1. Table of Contents
Executive summary……………....………………………………………………………page 2
Introduction……………………………………………………………………..…………page 3
Technical Section...……………....………………………………………………………page 3
Overview…………………………………………………………...……………...page 3
Project Objective..………………………………………………...……………...page 5
Assumptions……………………………………………………………………....page 5
Management Section...……….....………………………………………………………page 6
Major Tasks.….....………………………………………………...……………...page 6
Deliverables.........………………………………………………...……………...page 6
Acceptance Criteria.……………………………………………...……………...page 7
Plan for Quality…….……………………………………………...……………...page 7
Project Schedule.….……………………………………………...……………...page 7
Project Organization……………………………………………...……………...page 7
Related Experience…………………………………………………..…………..page 8
Equipment and Facilities…………………………………………………………page 8
Stakeholder Identification and Analysis………………………….…………….page 8
Cost Section...……….....……………………………………………….………………page 12
Labor……………………………………………………………………………..page 12
Materials..………………………………………………………………………..page 12
Equipment..……………………………………………………….……………..page 12
List of Lessons Learned….…………………………………………….....…………...page 13
Appendices
References/Resources……………………….…………………………………….Appendix A
Related Experience/ Resumes………………………………………….…………Appendix B
Annual Cost Savings……………………………………………………………….Appendix C
Task/Responsibility Files.………………………………………………………….Appendix D
Resource Allocation Report…………………………………………………………D-2
Schedule Files………………………………………………………………………Appendix E
Cost/Present Worth Analysis Files………………………………………………..Appendix F
Risk Matrix…………………………………………………………………………..Appendix G
Prior Deliverables…………………………………………………………………..Appendix H
2. 0
2000000
4000000
6000000
8000000
10000000
12000000
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Annual Cost Savings
With PV Flowers Currently
Table 1.1 Annual Cost Savings (Appendix C)
Executive Summary
Energy+ proposes that the Environmental Management Business Institute (EMBI) install
an 8.7 kilowatt (kW) photo voltaic (PV) flower system in order to provide a means of
generating renewable energy on campus that can be used to offset current energy
usages.
A PV flower system not only makes environmental sense by producing free, non-
polluting, renewable energy, but it is also aesthetically pleasing on the eyes. Over a 20-
year period, this system will be reducing the pounds of carbon dioxide (CO2) emitted by
almost 30,000 pounds, which is equivalent to effectively planting 328 trees.
A PV flower system the size of 8.7 kW will end up saving the client $1,003.00 in the first
year of operation, subsequently after 20 years the system will save a cumulative
present worth value of $15,654.00. Table 1.1 shows the annual costs is currently vs.
how it would be with
the 8.7kW PV flower
system.
The PV modules we
propose to install are
made right here in
Northern Wisconsin by
Lake Michigan Wind &
Sun. Lake Michigan
Wind & Sun model
SF2304 provides a high
production of annual
kilowatt-hours (kWh)
with maximum efficiency for such a large unit.
The DC to AC power conversion is designed into a bank of four inverters. Using single
inverters is more cost effective and requires less downtime of the system if one of them
fails than a single centralized inverter.
Also included in this design are the Sunny Web box package. This system allows the
customer to see real time power produced as well as the positive impact that EMBI will
make by installing our PV flower system.
Energy+ welcomes the opportunity to talk to EMBI about their particular needs and
design a systems that will meet all of the objectives. Please feel free to contact Energy+
with questions of for further information.
Sincerely,
Energy+
3. Table 1.2 UW System Fuel and Utilities Usage
(1)
Table 1.3 UW System Fuel and Utilities Cost Breakdown
(1)
Introduction
Energy+ is an energy sustainability company that offers affordable solutions. Energy+
specializes in design and installation of renewable energy systems. Energy+ is
determined to make Wisconsin a more energy sustainable state.
At Energy+ our company is based upon the functional model of organizations. This
organizational model allows us to meet the changing needs of our clients in the most
expedient and specific way. We at Energy+ put our clients and customers first and strive
to meet your specific needs.
Technical
Overview
In 2013, Wisconsin generated 62% of its net electricity from coal (2). Although coal
provides a cheap and readily available energy source, it not only produces carbon
dioxide emissions but also generates millions of tons of waste. Renewable energy
sources tend to cost more money up front however they do not produce pollutants and
waste that can be harmful to the
environment. By providing
affordable, innovative, and
renewable solutions to
commercial and residential
customers Energy+ is working
to increase the percent of net
electricity from renewable
resources.
University of Wisconsin
system has been
implementing energy sustainability projects to help save energy and reduce costs on
major campuses throughout the state. Table 1.2 shows in the 2015 fiscal year the
University of Wisconsin
System spent $71,026,570 on
electricity. The University of
Wisconsin spends 59.43% of
the Fuel & Utility Cost on
electricity alone (Table 1.3) (1).
Wisconsin’s average price of
commercial electricity went up
0.25% from 2014 to 2015.
Currently the price for
commercial electricity is 10.63
cents per kilowatt hour (2). It is
predicted that the in the next 10
years electricity prices will
4. Table 1.4 UWGB Electricity Usage Years 2005 and 2015
(1)
Figure 1.1 Placement of PV Solar Flowers on UWGB Campus
increase by 3.7% or more. Renewable energy sources help customers keep the cost
down to a minimum, installing renewable energy systems can also provide tax credits
and incentives which save the customer money and sometimes help the customer earn
money for the system they install.
Specifically looking at the University of Wisconsin-Green Bay (UWGB) there has been
multiple projects to
reduce and save
energy, including but
not limited to
installing more
efficient and motion
activated lights,
scheduling the
buildings heating and ventilation systems, and the building of photovoltaic (PV) glass in
the Mary Ann Cofrin (MAC) Hall. As seen in the Table 1.4 in the fiscal year 2015 the
UWGB campus energy consumption for electricity was 38,829 BTU/GSF, which is a
26.7% decrease since the 2005 fiscal year (1). Energy+ proposes to add four PV
flowers, which produce 2.9 kilowatt (kW) per flower, the total system will provide 8.7 kW
of power. The estimated annual production is 11,146 kilowatt-hour (kWh). Taken into
affect the price per kWh in Wisconsin this system will save UWGB around $1,000.00 in
the first year. Energy+ has looked over the UWGB campus and has concluded that the
PV flowers to be installed in front of the Laboratory Sciences (LS) Building (Figure 1.1).
The front of the LS building would be the most ideal spot on the UWGB campus
5. because of the lack of trees, open space available for construction, not having to worry
about shadows from nearby buildings, and minimal concrete removal for installation of
base, trenches, and conduit lines.
Project Objective
The purpose of this project is to generate 11,000 kWh, or about 1% of the university’s
total power usage, using a sustainable power generation system within a budget of
$150K by June 1, 2018.
Assumptions
• The project will not violate any local, state or national regulations.
• Weather will not unduly inhibit project completion.
• Funds required in addition to the initial amount of $150,000 will be provided by
the firm chosen to execute the project.
• Lake Michigan Wind and Sun will have the sufficient resources to complete the
project within the requested time and budgetary constraints.
• Environmental Management and Business Institute (EMBI) will fill out and send
all necessary paperwork for Focus on Energy incentive.
• EMBI will fill out necessary federal tax paperwork for Federal Tax Credit.
• EMBI to contact electricity provider to request Net Energy Billing.
6. Management
Major Tasks
Initial planning will include the majority of the timeline, and occurs from February 2016
to August 2017. The initial planning includes the designing of the flowers, technical
drawings of the photovoltaic (PV) flowers, a final review of the construction plans.
Another task that may require adjustments to the schedule is the concrete foundation
work, including building the rebar cages, trenching, soil testing, soil compacting, and
pouring concrete. These tasks are estimated to take 27 days in total to complete.
However, this is assuming the weather is conducive to the pouring of concrete. The
final large task is the DC electrical work, which is estimated to require 62 days. Upon
completion of the electrical work, an inspection will be performed, and system testing
will begin.
Deliverables
In order to facilitate adherence to the project timeline, a monthly status report will be
delivered to John Katers on the 15th
of every month. In addition to the monthly status
reports, the following major deliverables are to be submitted to the UWGB on the dates
listed. The preliminary drawings of the PV flower system are to be submitted on July
26th
of 2016. These will include technical schematics and a preliminary cost analysis.
The construction plans will undergo a final review from June 23rd
to 29th
, and the final
version of the plans will be sent to UWGB. A final cost analysis will be performed and
delivered to the UWGB by December 1st
of 2017.
The deliverables for this PV flower sustainability project (SP) will include:
A. Provide a detailed report of the PV flower SP for EMBI and assist in execution of
this project. Project will identify and analyze the energy savings of the SP in units
of kilowatt-hours (kWh). Documents for design and/or analysis, final engineering
drawings, system test and verification plans (quality assurance and construction
or plan implementation) will be included. Energy+ provide 1 electronic and 4 hard
copies of the report.
B. Provide a detailed report justifying the specific recommendation made by
Energy+. Outline approaches used to develop project concept and costs
associated with the specific SP for the EMBI. Energy+ will provide 1 electronic
and 4 hard copies of the report.
C. Status reports on project progress will be e-mailed to EMBI on the 15th of each
month, for a total of 24 reports. Reports will be brief and focus on progress
compared to Energy+ original plan and schedule. Reports will address activities,
milestones, achievements, plans for the next month, obstacles encountered or
anticipated, and hours and dollars spent. For any work items where progress is
behind schedule, a 2-week plan will be developed and implemented to complete
the project within the original schedule and budget. Energy+ will provide 1
electronic copy of the report.
D. A final status report due two months post project completion which compares
actual outcomes of data with projected measurements. This final report must
show detailed results which align within projected outcomes. Energy+ will provide
1 electronic and 4 hard copies of the report.
7. Acceptance Criteria
The following acceptable criteria for the PV flower SP include:
• The project scope will include knowledge of, and comply with, all US, state, local,
and University regulatory requirements and regulations.
• All technical and specific detailed information will include sources and any
applicable previous history of the technical information.
• Energy+ will provide details of the process used to determine the most cost-
efficient project, documentation describing previous project cost-efficiency
optimization processes, engineering drawings created in a computer-aided
design (CAD) program including measurements of all dimensions necessary for
construction, a work-breakdown structure organizing the work into sections that
can be managed by Energy+, a detailed list of tasks, a plan for regular recurring
quality checks, and details of 2 previously completed projects. The proposal will
include names, dates, and titles, along with reasons for sub-contracting or
employing outside means to complete the project. The project team will include
a detailed cost analysis report and complete the project within 2 years with a
budget of no more than $150,000.
• Energy+ will comply with all laws and regulations and perform work based on
current established and accepted manufacturing practices and guidelines.
• A detailed report that identifies and analyzes the energy savings of the SP in
units of kWh. Documents for design or analysis, final engineering drawings,
system test and verification plans will be included.
• A detailed report justifying the specific recommendation. Outline approaches
used to develop project concept, and costs associated with the specific
sustainability projects for the EMBI.
• Energy+ will meet with EMBI and prepare detailed reports and results of two
months of tests run on all completed projects before the work is considered
complete and final payment is authorized.
• Energy+ will work with EMBI to follow the Plan for Quality.
Plan for Quality
The purpose of this Quality Plan is to:
1. Ensure a Quality outcome for EMBI
a. Monthly inspection and evaluation of all work complete or in progress.
b. Project Manager will update EMBI monthly or progress reports
c. Provide all necessary deliverables to EMBI on time.
d. Maintain accurate records.
2. To form a partnership with subcontractor and implement the Quality Plan.
a. Produce Material Quality Assurance Check on products/materials.
b. Provide replacement or new parts for defective products.
c. Produce Work Verification Sign-off on work preformed every day.
3. Follow State and Federal standards and codes
a. Electrical Codes and Inspections
b. Building Permits
c. Safety
8. Quality Control Documents:
1. Work Verification Sign-off (Figure 1.2 a)
a. Supervisor to check all work progress at end of day and complete sign off.
2. Material Quality Assurance Check (Figure 1.2 b)
a. Receiver to check all material and complete form.
Project Schedule
The initial planning stages for the solar flower installation project are expected to occur
from February 2nd
, 2016 to August of 2017. After Energy+ has delivered the completed
feasibility study to the UWGB on June 24th
, 2016, work will begin on preliminary
drawings for the PV flowers. Upon delivery of these preliminary sketches, a review of
the construction plans is expected to occur from June 23rd
to June 29th
of 2016. This
review will ensure compliance with building and electrical codes. After the construction
plans are reviewed, an analysis of the potential energy savings will be executed and the
necessary building, operating, and electrical permits will be acquired. Permit acquisition
is expected to be completed by August 15th
, 2017. The second checkpoint meeting will
be held shortly after permit acquisition to ensure compliance with the project timeline,
and is expected to occur on August 12th
of 2016.
Site preparations and soil testing are expected to begin in mid-May of 2017, with work
on the concrete foundation scheduled to begin on May 19th
. Assembly of the solar
flower structures will begin on May 18th
, as the masts need to be installed while the
concrete is being poured. The DC electrical work will begin on May 22nd
, and will
conclude on August 15th
. AC electrical work will begin on June 22nd
and will conclude
on July 5th. Checkpoint meeting #4 will occur on September 22nd
, with the post-project
analysis/optimization of energy savings scheduled to occur from September 25th
to
December 1st
. Upon completion of the energy savings analysis, the final project
checkpoint meeting and post-project celebration can be planned. Currently, the 5th
and
final checkpoint meeting is scheduled for December 4th
, and is to occur on the same
day as the post-project celebration. If the project timeline was found to be too long,
there is about a 6-month period in which the project could be accelerated to meet an
earlier deadline. However, this is contingent on the successful installation of the DC
electrical work. If the DC electrical work follows the anticipated schedule, though, the
project will finish well within the allotted schedule.
Project Organization
Three managers will oversee the PV flower system installation, each bringing a unique
expertise to the project. Their respective project experience and other relevant areas of
Figure 1.2 a) Work Verification Sign-off Form b) Material Quality Assurance Check Form
9. knowledge are detailed in their resumes (Appendix B), but generally include
mechanical, electrical and environmental engineering technologies, respectively. A
responsibility assignment matrix (Appendix D) is included listing the manager assigned
to each of the major tasks required for successful completion of the project.
Related Experience
Energy+ is a three person company, comprised of an Electrical Engineer, a Mechanical
Engineer, and an Environmental Engineer. Energy+ has great expertise across the
board to design, implement, and install renewable energy systems.
Dan Beyer brings 23 years of management experience, and has completed associate’s
degrees in both Electromechanical Technology and Automation Engineering. As the
former manager of a computer consulting business, Dan brings management and
technical experience, as well as customer service skills, to all of his project work.
Dessiray Koss has completed an associate’s degree in Mechanical Design Technology,
and brings primarily technical expertise. With four years of quality assurance practice
and four years of experience in sheet metal and structural processes, Dessi has the
technical expertise to design and implement many types of mechanical system.
Will Corriveau brings years of leadership experience from his time in the Boy Scouts of
America. Having earned his Eagle Scout Award by managing a construction project at
age 17, he has since developed his management skills by serving as an area director at
a summer camp for 3 years. He also served as a program coordinator for a Boy Scouts
after-school program, where he developed programs targeted towards engaging
elementary-aged youth.
Equipment and Facilities
Energy+ has access to a large suite of computing systems. Energy+ has experts in
Microsoft Project, as well access to a high-level suite of computing programs, including
AutoCAD for technical drawings, SolidWorks solid modeling software and MATLAB for
performing high-level mathematics.
Stakeholder Identification and Analysis
Energy+ strives to maintain and enhance its ongoing contact with stakeholders.
Consequently, Energy+ analyzes the needs of our various stakeholders at different
levels based on our data collected through preliminary research.
10. Stakeholder Mapping:
Employees, Customers & Suppliers:
Employees may approach the Energy+ management team and are encouraged to
participate in the Energy+ feedback process at any time during their prospective
employment. At Energy+ we maintain an intensive dialog with our customers throughout
the proposed project and we interview our customers through their preferred method
annually either, via email or telephone contact. Our customers may choose to
participate in our satisfaction surveys provided at the completion of the work performed.
At Energy+ we maintain solid working relationships with our suppliers. Energy+ strives
to develop personal and immediate needs response priority networks through increased
communication and an annual supplier benefit festival held during the summer months.
Local Communities:
At Energy+ we maintain close knit ties with our community as we provide and assist
local church, schools, and non-profit organizations with assistance toward meeting their
project goals. We sponsor local sports teams and provide sporting equipment and
apparel for organizations that demonstrate a positive influence on youth in their
prospective communities.
Energy+ is responsible
to the following:
Influenced by Energy+’s
Work Processes
Probably influence
Energy+’s Performance
Customers
Suppliers
Community
EMBI
Press
Government
Authorities
Associations &
Trades Groups
Employees
Competitors
11. Associations, Trade groups, and Advocacy groups:
At Energy+ we maintain a regular dialog on social policy issues with our stakeholders.
We exchange ideas on such topics as lifecycle, sustainability, and recycling. We
maintain membership and support (SEIA) the Solar Energy Industry Association,
especially on trade issues and political topics that effect the solar industry.
Other Stakeholders:
At Energy+ we recognize and encourage our stakeholders to write to us or contact us
via email at any time at: NRGplus.org, or feel free to call our toll free customer support
line at 1-800-NRGPLUS, (1-800-674-7587).
12. Table 1.5 Total Cost
Table 1.6 Labor Break down
Table 1.7 Material Break down
Table 1.8 Equipment Break down
Cost
Energy+ has determined that the overall project will be approximately $144,730.00.
Table 1.5 shows that this cost includes labor, materials,
equipment, and a contingency cost associated with the
project.
Labor
Labor accounts for $23,231.35 of the total cost of the project.
There will need to be many specialized labors to complete the
project presented. Table 1.6 shows the hourly rate and how
many hours a laborer is expected to work on this project. (See
Appendix D-2)
Material
Material accounts for $99,970.00
of the total cost of the project. The
material break down (Table 1.7) is
accurate, due to using estimates
used on previous projects.
Equipment
Certain aspects of the project require specialty equipment, an
excavator and soil compactor must be rented and concrete
will have to be delivered. Equipment costs end up being
$2,650.00 of the total cost.
Type Cost
Labor $23,231.35
Materials $99,970.00
Equipment $2,650
Sub-total $125,851.35
Contingency 15%
Total $144,729.19
Position Hourly
Rate
Hours Cost
Construction Worker $14.67 226.37 $3,320.85
Project Manager $200.00 48.2 $9,640.00
Experienced
Engineer
$150.00 11.92 $1,788.00
Electrician Helper (3) $15.00 110.3 $1,654.50
Licensed Electrician
(4)
$25.00 13.95 $348.75
Operator (Trencher)
(5)
$25.00 18.18 $454.50
Will $25.00 58.27 $1,456.75
Dessi $25.00 108.9 $2,722.50
Dan $25.00 73.82 $1,845.50
Total $23,231.35
Material Cost
Solar Flair $86,000.00
Masts $5,000.00
Permit $50.00
Sonotube $320.00
Rebar $1,500.00
Inverter $5,200.00
Module $400.00
Wiring
Components
$1,000.00
Conduit $500.00
Total $99,970.00
Equipment Cost
Excavator $2,000
Concrete
Delivery
$650
Total $2,650
13. List of lessons learned
• Time management is crucial, procrastination does not work, and wrong decisions
can be corrected if detected early.
• The project manager needs to be aware of the strengths and weaknesses of the
team so that the talents of each individual are incorporated into the project in the
best manner.
• The project success is dependent on the skills and strengths of the team; our
team, while not the most experienced, certainly benefited from our dedication
and time commitment working toward our common goal.
• An effective line of communication needs to be established so decisions can be
made and progress not hindered by waiting on any one person to have input into
the decisions.
• When things went wrong our team found an alternative approach. Blaming only
cause’s dissention. Our team worked for a new solution that drew the team
together.
• Knowing all of the resources available to our team, and utilizing them, helped
accomplish our goals.
• Getting to know the customer’s needs and holding close to the objective at hand
can be difficult.
• Not to be afraid of taking calculated risks.
• Not to be shy in asking for help.
• How to use modern technology to our best advantage.
• Early planning and research along with making sound decisions can save
valuable time and headaches, especially as the project progresses.
• Costs can be greater than what were originally anticipated by a significant
margin.
• Microsoft project is a very powerful and complex program.
• The scope of the project changes as the deliverables are met and the project
approaches completion of the final planning stage.
14. Appendix A
References
(1) Energy Use in State Facilities (Rep.). (2015, November 13). Retrieved February 27,
2016, from State Energy Office website:
http://www.stateenergyoffice.wi.gov/docview.asp?docid=27152&locid=160
(2) U.S. Energy Information Administration- EIA- Independent Statistics and Analysis.
(2015, February 19). Retrieved February 27, 2016, from
http://www.eia.gov/state/?sid=WI
(3) 47-3013 Helpers--Electiricans. (n.d.).Retrieved March, 27,2016, from
http://www.bls.gov/oes/current/oes743013.htm
(4) 47-2111 Electricians. (n.d.). Retrieved March 27,2016, from
http://www.bls.gov/oes/current/oes472111.htm
(5) Excavator Operator Salary (United States). (n.d.). Retrieved March 28, 2016, from
http://www.payscale.com/research/US/Job=Excavator_Operator/Hourly_Rate
Resources
Focus on Energy incentive
https://www.focusonenergy.com/about-us/program-applications
15. Appendix B
Related Experience
Dan Beyer, Electrical Engineer
Associate degrees in: Electromechanical Technology and Automation
Engineering
Northeast Wisconsin Technical College (NWTC)
Electronics club treasurer NWTC
NWTC energy conservation club member
Established successful computer consulting business
Constructed and tested the new mobile modular trainers in the manufacturing
technology hall at NWTC.
23 years of work and management experience in the Respiratory care field
Dessiray Koss, Mechanical Engineer
Associates degree in Mechanical Design Technology (NWTC)
Member of Phi Theta Kappa, High Honors Society, helped incoming freshman
adjust to college
Three years experience designing doctoring systems in the manufacturing
industry
Four years experience with sheet metal and structural processes
Developed and implemented standard controls design process for Essco, Inc.
Four years experience of Quality Assurance processes
Will Corriveau, Environmental Engineer
Earned Eagle Scout Leadership Service Award by planning and executing a
service project for a non-profit organization
Oversaw assignment of teaching duties to merit badge counselors at a summer
camp as an area director
Developed and executed an education program to teach primary school students
Boy Scout requirements
