SlideShare ist ein Scribd-Unternehmen logo
1 von 20
Variables that affect the Super Bowl Winners
By: Hailee Gunn, Kristina Markey, Kevin Mathews, Christina Mavroudisc, and Donna Moulton
Table of Contents
1
An executive summary ...………………………….………………………………………..………….. 2
Description of the data ..…………………………….……………………………………………….3 - 4
Charts and Graphs ………………………………………………………...……………………...……..5
Results of Data .………………………………………….……………………..…………………….5 - 6
Discussion of Results ..……………………………………………...………………….…………...6 - 8
References …...……………………………………………………………………….………………….8
Appendix ..………………………………………….………………………………………………10 - 20
2
Executive Summary:
This report will give an overview of the winning Super Bowl teams and how different
variables affected the outcome of the games. The variables that we tested for this project are:
stadium type (indoor and outdoor), the weather (sunny, rain, snow), Interval win, Average age,
teams that won the Super Bowl more than once, and teams that appeared in the Super Bowl
more than once. In order to do this, we looked through online sports databases to find our data
and put it into Excel. We then made charts to visualize our data and finally ran our regression
analysis to see which variables were significant. Below are the results of our experimental
research design. We run a regression multiple times, we computed that the only significant
variables in our regression were interval win and that Pittsburgh, New England, and the NY
Giant were the only significant teams. From the beginning we felt that interval win would be a
significant indicator and were correct in predicting this. However, most of our other variables
were found insignificant. We found that the Pittsburgh team was significant and they were one
of the teams that won back to back and actually did so twice. We concluded that winning a
Super Bowl more than once is a significant variable for these three teams specifically.
3
Description of the Data:
Our main source for out Super Bowl data came from this website database football
(http://www.databasefootball.com/leagues/superbowl.htm). The information we found on this
database were the winning teams, the year of the Super Bowl, and the winning and losing
scores. We used this to compute our Y variable of interval win. For the rest of our data we
found a PDF of the winning teams, by year, that also included the stadium name, stadium type,
and weather the day of the game. The PDF was created by William William Schmitz of the
Southeast Regional Climate Center; (https://www.sercc.com/SuperBowlClimate.pdf). We also
found some data from online football websites that had articles on some of the winning teams
along with different team stats. The links to those websites can be found on our reference page.
When first setting up our excel document we have 51 rows including our labels and we
have 24 columns worth of variables that we used to run the regression analysis. Our Y variable
was interval win. Our X variables were winner of the game, loser of the game, Super Bowl,
stadium type (outdoor or dome), weather (rain or snow), average age, back to back win. Our
dummy variables were Green Bay, Miami, Pittsburg, San Francisco, Dallas, Denver, New
England, Baltimore, and NY Giants. This was due to the fact that they had either back to back
wins or won the Super Bowl more than once. After running this regression, we found that only
the outdoor variable was significant. This meant that the stadium was an outdoor stadium,
rather than a dome. Therefore, we changed our variables and re-ran our data set.
In setting up our second excel document we had 51 rows and 24 columns. We still used
interval win as our Y variable. However, we only ran 16 of our X variables. Our X variables were
outdoor bad weather, average age, and back to back win. Our dummy variables were Green
Bay, Miami, Pittsburg, San Francisco, Dallas, Denver, New England, Baltimore and the NY
Giants. In running this regression we found three significant variables however we also found an
error on the user end and had to run the regression one more time.
4
Our final time that we ran the regression we had 51 rows and 12 columns. Once again
we used interval win as our Y variable. Our final X variables were Pittsburg, New England, and
NY Giants. With this, we found that all variables were significant.
Charts and Graphs:
We made a bar graph of interval win for each Super Bowls winning team. The interval win was
calculated by how much that team won by (subtracting the losing team's final score from the
winning team's final score) and it was our Y variable for running regression. This specific chart
gives us a visual representation of not only who won each Super Bowl but also how much the
winning team actually won by. As one can see, the highest overall interval win was held by San
Francisco and the lowest was held by the NY Giants.
5
In this chart we used a pivot table to show the total amount of times each team won the Super
Bowl. Two of our X variables were back to back win and teams that won more than once, so, we
then made a bar graph with the data from the pivot table to get a visual representation of the
totaled data. As you can see, Pittsburg won the most amount of Super Bowls while Chicago,
the Colts, Kansas City, LA Raider, the Jets, the Saints, Seattle, St. Louis, and Tampa Bay have
won only once.
Results of Data Modeling with Regression:
Our first data set that we put together had 24 variables and then all 50 super bowl games and
the regression analysis came back and showed that there were no significant outcomes and
showed multiple number errors. We then went back through our data set and then eliminated
some of the variables and replaced them with other variables and then re-ran the regression
analysis to find our outcome. When we re-ran the regression analysis with 13 variables and
found that we had three significant variables, Pittsburgh, New england and the NY Giants came
back as significant variable. After looking at the results of this analysis we decided to adjust our
data and then run the regression analysis one more time and eliminated a few more insignificant
6
variables and then added and readjusted the variables. When we ran the regression analysis
this time we found we had more significant variables than we did the first two times. We found
that Pittsburgh, New england and the NY Giants were the only significant variables along with
our intercept was the average variable win. Below you will find a more detailed outline of the
results. As previously stated, the 3rd time that we ran regression was when we received the
best and most accurate results. The linear equation for this set of data is y= 17.53 - 10.03x -
14.28x - 10.78x. This means that if Pittsburgh were to appear in another Super Bowl, it would be
predicted that they would win, or have an interval win of, 7.5 points. If New England were to
appear at the Super Bowl again it would be predicted that they would have an interval win of
3.25 points. If the NY Giants were to appear in another Super Bowl, it would be predicted that
they would have an interval win of 6.75 points.
Discussion of Results:
When running regression for the final time, it was computed that the only significant
variables in our regression were interval win, Pittsburgh, New England, and the NY Giants.
From the beginning we felt that interval win would be a significant indicator and were correct in
predicting this. However, most of our other variables were found insignificant.
One variable that we found was significant was the Pittsburgh team, they were one of
the teams that won back to back and actually did so twice. Two of the other variables that we
found were significant, were New England and the NY Giants. Both of these teams had not only
been to the Super Bowl more than once but also won the Super Bowl more than once.
Therefore, we believe that winning a Super Bowl more than once is a significant variable for
these three teams specifically. After running regression and analysing the data we found a
connection between average interval win and the coefficient for our significant variables.
We believe that Pittsburgh was seen as a significant variable due to the fact that they
have the most overall Super Bowl Wins. This gives them a pretty good chance at winning
7
another Super Bowl if they were to make it to the Super Bowl again. Therefore, it would be easy
to predict how many points the team would win by. There average interval win is 7.5 points for
the amount of times that they have won the Super Bowl. It has been predicted by our data that if
Pittsburgh were to make it to another Super Bowl, they would win by 7.5 points, the coefficient
for Pittsburgh in our regression. As you can see, their average interval win and their coefficient
in the regression are the same number.
New England was another team that won the Super Bowl more than once. They won a
total of 4 times. With this, there is also a good chance that if they were to appear in another
Super Bowl they would win. The average interval win for this team is 3.25 points. With this, our
data predicts that they would win by an average of 3.25 points, the coefficient for this variable in
our regression. Once again, the average interval win and the coefficient for the significant are
the same number.
The NY Giants were, again, one of the teams that had won the Super Bowl more than
one time. Like New England, they won a total of 4 times. Their average interval win for the four
times that they won the Super Bowl was 6.75. With this, our data predicted that if the NY Giants
were to appear in the Super Bowl again they would win by an average total of 6.75 points. Yet
again, the average interval win and the coefficient for this significant variable are the same.
After realizing this, we can see that the regression we ran predicted these three teams
interval win, if they were to make it to the Super Bowl another time, by averaging their past
interval wins. We agree with the data, that this is a good way of predicting a future interval win
for a team returning to the Super Bowl.
8
References:
Works Cited
"Checkdowns: How the Ravens and 49ers Compare to Previous Super Bowl Teams."
FootballPerspective.com. 30 Jan. 2013. Web. 04 May 2016.
Dealer, Bill Lubinger The Plain. "Breaking down the Last Five Super Bowl Champions."
Cleveland.com. 12 Feb. 2012. Web. 23 Apr. 2016.
"Google." Google. Web. 23 Apr. 2016.
"Ranking NFL Teams by Age: Rams Youngest, Colts Oldest, Eagles Fifth-oldest."
PhillyVoice. Web. 23 Apr. 2016.
"Super Bowl 2014 Rosters: Peyton Manning, Richard Sherman among Many Stars."
SBNation.com. 02 Feb. 2014. Web. 23 Apr. 2016.
"Super Bowl Winners." List of. Web. 23 Apr. 2016.
"Super Bowl and MVP History, Historical Odds, Stadiums, Locations and More on
DatabaseFootball.com." Super Bowl and MVP History, Historical Odds, Stadiums,
Locations and More on DatabaseFootball.com. Web. 04 May 2016.
9
Appendix:
Our First Regression Analysis:
10
11
12
Our second data set and regression analysis looks like this:
13
14
15
Our last data set and regression looks like this:
16
17
18
19

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Andere mochten auch

Is 1161.1998 steel tubes for structural purposes
Is 1161.1998 steel tubes for structural purposesIs 1161.1998 steel tubes for structural purposes
Is 1161.1998 steel tubes for structural purposesVishal Mistry
 
Young 2016: Non studiare di più studia meglio
Young 2016: Non studiare di più studia meglioYoung 2016: Non studiare di più studia meglio
Young 2016: Non studiare di più studia meglioAndrea Vaccarella
 
MICHAEL D. HALE RESUME
MICHAEL D. HALE RESUMEMICHAEL D. HALE RESUME
MICHAEL D. HALE RESUMEMichael Hale
 
Is 5624.1993 foundation bolts
Is 5624.1993 foundation boltsIs 5624.1993 foundation bolts
Is 5624.1993 foundation boltsVishal Mistry
 
Sandra brown dulce manie vol 1 [ibuc.info]
Sandra brown   dulce manie vol 1 [ibuc.info]Sandra brown   dulce manie vol 1 [ibuc.info]
Sandra brown dulce manie vol 1 [ibuc.info]Oltița Gâză
 
10 Pro Tips for Twitter
10 Pro Tips for Twitter10 Pro Tips for Twitter
10 Pro Tips for TwitterAmanda Tiffany
 
Jennifer l.-armentrout-lux-4-origin
Jennifer l.-armentrout-lux-4-originJennifer l.-armentrout-lux-4-origin
Jennifer l.-armentrout-lux-4-originAde MA
 

Andere mochten auch (10)

Scan_Doc0006
Scan_Doc0006Scan_Doc0006
Scan_Doc0006
 
Utility Policies
Utility PoliciesUtility Policies
Utility Policies
 
Is 1161.1998 steel tubes for structural purposes
Is 1161.1998 steel tubes for structural purposesIs 1161.1998 steel tubes for structural purposes
Is 1161.1998 steel tubes for structural purposes
 
Sap introduction
Sap introductionSap introduction
Sap introduction
 
Young 2016: Non studiare di più studia meglio
Young 2016: Non studiare di più studia meglioYoung 2016: Non studiare di più studia meglio
Young 2016: Non studiare di più studia meglio
 
MICHAEL D. HALE RESUME
MICHAEL D. HALE RESUMEMICHAEL D. HALE RESUME
MICHAEL D. HALE RESUME
 
Is 5624.1993 foundation bolts
Is 5624.1993 foundation boltsIs 5624.1993 foundation bolts
Is 5624.1993 foundation bolts
 
Sandra brown dulce manie vol 1 [ibuc.info]
Sandra brown   dulce manie vol 1 [ibuc.info]Sandra brown   dulce manie vol 1 [ibuc.info]
Sandra brown dulce manie vol 1 [ibuc.info]
 
10 Pro Tips for Twitter
10 Pro Tips for Twitter10 Pro Tips for Twitter
10 Pro Tips for Twitter
 
Jennifer l.-armentrout-lux-4-origin
Jennifer l.-armentrout-lux-4-originJennifer l.-armentrout-lux-4-origin
Jennifer l.-armentrout-lux-4-origin
 

Ähnlich wie ConsumerInsightsusingTechFinalProject (1)

Data Science Salon: Data visualization and Analysis in the Florida Panthers H...
Data Science Salon: Data visualization and Analysis in the Florida Panthers H...Data Science Salon: Data visualization and Analysis in the Florida Panthers H...
Data Science Salon: Data visualization and Analysis in the Florida Panthers H...Formulatedby
 
What Innings Determine Total Wins
What Innings Determine Total WinsWhat Innings Determine Total Wins
What Innings Determine Total WinsPayton Soicher
 
Math in the News: 9/12/11
Math in the News: 9/12/11Math in the News: 9/12/11
Math in the News: 9/12/11Media4math
 
Identifying Key Factors in Winning MLB Games Using a Data-Mining Approach
Identifying Key Factors in Winning MLB Games Using a Data-Mining ApproachIdentifying Key Factors in Winning MLB Games Using a Data-Mining Approach
Identifying Key Factors in Winning MLB Games Using a Data-Mining ApproachJoelDabady
 
EconomicsResearch
EconomicsResearchEconomicsResearch
EconomicsResearchJohn Crain
 
The Year of the Pitcher: Analyzing No-Hitters
The Year of the Pitcher: Analyzing No-HittersThe Year of the Pitcher: Analyzing No-Hitters
The Year of the Pitcher: Analyzing No-HittersKenneth Burgos
 
Nba wage study
Nba wage studyNba wage study
Nba wage studyTy Candler
 

Ähnlich wie ConsumerInsightsusingTechFinalProject (1) (11)

Data Science Salon: Data visualization and Analysis in the Florida Panthers H...
Data Science Salon: Data visualization and Analysis in the Florida Panthers H...Data Science Salon: Data visualization and Analysis in the Florida Panthers H...
Data Science Salon: Data visualization and Analysis in the Florida Panthers H...
 
What Innings Determine Total Wins
What Innings Determine Total WinsWhat Innings Determine Total Wins
What Innings Determine Total Wins
 
Capstone
CapstoneCapstone
Capstone
 
Dv
DvDv
Dv
 
Stats111Final
Stats111FinalStats111Final
Stats111Final
 
Math in the News: 9/12/11
Math in the News: 9/12/11Math in the News: 9/12/11
Math in the News: 9/12/11
 
Identifying Key Factors in Winning MLB Games Using a Data-Mining Approach
Identifying Key Factors in Winning MLB Games Using a Data-Mining ApproachIdentifying Key Factors in Winning MLB Games Using a Data-Mining Approach
Identifying Key Factors in Winning MLB Games Using a Data-Mining Approach
 
EconomicsResearch
EconomicsResearchEconomicsResearch
EconomicsResearch
 
The Year of the Pitcher: Analyzing No-Hitters
The Year of the Pitcher: Analyzing No-HittersThe Year of the Pitcher: Analyzing No-Hitters
The Year of the Pitcher: Analyzing No-Hitters
 
Directed Research MRP
Directed Research MRPDirected Research MRP
Directed Research MRP
 
Nba wage study
Nba wage studyNba wage study
Nba wage study
 

Mehr von Donna Moulton

ConsumerBehaviorFinalProject
ConsumerBehaviorFinalProjectConsumerBehaviorFinalProject
ConsumerBehaviorFinalProjectDonna Moulton
 
Consumer Behavior Final Project
Consumer Behavior Final ProjectConsumer Behavior Final Project
Consumer Behavior Final ProjectDonna Moulton
 
MarketingResearchFinalProject
MarketingResearchFinalProjectMarketingResearchFinalProject
MarketingResearchFinalProjectDonna Moulton
 
Event Marketing Minor ppt fin
Event Marketing Minor ppt finEvent Marketing Minor ppt fin
Event Marketing Minor ppt finDonna Moulton
 
Digital Advertising Final Project
Digital Advertising Final ProjectDigital Advertising Final Project
Digital Advertising Final ProjectDonna Moulton
 
MACROECONOMICS [Repaired]
MACROECONOMICS  [Repaired]MACROECONOMICS  [Repaired]
MACROECONOMICS [Repaired]Donna Moulton
 
Donna Moulton_Paper2
Donna Moulton_Paper2Donna Moulton_Paper2
Donna Moulton_Paper2Donna Moulton
 
Donna Moulton_IntMkt_Paper1
Donna Moulton_IntMkt_Paper1Donna Moulton_IntMkt_Paper1
Donna Moulton_IntMkt_Paper1Donna Moulton
 
Donna Moulton Assignment 4
Donna Moulton Assignment 4Donna Moulton Assignment 4
Donna Moulton Assignment 4Donna Moulton
 
Final Project Fall 2016 Trends
Final Project Fall 2016 TrendsFinal Project Fall 2016 Trends
Final Project Fall 2016 TrendsDonna Moulton
 
Fashion Marketing Final PDF
Fashion Marketing Final PDFFashion Marketing Final PDF
Fashion Marketing Final PDFDonna Moulton
 
Donna MoultonFinalProject
Donna MoultonFinalProjectDonna MoultonFinalProject
Donna MoultonFinalProjectDonna Moulton
 
Textiles & Fashion - Team III
Textiles & Fashion - Team IIITextiles & Fashion - Team III
Textiles & Fashion - Team IIIDonna Moulton
 

Mehr von Donna Moulton (20)

ConsumerBehaviorFinalProject
ConsumerBehaviorFinalProjectConsumerBehaviorFinalProject
ConsumerBehaviorFinalProject
 
Consumer Behavior Final Project
Consumer Behavior Final ProjectConsumer Behavior Final Project
Consumer Behavior Final Project
 
MarketingResearchFinalProject
MarketingResearchFinalProjectMarketingResearchFinalProject
MarketingResearchFinalProject
 
Event Marketing Minor ppt fin
Event Marketing Minor ppt finEvent Marketing Minor ppt fin
Event Marketing Minor ppt fin
 
Digital Advertising Final Project
Digital Advertising Final ProjectDigital Advertising Final Project
Digital Advertising Final Project
 
MACROECONOMICS [Repaired]
MACROECONOMICS  [Repaired]MACROECONOMICS  [Repaired]
MACROECONOMICS [Repaired]
 
Donna Moulton_Paper2
Donna Moulton_Paper2Donna Moulton_Paper2
Donna Moulton_Paper2
 
Donna Moulton_IntMkt_Paper1
Donna Moulton_IntMkt_Paper1Donna Moulton_IntMkt_Paper1
Donna Moulton_IntMkt_Paper1
 
Donna Moulton Assignment 4
Donna Moulton Assignment 4Donna Moulton Assignment 4
Donna Moulton Assignment 4
 
Final Project Fall 2016 Trends
Final Project Fall 2016 TrendsFinal Project Fall 2016 Trends
Final Project Fall 2016 Trends
 
resume_3.30.16 fin
resume_3.30.16 finresume_3.30.16 fin
resume_3.30.16 fin
 
MOSCHINO
MOSCHINOMOSCHINO
MOSCHINO
 
Fashion Marketing Final PDF
Fashion Marketing Final PDFFashion Marketing Final PDF
Fashion Marketing Final PDF
 
Donna Moulton copy
Donna Moulton copyDonna Moulton copy
Donna Moulton copy
 
Donna Moulton
Donna MoultonDonna Moulton
Donna Moulton
 
Donna Moultonfinacc
Donna MoultonfinaccDonna Moultonfinacc
Donna Moultonfinacc
 
Donna MoultonFinalProject
Donna MoultonFinalProjectDonna MoultonFinalProject
Donna MoultonFinalProject
 
1926-1945
1926-19451926-1945
1926-1945
 
Estonia
EstoniaEstonia
Estonia
 
Textiles & Fashion - Team III
Textiles & Fashion - Team IIITextiles & Fashion - Team III
Textiles & Fashion - Team III
 

ConsumerInsightsusingTechFinalProject (1)

  • 1. Variables that affect the Super Bowl Winners By: Hailee Gunn, Kristina Markey, Kevin Mathews, Christina Mavroudisc, and Donna Moulton Table of Contents
  • 2. 1 An executive summary ...………………………….………………………………………..………….. 2 Description of the data ..…………………………….……………………………………………….3 - 4 Charts and Graphs ………………………………………………………...……………………...……..5 Results of Data .………………………………………….……………………..…………………….5 - 6 Discussion of Results ..……………………………………………...………………….…………...6 - 8 References …...……………………………………………………………………….………………….8 Appendix ..………………………………………….………………………………………………10 - 20
  • 3. 2 Executive Summary: This report will give an overview of the winning Super Bowl teams and how different variables affected the outcome of the games. The variables that we tested for this project are: stadium type (indoor and outdoor), the weather (sunny, rain, snow), Interval win, Average age, teams that won the Super Bowl more than once, and teams that appeared in the Super Bowl more than once. In order to do this, we looked through online sports databases to find our data and put it into Excel. We then made charts to visualize our data and finally ran our regression analysis to see which variables were significant. Below are the results of our experimental research design. We run a regression multiple times, we computed that the only significant variables in our regression were interval win and that Pittsburgh, New England, and the NY Giant were the only significant teams. From the beginning we felt that interval win would be a significant indicator and were correct in predicting this. However, most of our other variables were found insignificant. We found that the Pittsburgh team was significant and they were one of the teams that won back to back and actually did so twice. We concluded that winning a Super Bowl more than once is a significant variable for these three teams specifically.
  • 4. 3 Description of the Data: Our main source for out Super Bowl data came from this website database football (http://www.databasefootball.com/leagues/superbowl.htm). The information we found on this database were the winning teams, the year of the Super Bowl, and the winning and losing scores. We used this to compute our Y variable of interval win. For the rest of our data we found a PDF of the winning teams, by year, that also included the stadium name, stadium type, and weather the day of the game. The PDF was created by William William Schmitz of the Southeast Regional Climate Center; (https://www.sercc.com/SuperBowlClimate.pdf). We also found some data from online football websites that had articles on some of the winning teams along with different team stats. The links to those websites can be found on our reference page. When first setting up our excel document we have 51 rows including our labels and we have 24 columns worth of variables that we used to run the regression analysis. Our Y variable was interval win. Our X variables were winner of the game, loser of the game, Super Bowl, stadium type (outdoor or dome), weather (rain or snow), average age, back to back win. Our dummy variables were Green Bay, Miami, Pittsburg, San Francisco, Dallas, Denver, New England, Baltimore, and NY Giants. This was due to the fact that they had either back to back wins or won the Super Bowl more than once. After running this regression, we found that only the outdoor variable was significant. This meant that the stadium was an outdoor stadium, rather than a dome. Therefore, we changed our variables and re-ran our data set. In setting up our second excel document we had 51 rows and 24 columns. We still used interval win as our Y variable. However, we only ran 16 of our X variables. Our X variables were outdoor bad weather, average age, and back to back win. Our dummy variables were Green Bay, Miami, Pittsburg, San Francisco, Dallas, Denver, New England, Baltimore and the NY Giants. In running this regression we found three significant variables however we also found an error on the user end and had to run the regression one more time.
  • 5. 4 Our final time that we ran the regression we had 51 rows and 12 columns. Once again we used interval win as our Y variable. Our final X variables were Pittsburg, New England, and NY Giants. With this, we found that all variables were significant. Charts and Graphs: We made a bar graph of interval win for each Super Bowls winning team. The interval win was calculated by how much that team won by (subtracting the losing team's final score from the winning team's final score) and it was our Y variable for running regression. This specific chart gives us a visual representation of not only who won each Super Bowl but also how much the winning team actually won by. As one can see, the highest overall interval win was held by San Francisco and the lowest was held by the NY Giants.
  • 6. 5 In this chart we used a pivot table to show the total amount of times each team won the Super Bowl. Two of our X variables were back to back win and teams that won more than once, so, we then made a bar graph with the data from the pivot table to get a visual representation of the totaled data. As you can see, Pittsburg won the most amount of Super Bowls while Chicago, the Colts, Kansas City, LA Raider, the Jets, the Saints, Seattle, St. Louis, and Tampa Bay have won only once. Results of Data Modeling with Regression: Our first data set that we put together had 24 variables and then all 50 super bowl games and the regression analysis came back and showed that there were no significant outcomes and showed multiple number errors. We then went back through our data set and then eliminated some of the variables and replaced them with other variables and then re-ran the regression analysis to find our outcome. When we re-ran the regression analysis with 13 variables and found that we had three significant variables, Pittsburgh, New england and the NY Giants came back as significant variable. After looking at the results of this analysis we decided to adjust our data and then run the regression analysis one more time and eliminated a few more insignificant
  • 7. 6 variables and then added and readjusted the variables. When we ran the regression analysis this time we found we had more significant variables than we did the first two times. We found that Pittsburgh, New england and the NY Giants were the only significant variables along with our intercept was the average variable win. Below you will find a more detailed outline of the results. As previously stated, the 3rd time that we ran regression was when we received the best and most accurate results. The linear equation for this set of data is y= 17.53 - 10.03x - 14.28x - 10.78x. This means that if Pittsburgh were to appear in another Super Bowl, it would be predicted that they would win, or have an interval win of, 7.5 points. If New England were to appear at the Super Bowl again it would be predicted that they would have an interval win of 3.25 points. If the NY Giants were to appear in another Super Bowl, it would be predicted that they would have an interval win of 6.75 points. Discussion of Results: When running regression for the final time, it was computed that the only significant variables in our regression were interval win, Pittsburgh, New England, and the NY Giants. From the beginning we felt that interval win would be a significant indicator and were correct in predicting this. However, most of our other variables were found insignificant. One variable that we found was significant was the Pittsburgh team, they were one of the teams that won back to back and actually did so twice. Two of the other variables that we found were significant, were New England and the NY Giants. Both of these teams had not only been to the Super Bowl more than once but also won the Super Bowl more than once. Therefore, we believe that winning a Super Bowl more than once is a significant variable for these three teams specifically. After running regression and analysing the data we found a connection between average interval win and the coefficient for our significant variables. We believe that Pittsburgh was seen as a significant variable due to the fact that they have the most overall Super Bowl Wins. This gives them a pretty good chance at winning
  • 8. 7 another Super Bowl if they were to make it to the Super Bowl again. Therefore, it would be easy to predict how many points the team would win by. There average interval win is 7.5 points for the amount of times that they have won the Super Bowl. It has been predicted by our data that if Pittsburgh were to make it to another Super Bowl, they would win by 7.5 points, the coefficient for Pittsburgh in our regression. As you can see, their average interval win and their coefficient in the regression are the same number. New England was another team that won the Super Bowl more than once. They won a total of 4 times. With this, there is also a good chance that if they were to appear in another Super Bowl they would win. The average interval win for this team is 3.25 points. With this, our data predicts that they would win by an average of 3.25 points, the coefficient for this variable in our regression. Once again, the average interval win and the coefficient for the significant are the same number. The NY Giants were, again, one of the teams that had won the Super Bowl more than one time. Like New England, they won a total of 4 times. Their average interval win for the four times that they won the Super Bowl was 6.75. With this, our data predicted that if the NY Giants were to appear in the Super Bowl again they would win by an average total of 6.75 points. Yet again, the average interval win and the coefficient for this significant variable are the same. After realizing this, we can see that the regression we ran predicted these three teams interval win, if they were to make it to the Super Bowl another time, by averaging their past interval wins. We agree with the data, that this is a good way of predicting a future interval win for a team returning to the Super Bowl.
  • 9. 8 References: Works Cited "Checkdowns: How the Ravens and 49ers Compare to Previous Super Bowl Teams." FootballPerspective.com. 30 Jan. 2013. Web. 04 May 2016. Dealer, Bill Lubinger The Plain. "Breaking down the Last Five Super Bowl Champions." Cleveland.com. 12 Feb. 2012. Web. 23 Apr. 2016. "Google." Google. Web. 23 Apr. 2016. "Ranking NFL Teams by Age: Rams Youngest, Colts Oldest, Eagles Fifth-oldest." PhillyVoice. Web. 23 Apr. 2016. "Super Bowl 2014 Rosters: Peyton Manning, Richard Sherman among Many Stars." SBNation.com. 02 Feb. 2014. Web. 23 Apr. 2016. "Super Bowl Winners." List of. Web. 23 Apr. 2016. "Super Bowl and MVP History, Historical Odds, Stadiums, Locations and More on DatabaseFootball.com." Super Bowl and MVP History, Historical Odds, Stadiums, Locations and More on DatabaseFootball.com. Web. 04 May 2016.
  • 11. 10
  • 12. 11
  • 13. 12 Our second data set and regression analysis looks like this:
  • 14. 13
  • 15. 14
  • 16. 15 Our last data set and regression looks like this:
  • 17. 16
  • 18. 17
  • 19. 18
  • 20. 19