believe the growth of
technology has harmed
the poor
Believe the growth of
technology has benefited
the middle class
45%
Believe the growth of
technology has harmed
the middle class
7%Believe the growth of
technology has harmed
the wealthy
37
SIMILAR UNEVEN DISTRIBUTION OF TECH SECTOR BENEFITS IN THE
BAY AREA
HARMED
QN1. Please indicate whether the growth of the technology sector in California has benefited, harmed, or had no impact on people in each of the following groups. Population: Bay Area adults
Wealthy
75%Believe the growth of
technology has benefited
the wealthy
Middle Class
Poor
37%
20%Believe the growth of
technology has
benefited the poor
53%Believe the growth of
technology has harmed
the poor
Believe the growth of
technology has benefited
the middle class
43%
Believe the growth of
technology has harmed
the middle class
10%Believe the growth of
technology has harmed
the wealthy
38
INEQUALITY IN THE TECH SECTOR IS A HIGH CONCERN,
ESPECIALLY IN BAY AREA
QN17. Switching topics slightly, what are your top concerns about the technology industry? Please select all that apply. (n=1,538) Population: California adults
42% of Californians say one
of their top concerns about
the tech industry is that
Tech CEOs and employees
make a lot of money, while
regular people struggle to
make ends meet
41%
of people in the Bay Area
believe the tech sector is
creating a society of
“haves” and “have-nots”
vs. 36% statewide
39
WHILE MOST TRUSTED INDUSTRY IN CA, TECH IS NOT INFALLIBLE
54%
53%
50%
42%
36%
31%
29%
27%
16%
13%
Failure to protect from data security threats
People are too focused on their technology and gadgets rather than
real life
Lack of privacy/my data is shared too much
Tech CEOs and employees make a lot of money, while regular people
struggle to make ends meet
It is creating a society of “haves” and “have-nots”
It is moving too fast, without safeguards
It is increasing housing costs
The tech bubble crashing and many people losing their jobs
Lack of diversity at tech companies
It is creating traffic
QN17. Switching topics slightly, what are your top concerns about the technology industry? Please select all that apply. (n=1,538) Population: California adults
Industry issues
Issues that impact
respondents directly
Bay Area: 45%
WORRIES CENTER MORE ON RISKS TO RESPONDENT’S OWN LIFE THAN INDUSTRY IMPERFECTIONS
40
ROLE OF
BUSINESS
41QN6. Overall, who do you trust most to address and solve the issues we face in California? Population: California adults
PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS PREFERRED OVER ANYONE GOING IT ALONE
34%
31%
20%
15%
Public-private partnerships (i.e. joint projects
between the government and private businesses)
Non-profit organizations
Government
Business
42
LOWER TRUST ON ISSUES THAT ARE LESS RELEVANT TO THEIR BUSINESS AND WORKERS
QN5. Overall, who do you trust more to address and solve the issues we face in California? (n=783)
QN4. For each of the following issues and problems in in California, please indicate who you would trust more to address them, the government or business? (n=783) Population: California adults
IF BUSINESS GETS INVOLVED, WHERE FIRST?
55%
Government
45%
Business
47%
47%
51%
47%
The economy
Income inequality
High housing costs
Transportation
43
CEOS
44
TECH CEOS HAVE MORE LICENSE TO LEAD THAN OTHERS
Q447G. Thinking about company CEOs, please indicate how much you trust CEOs to do what is right using a 9-point scale where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them
a great deal”. (Please select one response for each.) (n=1,538) Population: California adults
36%
41%
18%
19%
40%
34%
CEOs in general CEOs of tech companies
+ 5%
Total Distrust (1-4)
Neutral (5)
Total Trust (6-9) Informed Public trust tech CEOs
45
TECH CEOS ARE MORE TRUSTED ACROSS THE STATE,
LARGEST GAP IN BAY AREA
Q447G. Thinking about company CEOs, please indicate how much you trust CEOs to do what is right using a 9-point scale where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you
“trust them a great deal”. (Please select one response for each.) (n=1,538) Population: California adults
45%
41%
38%
36% 36%
35%
Bay Area LA Area Rest of State
CEOs in general
CEOs of Tech Companies
+9 +5 +3
46
WHY ARE TECH CEOS MORE TRUSTED? THEY ARE MORE SINCERE THAN OTHER CEOS
QN11A (SPLIT A). Please indicate how well each of the following terms apply to CEOs, using a scale from 1 to 9, where 1 means it does not apply at all and 9 means it applies extremely well. (n=783)
QN11B (SPLIT B). Please indicate how well each of the following terms apply to tech CEOs, using a scale from 1 to 9, where 1 means it does not apply at all and 9 means it applies extremely well. (n=783)
Population: California adults
12%
12%
11%
10%
10%
7%
6%
6%
5%
4%
4%
4%
2%
-10%
-11%
-13%
Tech CEOs less likely
than other CEOs to be
described negatively
Honest
Innovative
Authentic
Integrity
Competent
Ethical
Collaborative
Compassionate
Generous
Transparent
Inspirational
A role model
Accountable
Arrogant
Greedy
Phony
PROVIDES A LESSON – HONEST AND AUTHENTIC CEOS ARE MORE TRUSTED
47
CEOS IN THE TECH SECTOR ARE TOP OF MIND
QN9. Thinking about CEOs of companies, please name the first 3 that come to mind. If you are unable to think of any, please write N/A. (OPEN END)
QN10. What 1 CEO do you trust the most to do what is right? If you are unable to think of any, please write N/A. (OPEN END)
Population: California adults
Marissa Mayer of
Yahoo! Is the only
female in the top 10
CEOs mentioned
Top 10
Mark Zuckerberg 18%
Bill Gates 13%
Tim Cook 8%
Steve Jobs 7%
Donald Trump 5%
Elon Musk 4%
Larry Ellison 3%
Marissa Mayer 3%
Warren Buffett 3%
Jeff Bezos 2%
Top 10
Bill Gates 20%
Mark Zuckerberg 17%
Elon Musk 8%
Tim Cook 8%
Donald Trump 7%
Steve Jobs 4%
Warren Buffett 4%
Satya Nadella 2%
Jeff Bezos 2%
Meg Whitman 1%
48
FEW EXPECT CEOS TO BE FEMALE…BUT, SADLY, THEY EVEN OVERESTIMATE
QN16. If you had to guess, what percentage of the CEOs at the 500 largest companies in the US do you think are female? (n=1,538) Population: California adults
Source: http://www.bizjournals.com/bizwomen/news/latest-news/2015/06/the-new-fortune-500-list-gives-a-status-update-on.html
Californians estimate that
females make up 21% of
CEOs at the 500 largest
companies in the US.
In reality, women only
make up 5%.

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Andere mochten auch

Social Business for Complex Organizations
Social Business for Complex OrganizationsSocial Business for Complex Organizations
Social Business for Complex OrganizationsEdelman Digital
 
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer - Trust and the CEO
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer - Trust and the CEO2016 Edelman Trust Barometer - Trust and the CEO
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer - Trust and the CEOEdelman
 
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Financial Services Results
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Financial Services Results2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Financial Services Results
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Financial Services ResultsEdelman
 
The Innovation Game: Why & How Businesses are Investing in Innovation Centers
The Innovation Game: Why & How Businesses are Investing in Innovation Centers The Innovation Game: Why & How Businesses are Investing in Innovation Centers
The Innovation Game: Why & How Businesses are Investing in Innovation Centers Capgemini
 
2017 Edelman TRUST BAROMETER™- Global Results
2017 Edelman TRUST BAROMETER™- Global Results2017 Edelman TRUST BAROMETER™- Global Results
2017 Edelman TRUST BAROMETER™- Global ResultsEdelman
 
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - California Results
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - California Results2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - California Results
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - California ResultsEdelman
 

Andere mochten auch (8)

The 2016 State of Social Business
The 2016 State of Social BusinessThe 2016 State of Social Business
The 2016 State of Social Business
 
Social Business for Complex Organizations
Social Business for Complex OrganizationsSocial Business for Complex Organizations
Social Business for Complex Organizations
 
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer - Trust and the CEO
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer - Trust and the CEO2016 Edelman Trust Barometer - Trust and the CEO
2016 Edelman Trust Barometer - Trust and the CEO
 
[NEW RESEARCH] Crafting A Digital Strategy
[NEW RESEARCH] Crafting A Digital Strategy[NEW RESEARCH] Crafting A Digital Strategy
[NEW RESEARCH] Crafting A Digital Strategy
 
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Financial Services Results
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Financial Services Results2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Financial Services Results
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - Financial Services Results
 
The Innovation Game: Why & How Businesses are Investing in Innovation Centers
The Innovation Game: Why & How Businesses are Investing in Innovation Centers The Innovation Game: Why & How Businesses are Investing in Innovation Centers
The Innovation Game: Why & How Businesses are Investing in Innovation Centers
 
2017 Edelman TRUST BAROMETER™- Global Results
2017 Edelman TRUST BAROMETER™- Global Results2017 Edelman TRUST BAROMETER™- Global Results
2017 Edelman TRUST BAROMETER™- Global Results
 
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - California Results
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - California Results2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - California Results
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer - California Results
 

Mehr von Edelman

2020 Edelman-LinkedIn B2B Thought Leadership Impact Study_U.S.
2020 Edelman-LinkedIn B2B Thought Leadership Impact Study_U.S.2020 Edelman-LinkedIn B2B Thought Leadership Impact Study_U.S.
2020 Edelman-LinkedIn B2B Thought Leadership Impact Study_U.S.Edelman
 
2020 Edelman-LinkedIn B2B Thought Leadership Impact Study_GLOBAL
2020 Edelman-LinkedIn B2B Thought Leadership Impact Study_GLOBAL2020 Edelman-LinkedIn B2B Thought Leadership Impact Study_GLOBAL
2020 Edelman-LinkedIn B2B Thought Leadership Impact Study_GLOBALEdelman
 
2019 Edelman-LinkedIn B2B Thought Leadership Impact Study
2019 Edelman-LinkedIn B2B Thought Leadership Impact Study2019 Edelman-LinkedIn B2B Thought Leadership Impact Study
2019 Edelman-LinkedIn B2B Thought Leadership Impact StudyEdelman
 
2018 Federal Cabinet Shuffle
2018 Federal Cabinet Shuffle2018 Federal Cabinet Shuffle
2018 Federal Cabinet ShuffleEdelman
 
The Edelman Perspective - 2018 Federal Cabinet Shuffle
The Edelman Perspective - 2018 Federal Cabinet ShuffleThe Edelman Perspective - 2018 Federal Cabinet Shuffle
The Edelman Perspective - 2018 Federal Cabinet ShuffleEdelman
 
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer: Attitudes Toward Energy in a Polarized World
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer: Attitudes Toward Energy in a Polarized World 2018 Edelman Trust Barometer: Attitudes Toward Energy in a Polarized World
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer: Attitudes Toward Energy in a Polarized World Edelman
 
Edelman Trust Barometer – U.S. Natural Gas Industry Perceptions
Edelman Trust Barometer – U.S. Natural Gas Industry PerceptionsEdelman Trust Barometer – U.S. Natural Gas Industry Perceptions
Edelman Trust Barometer – U.S. Natural Gas Industry PerceptionsEdelman
 
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer Special Report: Institutional Investors
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer Special Report: Institutional Investors2017 Edelman Trust Barometer Special Report: Institutional Investors
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer Special Report: Institutional InvestorsEdelman
 
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer Special Report: Investor Trust Executive Summary
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer Special Report: Investor Trust Executive Summary2017 Edelman Trust Barometer Special Report: Investor Trust Executive Summary
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer Special Report: Investor Trust Executive SummaryEdelman
 
8 Trends That Will Shape Travel in 2018
8 Trends That Will Shape Travel in 20188 Trends That Will Shape Travel in 2018
8 Trends That Will Shape Travel in 2018Edelman
 
The Edelman Perspective - Ontario Budget 2018
The Edelman Perspective - Ontario Budget 2018The Edelman Perspective - Ontario Budget 2018
The Edelman Perspective - Ontario Budget 2018Edelman
 
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer Special Report: Trust in Brand China
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer Special Report:  Trust in Brand China2018 Edelman Trust Barometer Special Report:  Trust in Brand China
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer Special Report: Trust in Brand ChinaEdelman
 
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Italy Report
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Italy Report 2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Italy Report
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Italy Report Edelman
 
Tendências em Viagens e Turismo na América Latina em 2018
Tendências em Viagens e Turismo na América Latina em 2018Tendências em Viagens e Turismo na América Latina em 2018
Tendências em Viagens e Turismo na América Latina em 2018Edelman
 
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - UAE
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - UAE2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - UAE
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - UAEEdelman
 
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Malaysia Report
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Malaysia Report2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Malaysia Report
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Malaysia ReportEdelman
 
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Australia Results
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Australia Results2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Australia Results
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Australia ResultsEdelman
 
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Africa Report
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Africa Report2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Africa Report
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Africa ReportEdelman
 
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Brasil Report
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Brasil Report2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Brasil Report
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Brasil ReportEdelman
 
Edelman 2018 Federal Budget Update
Edelman 2018 Federal Budget UpdateEdelman 2018 Federal Budget Update
Edelman 2018 Federal Budget UpdateEdelman
 

Mehr von Edelman (20)

2020 Edelman-LinkedIn B2B Thought Leadership Impact Study_U.S.
2020 Edelman-LinkedIn B2B Thought Leadership Impact Study_U.S.2020 Edelman-LinkedIn B2B Thought Leadership Impact Study_U.S.
2020 Edelman-LinkedIn B2B Thought Leadership Impact Study_U.S.
 
2020 Edelman-LinkedIn B2B Thought Leadership Impact Study_GLOBAL
2020 Edelman-LinkedIn B2B Thought Leadership Impact Study_GLOBAL2020 Edelman-LinkedIn B2B Thought Leadership Impact Study_GLOBAL
2020 Edelman-LinkedIn B2B Thought Leadership Impact Study_GLOBAL
 
2019 Edelman-LinkedIn B2B Thought Leadership Impact Study
2019 Edelman-LinkedIn B2B Thought Leadership Impact Study2019 Edelman-LinkedIn B2B Thought Leadership Impact Study
2019 Edelman-LinkedIn B2B Thought Leadership Impact Study
 
2018 Federal Cabinet Shuffle
2018 Federal Cabinet Shuffle2018 Federal Cabinet Shuffle
2018 Federal Cabinet Shuffle
 
The Edelman Perspective - 2018 Federal Cabinet Shuffle
The Edelman Perspective - 2018 Federal Cabinet ShuffleThe Edelman Perspective - 2018 Federal Cabinet Shuffle
The Edelman Perspective - 2018 Federal Cabinet Shuffle
 
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer: Attitudes Toward Energy in a Polarized World
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer: Attitudes Toward Energy in a Polarized World 2018 Edelman Trust Barometer: Attitudes Toward Energy in a Polarized World
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer: Attitudes Toward Energy in a Polarized World
 
Edelman Trust Barometer – U.S. Natural Gas Industry Perceptions
Edelman Trust Barometer – U.S. Natural Gas Industry PerceptionsEdelman Trust Barometer – U.S. Natural Gas Industry Perceptions
Edelman Trust Barometer – U.S. Natural Gas Industry Perceptions
 
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer Special Report: Institutional Investors
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer Special Report: Institutional Investors2017 Edelman Trust Barometer Special Report: Institutional Investors
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer Special Report: Institutional Investors
 
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer Special Report: Investor Trust Executive Summary
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer Special Report: Investor Trust Executive Summary2017 Edelman Trust Barometer Special Report: Investor Trust Executive Summary
2017 Edelman Trust Barometer Special Report: Investor Trust Executive Summary
 
8 Trends That Will Shape Travel in 2018
8 Trends That Will Shape Travel in 20188 Trends That Will Shape Travel in 2018
8 Trends That Will Shape Travel in 2018
 
The Edelman Perspective - Ontario Budget 2018
The Edelman Perspective - Ontario Budget 2018The Edelman Perspective - Ontario Budget 2018
The Edelman Perspective - Ontario Budget 2018
 
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer Special Report: Trust in Brand China
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer Special Report:  Trust in Brand China2018 Edelman Trust Barometer Special Report:  Trust in Brand China
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer Special Report: Trust in Brand China
 
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Italy Report
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Italy Report 2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Italy Report
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Italy Report
 
Tendências em Viagens e Turismo na América Latina em 2018
Tendências em Viagens e Turismo na América Latina em 2018Tendências em Viagens e Turismo na América Latina em 2018
Tendências em Viagens e Turismo na América Latina em 2018
 
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - UAE
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - UAE2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - UAE
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - UAE
 
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Malaysia Report
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Malaysia Report2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Malaysia Report
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Malaysia Report
 
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Australia Results
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Australia Results2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Australia Results
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Australia Results
 
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Africa Report
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Africa Report2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Africa Report
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - South Africa Report
 
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Brasil Report
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Brasil Report2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Brasil Report
2018 Edelman Trust Barometer - Brasil Report
 
Edelman 2018 Federal Budget Update
Edelman 2018 Federal Budget UpdateEdelman 2018 Federal Budget Update
Edelman 2018 Federal Budget Update
 

Kürzlich hochgeladen

Case study on tata clothing brand zudio in detail
Case study on tata clothing brand zudio in detailCase study on tata clothing brand zudio in detail
Case study on tata clothing brand zudio in detailAriel592675
 
Investment in The Coconut Industry by Nancy Cheruiyot
Investment in The Coconut Industry by Nancy CheruiyotInvestment in The Coconut Industry by Nancy Cheruiyot
Investment in The Coconut Industry by Nancy Cheruiyotictsugar
 
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in New Ashok Nagar Delhi NCR
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in New Ashok Nagar Delhi NCR8447779800, Low rate Call girls in New Ashok Nagar Delhi NCR
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in New Ashok Nagar Delhi NCRashishs7044
 
Innovation Conference 5th March 2024.pdf
Innovation Conference 5th March 2024.pdfInnovation Conference 5th March 2024.pdf
Innovation Conference 5th March 2024.pdfrichard876048
 
Buy gmail accounts.pdf Buy Old Gmail Accounts
Buy gmail accounts.pdf Buy Old Gmail AccountsBuy gmail accounts.pdf Buy Old Gmail Accounts
Buy gmail accounts.pdf Buy Old Gmail AccountsBuy Verified Accounts
 
Annual General Meeting Presentation Slides
Annual General Meeting Presentation SlidesAnnual General Meeting Presentation Slides
Annual General Meeting Presentation SlidesKeppelCorporation
 
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Rohini Delhi NCR
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Rohini Delhi NCR8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Rohini Delhi NCR
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Rohini Delhi NCRashishs7044
 
APRIL2024_UKRAINE_xml_0000000000000 .pdf
APRIL2024_UKRAINE_xml_0000000000000 .pdfAPRIL2024_UKRAINE_xml_0000000000000 .pdf
APRIL2024_UKRAINE_xml_0000000000000 .pdfRbc Rbcua
 
Flow Your Strategy at Flight Levels Day 2024
Flow Your Strategy at Flight Levels Day 2024Flow Your Strategy at Flight Levels Day 2024
Flow Your Strategy at Flight Levels Day 2024Kirill Klimov
 
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Kotla Mubarakpur Delhi NCR
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Kotla Mubarakpur Delhi NCR8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Kotla Mubarakpur Delhi NCR
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Kotla Mubarakpur Delhi NCRashishs7044
 
Youth Involvement in an Innovative Coconut Value Chain by Mwalimu Menza
Youth Involvement in an Innovative Coconut Value Chain by Mwalimu MenzaYouth Involvement in an Innovative Coconut Value Chain by Mwalimu Menza
Youth Involvement in an Innovative Coconut Value Chain by Mwalimu Menzaictsugar
 
Call Girls in DELHI Cantt, ( Call Me )-8377877756-Female Escort- In Delhi / Ncr
Call Girls in DELHI Cantt, ( Call Me )-8377877756-Female Escort- In Delhi / NcrCall Girls in DELHI Cantt, ( Call Me )-8377877756-Female Escort- In Delhi / Ncr
Call Girls in DELHI Cantt, ( Call Me )-8377877756-Female Escort- In Delhi / Ncrdollysharma2066
 
Call US-88OO1O2216 Call Girls In Mahipalpur Female Escort Service
Call US-88OO1O2216 Call Girls In Mahipalpur Female Escort ServiceCall US-88OO1O2216 Call Girls In Mahipalpur Female Escort Service
Call US-88OO1O2216 Call Girls In Mahipalpur Female Escort Servicecallgirls2057
 
MAHA Global and IPR: Do Actions Speak Louder Than Words?
MAHA Global and IPR: Do Actions Speak Louder Than Words?MAHA Global and IPR: Do Actions Speak Louder Than Words?
MAHA Global and IPR: Do Actions Speak Louder Than Words?Olivia Kresic
 
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Tughlakabad Delhi NCR
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Tughlakabad Delhi NCR8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Tughlakabad Delhi NCR
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Tughlakabad Delhi NCRashishs7044
 
Intro to BCG's Carbon Emissions Benchmark_vF.pdf
Intro to BCG's Carbon Emissions Benchmark_vF.pdfIntro to BCG's Carbon Emissions Benchmark_vF.pdf
Intro to BCG's Carbon Emissions Benchmark_vF.pdfpollardmorgan
 
Traction part 2 - EOS Model JAX Bridges.
Traction part 2 - EOS Model JAX Bridges.Traction part 2 - EOS Model JAX Bridges.
Traction part 2 - EOS Model JAX Bridges.Anamaria Contreras
 
PSCC - Capability Statement Presentation
PSCC - Capability Statement PresentationPSCC - Capability Statement Presentation
PSCC - Capability Statement PresentationAnamaria Contreras
 
Independent Call Girls Andheri Nightlaila 9967584737
Independent Call Girls Andheri Nightlaila 9967584737Independent Call Girls Andheri Nightlaila 9967584737
Independent Call Girls Andheri Nightlaila 9967584737Riya Pathan
 

Kürzlich hochgeladen (20)

Case study on tata clothing brand zudio in detail
Case study on tata clothing brand zudio in detailCase study on tata clothing brand zudio in detail
Case study on tata clothing brand zudio in detail
 
Investment in The Coconut Industry by Nancy Cheruiyot
Investment in The Coconut Industry by Nancy CheruiyotInvestment in The Coconut Industry by Nancy Cheruiyot
Investment in The Coconut Industry by Nancy Cheruiyot
 
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in New Ashok Nagar Delhi NCR
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in New Ashok Nagar Delhi NCR8447779800, Low rate Call girls in New Ashok Nagar Delhi NCR
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in New Ashok Nagar Delhi NCR
 
Innovation Conference 5th March 2024.pdf
Innovation Conference 5th March 2024.pdfInnovation Conference 5th March 2024.pdf
Innovation Conference 5th March 2024.pdf
 
Buy gmail accounts.pdf Buy Old Gmail Accounts
Buy gmail accounts.pdf Buy Old Gmail AccountsBuy gmail accounts.pdf Buy Old Gmail Accounts
Buy gmail accounts.pdf Buy Old Gmail Accounts
 
Call Us ➥9319373153▻Call Girls In North Goa
Call Us ➥9319373153▻Call Girls In North GoaCall Us ➥9319373153▻Call Girls In North Goa
Call Us ➥9319373153▻Call Girls In North Goa
 
Annual General Meeting Presentation Slides
Annual General Meeting Presentation SlidesAnnual General Meeting Presentation Slides
Annual General Meeting Presentation Slides
 
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Rohini Delhi NCR
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Rohini Delhi NCR8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Rohini Delhi NCR
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Rohini Delhi NCR
 
APRIL2024_UKRAINE_xml_0000000000000 .pdf
APRIL2024_UKRAINE_xml_0000000000000 .pdfAPRIL2024_UKRAINE_xml_0000000000000 .pdf
APRIL2024_UKRAINE_xml_0000000000000 .pdf
 
Flow Your Strategy at Flight Levels Day 2024
Flow Your Strategy at Flight Levels Day 2024Flow Your Strategy at Flight Levels Day 2024
Flow Your Strategy at Flight Levels Day 2024
 
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Kotla Mubarakpur Delhi NCR
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Kotla Mubarakpur Delhi NCR8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Kotla Mubarakpur Delhi NCR
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Kotla Mubarakpur Delhi NCR
 
Youth Involvement in an Innovative Coconut Value Chain by Mwalimu Menza
Youth Involvement in an Innovative Coconut Value Chain by Mwalimu MenzaYouth Involvement in an Innovative Coconut Value Chain by Mwalimu Menza
Youth Involvement in an Innovative Coconut Value Chain by Mwalimu Menza
 
Call Girls in DELHI Cantt, ( Call Me )-8377877756-Female Escort- In Delhi / Ncr
Call Girls in DELHI Cantt, ( Call Me )-8377877756-Female Escort- In Delhi / NcrCall Girls in DELHI Cantt, ( Call Me )-8377877756-Female Escort- In Delhi / Ncr
Call Girls in DELHI Cantt, ( Call Me )-8377877756-Female Escort- In Delhi / Ncr
 
Call US-88OO1O2216 Call Girls In Mahipalpur Female Escort Service
Call US-88OO1O2216 Call Girls In Mahipalpur Female Escort ServiceCall US-88OO1O2216 Call Girls In Mahipalpur Female Escort Service
Call US-88OO1O2216 Call Girls In Mahipalpur Female Escort Service
 
MAHA Global and IPR: Do Actions Speak Louder Than Words?
MAHA Global and IPR: Do Actions Speak Louder Than Words?MAHA Global and IPR: Do Actions Speak Louder Than Words?
MAHA Global and IPR: Do Actions Speak Louder Than Words?
 
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Tughlakabad Delhi NCR
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Tughlakabad Delhi NCR8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Tughlakabad Delhi NCR
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Tughlakabad Delhi NCR
 
Intro to BCG's Carbon Emissions Benchmark_vF.pdf
Intro to BCG's Carbon Emissions Benchmark_vF.pdfIntro to BCG's Carbon Emissions Benchmark_vF.pdf
Intro to BCG's Carbon Emissions Benchmark_vF.pdf
 
Traction part 2 - EOS Model JAX Bridges.
Traction part 2 - EOS Model JAX Bridges.Traction part 2 - EOS Model JAX Bridges.
Traction part 2 - EOS Model JAX Bridges.
 
PSCC - Capability Statement Presentation
PSCC - Capability Statement PresentationPSCC - Capability Statement Presentation
PSCC - Capability Statement Presentation
 
Independent Call Girls Andheri Nightlaila 9967584737
Independent Call Girls Andheri Nightlaila 9967584737Independent Call Girls Andheri Nightlaila 9967584737
Independent Call Girls Andheri Nightlaila 9967584737
 

2016 Edelman Trust Barometer - California Results

  • 2. 2 GLOBAL TRUST SURVEYS IN RETROSPECT Rising Influence of NGOs 2001 Business Must Partner with Government to Regain Trust 2009 Fall of the Celebrity CEO 2002 Earned Media More Credible Than Advertising 2003 U.S. Companies in Europe Suffer Trust Discount 2004 Trust Shifts from “Authorities” to Peers 2005 “A Person Like Me” Emerges as Credible Spokesperson 2006 Business More Trusted Than Government and Media 2007 Young Influencers Have More Trust in Business 2008 Trust is Now an Essential Line of Business 2010 Rise of Authority Figures 2011 Fall of Government 2012 Crisis of Leadership 2013 Business to Lead the Debate for Change 2014 Trust is Essential to Innovation 2015 Growing Inequality of Trust 2016 For more information on Edelman’s Global Trust survey, please visit http://www.edelman.com/insights/intellectual-property/2016-edelman-trust-barometer/
  • 3. 3 Informed Public ‣ 8 years in 20+ markets ‣ Represents 15% of total global population ‣ 500 respondents in U.S. and China; 200 in all other countries Must meet 4 criteria: ‣ Ages 25-64 ‣ College educated ‣ In top 25% of household income per age group in each country ‣ Report significant media consumption and engagement in business news General Online Population ‣ 5 years in 25+ markets ‣ Ages 18+ ‣ 1,150 respondents per country GLOBAL TRUST METHODOLOGY 28-country global data margin of error: General Population +/-0.6% (N=32,200), Informed Public +/- 1.2% (N=6,200), Mass Population +/- 0.6% (26,000). Country-specific data margin of error: General Population +/- 2.9 ( N=1,150), Informed Public +/- 6.9% (N = min 200, varies by country), China and U.S. +/- 4.4% (N=500), Mass Population +/- 3.0 to 3.6 (N =min 740, varies by country), half sample Global General Online Population +/- 0.8 (N=16,100). ‣ 16 years of data ‣ 33,000+ respondents total ‣ All fieldwork was conducted between October 13th and November 16th, 2015 Online Survey in 28 Countries Mass Population ‣ All population not including Informed Public ‣ Represents 85% of total global population
  • 5. 5 51 48 45 41 55 53 47 42 63 57 51 48 67 63 57 51 GLOBALLY, TRUST RISING Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Q11-14. Below is a list of institutions. For each one, please indicate how much you trust that institution to do what is right using a nine-point scale, where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal.” (Top 4 Box, Trust) Informed Public and General Population, 27-country global total. PERCENT TRUST IN THE FOUR INSTITUTIONS OF GOVERNMENT, BUSINESS, MEDIA AND NGOS, 2015 VS. 2016 NGOs Business Media Government +4 +6 +6 +3 Informed Public General Population 2015 2016 +4 +5 +2 +1
  • 7. 7 53 58 56 56 60 44 47 46 46 48 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 A SIGNIFICANT DIVIDE Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Q11-14. Below is a list of institutions. For each one, please indicate how much you trust that institution to do what is right using a nine-point scale, where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal.” (Top 4 Box, Trust) Informed Public and Mass Population, 25-country global total. GDP 5 = U.S., China, Japan, Germany, U.K. PERCENT TRUST IN THE FOUR INSTITUTIONS OF GOVERNMENT, BUSINESS, MEDIA AND NGOS, 2012 TO 2016, ACROSS 25 COUNTRIES Informed Public Mass Population 12pt Gap 9pt Gap in trust inequality--which jumps to a 5-point increase among the GDP5 3-point increase
  • 8. 8 A GLOBAL PHENOMENON Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer. The Trust Index is an average of a country’s trust in the institutions of government, business, media and NGOs, 28-country global total. TRUST INDEX, INFORMED PUBLIC VS. MASS POPULATION, 15 COUNTRIES WITH DOUBLE-DIGIT TRUST GAPS IN 2016 Country Informed Public Mass Population Gap U.S. 64 45 19 U.K. 57 40 17 France 55 39 16 India 78 62 16 Australia 63 47 16 Mexico 72 57 15 Italy 58 47 11 China 82 71 11 Brazil 58 48 10 Ireland 49 39 10 Netherlands 62 52 10 Sweden 46 36 10 S. Africa 54 44 10 S. Korea 50 40 10 Singapore 72 62 10
  • 10. 10 Mass Population THE INVERSION OF INFLUENCE Authority & Influence Influence Authority Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Q11-14. Below is a list of institutions. For each one, please indicate how much you trust that institution to do what is right using a nine-point scale, where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal.” (Top 4 Box, Trust) Informed Public and Mass Population, 28-country global total. 85% of population 48 Trust Index 15% of population 60 Trust Index Informed Public
  • 11. 11 63 64 57 50 48 41 50 39 33 67 64 63 53 52 49 48 44 35 PEERS, EMPLOYEES MORE CREDIBLE THAN LEADERS Source: 2016 Edelman. Trust Barometer Q130-587. Below is a list of people. In general, when forming an opinion of a company, if you heard information about a company from each person, how credible would the information be—extremely credible, very credible, somewhat credible, or not credible at all? (Top 2 Box, Very/Extremely Credible) General Population, 27-country global total. PERCENT WHO RATE EACH SPOKESPERSON AS EXTREMELY/VERY CREDIBLE 2015 2016 +8 Technical expert Academic expert A person like yourself Financial industry analyst Employee CEO NGO representative Board of Directors Government official/regulator CEO credibility increased the most General Population +6
  • 13. 13 BUSINESS MUST LEAD TO SOLVE PROBLEMS Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Q249. Please indicate how much you agree or disagree with the following statement? (Top 4 Box, Agree). General Population, 27-country global total, question asked of half the sample. . 80% agree “A company can take specific actions that both increase profits and improve the economic and social conditions in the community where it operates.” up from 74% in 2015 General Population
  • 14. 14
  • 15. 15 Informed Public N: 244; MOE: ±6.3% Mass Population N: 1,294; MOE: ±2.7% METHODOLOGY | 2016 CA SURVEY *We conducted an online statewide survey of 1,538 California residents. The results were weighted to Census data to be representative of the CA adult population. California Regions Surveyed San Francisco Bay Area N: 503 MOE: ±4.4% % of State: 21% LA Area N: 523 MOE: ±4.3% % of State: 48% Rest of State N: 570 MOE: ±4.1% % of State: 31% TOTAL N: 1,538; MOE: ±2.5% *Informed Public definition: top household income, college educated, significant media consumption. Represents ~10% of population *Mass population definition: not informed public, ~90% of population Other groups January 17-25, 2016 1,538 adults 18+
  • 16. 16 CA KEY FINDINGS Trust • Tech, ag, and retail most trusted industries in CA • CA more distrustful of institutions than US across the board; particularly skeptical about the media • Ag and “sharing economy” have improved their image, while real estate and pharmaceuticals face a more apprehensive public • Trust linked to positive impact on community rather than economic stimulus CA Issues • Drought concerns up, now above the economy • Housing costs are a significant threat to CA growth – far outpacing all other threats (especially in the Bay Area) Inequality • Inequality is rising and success is becoming seen as out of reach for more and more
  • 17. 17 CA KEY FINDINGS Business role • License to lead on societal issues - business most trusted entity • However, public-private partnership preferred over going it alone • Highest interest in business getting involved on issues relevant to the business or its workers (i.e. economy, inequality, housing, and transportation) CEOs • CEOs have lost their sheen • Most widely seen as greedy, arrogant and phony – but Tech CEOs, like their industry, seen more positively • Tech CEOs provide a lesson to all CEOs: honesty and sincerity are critical…and lacking among many CEOs Media
  • 19. 19 Q11G: Please indicate how much you trust businesses in each of the following industries to do what is right. Again, please use the same 9-point scale where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal”. Full industry description: Telecommunications (telephone, wireless, internet, and cable service providers), Consumer Electronics Manufacturing (includes companies that make equipment intended for everyday use in entertainment, communications and offices, including personal computers, mobile devices, digital cameras, gaming consoles, e-readers, DVD players and MP3 players), The “sharing economy” (peer to peer businesses like Uber, Lyft, and Airbnb, which are built on individuals sharing or renting unused resources to other individuals); Retail (including both stores with physical locations and online-only retailers). Population: California adults 66% 65% 63% 59% 56% 55% 54% 53% 53% 53% 51% 49% 46% 45% 43% Technology Agriculture Retail Consumer Electronics Manufacturing Startup companies Transportation and Infrastructure Telecommunications Energy Biotech/life sciences Healthcare Entertainment The “sharing economy” Financial services Real Estate Pharmaceuticals BIOTECH & HEALTHCARE 10PTS HIGHER THAN PHARMA TECH MOST TRUSTED IN CA, AG AND RETAIL CLOSE
  • 20. 20 TRUST DECREASES AS TIME IN CA INCREASES CALIFORNIANS ARE SKEPTICS, ESPECIALLY ABOUT THE MEDIA Q3: Below is a list of institutions and people. For each one, please indicate how much you trust that institution or person to do what is right using a 9-point scale where 1 means that you “do not trust them at all” and 9 means that you “trust them a great deal”. Shown: % Trust 6-9. Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Q11-14. Below is a list of institutions. For each one, please indicate how much you trust that institution to do what is right using a nine-point scale, where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal.” (Top 4 Box, Trust) General Population, U.S. and 28-country global total. 48% 46% 37% 33% 51% 57% 39% 47% 53% 55% 42% 48% Business NGOs Government Media CA US Global Time in CA <20 yrs: 40% 20+ yrs: 32% CA’s most trusted institution
  • 21. 21 AMONG CALIFORNIANS WHOSE TRUST IN BUSINESS DECLINED, EXCESSIVE FOCUS ON PROFIT CITED Among those whose trust in each institution decreased: QN2. Earlier, you stated that your trust in government in general has declined over the last year. Which is the larger reason your trust in government in general has declined over the last year? QN3. Earlier, you stated that your trust in business in general has declined over the last year. Which is the largest reason your trust in business in general has declined over the last year? Population: California adults 41% 33% 15% 10% 2% Businesses are too focused on profit, rather than focused on customers or quality CEOs and shareholders are making record profits but paying their workers little Data security and hacking/personal information is not safe Businesses are not contributing to the greater good Some other reason
  • 22. 22 Q5: Please indicate how much you think each of the following industries is fueling the economy in your area of California. A great deal, Some, A little, None, Don’t know Full industry description: Telecommunications (telephone, wireless, internet, and cable service providers), Consumer Electronics Manufacturing (includes companies that make equipment intended for everyday use in entertainment, communications and offices, including personal computers, mobile devices, digital cameras, gaming consoles, e-readers, DVD players and MP3 players), The “sharing economy” (peer to peer businesses like Uber, Lyft, and Airbnb, which are built on individuals sharing or renting unused resources to other individuals), 2016 ONLY: Retail (including both stores with physical locations and online-only retailers). Population: California adults WHILE STILL TRAILING ESTABLISHED INDUSTRIES, “SHARING ECONOMY” PICKING UP ECONOMIC STEAM IN CA 24% 33% 22% 26% 21% 20% 26% 24% 20% 15% 15% 16% 13% 13% 12% 41% 29% 39% 35% 40% 36% 28% 30% 31% 34% 34% 31% 27% 28% 27% 65% 62% 62% 61% 61% 56% 54% 54% 51% 50% 49% 46% 41% 41% 39% Retail Technology Real Estate Telecommunications Healthcare Energy Agriculture Entertainment Consumer Electronics Manufacturing Financial services Transportation and infrastructure Pharmaceuticals The “sharing economy” Biotech/life sciences Startup companies A Great Deal Some n/a -3 +1 -1 +3 -3 +1 +1 +0 +0 -1 +3 +6 -3 -2 Δ Since 2015
  • 23. 23 TOP 2 INDUSTRIES FUELING ECONOMY VARY GREATLY Q5: Please indicate how much you think each of the following industries is fueling the economy in your area of California. A great deal, Some, A little, None, Don’t know Full industry description: Telecommunications (telephone, wireless, internet, and cable service providers), Consumer Electronics Manufacturing (includes companies that make equipment intended for everyday use in entertainment, communications and offices, including personal computers, mobile devices, digital cameras, gaming consoles, e-readers, DVD players and MP3 players), The “sharing economy” (peer to peer businesses like Uber, Lyft, and Airbnb, which are built on individuals sharing or renting unused resources to other individuals), 2016 ONLY: Retail (including both stores with physical locations and online-only retailers). Shown: great deal + some. CALIFORNIA’S ECONOMIC DIVERSITY SHOWS THROUGH Bay Area Tech Real Estate LA Area Retail Entertainment Rest of State Retail Agriculture Full list and percentages in appendix
  • 24. 24 HIGHEST NEGATIVE IMPACT AND LOOMING THREAT: REAL ESTATE Q25: For each industry, please indicate whether, on the whole, that industry is currently having a positive or negative impact on the state of California and its communities. Very positive, Somewhat positive, Somewhat negative, Very negative, Don’t know. Population: California adults TECH SIGNIFICANTLY BEATING OTHER INDUSTRIES ON POSITIVE IMPACT Pharma, 39% Financial services, 40% Real Estate, 42% Health care, 39% Transport & Infrastructure, 31% Energy, 32% Biotech/ life sciences, 19% The “sharing economy”, 26% Entertain, 26% Agriculture, 23% Startup companies, 20% Telecom, 25% Consumer Electr Mfg, 19% Retail, 19% Technology, 14% 45% 45% 47% 51% 56% 57% 58% 59% 64% 64% 64% 65% 67% 71% 78% Negative Positive Δ Since 2015 +2 +1 +1 +6 +5 n/a 0 -1 -1 -1 -1 -5 -5 -4 -6
  • 25. 25 Q25: For each industry, please indicate whether, on the whole, that industry is currently having a positive or negative impact on the state of California and its communities. Very positive, Somewhat positive, Somewhat negative, Very negative, Don’t know. Population: California adults AG NEEDED TO (AND DID) PROVE WORTH TO FEND OFF DROUGHT RESTRICTIONS; SHARING ECON INCREASINGLY REVEALING POSITIVE IMPACT BUT ROOM TO GROW 6% 5% -5% -5% -6% Agriculture The “sharing economy” Energy Real Estate Pharmaceuticals INDUSTRIES AT THE BOTTOM ARE GETTING WORSE...SUGGESTING A GROWING TRUST GAP FOR SOME
  • 26. 26 WEAK RELATIONSHIP FUELING ECONOMY TRUST ONLY A WEAK LINK BETWEEN ECONOMIC IMPACT & TRUST STRONG LINK BETWEEN COMMUNITY IMPACT & TRUST Q5CA: Please indicate how much you think each of the following industries is fueling the economy in your area of California. A great deal, Some, A little, None, Don’t know Q11G: Please indicate how much you trust businesses in each of the following industries to do what is right. Again, please use the same 9-point scale where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal”. Q25CA: For each industry, please indicate whether, on the whole, that industry is currently having a positive or negative impact on the state of California and its communities. Very positive, Somewhat positive, , Somewhat negative, Very negative, Don’t know. Population: California adults 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% TRUST POSITIVE IMPACT ON COMMUNITY CLEAR RELATIONSHIP
  • 28. 28Q2: Which of the following state issues do you think is the most important for California’s Governor and State Legislature to address? Population: California adults THE DROUGHT LOOMS LARGE IN CA POLITICS, SURPASSING THE ECONOMY 19% 18% 9% 7% 7% 6% 6% 5% 5% 4% 3% 3% 3% 2% 2% 1% Water/drought The economy Immigration The state budget Education Taxes Homelessness Health care Crime Housing Income inequality Infrastructure Public trust in law enforcement Other Mental illness Innovation +8 since 2015 Economy < drought because few in the Bay Area cite the economy as a problem to fix, while drought concerns are high across the board ECONOMY PERCEIVED TO BE MORE PROBLEMATIC OUTSIDE THE BAY AREA
  • 29. 29 BAY AREA NOTABLY DIFFERENT THAN LA OR OTHER AREAS OF CA Q4: Which of the following issues do you think is the most important for your local government to address? Population: California adults LOCALLY, HOMELESSNESS AND HOUSING ALSO STAND OUT 14% 11% 15% 16% 13% 11% 14% 15% 12% 10% 12% 13% Total Bay Area LA Area Rest of State Economy Drought Economy Homeless Homeless Drought Drought Drought Homeless Economy Housing Education Twice as many want local government to address homelessness vs state government (6%)
  • 30. 30 Q8. Which of the following do you think is the most likely to hold back California’s economy and hamper growth? Not shown: Lack of innovation by businesses (3%), Not enough trained workers (3%), Other (7%), Don’t know (4%). Population: California adults COST OF LIVING POSES SERIOUS THREAT TO CA GROWTH 28% 15% 9% 9% 7% 6% 4% 4% 38% 13% 7% 8% 8% 6% 5% 2% 28% 14% 10% 9% 7% 7% 3% 4% 20% 19% 10% 11% 6% 6% 4% 5% Total Bay Area LA Area Rest of State Crime /security High housing costs The drought Lack of affordable higher education/ college debt High health care costs Failing schools Transportation system overloaded Problems in agriculture/inability to grow food Housing costs nearly 2x next threat (3x in Bay Area)
  • 32. A GLOBAL PHENOMENON Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer. The Trust Index is an average of a country’s trust in the institutions of government, business, media and NGOs, 28-country global total. 3 Trust Index, Informed Public vs. Mass Population, 15 countries with double-digit trust gaps in 2016 Country Informed Public Mass Population Gap U.S. 64 45 19 U.K. 57 40 17 France 55 39 16 India 78 62 16 Australia 63 47 16 Mexico 72 57 15 Italy 58 47 11 China 82 71 11 Brazil 58 48 10 Ireland 49 39 10 Netherlands 62 52 10 Sweden 46 36 10 S. Africa 54 44 10 S. Korea 50 40 10 Singapore 72 62 10
  • 33. 33 THE INEQUALITY OF TRUST; CA EVEN MORE DIVIDED THAN THE US CA: Q3: Below is a list of institutions and people. For each one, please indicate how much you trust that institution or person to do what is right using a 9-point scale where 1 means that you “do not trust them at all” and 9 means that you “trust them a great deal”. Shown: % Trust 6-9. US Source: 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Q11-14. Below is a list of institutions. For each one, please indicate how much you trust that institution to do what is right using a nine-point scale, where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal.” (Top 4 Box, Trust) Informed Public and Mass Population, U.S. 67% 66% 55% 49% 45% 44% 35% 32% Business NGOs Government Media +22 +22 +20 +17 Informed Public Mass Population Avg Gap +20 +19
  • 34. 34 10%59%31% N27. Which best describes your financial situation? (n=1,538) Population: California adults FEW IN CA BELIEVE THEY ARE GETTING AHEAD Falling Behind INFORMED PUBLIC AND THE WEALTHY ARE MUCH MORE LIKELY TO BELIEVE THEY ARE GETTING AHEAD Keeping Up Getting Ahead 9% Informed Public Mass Pop. 5% $100k+ <50k
  • 35. 35 N28. Compared to 5 years ago… Is it now easier or harder to get ahead than it was 5 years ago? (Millennilas n= 508; Gen X n= 508; Baby Boomers n= 633) Q445G. Thinking about the economic prospects for yourself and your family, how do you think you and your family will be doing in five years’ time? (Millennilas n= 508; Gen X n= 508; Baby Boomers n= 633) Population: California adults MOST BELIEVE THAT THE STRUGGLE HAS ONLY GOTTEN MORE DIFFICULT AND FEWER THAN HALF SEE A BRIGHTER FUTURE 17% 23% 60% Among All Harder About the same Easier 47% 36% 17% Among All Worse off About the same/ not sure Better off 56% of Millennials show a youthful optimism for the future (vs. just 33% of Baby Boomers) YOUNGER GENERATIONS ARE MORE OPTIMISTIC
  • 36. 36 UNEVEN DISTRIBUTION OF TECH SECTOR BENEFITS IN CA, AND THE MIDDLE CLASS AND POOR ARE PAYING THE PRICE HARMED QN1. Please indicate whether the growth of the technology sector in California has benefited, harmed, or had no impact on people in each of the following groups. (n=1,538) Population: California adults Wealthy 76%Believe the growth of technology has benefited the wealthy Middle Class Poor 32% 19%Believe the growth of technology has benefited the poor 51%Believe the growth of technology has harmed the poor Believe the growth of technology has benefited the middle class 45% Believe the growth of technology has harmed the middle class 7%Believe the growth of technology has harmed the wealthy
  • 37. 37 SIMILAR UNEVEN DISTRIBUTION OF TECH SECTOR BENEFITS IN THE BAY AREA HARMED QN1. Please indicate whether the growth of the technology sector in California has benefited, harmed, or had no impact on people in each of the following groups. Population: Bay Area adults Wealthy 75%Believe the growth of technology has benefited the wealthy Middle Class Poor 37% 20%Believe the growth of technology has benefited the poor 53%Believe the growth of technology has harmed the poor Believe the growth of technology has benefited the middle class 43% Believe the growth of technology has harmed the middle class 10%Believe the growth of technology has harmed the wealthy
  • 38. 38 INEQUALITY IN THE TECH SECTOR IS A HIGH CONCERN, ESPECIALLY IN BAY AREA QN17. Switching topics slightly, what are your top concerns about the technology industry? Please select all that apply. (n=1,538) Population: California adults 42% of Californians say one of their top concerns about the tech industry is that Tech CEOs and employees make a lot of money, while regular people struggle to make ends meet 41% of people in the Bay Area believe the tech sector is creating a society of “haves” and “have-nots” vs. 36% statewide
  • 39. 39 WHILE MOST TRUSTED INDUSTRY IN CA, TECH IS NOT INFALLIBLE 54% 53% 50% 42% 36% 31% 29% 27% 16% 13% Failure to protect from data security threats People are too focused on their technology and gadgets rather than real life Lack of privacy/my data is shared too much Tech CEOs and employees make a lot of money, while regular people struggle to make ends meet It is creating a society of “haves” and “have-nots” It is moving too fast, without safeguards It is increasing housing costs The tech bubble crashing and many people losing their jobs Lack of diversity at tech companies It is creating traffic QN17. Switching topics slightly, what are your top concerns about the technology industry? Please select all that apply. (n=1,538) Population: California adults Industry issues Issues that impact respondents directly Bay Area: 45% WORRIES CENTER MORE ON RISKS TO RESPONDENT’S OWN LIFE THAN INDUSTRY IMPERFECTIONS
  • 41. 41QN6. Overall, who do you trust most to address and solve the issues we face in California? Population: California adults PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS PREFERRED OVER ANYONE GOING IT ALONE 34% 31% 20% 15% Public-private partnerships (i.e. joint projects between the government and private businesses) Non-profit organizations Government Business
  • 42. 42 LOWER TRUST ON ISSUES THAT ARE LESS RELEVANT TO THEIR BUSINESS AND WORKERS QN5. Overall, who do you trust more to address and solve the issues we face in California? (n=783) QN4. For each of the following issues and problems in in California, please indicate who you would trust more to address them, the government or business? (n=783) Population: California adults IF BUSINESS GETS INVOLVED, WHERE FIRST? 55% Government 45% Business 47% 47% 51% 47% The economy Income inequality High housing costs Transportation
  • 44. 44 TECH CEOS HAVE MORE LICENSE TO LEAD THAN OTHERS Q447G. Thinking about company CEOs, please indicate how much you trust CEOs to do what is right using a 9-point scale where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal”. (Please select one response for each.) (n=1,538) Population: California adults 36% 41% 18% 19% 40% 34% CEOs in general CEOs of tech companies + 5% Total Distrust (1-4) Neutral (5) Total Trust (6-9) Informed Public trust tech CEOs
  • 45. 45 TECH CEOS ARE MORE TRUSTED ACROSS THE STATE, LARGEST GAP IN BAY AREA Q447G. Thinking about company CEOs, please indicate how much you trust CEOs to do what is right using a 9-point scale where one means that you “do not trust them at all” and nine means that you “trust them a great deal”. (Please select one response for each.) (n=1,538) Population: California adults 45% 41% 38% 36% 36% 35% Bay Area LA Area Rest of State CEOs in general CEOs of Tech Companies +9 +5 +3
  • 46. 46 WHY ARE TECH CEOS MORE TRUSTED? THEY ARE MORE SINCERE THAN OTHER CEOS QN11A (SPLIT A). Please indicate how well each of the following terms apply to CEOs, using a scale from 1 to 9, where 1 means it does not apply at all and 9 means it applies extremely well. (n=783) QN11B (SPLIT B). Please indicate how well each of the following terms apply to tech CEOs, using a scale from 1 to 9, where 1 means it does not apply at all and 9 means it applies extremely well. (n=783) Population: California adults 12% 12% 11% 10% 10% 7% 6% 6% 5% 4% 4% 4% 2% -10% -11% -13% Tech CEOs less likely than other CEOs to be described negatively Honest Innovative Authentic Integrity Competent Ethical Collaborative Compassionate Generous Transparent Inspirational A role model Accountable Arrogant Greedy Phony PROVIDES A LESSON – HONEST AND AUTHENTIC CEOS ARE MORE TRUSTED
  • 47. 47 CEOS IN THE TECH SECTOR ARE TOP OF MIND QN9. Thinking about CEOs of companies, please name the first 3 that come to mind. If you are unable to think of any, please write N/A. (OPEN END) QN10. What 1 CEO do you trust the most to do what is right? If you are unable to think of any, please write N/A. (OPEN END) Population: California adults Marissa Mayer of Yahoo! Is the only female in the top 10 CEOs mentioned Top 10 Mark Zuckerberg 18% Bill Gates 13% Tim Cook 8% Steve Jobs 7% Donald Trump 5% Elon Musk 4% Larry Ellison 3% Marissa Mayer 3% Warren Buffett 3% Jeff Bezos 2% Top 10 Bill Gates 20% Mark Zuckerberg 17% Elon Musk 8% Tim Cook 8% Donald Trump 7% Steve Jobs 4% Warren Buffett 4% Satya Nadella 2% Jeff Bezos 2% Meg Whitman 1%
  • 48. 48 FEW EXPECT CEOS TO BE FEMALE…BUT, SADLY, THEY EVEN OVERESTIMATE QN16. If you had to guess, what percentage of the CEOs at the 500 largest companies in the US do you think are female? (n=1,538) Population: California adults Source: http://www.bizjournals.com/bizwomen/news/latest-news/2015/06/the-new-fortune-500-list-gives-a-status-update-on.html Californians estimate that females make up 21% of CEOs at the 500 largest companies in the US. In reality, women only make up 5%.