12. Algorithm for HER2 and/or HER2 testing by IHC and/or FISH Wolff AC et al. JCO 2007
13.
14.
15. Caveats 3: molecular ≠ pathological ≠ clinical definition « Basal-like » cancers are associated with bad prognosis and are frequently ER and HER2 negative: Triple negative ?
17. BRCA1 downregulation High histological grade Medullary histological type Basal-like immunophenotype TN Hanneman et al EBCC6
18. TNBC overlaps with BLBC a subgroup that expresses cytokeratins and other non-luminal (basal) genes. Breast cancers occurring in patients with germline BRCA1 mutations are often TNBC & BLBC, bringing the hypothesis that BRCA1 defects or deficiency may be involved in sporadic TNBC and BLBC Carey L et al. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2010
21. Intrinsic subtype distribution within the triple-negative tumor category shown with and without Claudin-low tumors. Prat A, Perou CM. Molecular Oncology 2011
22.
23. Part of prognosis is always driven by pathology Basal-like and Triple Negative Breast Cancers High grade tumours Medullary breast cancer Metaplastic breast cancer Grade 3 – IDC-NST Low grade tumours Secretory carcinoma Adenoid cystic carcinoma Courtesy F Penault LLorca
24. Natural Histoty & Prognosis Prat A, Perou CM. Molecular Oncology 2011
26. Tumor size by nodal status in the triple-negative and other groups Dent R et al. Clin Canc Res 2007 Method of breast cancer detection in the triple-negative and other groups
27. Local Reccurence, Distant Reccurence and Death HRs in the TNBC group compared with the other group Dent R et al. Clin Canc Res 2007
28.
29. Local Reccurence, Distant Reccurence and Death HRs in the TNBC group compared with the other group Dent R et al. Clin Canc Res 2007
30. Rates of distant recurrences and breast-specific survival in TNBC and other breast cancers. RFS OS Dent R et al. Clin Canc Res 2007
31. Rates of distant recurrences following surgery in triple-negative and other breast cancers. Dent R et al. Clin Canc Res 2007
32.
33.
34.
35. Local Reccurence, Distant Reccurence and Death HRs in the TNBC group compared with the other group Dent R et al. Clin Canc Res 2007
36.
37.
38. There are limited single-arm prospective data for certain patient populations regarding the use of accelerated partial breast irradiation, including those with negative ES receptor satus.
39. Natural Histoty & Prognosis Prat A, Perou CM. Molecular Oncology 2011
40.
41. pCR and OS relationship Rastogi P et al. JCO 2008 NSABP B18 NSABP B27
42. Liedtke C et al. JCO 2008 pCR and OS relationship in TNBC
43.
44.
45.
46.
47. Importance of Alkylating agents for TNBC MA5 Study - 710 patients - CMF vs CEF The interaction between basal status and treatment is borderline significant (p=0.06) Test of main hypothesis: comparison of overall survival in core basal patients versus all other subtypes in MA5, stratified by treatment arm Evaluation immunohistochimique de ER, PR, HER2, Ki67, CK5/6, EGFR Cheang M et al. ASCO 2009 Biological subtype and treatments N 5-Year OS (95% CI) P-value Hazard ratio (95% CI) Log-rank Wilcoxon CEF Core basal 35 51% (35-68) 0.02 0.002 1.84 (1.09-3.11) All others 209 80% (74-85) CMF Core basal 35 71% (56-86) 0.72 0.74 0.90 (0.50-1.60) All others 232 71% (64-76)
48.
49.
50.
51. TNBC platin compounds – refractory patients 1 Baselga et al. ESMO 2010; 2 O ’ Shaughnessy et al. ESMO 2010; 3 Carey et al. ASCO 2008 Study Platin arm Doses N First line ORR (%) PFS BALI-1 1 Cisplatin 75 mg/m 2 q3w 58 73% 6 (10.3%) 1.5 months BSI-201 2 Carbo - Gem AUC 2 d1, 8 q3w 1000 mg/m 2 d1, 8 62 60% 20 (32,2%) 3.6 months TBCRC-001 3 Carbo – Cetuximab AUC 2 d1, 8, 15 q4w 71 46% 13 (18%) 2.0 months
56. FINXX TRIAL Time to any recurrence: Patients with triple-negative cancer (n=202) HR = 0.43 (p = 0.024) 95% CI 0.21 – 0.90 HR: 0.43, 95% CI 0.21–0.90 P = 0.024 TX + CEX, n=93 T + CEF, n=109 Courtesy H Joensuu
64. Structural and Functional characteristics of PARP1 Rouleau et al. Nat Rev Cancer 2010 10- to 500-fold increase in PARP1 activity PARP1 is active in a homodimeric form The dense negative charge of pADPr succeeds has the loss of affinity of PARP1 for DNA and allowes the recruitement of repair proteins
65.
66. Strategies to target PARP1 ionizing radiation DNA-methylating agents NAD + Catalytic inhibition Nicotinamide
67. Strategies to target PARP1 ionizing radiation DNA-methylating agents Catalytic inhibition Other PARPs Mono-ADP-ribosyl-transferase Sirtuins … NAD + Nicotinamide
68. Strategies to target PARP1 ionizing radiation DNA-methylating agents PARP activity must be inhibited by > 90% to detectably impair DNA repair
69. Clinical development approaches of PARP inhibitors Targeting cells genetically predisposed to die when PARP activity is lost Combining PARP inhibitors with DNA-damaging agents
BV=bevacizumab, CI=confidence interval, ER=estrogen receptor, PR=progesterone receptor. Updated overall survival data with cutoff date of April 30, 2009 for AVADO and February 23, 2009 for RIBBON-1 was used for this analysis.