SlideShare ist ein Scribd-Unternehmen logo
1 von 49
Downloaden Sie, um offline zu lesen
All Oil Companies Are Not Alike.
NYSE: DNR
Corporate Presentation
April 2013
2
This page is intentionally left blank
3
About Forward Looking Statements
The data contained in this presentation that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements that involve a number of risks and
uncertainties. Such statements may relate to, among other things, forecasted capital expenditures, drilling activity, completion of
acquisitions or reserves or future production attributable to them, development activities, timing of CO2 injections and initial production
response in tertiary flooding projects, estimated costs, production rates and volumes or forecasts thereof, hydrocarbon reserve quantities
and values, CO2 reserves, helium reserves, potential reserves from tertiary operations, future hydrocarbon prices or assumptions,
liquidity, cash flows, availability of capital, borrowing capacity, finding costs, rates of return, overall economics, net asset values, estimates
of potential or recoverable reserves and anticipated production growth rates in our CO2 models, or estimated production in 2013 and
future production and expenditure estimates, and availability and cost of equipment and services. These forward-looking statements are
generally accompanied by words such as “estimated”, “preliminary”, “projected”, “potential”, “anticipated”, “forecasted” or other words that
convey the uncertainty of future events or outcomes. These statements are based on management’s current plans and assumptions and
are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties as further outlined in our most recent Form 10-K and Form 10-Q filed with the SEC.
Therefore, the actual results may differ materially from the expectations, estimates or assumptions expressed in or implied by any
forward-looking statement made by or on behalf of the Company.
Cautionary Note to U.S. Investors – Current SEC rules regarding oil and gas reserve information allow oil and gas companies to disclose
in filings with the SEC not only proved reserves, but also probable and possible reserves that meet the SEC’s definitions of such terms.
We disclose only proved reserves in our filings with the SEC. Denbury’s proved reserves as of December 31, 2012 were estimated by
DeGolyer & MacNaughton, an independent petroleum engineering firm. In this presentation, we make reference to probable and possible
reserves, some of which have been prepared by our independent engineers and some of which have been prepared by Denbury’s internal
staff of engineers. In this presentation, we also refer to estimates of original oil in place, resource “potential” or other descriptions of
volumes potentially recoverable, which in addition to reserves generally classifiable as probable and possible (2P and 3P reserves),
include estimates of reserves that do not rise to the standards for possible reserves, and which SEC guidelines strictly prohibit us from
including in filings with the SEC. These estimates, as well as the estimates of probable and possible reserves, are by their nature more
speculative than estimates of proved reserves and are subject to greater uncertainties, and accordingly the likelihood of recovering those
reserves is subject to substantially greater risk.
4
A Different Kind of Oil Company
“We Bring Old Oil Fields Back to Life”
• Highest operating margins and capital efficiency in peer group(1)
• Within the next 5 years we anticipate our free cash flow growing while our
CapEx is declining
• More than 1 billion barrels of potential oil reserves
• CO2 EOR is one of the most efficient tertiary oil recovery methods
• 29% compound annual growth rate (CAGR) in our EOR production since 1999
• We have produced nearly 70 million barrels of oil from CO2 EOR to date
• Strategic CO2 supply and own or control over 1,000 miles of CO2 pipeline
• Large inventory of mature oil fields well-suited for CO2 EOR
• Top talent and technology
• We acquire mature oil fields and recover oil using carbon dioxide (CO2)
• Requires large sources of CO2 near oil fields.
(1) Please reference slides 17 and 18 for more information
Value
Creation
Proven
Process
Repeatable
Growth
Unique
Strategy
Competitive
Advantage
• Ability to use and store CO2 captured from industrial facilities results in net
carbon reduction
• By developing existing oil fields, we are not disturbing new habitats
Eco-friendly
• We anticipate a decade of low teens annual EOR production growth from
existing fields
• Relatively lower-risk – We develop mature conventional oil fields
55
Denbury at a Glance
~$7 billion
70,116
$9.9 billion
~17 Tcf
~1,000 miles
~$900 million
Market Cap (2/28/13)
Total Daily Production – BOE/d (4Q12)
Proved PV-10 (12/31/12) $94.71 NYMEX Oil Price
CO2 Supply 3P Reserves (12/31/12)
CO2 Pipelines Controlled
Credit Facility Availability (12/31/12)(4)
~1.1 BBOE
93%
Total 3P Reserves (12/31/12)
% Oil Production (4Q12)
$3.0 billionTotal Net Debt (12/31/12)(3)
(1) Pro forma for recently announced CCA acquisition expected to close near the end of 1Q 2013.
(2) Pro forma production removes 10,064 BOE/d of Bakken area production in 4Q12 and adds 11,000 BOE/d for recently announced CCA acquisition expected to close near the end of 1Q
2013 and 2,400 BOE/d to reflect a full quarter contribution from Hartzog Draw and Webster fields acquired on November 30, 2012.
(3) As of 12/31/12, we had ~ $700 million of borrowings outstanding under our $1.6 billion bank credit facility and our cash and cash equivalents totaled ~$100 million. At 12/31/12, ~$1.05
billion in restricted cash remained deposited with a qualified intermediary. Pro forma for expected deal and stock repurchases through 2/15/13.
(4) As of 12/31/12, we had ~$900 million of availability under our $1.6 billion bank credit facility and ~$100 million in unrestricted cash.
~73,450(2)
~1.2 BBOE
~94%(2)
~$3.1 billion
Pro forma(1)
$11.0 billion
6
What is CO2 EOR & How Much Oil Does It Recover?
Secure CO2 Supply Transport via Pipeline Inject into Oilfield
CO2 EOR Delivers Almost as Much Production as
Primary and Secondary Recovery(1)
(1) Recovery of Original Oil in Place based on history at Little Creek Field.
Primary
Recovery
~20%
Secondary
Recovery
(waterfloods)
~18%
Tertiary
Recovery
(CO2 EOR)
~17%
Remaining
Oil
7
Our Two CO2 EOR Target Areas:
Up to 10 Billion Barrels Recoverable with CO2 EOR
Green
Pipeline
Jackson
Dome
Delta Pipeline
Sonat MS
Pipeline
ND
SD
Lost
Cabin
ID
MT
WY
TX
LA
MS
IL
IN
KY
Greencore
Pipeline
(1) Source: DOE 2005 and 2006 reports.
(2) 3P tertiary oil reserve estimates based on year-end 12/31/12 SEC
proved reserves, based on a variety of recovery factors, includes recently
announced CCA area acquisition.
Estimated 1.3 to 3.2
Billion Barrels
Recoverable(1)
Estimated 3.4 to 7.5
Billion Barrels
Recoverable(1)
Existing or Proposed CO2 Source
Owned or Contracted
Existing Denbury CO2 Pipelines
Denbury owned Fields With CO2 EOR Potential
Other CO2 Sources
Denbury Gulf Coast Region
587 Million 3P CO2 EOR Barrels(2)
Denbury Rockies Region
331 Million 3P CO2 EOR Barrels(2)
Hartzog Draw Field
Webster Field
Free State
Pipeline
Cedar Creek Anticline
8
Jackson
Dome
Sonat
MS Pipeline
Green Pipeline
Citronelle
(2)
Tinsley
Free State Pipeline
Martinville
Davis
Quitman
Heidelberg
Summerland Soso
Sandersville
Eucutta Yellow Creek
Cypress Creek
Brookhaven
Mallalieu
Little Creek
Olive
Smithdale
McComb
Donaldsonville
Delhi
Lake
St. John
Cranfield
Lockhart
Crossing
Hastings
Conroe
Oyster
Bayou
Fig Ridge
Delhi
36 MMBbls
Tinsley
46 MMBbls
Mature Area
178 MMBbls
Oyster Bayou
20 - 30 MMBbls
Conroe
130 MMBbls
(1) Proved tertiary oil reserves based on year-end 12/31/12 SEC proved reserves. Probable and possible tertiary reserve estimates as of 12/31/2012, based on a variety of recovery factors.
(2) Produced-to-Date is cumulative tertiary production through 12/31/12.
(3) Using mid-points of range.
Summary(1)
Proved 201
Potential 386
Produced-to-Date(2) 71
Total MMBbls 658
CO2 EOR in Gulf Coast Region:
Control of CO2 Sources & Pipeline Infrastructure Provides a Strategic Advantage
15 - 50 MMBoe
50 – 100 MMBoe
> 100 MMBoe
Denbury Owned Fields – Current CO2 Floods
Denbury Owned Fields – Future CO2 Floods
Fields Owned by Others – CO2 EOR Candidates
Cumulative Production
Thompson
Heidelberg
44 MMBbls
Houston Area
Hastings 60 - 80 MMBbls
Webster 60 - 75 MMBbls
Thompson 30 - 60 MMBbls
Other 10 - 20 MMBbls
160 - 235 MMBbls
Webster
9
MONTANA
NORTH DAKOTA
SOUTH DAKOTA
WYOMING
Cedar Creek
Anticline
Elk Basin
Shute Creek
(XOM)
Lost Cabin
(COP)
DGC Beulah
Bell Creek
Riley Ridge
(DNR)
DKRW
Greencore Pipeline
232 Miles
Bell Creek
30 MMBbls(1)
Cedar Creek Anticline Area
Existing CCA Fields(1) 200 MMBbls
CCA Acquisition(3) 60-80 MMBbls
260 - 280 MMBbls
(1) Probable and possible tertiary reserve estimates as of 12/31/2012, using mid-point of ranges, based on a variety of recovery factors.
(2) Proved reserves as of 12/31/12 and are presented on a gross working interest or 8/8ths basis, except those reserves recently acquired from
ExxonMobil which are reported net to Denbury’s interest.
(3) Recently agreed to purchase from ConocoPhillips in a transaction expected to close near the end of the first quarter of 2013.
Grieve Field
6 MMBbls(1)
Existing CO2
Pipeline
Pipelines
Denbury Pipelines in Process
Denbury Proposed Pipelines
Pipelines Owned by Others
LaBarge Area(2)
416 BCF Nat Gas
12.0 BCF Helium
3.5 TCF CO2
Other CO2 Sources
CO2 Sources
Existing or Proposed CO2 Source
Owned or Contracted
CO2 EOR in Rocky Mountain Region:
Control of CO2 Sources & Pipeline Infrastructure Provides a Strategic Advantage
Hartzog Draw
20 - 30 MMBbls
15 - 50 MMBoe
50 – 100 MMBoe
> 100 MMBoe
Denbury Owned Fields – Future CO2 Floods
Fields Owned by Others – CO2 EOR Candidates
Cumulative Production
Planned
Interconnect
(2013)
Summary(1)
Proved ---
Potential 331
Produced-to-Date ---
Total MMBbls 331
10
Texas CO2 Pipeline Expansions – Economies of Scale
$-
$2
$4
$6
$8
$10
$12
$14
PipelinecostpertertiaryBbl
Hastings Oyster Bayou Webster Conroe Thompson
Hastings + Oyster Bayou + Webster + Conroe + Thompson
70
MMBbls
95
MMBbls
163
MMBbls
293
MMBbls 338
MMBbls
(1) Using mid-point of ranges and includes costs of Green Pipeline plus forecasted costs for required incremental pipelines.
11
Strategic and Value-Driven M&A Transactions
Assets (Quarter close date)
Est.
Production(1)
(BOE/d)
Est. Proved
Reserves
(MMBOE)
Est. PDP
%
Impact on
Current
FCF(4)
Est. Potential
Reserves(2)
(MMBOE)
Est. Proved
PV10(3)
($Billions)
Non-Core LA & MS (1Q12) 1,400 6 54% + --- 0.2
Non-Operated Greater Aneth (2Q12) 650 6 58% + --- 0.1
Bakken (4Q12) 15,850 109 30% – 191 1.5
Total Sold 17,900 121 33% 191 1.8
Assets (Quarter close date)
Est.
Production(1)
(BOE/d)
Est. Proved
Reserves
(MMBOE)
Est. PDP
%
Impact on
Current
FCF(4)
Est. Potential
Reserves(2)
(MMBOE)
Est. Proved
PV10(3)
($Billions)
Thompson Field (2Q12) 2,200 17 34% + 45 0.5
Webster Field (4Q12) 1,000 4 100% + 68 0.1
Hartzog Draw (4Q12) 2,600 5 100% + 25 0.1
COP CCA Assets (1Q13E) 11,000 42 91% + 70 1.1
Total Purchased 16,800 68 78% 208 1.8
XOM LaBarge CO2 (4Q12) Up to 115 MMcf/d Production 1.3 TCF Proved Reserves at 12/31/2012
+ Additional CO2 Supply in the Rockies:
(1) Estimated production at time of acquisition, divestiture or agreement to purchase in case of CCA; Bakken area production is actual year-to-date average production through 9/30/12.
(2) Preliminary mid-point of estimates based on internal calculations, refer to slide 3 for full disclosure of forward-looking statements. Potential reserves include probable and possible
reserves.
(3) Estimated discounted net present value of proved reserves or impact of sales on net present value, using a 10% annum discount rate.
(4) Spent $90 million in excess of operating cash flow on Bakken area assets in first nine months of 2012; expect capital expenditures on acquired properties to be minimal.
Divestitures
Acquisitions
+
~$100MM
in cash
12
Encore Acquisition was Highly Profitable
Purchase price: (Billions)
Equity $2.8
Debt assumed 1.0
Total value $3.8
Value: (Estimated values at $94.71/Bbl – 12/31/12 SEC Pricing)
Proved reserves at 12/31/12 $1.5
Value received from sold properties ~3.6
Net cash flow from 3/9/10 to 9/30/12 0.4
Total ~$5.5
Additional potential:
CO2 EOR potential 230 MMBOE
(1)
(2)
(1) Excludes consolidated ENP debt and minority interest in ENP.
(2) Excludes sold properties, and ENP reserves.
(3) Includes ~$2 billion of estimated value of Bakken sale.
(4) Made up of CO2 EOR potential at Bell Creek and CCA acquired from Encore.
(3)
(4)
13
Acquisition of Cedar Creek Anticline Fields
Transaction Terms
● $1.05 billion cash, prior to working capital adjustments
● Acquisition expected to close near the end of the first
quarter of 2013 with a 1/1/2013 effective date
● The original oil in place of all units in the CCA is estimated
at over three billion barrels of oil
● Including this acquisition, we estimate that a CO2 flood of
our CCA assets could recover between 260-280 million
barrels of oil
● Currently producing ~11,000 barrels of oil equivalent per
day (~95% oil, ~4% NGLs)
● Assuming acquisition closes at the end of 1Q 2013, we
estimate it to add ~7,700 BOE/d to 2013 production
estimates
● Conventional (non-tertiary) reserves ~42 million boe
MONTANA
NORTHDAKOTA
DAWSON
PRAIRIE
WIBAUX
GOLDEN
VALLEY
FALLON
SLOPE
BOWMAN
Glendive North
Glendive
Gas City
North Pine
South Pine
Cabin Creek
Monarch
Pennel
Coral Creek
Little Beaver
East Lookout
Butte
Existing CCA Properties
CCA Acquisition
CCA Fields Owned by Others
Cedar Hills
South Unit
0
250
500
750
1,000
1,250
12/31/11
Proved
Reserves
12/31/12
Proved
Reserves
12/31/12
Estimated
Pro-Forma
Proved
Reserves
+CO2 EOR
Potential
+Additional
CCA CO2
EOR
Potential
+Riley
Ridge
Natural Gas
=Total
Potential
MMBOE
14
More than a Billion Barrels of Oil Potential
1,22070
409
77%
Oil
451
89%
Oil
46
100%
Natural
Gas
(1) Based on year-end 12/31/12 SEC proved reserves.
(2) Based on year-end 12/31/12 SEC proved reserves pro-forma for recently announced CCA acquisition.
(3) Estimates based on mid-point of internal estimates, refer to slide 3 for full disclosure of forward-looking statements.
(1)
(2)
(3)
(3)
.....
.....462
80%
Oil
82%
Oil
100%
Oil
.....653
100%
Oil
(3)
.....
15
Proven Track Record
Net Daily Oil Production – Tertiary Operations (through 12/31/12)
-
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
35,000
40,000
1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013E
AverageDailyProduction(Bbls/D)
Mature Properties Tinsley Heidelberg Delhi Oyster Bayou Hastings
29% CAGR
(1999-2012)
Estimated
2013 Range
36,500-to-
39,500
16
Highest Operating Margin in the Peer Group (1)
(1) Data derived from SEC filings, twelve months ended 12/31/12 and includes CLR, CXO, FST, NBL, NFX, PXD, RRC, SD, SM, WLL, and XEC. Calculated as revenues
less lease operating expenses, marketing/transportation expenses, and production and ad valorem taxes. Includes historical data only, not adjusted for the Bakken
transaction or CCA acquisition that closed on 3/27/13.
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
DNR Peer A Peer B Peer C Peer D Peer E Peer F Peer G Peer H Peer I Peer J Peer K
$/BOE 12-Months ended 12/31/2012
~94% oil + high LLS exposure = Premium Pricing
17
1717
Highest Capital Efficiency in Peer Group(1)
TTM EBITDA(4)
Adj. F&D
Efficiency
Ratio=
(3)
331%
264%
244% 240%
206%
181%
151%
140%
85% 82% 74%
0%
50%
100%
150%
200%
250%
300%
350%
DNR Peer A Peer B Peer C Peer D Peer E Peer F Peer G Peer H Peer I Peer J
Adjusted Capital Efficiency Ratio
$60.26
$50.15
$33.57
$32.26
$23.23 $22.82 $21.14 $19.57 $19.39
$18.42
$7.17
$0.00
$10.00
$20.00
$30.00
$40.00
$50.00
$60.00
Peer J Peer H Peer I Peer F Peer D Peer A Peer B Peer E Peer G DNR Peer C
Adjusted 3-Year Finding & Development Cost ($/BOE)(2)
(1) Peer Group includes BRY,CLR,CXO,OAS,PXD,PXP,RRC,SD,SM,WLL. Includes historical data only, excludes impact of CCA acquisition that closed on 3/27/13.
(2) Three years ended 12/32/2012, and includes Encore Acquisition in 2010. calculated as total capital expenditures divided by net reserve additions, including changes in future
development costs and change in unevaluated properties.
(3) Includes 3 year average DD&A for CO2 properties of $0.82 per BOE
(4) Trailing twelve months EBITDA ended 12/31/2012.
18
CO2 EOR – Superior Economics(1)
EOR Bakken
Gulf Coast
Model Averages
575,000 BOE / Well
$9.6 Million / Well
20% Royalty
NYMEX oil price $90.00 $90.00
Finding & development cost:
Field
Infrastructure
9.00
4.50
21.00
---
Total capital per BOE $13.50 $21.00
Average operating cost over life 25.00 8.00
Average historic NYMEX differentials 1.25 10.00
Estimated gross margin $50.25 $51.00
Estimated Internal Rate of Return 39% 27%
Return on investment 4.4x 2.7x
(1) Updated as of 12/31/11 which does not include Thompson or Webster.
19
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
Production(Bbls/d)
Years
Gulf CoastEOR Field
Bakken
CO2 EOR – Superior Production Profile
Capital Spending per
Year Based on EOR
Spending Pattern
Year $MM
1 83
2 83
3 60
4 60
5 68
6 52
7 52
8 52
9 45
Total $555
Note: Assumes 700 BOEPD initial 30 day rate for Bakken wells.
Production(BOEPD)
Projected Production Profile with Same Capital Spending
2020
CO2 EOR – Compelling Economics
(1) Source: KeyBanc as of March 2013. Defined as the threshold WTI oil price necessary to generate a 20% before-tax rate of return. Calculations reflect current type curve and basis
differential of each play. Excludes acreage acquisition cost.
(2) Internal estimate for indicative large CO2 EOR development project in the Gulf Coast Region. Assumes a $5 basis premium. Excludes property acquisition cost.
$50
$63 $64 $65
$68 $70
$74 $76
$83 $83
$87
$0
$10
$20
$30
$40
$50
$60
$70
$80
$90
$100
WTI Breakeven Price for a 20% Before-Tax Rate of Return ($ per Bbl)(1)
2121
CO2 Supply to Support Gulf Coast Growth
Note: Forecast based on internal management estimates and includes fields currently owned. Actual results may vary.
0
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
1,400
1,600
1,800
2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022
CO2Volumes,MMCFPD
JACKSON DOME
PROVED RESERVES
~6.1 TCF
Estimated as of 12/31/2012
JACKSON DOME
RISKED DRILLING PROGRAM
ANTHROPOGENIC SUPPLY-
Executed Agreements with Future Construction
Additional CO2 Potential (not reflected in graph)
Probable & Possible Reserves: ~3 TCF
Improved Recovery of Proved Reserves: ~0.8 TCF
Recycle: ~3 TCF
22
Gulf Coast Industrial Partners
Air Products
• Port Arthur, Texas
• Hydrogen Plant
• Capture Date: 1Q 2013
• Quantity: ~50 MMcf/d
PCS Nitrogen
• Geismar, Louisiana
• Ammonia Products
• Capture Date: ~2Q 2013
• Quantity: ~25 MMcf/d
Mississippi Power – (Under Construction)
• Kemper County, MS
• Gasifier
• Capture Date: ~2014
• Quantity: ~115 MMcf/d
Lake Charles Cogeneration(1)
• Lake Charles, Louisiana
• Petroleum Coke to
Methanol Plant
• Capture Date: ~2018
• Quantity: >200 MMcf/d
Ammonia Plant(1)
• Near Green Pipeline
• Capture Date: ~1Q 2016
• Quantity: ~85 MMcf/d
Chemical Plant(1)
• Near Green Pipeline
• Capture Date: ~2020
• Quantity: ~200 MMcf/d
Currently Producing or Under Construction
Future Construction (currently planned or proposed)
CO2 Supply to Support Rocky Mountain Growth
23
LaBarge Area
● Estimated Field Size: 750 Square Miles
● Estimated 100 TCF of CO2 Recoverable
Riley Ridge – Denbury Operated
● 100% WI in 9,700 acre Riley Ridge Federal Unit
● 33% WI in ~28,000 acre Horseshoe Unit
● Estimated 2.2 TCF CO2 proved reserves
Shute Creek – XOM Operated
● Denbury has acquired 1/3 of XOM’s CO2 reserves
● Based on XOM’s current plant capacity and
availability, Denbury could receive up to ~115 MMcfpd
of CO2 from the plant
● Estimated 0.3 TCF CO2 proved reserves
LaBarge Area(1)
416 BCF Nat Gas
12.0 BCF Helium
3.5 TCF CO2
1) Proved reserves as of 12/31/2012
Composition of Produced Gas Stream:
~65% CO2; ~19% Natural Gas; ~5% Hydrogen
Sulfide; <1% Helium, and other gasses
24
Strong Financial Position
● ~$900 million availability under
credit facility on 12/31/12
Debt to Capitalization
(12/31/12)
38% Debt
$1.6 billion borrowing base
Unused
Credit
Facility
100%
+ (12/31/12) Cash(1) ~ $100 million
56%
(1) As of 12/31/12, our cash and cash equivalents totaled ~$100 million. At 12/31/12, ~$1.05 billion in restricted cash remained deposited with a qualified intermediary designated
for the recently announced acquisition of CCA, which closed at the end of March 2013.
2013 Summary Guidance(1)
CO2 Pipelines
$110MM
Tertiary Floods
$540MM
All Other
$150 MM
CO2 Sources
$200MM
2013 Capital Budget – $1.0 Billion(2)
2013 Production Estimate
(1) See slide 3 for full disclosure of forward-looking statements.
(2) Excludes capitalized exploration, capitalized interest and capitalized pre-production EOR startup costs, estimated at $150 million.
(3) Includes impact of CCA acquisition that closed on 3/27/13. See slide 52 for more details.
(4) Total stock purchased since October 2011 is 34.6 million shares at about $15 per share, as of 2/20/13.
(5) Including capitalized exploration, capitalized interest and capitalized pre-production EOR startup costs, estimated at $150 million.
~$250 million remains under current stock repurchase authorization.
Stock re-purchased to date increases production per share ~9%(4)
25
We estimate the 2013 capital program(5) to be more than self-funded at
~low to mid $90’s NYMEX WTI crude oil price.
Operating area
2012
(BOE/d)
2013E
(BOE/d)
2013E
Growth
Tertiary Oil Fields 35,206
36,500-
39,500
4-12%
Non-Tertiary Oil Fields 21,636 24,500
CCA Acquisition(3) --- 7,700
Total Estimated
Production
56,842
68,700-
71,700
21-26%
26
Hedges Protect Against Downside in Near-Term(1)
(1) Figures and averages as of 4/10/13.
(2) All crude oil derivative contracts are based on West Texas Intermediate (WTI) NYMEX price basis.
(3) Averages are volume weighted.
Crude Oil (2) 2013 2014 2015
2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 4th Quarter 1st Half 2nd Half 1st Quarter
Volumes hedged (Bbls/d) 56,000 56,000 54,000 56,000 54,000 20,000
Principal price floors ~$80 ~$80 $80 $80 $80 ~$80
Principal price ceilings(3) ~$109 ~$109 ~$118 ~$102 ~$98 ~$98
2727
A Decade of CO2 EOR Production Growth(1)
-200
300
800
1,300
1,800
2,300
0
20,000
40,000
60,000
80,000
100,000
120,000
2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022E
EstimatedCO2EORCapital
Budget($MM)
EstimatedCO2EORProduction
(Bbls/d)
100,000
35,206
● Bell Creek
● Webster
● Hartzog Draw
● Conroe
● Cedar Creek Anticline
● Thompson
Expected Peak
CO2 EOR Cap-Ex
(1) 2013 and future forecasted capital expenditures and production may differ materially from actual results. Does not include recently
announced incremental CCA acquisition. See slide 3 for full disclosure of forward-looking statements.
Anticipating Average Annual Percentage Growth Rate in the Low Teens
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013E 2014E 2015E 2016E
CumulativeFreeCashFlow($MM)
Cumulative Gulf Coast Tertiary Free Cash Flows (1)
2828
CO2 EOR – Proven Free Cash Flow Generator
(1) Calculated from actual historical operating cash flow (revenues less operating expenses) less capital expenditures and currently projected operating
income and capital expenditures in 2012 and beyond using a flat $90 NYMEX crude oil price. Includes Jackson Dome and Pipeline expenditures in Gulf
Coast, and also includes recently closed acquisition of Webster. See slide 3 for full disclosure of forward-looking statements.
+/- $1.7 Billion
First Year of
Free Cash Flow
2929
Estimated CO2 EOR Peak Production Rates
Operating Area
First
Production
Estimated Peak Production Rate
(Net MBOE/d) Expected
Peak Year
Produced
to date(1)
(MMBOE)
Proved
Remaining(1)
(MMBOE)
Potential
Remaining(2)
(MMBOE)< 5 5-10 10-15 15-20 > 20
Mature Area 1999 2010 54 54 70
Tinsley 2008 2012-14 9 28 9
Heidelberg 2009 2018-20 3 35 6
Delhi 2010 2015-17 3 25 8
Oyster Bayou 2012 2015-17 <1 14 11
Hastings 2012 2018-20 1 45 24
Bell Creek 2013 2019-21 --- --- 30
Webster 2015 2022-25 --- --- 68
Hartzog Draw 2016 2021-23 --- --- 25
Conroe 2017 2033-35 --- --- 130
Cedar Creek Anticline(3)
2017 2023-27(3)
--- --- 200(3)
Thompson 2019 2025-27 --- --- 45
Expected year of first tertiary production.
(1) Tertiary oil production and reserves as of 12/31/2012
(2) Based on internal estimates of reserve recovery, using mid-points of ranges.
(3) Does not include impact of CCA acquisition that closed on 3/27/13. Potential tertiary reserves for CCA acquisition are currently estimated at 60-80 MMBOE.
30
• Significant strategic advantage in CO2 EOR
• Well defined and focused long-term growth strategy
• Highest operating margin and capital efficiency in peer group
• Substantial free cash flow generation from CO2 EOR after up-
front investment in infrastructure
IN SUMMARY: A Different Kind of Oil Company
Leading CO2 Enhanced Oil Recovery Company in the U.S. with a Unique Profile
3131
Corporate Information
Corporate Headquarters
Denbury Resources Inc.
5320 Legacy Drive
Plano, Texas 75024
Ph: (972) 673-2000 Fax: (972) 673-2150
denbury.com
Contact Information
Phil Rykhoek
President & CEO
(972) 673-2000
Mark Allen
Senior VP & CFO
(972) 673-2000
Jack Collins
Executive Director, Investor Relations
(972) 673-2028
jack.collins@denbury.com
Appendix
33
Why is CO2 EOR our core focus?
● High Confidence of Oil Target
 Nearly 70 million barrels produced by Denbury to date
 Net upward adjustments to reserves-to-date
● CO2 Flooding Recovers Oil (CO2 ♥’s Crude Oil)
 First CO2 EOR production was in 1972
 Over 1.5 billion barrels produced to date in the US(1)
 Current estimated production in the US is ~284 MBbls/d(2)
● A Very Repeatable Process with a lot of Running Room
 Up to 10 Billion Barrels Recoverable with CO2 EOR in our two operating areas
 Over 900 Million Barrels of CO2 EOR potential in our portfolio today
(1) Oil & Gas Journal, Dec. 7, 2009
(2) Oil & Gas Journal, July 2, 2012
34
CO2 EOR is a Proven Process
Significant CO2 Suppliers by Region
Gulf Coast Region
• Jackson Dome, MS (Denbury Resources)
Permian Basin Region
• Bravo Dome, NM (Kinder Morgan, Occidental)
• McElmo Dome, CO (ExxonMobil, Kinder Morgan)
• Sheep Mountain, CO (ExxonMobil, Occidental)
Rockies Region
• Riley Ridge, WY (Denbury Resources)
• LaBarge, WY (ExxonMobil, Denbury Resources)
• Lost Cabin, WY (ConocoPhillips)
Canada
• Dakota Gasification – Anthropogenic (Cenovus, Apache)
Significant CO2 EOR Operators by Region
Gulf Coast Region
• Denbury Resources
Permian Basin Region
• Occidental • Kinder Morgan
• Whiting
Rockies Region
• Denbury Resources • Anadarko
Canada
• Cenovus • Apache
Jackson
Dome
Bravo
Dome
Riley Ridge
& LaBarge
Lost
Cabin
DGC
McElmo
Dome
Significant CO2 Source
-
50
100
150
200
250
300
1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012
MBbls/d
CO2 EOR Oil Production by Region
Gulf Coast/Other
Mid-Continent
Rocky Mountains
Permian Basin
35
CO2 Operations: Oil Recovery Process
CO2 PIPELINE - from Jackson Dome
CO2 moves through
formation mixing with
oil droplets,
expanding them and
moving them to
producing wells.
INJECTION WELL - Injects
CO2 in dense phase
PRODUCTION WELLS
Produce oil, water and CO2
(CO2 is recycled)
Model for Oil Recovery Using CO2 is +/- 17%
of Original Oil in Place (Based on Little Creek)
Primary recovery = +/- 20%
Secondary recovery (waterfloods) = +/- 18%
Tertiary (CO2) = +/- 17%
Oil Formation
36
CO2 EOR – Proven Value Creation
Investments – Inception-to-12/31/2012 ($) Billions
Gulf Coast EOR Fields $3.0
Gulf Coast CO2 Sources & Pipelines 2.0
Less Undeveloped:
EOR Fields 0.1
CO2 Pipelines 0.2
(0.3)
Net Investment-to-Date – Proved Properties 4.7
Inception-to-Date Net Revenues 4.1
Net Cash flow (0.6)
PV10 of proved EOR at 12/31/2012 6.8
Value Created $6.2
37
Denbury vs. Peer Group Trading Multiples
Source: KeyBanc – Net Asset Values (NAVs) based on YE11 proved reserves and KeyBanc price deck with balance sheet adjustments to reflect
latest 10Q; January 2013. Peer Group includes CLR, CXO, FST, NFX, PXD, RRC, SD, SM, WLL, XEC
-
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
0% 50% 100% 150% 200% 250% 300% 350% 400% 450%
P/CFPS
P/ Proved NAV
Plateau
Incline (Yrs) Plateau (Yrs) Decline (Yrs)
Large Fields 6 6.5 30
Average Fields 4.5 5.5 25
Small Fields 4 5 20
ProductionRate
CO2 EOR Generalized Type Curve
38
39
Capital Spending Range for CO2 Floods
39
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
1 2 3 4 5
%ofTotalCapital
Year
40
• We attempt to balance development expenditures with free cash flow
• In contrast to shale plays, a reduction in EOR capital spending will not
immediately impact EOR production growth
• Our newer EOR projects have many years of production growth with fairly low
capital expenditures
• It is relatively easy to slow the development pace of EOR projects - most Rocky
Mountain EOR infrastructure development could be delayed if necessary
• No lease expiration issues and limited capital commitments on EOR projects
• We can hold production flat over the next several years using 50% or less of our
2013 forecasted capital expenditures
Capital Spending Flexibility in Low Oil Price Environment
Unique characteristics of CO2 EOR provides significant capital flexibility
41
Proved Reserve Changes
Estimated
Proved
Reserves
(MMBOE)
Estimated
PV10
($Billion)
SEC Proved Reserves 12/31/11 462 $10.6
New CO2 Floods (Oyster Bayou & Hastings) 57
Extensions & Discoveries and Improved Recovery 29
Acquisitions (Thompson, Hartzog & Webster) 28
Divestitures (Non-Core Assets & Bakken area assets) (124)
Estimated 2012 Production (26)
Price Effect(1) (7)
Other Estimated Revisions (10)
SEC Proved Reserves 12/31/12 409 $9.9
Pending COP CCA Acquisition ~42 1.1
Estimated Pro-Forma Proved Reserves ~451 $11.0
(1) Primarily due to lower natural gas prices.
42
Production by Area (BOE/d)(1)
Operating area 1Q12 2Q12 3Q12 4Q12 2012 2013E
Tertiary Oil Fields 33,257 35,208 34,786 37,550 35,206 36,500 – 39,500
Texas Non-Tertiary 3,674 4,573 5,173 5,513 4,737 6,300
Other Gulf Coast Non-Tertiary 5,854 5,401 4,538 4,880 5,165 4,300
Cedar Creek Anticline 8,496 8,535 8,490 8,493 8,503 8,500
Other Rockies Non-Tertiary 3,204 3,060 3,037 3,616 3,231 5,400
Incremental Cedar Creek Anticline(2) --- --- --- --- --- 7,700
Total Continuing Production 54,485 56,777 56,024 60,052 56,842 68,700 – 71,700
Bakken Area 15,285 15,503 16,752 10,064 14,395 ~94% Oil
Gulf Coast Non-Core Properties 1,054 --- --- --- 262
Paradox Basin Properties 708 57 --- --- 190
Total Production 71,532 72,337 72,776 70,116 71,689
(1) See slide 3 for full disclosure of forward-looking statements.
(2) Assumes recently announced CCA acquisition closes at the end of the first quarter of 2013. See slide 13 for more details.
43
Tertiary Production by Field
Average Daily Production (BOE/d)
Field 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 1Q12 2Q12 3Q12 4Q12
Brookhaven 2,826 3,416 3,429 3,255 2,692 3,014 2,779 2,460 2,520
Little Creek Area 1,683 1,502 1,805 1,561 1,091 1,216 1,131 1,021 999
Mallalieu Area 5,686 4,107 3,377 2,693 2,338 2,585 2,461 2,181 2,127
McComb Area 1,901 2,391 2,342 1,997 1,785 1,746 1,902 1,769 1,722
Lockhart Crossing 186 804 1,397 1,465 1,176 1,284 1,313 1,039 1,072
Martinville 865 877 720 462 507 551 480 476 522
Eucutta 3,109 3,985 3,495 3,121 2,868 3,090 2,870 2,782 2,730
Soso 2,111 2,834 3,065 2,347 1,989 2,063 1,947 1,923 2,021
Heidelberg --- 651 2,454 3,448 3,763 3,583 3,823 3,716 3,930
Tinsley 1,010 3,328 5,584 6,743 7,947 7,297 8,168 8,153 8,166
Cranfield --- 448 911 1,123 1,159 1,152 1,094 1,119 1,269
Delhi --- --- 483 2,739 4,315 4,181 4,023 3,813 5,237
Hastings --- --- --- --- 2,188 618 1,913 2,794 3,409
Oyster Bayou --- --- --- 5 1,388 877 1,304 1,540 1,826
Total Tertiary Production 19,377 24,343 29,062 30,959 35,206 33,257 35,208 34,786 37,550
44
Analysis of Tertiary Operating Costs
Correlation
w/Oil
3Q10
$/BOE
4Q10
$/BOE
1Q11
$/BOE
2Q11
$/BOE
3Q11
$/BOE
4Q11
$/BOE
1Q12
$/BOE
2Q12
$/BOE
3Q12
$/BOE
4Q12
$/BOE
CO2 Costs Direct $4.52 $5.38 $5.39 $5.43 $4.87 $4.53 $5.76 $5.14 $4.96 $5.21
Power & Fuel Partially 6.03 5.76 6.12 6.17 6.24 6.71 6.71 6.69 6.69 5.98
Labor & Overhead None 3.70 3.43 3.94 3.77 3.85 3.90 4.59 4.64 4.74 4.57
Equipment Rental None 1.93 1.79 2.20 1.52 2.28 2.38 2.30 0.15 0.08 0.15
Chemicals Partially 1.73 1.67 1.62 1.44 1.80 1.67 1.63 1.27 1.46 1.59
Workovers Partially 2.78 2.36 3.75 2.53 3.44 2.68 3.43 3.01 3.68 3.30
Other None 1.68 1.34 1.91 2.01 2.43 1.72 2.32 2.05 1.89 1.79
Total $22.37 $21.73 $24.93 $22.87 $24.91 $23.59 $26.74 $22.95 $23.50 $22.59
NYMEX Oil Price $76.09 $85.16 $94.26 $102.58 $89.60 $93.93 $102.89 $93.49 $92.29 $88.18
45
Pro Forma Bakken Transaction
4Q 2012 Pro Forma(1)
Production (BOE/d) 70,116 60,052
% Oil Production 93% 95%
NYMEX Oil Price Differential ($/Bbl) $9.43 $11.65
LOE/BOE $21.61 $24.33
Operating Margin/BOE(2) $65.33 $66.07
DD&A/BOE(3) $18.20 ~$19.00 to ~$21.00
Bakken Area Cash Flow ($MM) YTD 12/31/2012
Operating Cash Flow(4) $300
Capital Expenditures (430)
Net ($130)
(1) Pro forma for recently closed Bakken sale, does not include Webster or Hartzog Draw. Also does not include recently announced CCA acquisition.
(2) Calculated as oil, natural gas, and related product sales less production and ad valorem taxes and LOE.
(3) Preliminary estimate, subject to change materially.
(4) Cash flow from operations before working capital reflecting only results from the portion of 4Q before sale of Bakken assets.
46
NYMEX Differential Summary
Crude Oil Differentials 3Q10 4Q10 1Q11 2Q11 3Q11 4Q11 1Q12 2Q12 3Q12 4Q12
Tertiary Oil Fields $0.66 $0.90 $4.33 $9.69 $14.84 $19.44 $9.80 $13.60 $10.61 $15.57
Mississippi (7.59) (8.02) (4.50) 1.32 7.25 6.98 2.44 8.63 2.48 10.82
Texas (3.67) (4.33) (4.29) (3.46) 1.19 12.29 1.77 5.38 5.46 13.10
Cedar Creek Anticline (5.70) (5.01) (3.27) 1.25 0.85 (0.29) (9.89) (7.44) (9.26) (0.23)
Bakken Area Assets (1) (11.41) (13.24) (11.67) (9.61) (5.67) (8.45) (16.96) (20.07) (16.32) (5.35)
Other Rockies (10.88) (11.64) (12.04) (6.25) (6.25) (8.11) (16.30) (16.67) (14.42) (6.57)
Denbury Totals ($3.86) ($3.90) ($0.59) $3.72 $7.25 $9.14 ($0.37) $2.14 $0.80 $9.43
(1) Represents certain Bakken area assets sold at the end of Nov. 2012.
$75
$85
$95
$105
$115
$125
$135
Jan-12 Feb-12 Mar-12 Apr-12 May-12 Jun-12 Jul-12 Aug-12 Sep-12 Oct-12 Nov-12 Dec-12 Jan-13 Feb-13
WTI BRENT LLS
47
Tracking Oil Prices
WTI NYMEX
Brent
Light Louisiana Sweet
● We currently sell ~45% of our oil production based on LLS index
price, ~25% based on various other indexes, most of which have
also improved relative to WTI, but to a lesser degree
48
Crude Oil Hedge Detail
(1) All crude oil derivative contracts are based on West Texas Intermediate (WTI) NYMEX price basis.
(2) Averages are volume weighted
2013 Crude Oil Hedges (BOPD)(1)
Average(2)
Ceiling
Instrument Volume Floor Ceiling Low High
Q1 Collars 6,000 70.00 109.67 106.50 113.00
9,000 80.00 105.14 102.25 106.50
40,000 80.00 108.41 108.00 109.60
Q2 Collars 4,000 75.00 118.25 115.00 121.50
10,000 80.00 105.65 104.50 106.50
42,000 80.00 108.40 108.00 109.60
Q3 Collars 4,000 75.00 126.80 120.50 133.10
12,000 80.00 105.58 104.50 106.50
40,000 80.00 108.46 108.00 109.60
Q4 Collars 16,000 80.00 103.39 102.25 105.00
20,000 80.00 120.66 120.00 121.50
18,000 80.00 126.63 126.00 127.50
2014 Crude Oil Hedges (BOPD)(1)
Average(2)
Ceiling
Instrument Volume Floor Ceiling Low High
1H Collars 6,000 80.00 97.22 96.55 97.60
16,000 80.00 102.43 101.60 102.70
24,000 80.00 103.32 103.00 103.90
6,000 80.00 104.23 104.10 104.50
2H Collars 20,000 80.00 96.77 96.55 96.90
16,000 80.00 97.36 97.00 97.75
12,000 80.00 98.74 98.60 98.80
2015 Crude Oil Hedges (BOPD)(1)
Average(2)
Ceiling
Instrument Volume Floor Ceiling Low High
Q1 Collars 20,000 80.00 98.33 96.00 100.90
($MM) 12/31/12
Pro forma for
debt offering
12/31/12
Cash and cash equivalents(1) $99 $99
Bank credit facility(2) (Borrowing base of $1.6 billion, matures May 2016) 700 209
9.75% Sr. Sub Notes due 2016 (Callable March 2013 at 104.875% of par) 413 ---
9.50% Sr. Sub Notes due 2016 (Callable May 2013 at 104.75% of par) 234 ---
8.25% Sr. Sub Notes due 2020 (Callable February 2015 at 104.125% of par) 996 996
6.375% Sr. Sub Notes due 2021 (Callable August 2016 at 103.188% of par) 400 400
4.625% Sr. Sub Notes due 2023 (Callable January 2018 at 102.313% of par) --- 1,200
Other Encore Sr. Sub Notes 4 4
Genesis pipeline financings / other capital leases 357 357
Total long-term debt(3) $3,104 $3,166
Equity 5,115 5,115
Total capitalization $8,219 $8,281
Annualized 4Q12 Adjusted cash flow from operations(4) $1,431 $1,431
Net Debt to Annualized 4Q12 Adjusted cash flow from operations(4) 2.1x 2.1x
Net Debt to Annualized 4Q12 EBITDA(4) 1.9x 1.9x
Debt to total capitalization 38% 38%
Strong Financial Position
(1) As of 12/31/12, our cash and cash equivalents totaled ~$100 million. At 12/31/12, ~$1.05 billion in restricted cash remained deposited with a qualified intermediary designated for the
acquisition of CCA, which closed at the end of March 2013.
(2) As of 12/31/12, we had ~$700 million of borrowings outstanding under our $1.6 billion bank credit facility.
(3) Excludes current portion of capital lease obligations and pipeline financings totaling $36.6 million.
(4) A non-GAAP measure; please visit our website for a full reconciliation. Represents historical amounts not adjusted for the Bakken Exchange Transaction or recent CCA acquisition. Adjusted
cash flow from operations excludes current taxes related to the Bakken Exchange Transaction in Q4 2012 of approximately $42 million.
Record low
yield for non-
investment
grade sub.
notes
offering
49

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Was ist angesagt?

Dismukes global brgs_presentation_08-16-10
Dismukes global brgs_presentation_08-16-10Dismukes global brgs_presentation_08-16-10
Dismukes global brgs_presentation_08-16-10Jordan Lane
 
Dismukes nabe presentation_08-10-10_v2
Dismukes nabe presentation_08-10-10_v2Dismukes nabe presentation_08-10-10_v2
Dismukes nabe presentation_08-10-10_v2Jordan Lane
 
PVA Capital One Investor Presentation 2012
PVA Capital One Investor Presentation 2012PVA Capital One Investor Presentation 2012
PVA Capital One Investor Presentation 2012PennVirginiaCorp
 
PVA Jefferies Investor Presentation 2012
PVA Jefferies Investor Presentation 2012PVA Jefferies Investor Presentation 2012
PVA Jefferies Investor Presentation 2012PennVirginiaCorp
 
Nal energy corporate presentation - january 2012
Nal energy   corporate presentation - january 2012Nal energy   corporate presentation - january 2012
Nal energy corporate presentation - january 2012NALenergy
 
PVA Investor Presentation 10/12
PVA Investor Presentation 10/12PVA Investor Presentation 10/12
PVA Investor Presentation 10/12PennVirginiaCorp
 
2018 05-03 great panther silver limited corporate presentation
2018 05-03 great panther silver limited corporate presentation2018 05-03 great panther silver limited corporate presentation
2018 05-03 great panther silver limited corporate presentationAlex Heath, CFA
 
092514_lcfs_fuels_availability_presenation_color
092514_lcfs_fuels_availability_presenation_color092514_lcfs_fuels_availability_presenation_color
092514_lcfs_fuels_availability_presenation_colorKirsten Cayabyab
 
Dismukes jones walker_banking_presentation_08-31-10
Dismukes jones walker_banking_presentation_08-31-10Dismukes jones walker_banking_presentation_08-31-10
Dismukes jones walker_banking_presentation_08-31-10Jordan Lane
 
Russ Ford- UBS Global Oil & Gas Conference – May 24, 2011
Russ Ford- UBS Global Oil & Gas Conference – May 24, 2011 Russ Ford- UBS Global Oil & Gas Conference – May 24, 2011
Russ Ford- UBS Global Oil & Gas Conference – May 24, 2011 Shell plc
 
Climate Change, Peak Oil and Their Effects on Hydrography
Climate Change, Peak Oil and Their Effects on HydrographyClimate Change, Peak Oil and Their Effects on Hydrography
Climate Change, Peak Oil and Their Effects on HydrographyMichael J. Casey
 
PVA June Investor Presentation
PVA June Investor PresentationPVA June Investor Presentation
PVA June Investor PresentationPennVirginiaCorp
 
October Corporate Presentation
October Corporate PresentationOctober Corporate Presentation
October Corporate PresentationDenbury
 
Corporate Presentation - October 2012
Corporate Presentation - October 2012Corporate Presentation - October 2012
Corporate Presentation - October 2012Denbury
 
US Oil & Gas Plc Final June 2014
US Oil & Gas Plc Final June 2014US Oil & Gas Plc Final June 2014
US Oil & Gas Plc Final June 2014Brian Stuart McBeth
 
1 q18 earnings presentation final
1 q18 earnings presentation final1 q18 earnings presentation final
1 q18 earnings presentation finalDenbury
 
October - Corporatre Presentation
October - Corporatre PresentationOctober - Corporatre Presentation
October - Corporatre Presentationglevel
 
John Hollister - Planning Issues
John Hollister - Planning IssuesJohn Hollister - Planning Issues
John Hollister - Planning IssuesPAS_Team
 

Was ist angesagt? (20)

Dismukes global brgs_presentation_08-16-10
Dismukes global brgs_presentation_08-16-10Dismukes global brgs_presentation_08-16-10
Dismukes global brgs_presentation_08-16-10
 
Dismukes nabe presentation_08-10-10_v2
Dismukes nabe presentation_08-10-10_v2Dismukes nabe presentation_08-10-10_v2
Dismukes nabe presentation_08-10-10_v2
 
PVA Capital One Investor Presentation 2012
PVA Capital One Investor Presentation 2012PVA Capital One Investor Presentation 2012
PVA Capital One Investor Presentation 2012
 
PVA Jefferies Investor Presentation 2012
PVA Jefferies Investor Presentation 2012PVA Jefferies Investor Presentation 2012
PVA Jefferies Investor Presentation 2012
 
Nal energy corporate presentation - january 2012
Nal energy   corporate presentation - january 2012Nal energy   corporate presentation - january 2012
Nal energy corporate presentation - january 2012
 
PVA Investor Presentation 10/12
PVA Investor Presentation 10/12PVA Investor Presentation 10/12
PVA Investor Presentation 10/12
 
2018 05-03 great panther silver limited corporate presentation
2018 05-03 great panther silver limited corporate presentation2018 05-03 great panther silver limited corporate presentation
2018 05-03 great panther silver limited corporate presentation
 
092514_lcfs_fuels_availability_presenation_color
092514_lcfs_fuels_availability_presenation_color092514_lcfs_fuels_availability_presenation_color
092514_lcfs_fuels_availability_presenation_color
 
Dismukes jones walker_banking_presentation_08-31-10
Dismukes jones walker_banking_presentation_08-31-10Dismukes jones walker_banking_presentation_08-31-10
Dismukes jones walker_banking_presentation_08-31-10
 
Dej april2015
Dej april2015Dej april2015
Dej april2015
 
Russ Ford- UBS Global Oil & Gas Conference – May 24, 2011
Russ Ford- UBS Global Oil & Gas Conference – May 24, 2011 Russ Ford- UBS Global Oil & Gas Conference – May 24, 2011
Russ Ford- UBS Global Oil & Gas Conference – May 24, 2011
 
Climate Change, Peak Oil and Their Effects on Hydrography
Climate Change, Peak Oil and Their Effects on HydrographyClimate Change, Peak Oil and Their Effects on Hydrography
Climate Change, Peak Oil and Their Effects on Hydrography
 
PVA June Investor Presentation
PVA June Investor PresentationPVA June Investor Presentation
PVA June Investor Presentation
 
October Corporate Presentation
October Corporate PresentationOctober Corporate Presentation
October Corporate Presentation
 
Corporate Presentation - October 2012
Corporate Presentation - October 2012Corporate Presentation - October 2012
Corporate Presentation - October 2012
 
US Oil & Gas Plc Final June 2014
US Oil & Gas Plc Final June 2014US Oil & Gas Plc Final June 2014
US Oil & Gas Plc Final June 2014
 
1 q18 earnings presentation final
1 q18 earnings presentation final1 q18 earnings presentation final
1 q18 earnings presentation final
 
October - Corporatre Presentation
October - Corporatre PresentationOctober - Corporatre Presentation
October - Corporatre Presentation
 
John Hollister - Planning Issues
John Hollister - Planning IssuesJohn Hollister - Planning Issues
John Hollister - Planning Issues
 
Opportunity Arabia 2014: Joep Straathof
Opportunity Arabia 2014: Joep StraathofOpportunity Arabia 2014: Joep Straathof
Opportunity Arabia 2014: Joep Straathof
 

Ähnlich wie 2013 04 ir presentation

Ubs conference-5 26-16
Ubs conference-5 26-16Ubs conference-5 26-16
Ubs conference-5 26-16Denbury
 
2017 february corporate presentation final
2017 february corporate presentation  final2017 february corporate presentation  final
2017 february corporate presentation finalDenbury
 
Denbury - Barclays presentation 9.6.16
Denbury - Barclays presentation 9.6.16Denbury - Barclays presentation 9.6.16
Denbury - Barclays presentation 9.6.16Denbury
 
Enercom presentation final
Enercom presentation finalEnercom presentation final
Enercom presentation finalDenbury
 
April 2017 corporate presentation
April 2017 corporate presentationApril 2017 corporate presentation
April 2017 corporate presentationDenbury
 
June 2017 corporate presentation final
June 2017 corporate presentation finalJune 2017 corporate presentation final
June 2017 corporate presentation finalDenbury
 
J.p. morgan 2017 energy equity conference final
J.p. morgan 2017 energy equity conference finalJ.p. morgan 2017 energy equity conference final
J.p. morgan 2017 energy equity conference finalDenbury
 
2017 credit suisse final
2017 credit suisse final2017 credit suisse final
2017 credit suisse finalDenbury
 
2017 12 capital one conference final
2017 12 capital one conference final2017 12 capital one conference final
2017 12 capital one conference finalDenbury
 
Barclays sept 2017 presentation final
Barclays sept 2017 presentation finalBarclays sept 2017 presentation final
Barclays sept 2017 presentation finalDenbury
 
Enercom august 2017 presentation final
Enercom august 2017 presentation finalEnercom august 2017 presentation final
Enercom august 2017 presentation finalDenbury
 
March Corporate Presentataion
March Corporate PresentataionMarch Corporate Presentataion
March Corporate PresentataionDenbury
 
November 2016 corporate presentation final
November 2016 corporate presentation finalNovember 2016 corporate presentation final
November 2016 corporate presentation finalDenbury
 
Denbury 3 q17-earnings
Denbury 3 q17-earningsDenbury 3 q17-earnings
Denbury 3 q17-earningsDenbury
 
Johnson Rice 2017 Energy Conference
Johnson Rice 2017 Energy ConferenceJohnson Rice 2017 Energy Conference
Johnson Rice 2017 Energy ConferenceDenbury
 
First Quarter 2017 Earnings Presentation
First Quarter 2017 Earnings Presentation First Quarter 2017 Earnings Presentation
First Quarter 2017 Earnings Presentation Denbury
 
2 q17 earnings presentation final
2 q17 earnings presentation final2 q17 earnings presentation final
2 q17 earnings presentation finalDenbury
 
Fall Analyst Presentation
Fall Analyst PresentationFall Analyst Presentation
Fall Analyst PresentationDenbury
 
The best overview of CO2 EOR I've seen crabtree
The best overview of CO2 EOR I've seen crabtreeThe best overview of CO2 EOR I've seen crabtree
The best overview of CO2 EOR I've seen crabtreeSteve Wittrig
 
Tim Bertels - Leading CCS projects (Shell)
Tim Bertels - Leading CCS projects (Shell)Tim Bertels - Leading CCS projects (Shell)
Tim Bertels - Leading CCS projects (Shell)Global CCS Institute
 

Ähnlich wie 2013 04 ir presentation (20)

Ubs conference-5 26-16
Ubs conference-5 26-16Ubs conference-5 26-16
Ubs conference-5 26-16
 
2017 february corporate presentation final
2017 february corporate presentation  final2017 february corporate presentation  final
2017 february corporate presentation final
 
Denbury - Barclays presentation 9.6.16
Denbury - Barclays presentation 9.6.16Denbury - Barclays presentation 9.6.16
Denbury - Barclays presentation 9.6.16
 
Enercom presentation final
Enercom presentation finalEnercom presentation final
Enercom presentation final
 
April 2017 corporate presentation
April 2017 corporate presentationApril 2017 corporate presentation
April 2017 corporate presentation
 
June 2017 corporate presentation final
June 2017 corporate presentation finalJune 2017 corporate presentation final
June 2017 corporate presentation final
 
J.p. morgan 2017 energy equity conference final
J.p. morgan 2017 energy equity conference finalJ.p. morgan 2017 energy equity conference final
J.p. morgan 2017 energy equity conference final
 
2017 credit suisse final
2017 credit suisse final2017 credit suisse final
2017 credit suisse final
 
2017 12 capital one conference final
2017 12 capital one conference final2017 12 capital one conference final
2017 12 capital one conference final
 
Barclays sept 2017 presentation final
Barclays sept 2017 presentation finalBarclays sept 2017 presentation final
Barclays sept 2017 presentation final
 
Enercom august 2017 presentation final
Enercom august 2017 presentation finalEnercom august 2017 presentation final
Enercom august 2017 presentation final
 
March Corporate Presentataion
March Corporate PresentataionMarch Corporate Presentataion
March Corporate Presentataion
 
November 2016 corporate presentation final
November 2016 corporate presentation finalNovember 2016 corporate presentation final
November 2016 corporate presentation final
 
Denbury 3 q17-earnings
Denbury 3 q17-earningsDenbury 3 q17-earnings
Denbury 3 q17-earnings
 
Johnson Rice 2017 Energy Conference
Johnson Rice 2017 Energy ConferenceJohnson Rice 2017 Energy Conference
Johnson Rice 2017 Energy Conference
 
First Quarter 2017 Earnings Presentation
First Quarter 2017 Earnings Presentation First Quarter 2017 Earnings Presentation
First Quarter 2017 Earnings Presentation
 
2 q17 earnings presentation final
2 q17 earnings presentation final2 q17 earnings presentation final
2 q17 earnings presentation final
 
Fall Analyst Presentation
Fall Analyst PresentationFall Analyst Presentation
Fall Analyst Presentation
 
The best overview of CO2 EOR I've seen crabtree
The best overview of CO2 EOR I've seen crabtreeThe best overview of CO2 EOR I've seen crabtree
The best overview of CO2 EOR I've seen crabtree
 
Tim Bertels - Leading CCS projects (Shell)
Tim Bertels - Leading CCS projects (Shell)Tim Bertels - Leading CCS projects (Shell)
Tim Bertels - Leading CCS projects (Shell)
 

Kürzlich hochgeladen

NAB Show Exhibitor List 2024 - Exhibitors Data
NAB Show Exhibitor List 2024 - Exhibitors DataNAB Show Exhibitor List 2024 - Exhibitors Data
NAB Show Exhibitor List 2024 - Exhibitors DataExhibitors Data
 
How Generative AI Is Transforming Your Business | Byond Growth Insights | Apr...
How Generative AI Is Transforming Your Business | Byond Growth Insights | Apr...How Generative AI Is Transforming Your Business | Byond Growth Insights | Apr...
How Generative AI Is Transforming Your Business | Byond Growth Insights | Apr...Hector Del Castillo, CPM, CPMM
 
Excvation Safety for safety officers reference
Excvation Safety for safety officers referenceExcvation Safety for safety officers reference
Excvation Safety for safety officers referencessuser2c065e
 
Healthcare Feb. & Mar. Healthcare Newsletter
Healthcare Feb. & Mar. Healthcare NewsletterHealthcare Feb. & Mar. Healthcare Newsletter
Healthcare Feb. & Mar. Healthcare NewsletterJamesConcepcion7
 
business environment micro environment macro environment.pptx
business environment micro environment macro environment.pptxbusiness environment micro environment macro environment.pptx
business environment micro environment macro environment.pptxShruti Mittal
 
Traction part 2 - EOS Model JAX Bridges.
Traction part 2 - EOS Model JAX Bridges.Traction part 2 - EOS Model JAX Bridges.
Traction part 2 - EOS Model JAX Bridges.Anamaria Contreras
 
Go for Rakhi Bazaar and Pick the Latest Bhaiya Bhabhi Rakhi.pptx
Go for Rakhi Bazaar and Pick the Latest Bhaiya Bhabhi Rakhi.pptxGo for Rakhi Bazaar and Pick the Latest Bhaiya Bhabhi Rakhi.pptx
Go for Rakhi Bazaar and Pick the Latest Bhaiya Bhabhi Rakhi.pptxRakhi Bazaar
 
Pitch Deck Teardown: Xpanceo's $40M Seed deck
Pitch Deck Teardown: Xpanceo's $40M Seed deckPitch Deck Teardown: Xpanceo's $40M Seed deck
Pitch Deck Teardown: Xpanceo's $40M Seed deckHajeJanKamps
 
Driving Business Impact for PMs with Jon Harmer
Driving Business Impact for PMs with Jon HarmerDriving Business Impact for PMs with Jon Harmer
Driving Business Impact for PMs with Jon HarmerAggregage
 
Welding Electrode Making Machine By Deccan Dynamics
Welding Electrode Making Machine By Deccan DynamicsWelding Electrode Making Machine By Deccan Dynamics
Welding Electrode Making Machine By Deccan DynamicsIndiaMART InterMESH Limited
 
Memorándum de Entendimiento (MoU) entre Codelco y SQM
Memorándum de Entendimiento (MoU) entre Codelco y SQMMemorándum de Entendimiento (MoU) entre Codelco y SQM
Memorándum de Entendimiento (MoU) entre Codelco y SQMVoces Mineras
 
Strategic Project Finance Essentials: A Project Manager’s Guide to Financial ...
Strategic Project Finance Essentials: A Project Manager’s Guide to Financial ...Strategic Project Finance Essentials: A Project Manager’s Guide to Financial ...
Strategic Project Finance Essentials: A Project Manager’s Guide to Financial ...Aggregage
 
PSCC - Capability Statement Presentation
PSCC - Capability Statement PresentationPSCC - Capability Statement Presentation
PSCC - Capability Statement PresentationAnamaria Contreras
 
Guide Complete Set of Residential Architectural Drawings PDF
Guide Complete Set of Residential Architectural Drawings PDFGuide Complete Set of Residential Architectural Drawings PDF
Guide Complete Set of Residential Architectural Drawings PDFChandresh Chudasama
 
Onemonitar Android Spy App Features: Explore Advanced Monitoring Capabilities
Onemonitar Android Spy App Features: Explore Advanced Monitoring CapabilitiesOnemonitar Android Spy App Features: Explore Advanced Monitoring Capabilities
Onemonitar Android Spy App Features: Explore Advanced Monitoring CapabilitiesOne Monitar
 
digital marketing , introduction of digital marketing
digital marketing , introduction of digital marketingdigital marketing , introduction of digital marketing
digital marketing , introduction of digital marketingrajputmeenakshi733
 
Church Building Grants To Assist With New Construction, Additions, And Restor...
Church Building Grants To Assist With New Construction, Additions, And Restor...Church Building Grants To Assist With New Construction, Additions, And Restor...
Church Building Grants To Assist With New Construction, Additions, And Restor...Americas Got Grants
 
TriStar Gold Corporate Presentation - April 2024
TriStar Gold Corporate Presentation - April 2024TriStar Gold Corporate Presentation - April 2024
TriStar Gold Corporate Presentation - April 2024Adnet Communications
 
Interoperability and ecosystems: Assembling the industrial metaverse
Interoperability and ecosystems:  Assembling the industrial metaverseInteroperability and ecosystems:  Assembling the industrial metaverse
Interoperability and ecosystems: Assembling the industrial metaverseSiemens
 

Kürzlich hochgeladen (20)

NAB Show Exhibitor List 2024 - Exhibitors Data
NAB Show Exhibitor List 2024 - Exhibitors DataNAB Show Exhibitor List 2024 - Exhibitors Data
NAB Show Exhibitor List 2024 - Exhibitors Data
 
The Bizz Quiz-E-Summit-E-Cell-IITPatna.pptx
The Bizz Quiz-E-Summit-E-Cell-IITPatna.pptxThe Bizz Quiz-E-Summit-E-Cell-IITPatna.pptx
The Bizz Quiz-E-Summit-E-Cell-IITPatna.pptx
 
How Generative AI Is Transforming Your Business | Byond Growth Insights | Apr...
How Generative AI Is Transforming Your Business | Byond Growth Insights | Apr...How Generative AI Is Transforming Your Business | Byond Growth Insights | Apr...
How Generative AI Is Transforming Your Business | Byond Growth Insights | Apr...
 
Excvation Safety for safety officers reference
Excvation Safety for safety officers referenceExcvation Safety for safety officers reference
Excvation Safety for safety officers reference
 
Healthcare Feb. & Mar. Healthcare Newsletter
Healthcare Feb. & Mar. Healthcare NewsletterHealthcare Feb. & Mar. Healthcare Newsletter
Healthcare Feb. & Mar. Healthcare Newsletter
 
business environment micro environment macro environment.pptx
business environment micro environment macro environment.pptxbusiness environment micro environment macro environment.pptx
business environment micro environment macro environment.pptx
 
Traction part 2 - EOS Model JAX Bridges.
Traction part 2 - EOS Model JAX Bridges.Traction part 2 - EOS Model JAX Bridges.
Traction part 2 - EOS Model JAX Bridges.
 
Go for Rakhi Bazaar and Pick the Latest Bhaiya Bhabhi Rakhi.pptx
Go for Rakhi Bazaar and Pick the Latest Bhaiya Bhabhi Rakhi.pptxGo for Rakhi Bazaar and Pick the Latest Bhaiya Bhabhi Rakhi.pptx
Go for Rakhi Bazaar and Pick the Latest Bhaiya Bhabhi Rakhi.pptx
 
Pitch Deck Teardown: Xpanceo's $40M Seed deck
Pitch Deck Teardown: Xpanceo's $40M Seed deckPitch Deck Teardown: Xpanceo's $40M Seed deck
Pitch Deck Teardown: Xpanceo's $40M Seed deck
 
Driving Business Impact for PMs with Jon Harmer
Driving Business Impact for PMs with Jon HarmerDriving Business Impact for PMs with Jon Harmer
Driving Business Impact for PMs with Jon Harmer
 
Welding Electrode Making Machine By Deccan Dynamics
Welding Electrode Making Machine By Deccan DynamicsWelding Electrode Making Machine By Deccan Dynamics
Welding Electrode Making Machine By Deccan Dynamics
 
Memorándum de Entendimiento (MoU) entre Codelco y SQM
Memorándum de Entendimiento (MoU) entre Codelco y SQMMemorándum de Entendimiento (MoU) entre Codelco y SQM
Memorándum de Entendimiento (MoU) entre Codelco y SQM
 
Strategic Project Finance Essentials: A Project Manager’s Guide to Financial ...
Strategic Project Finance Essentials: A Project Manager’s Guide to Financial ...Strategic Project Finance Essentials: A Project Manager’s Guide to Financial ...
Strategic Project Finance Essentials: A Project Manager’s Guide to Financial ...
 
PSCC - Capability Statement Presentation
PSCC - Capability Statement PresentationPSCC - Capability Statement Presentation
PSCC - Capability Statement Presentation
 
Guide Complete Set of Residential Architectural Drawings PDF
Guide Complete Set of Residential Architectural Drawings PDFGuide Complete Set of Residential Architectural Drawings PDF
Guide Complete Set of Residential Architectural Drawings PDF
 
Onemonitar Android Spy App Features: Explore Advanced Monitoring Capabilities
Onemonitar Android Spy App Features: Explore Advanced Monitoring CapabilitiesOnemonitar Android Spy App Features: Explore Advanced Monitoring Capabilities
Onemonitar Android Spy App Features: Explore Advanced Monitoring Capabilities
 
digital marketing , introduction of digital marketing
digital marketing , introduction of digital marketingdigital marketing , introduction of digital marketing
digital marketing , introduction of digital marketing
 
Church Building Grants To Assist With New Construction, Additions, And Restor...
Church Building Grants To Assist With New Construction, Additions, And Restor...Church Building Grants To Assist With New Construction, Additions, And Restor...
Church Building Grants To Assist With New Construction, Additions, And Restor...
 
TriStar Gold Corporate Presentation - April 2024
TriStar Gold Corporate Presentation - April 2024TriStar Gold Corporate Presentation - April 2024
TriStar Gold Corporate Presentation - April 2024
 
Interoperability and ecosystems: Assembling the industrial metaverse
Interoperability and ecosystems:  Assembling the industrial metaverseInteroperability and ecosystems:  Assembling the industrial metaverse
Interoperability and ecosystems: Assembling the industrial metaverse
 

2013 04 ir presentation

  • 1. All Oil Companies Are Not Alike. NYSE: DNR Corporate Presentation April 2013
  • 2. 2 This page is intentionally left blank
  • 3. 3 About Forward Looking Statements The data contained in this presentation that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements that involve a number of risks and uncertainties. Such statements may relate to, among other things, forecasted capital expenditures, drilling activity, completion of acquisitions or reserves or future production attributable to them, development activities, timing of CO2 injections and initial production response in tertiary flooding projects, estimated costs, production rates and volumes or forecasts thereof, hydrocarbon reserve quantities and values, CO2 reserves, helium reserves, potential reserves from tertiary operations, future hydrocarbon prices or assumptions, liquidity, cash flows, availability of capital, borrowing capacity, finding costs, rates of return, overall economics, net asset values, estimates of potential or recoverable reserves and anticipated production growth rates in our CO2 models, or estimated production in 2013 and future production and expenditure estimates, and availability and cost of equipment and services. These forward-looking statements are generally accompanied by words such as “estimated”, “preliminary”, “projected”, “potential”, “anticipated”, “forecasted” or other words that convey the uncertainty of future events or outcomes. These statements are based on management’s current plans and assumptions and are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties as further outlined in our most recent Form 10-K and Form 10-Q filed with the SEC. Therefore, the actual results may differ materially from the expectations, estimates or assumptions expressed in or implied by any forward-looking statement made by or on behalf of the Company. Cautionary Note to U.S. Investors – Current SEC rules regarding oil and gas reserve information allow oil and gas companies to disclose in filings with the SEC not only proved reserves, but also probable and possible reserves that meet the SEC’s definitions of such terms. We disclose only proved reserves in our filings with the SEC. Denbury’s proved reserves as of December 31, 2012 were estimated by DeGolyer & MacNaughton, an independent petroleum engineering firm. In this presentation, we make reference to probable and possible reserves, some of which have been prepared by our independent engineers and some of which have been prepared by Denbury’s internal staff of engineers. In this presentation, we also refer to estimates of original oil in place, resource “potential” or other descriptions of volumes potentially recoverable, which in addition to reserves generally classifiable as probable and possible (2P and 3P reserves), include estimates of reserves that do not rise to the standards for possible reserves, and which SEC guidelines strictly prohibit us from including in filings with the SEC. These estimates, as well as the estimates of probable and possible reserves, are by their nature more speculative than estimates of proved reserves and are subject to greater uncertainties, and accordingly the likelihood of recovering those reserves is subject to substantially greater risk.
  • 4. 4 A Different Kind of Oil Company “We Bring Old Oil Fields Back to Life” • Highest operating margins and capital efficiency in peer group(1) • Within the next 5 years we anticipate our free cash flow growing while our CapEx is declining • More than 1 billion barrels of potential oil reserves • CO2 EOR is one of the most efficient tertiary oil recovery methods • 29% compound annual growth rate (CAGR) in our EOR production since 1999 • We have produced nearly 70 million barrels of oil from CO2 EOR to date • Strategic CO2 supply and own or control over 1,000 miles of CO2 pipeline • Large inventory of mature oil fields well-suited for CO2 EOR • Top talent and technology • We acquire mature oil fields and recover oil using carbon dioxide (CO2) • Requires large sources of CO2 near oil fields. (1) Please reference slides 17 and 18 for more information Value Creation Proven Process Repeatable Growth Unique Strategy Competitive Advantage • Ability to use and store CO2 captured from industrial facilities results in net carbon reduction • By developing existing oil fields, we are not disturbing new habitats Eco-friendly • We anticipate a decade of low teens annual EOR production growth from existing fields • Relatively lower-risk – We develop mature conventional oil fields
  • 5. 55 Denbury at a Glance ~$7 billion 70,116 $9.9 billion ~17 Tcf ~1,000 miles ~$900 million Market Cap (2/28/13) Total Daily Production – BOE/d (4Q12) Proved PV-10 (12/31/12) $94.71 NYMEX Oil Price CO2 Supply 3P Reserves (12/31/12) CO2 Pipelines Controlled Credit Facility Availability (12/31/12)(4) ~1.1 BBOE 93% Total 3P Reserves (12/31/12) % Oil Production (4Q12) $3.0 billionTotal Net Debt (12/31/12)(3) (1) Pro forma for recently announced CCA acquisition expected to close near the end of 1Q 2013. (2) Pro forma production removes 10,064 BOE/d of Bakken area production in 4Q12 and adds 11,000 BOE/d for recently announced CCA acquisition expected to close near the end of 1Q 2013 and 2,400 BOE/d to reflect a full quarter contribution from Hartzog Draw and Webster fields acquired on November 30, 2012. (3) As of 12/31/12, we had ~ $700 million of borrowings outstanding under our $1.6 billion bank credit facility and our cash and cash equivalents totaled ~$100 million. At 12/31/12, ~$1.05 billion in restricted cash remained deposited with a qualified intermediary. Pro forma for expected deal and stock repurchases through 2/15/13. (4) As of 12/31/12, we had ~$900 million of availability under our $1.6 billion bank credit facility and ~$100 million in unrestricted cash. ~73,450(2) ~1.2 BBOE ~94%(2) ~$3.1 billion Pro forma(1) $11.0 billion
  • 6. 6 What is CO2 EOR & How Much Oil Does It Recover? Secure CO2 Supply Transport via Pipeline Inject into Oilfield CO2 EOR Delivers Almost as Much Production as Primary and Secondary Recovery(1) (1) Recovery of Original Oil in Place based on history at Little Creek Field. Primary Recovery ~20% Secondary Recovery (waterfloods) ~18% Tertiary Recovery (CO2 EOR) ~17% Remaining Oil
  • 7. 7 Our Two CO2 EOR Target Areas: Up to 10 Billion Barrels Recoverable with CO2 EOR Green Pipeline Jackson Dome Delta Pipeline Sonat MS Pipeline ND SD Lost Cabin ID MT WY TX LA MS IL IN KY Greencore Pipeline (1) Source: DOE 2005 and 2006 reports. (2) 3P tertiary oil reserve estimates based on year-end 12/31/12 SEC proved reserves, based on a variety of recovery factors, includes recently announced CCA area acquisition. Estimated 1.3 to 3.2 Billion Barrels Recoverable(1) Estimated 3.4 to 7.5 Billion Barrels Recoverable(1) Existing or Proposed CO2 Source Owned or Contracted Existing Denbury CO2 Pipelines Denbury owned Fields With CO2 EOR Potential Other CO2 Sources Denbury Gulf Coast Region 587 Million 3P CO2 EOR Barrels(2) Denbury Rockies Region 331 Million 3P CO2 EOR Barrels(2) Hartzog Draw Field Webster Field Free State Pipeline Cedar Creek Anticline
  • 8. 8 Jackson Dome Sonat MS Pipeline Green Pipeline Citronelle (2) Tinsley Free State Pipeline Martinville Davis Quitman Heidelberg Summerland Soso Sandersville Eucutta Yellow Creek Cypress Creek Brookhaven Mallalieu Little Creek Olive Smithdale McComb Donaldsonville Delhi Lake St. John Cranfield Lockhart Crossing Hastings Conroe Oyster Bayou Fig Ridge Delhi 36 MMBbls Tinsley 46 MMBbls Mature Area 178 MMBbls Oyster Bayou 20 - 30 MMBbls Conroe 130 MMBbls (1) Proved tertiary oil reserves based on year-end 12/31/12 SEC proved reserves. Probable and possible tertiary reserve estimates as of 12/31/2012, based on a variety of recovery factors. (2) Produced-to-Date is cumulative tertiary production through 12/31/12. (3) Using mid-points of range. Summary(1) Proved 201 Potential 386 Produced-to-Date(2) 71 Total MMBbls 658 CO2 EOR in Gulf Coast Region: Control of CO2 Sources & Pipeline Infrastructure Provides a Strategic Advantage 15 - 50 MMBoe 50 – 100 MMBoe > 100 MMBoe Denbury Owned Fields – Current CO2 Floods Denbury Owned Fields – Future CO2 Floods Fields Owned by Others – CO2 EOR Candidates Cumulative Production Thompson Heidelberg 44 MMBbls Houston Area Hastings 60 - 80 MMBbls Webster 60 - 75 MMBbls Thompson 30 - 60 MMBbls Other 10 - 20 MMBbls 160 - 235 MMBbls Webster
  • 9. 9 MONTANA NORTH DAKOTA SOUTH DAKOTA WYOMING Cedar Creek Anticline Elk Basin Shute Creek (XOM) Lost Cabin (COP) DGC Beulah Bell Creek Riley Ridge (DNR) DKRW Greencore Pipeline 232 Miles Bell Creek 30 MMBbls(1) Cedar Creek Anticline Area Existing CCA Fields(1) 200 MMBbls CCA Acquisition(3) 60-80 MMBbls 260 - 280 MMBbls (1) Probable and possible tertiary reserve estimates as of 12/31/2012, using mid-point of ranges, based on a variety of recovery factors. (2) Proved reserves as of 12/31/12 and are presented on a gross working interest or 8/8ths basis, except those reserves recently acquired from ExxonMobil which are reported net to Denbury’s interest. (3) Recently agreed to purchase from ConocoPhillips in a transaction expected to close near the end of the first quarter of 2013. Grieve Field 6 MMBbls(1) Existing CO2 Pipeline Pipelines Denbury Pipelines in Process Denbury Proposed Pipelines Pipelines Owned by Others LaBarge Area(2) 416 BCF Nat Gas 12.0 BCF Helium 3.5 TCF CO2 Other CO2 Sources CO2 Sources Existing or Proposed CO2 Source Owned or Contracted CO2 EOR in Rocky Mountain Region: Control of CO2 Sources & Pipeline Infrastructure Provides a Strategic Advantage Hartzog Draw 20 - 30 MMBbls 15 - 50 MMBoe 50 – 100 MMBoe > 100 MMBoe Denbury Owned Fields – Future CO2 Floods Fields Owned by Others – CO2 EOR Candidates Cumulative Production Planned Interconnect (2013) Summary(1) Proved --- Potential 331 Produced-to-Date --- Total MMBbls 331
  • 10. 10 Texas CO2 Pipeline Expansions – Economies of Scale $- $2 $4 $6 $8 $10 $12 $14 PipelinecostpertertiaryBbl Hastings Oyster Bayou Webster Conroe Thompson Hastings + Oyster Bayou + Webster + Conroe + Thompson 70 MMBbls 95 MMBbls 163 MMBbls 293 MMBbls 338 MMBbls (1) Using mid-point of ranges and includes costs of Green Pipeline plus forecasted costs for required incremental pipelines.
  • 11. 11 Strategic and Value-Driven M&A Transactions Assets (Quarter close date) Est. Production(1) (BOE/d) Est. Proved Reserves (MMBOE) Est. PDP % Impact on Current FCF(4) Est. Potential Reserves(2) (MMBOE) Est. Proved PV10(3) ($Billions) Non-Core LA & MS (1Q12) 1,400 6 54% + --- 0.2 Non-Operated Greater Aneth (2Q12) 650 6 58% + --- 0.1 Bakken (4Q12) 15,850 109 30% – 191 1.5 Total Sold 17,900 121 33% 191 1.8 Assets (Quarter close date) Est. Production(1) (BOE/d) Est. Proved Reserves (MMBOE) Est. PDP % Impact on Current FCF(4) Est. Potential Reserves(2) (MMBOE) Est. Proved PV10(3) ($Billions) Thompson Field (2Q12) 2,200 17 34% + 45 0.5 Webster Field (4Q12) 1,000 4 100% + 68 0.1 Hartzog Draw (4Q12) 2,600 5 100% + 25 0.1 COP CCA Assets (1Q13E) 11,000 42 91% + 70 1.1 Total Purchased 16,800 68 78% 208 1.8 XOM LaBarge CO2 (4Q12) Up to 115 MMcf/d Production 1.3 TCF Proved Reserves at 12/31/2012 + Additional CO2 Supply in the Rockies: (1) Estimated production at time of acquisition, divestiture or agreement to purchase in case of CCA; Bakken area production is actual year-to-date average production through 9/30/12. (2) Preliminary mid-point of estimates based on internal calculations, refer to slide 3 for full disclosure of forward-looking statements. Potential reserves include probable and possible reserves. (3) Estimated discounted net present value of proved reserves or impact of sales on net present value, using a 10% annum discount rate. (4) Spent $90 million in excess of operating cash flow on Bakken area assets in first nine months of 2012; expect capital expenditures on acquired properties to be minimal. Divestitures Acquisitions + ~$100MM in cash
  • 12. 12 Encore Acquisition was Highly Profitable Purchase price: (Billions) Equity $2.8 Debt assumed 1.0 Total value $3.8 Value: (Estimated values at $94.71/Bbl – 12/31/12 SEC Pricing) Proved reserves at 12/31/12 $1.5 Value received from sold properties ~3.6 Net cash flow from 3/9/10 to 9/30/12 0.4 Total ~$5.5 Additional potential: CO2 EOR potential 230 MMBOE (1) (2) (1) Excludes consolidated ENP debt and minority interest in ENP. (2) Excludes sold properties, and ENP reserves. (3) Includes ~$2 billion of estimated value of Bakken sale. (4) Made up of CO2 EOR potential at Bell Creek and CCA acquired from Encore. (3) (4)
  • 13. 13 Acquisition of Cedar Creek Anticline Fields Transaction Terms ● $1.05 billion cash, prior to working capital adjustments ● Acquisition expected to close near the end of the first quarter of 2013 with a 1/1/2013 effective date ● The original oil in place of all units in the CCA is estimated at over three billion barrels of oil ● Including this acquisition, we estimate that a CO2 flood of our CCA assets could recover between 260-280 million barrels of oil ● Currently producing ~11,000 barrels of oil equivalent per day (~95% oil, ~4% NGLs) ● Assuming acquisition closes at the end of 1Q 2013, we estimate it to add ~7,700 BOE/d to 2013 production estimates ● Conventional (non-tertiary) reserves ~42 million boe MONTANA NORTHDAKOTA DAWSON PRAIRIE WIBAUX GOLDEN VALLEY FALLON SLOPE BOWMAN Glendive North Glendive Gas City North Pine South Pine Cabin Creek Monarch Pennel Coral Creek Little Beaver East Lookout Butte Existing CCA Properties CCA Acquisition CCA Fields Owned by Others Cedar Hills South Unit
  • 14. 0 250 500 750 1,000 1,250 12/31/11 Proved Reserves 12/31/12 Proved Reserves 12/31/12 Estimated Pro-Forma Proved Reserves +CO2 EOR Potential +Additional CCA CO2 EOR Potential +Riley Ridge Natural Gas =Total Potential MMBOE 14 More than a Billion Barrels of Oil Potential 1,22070 409 77% Oil 451 89% Oil 46 100% Natural Gas (1) Based on year-end 12/31/12 SEC proved reserves. (2) Based on year-end 12/31/12 SEC proved reserves pro-forma for recently announced CCA acquisition. (3) Estimates based on mid-point of internal estimates, refer to slide 3 for full disclosure of forward-looking statements. (1) (2) (3) (3) ..... .....462 80% Oil 82% Oil 100% Oil .....653 100% Oil (3) .....
  • 15. 15 Proven Track Record Net Daily Oil Production – Tertiary Operations (through 12/31/12) - 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 35,000 40,000 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013E AverageDailyProduction(Bbls/D) Mature Properties Tinsley Heidelberg Delhi Oyster Bayou Hastings 29% CAGR (1999-2012) Estimated 2013 Range 36,500-to- 39,500
  • 16. 16 Highest Operating Margin in the Peer Group (1) (1) Data derived from SEC filings, twelve months ended 12/31/12 and includes CLR, CXO, FST, NBL, NFX, PXD, RRC, SD, SM, WLL, and XEC. Calculated as revenues less lease operating expenses, marketing/transportation expenses, and production and ad valorem taxes. Includes historical data only, not adjusted for the Bakken transaction or CCA acquisition that closed on 3/27/13. 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 DNR Peer A Peer B Peer C Peer D Peer E Peer F Peer G Peer H Peer I Peer J Peer K $/BOE 12-Months ended 12/31/2012 ~94% oil + high LLS exposure = Premium Pricing
  • 17. 17 1717 Highest Capital Efficiency in Peer Group(1) TTM EBITDA(4) Adj. F&D Efficiency Ratio= (3) 331% 264% 244% 240% 206% 181% 151% 140% 85% 82% 74% 0% 50% 100% 150% 200% 250% 300% 350% DNR Peer A Peer B Peer C Peer D Peer E Peer F Peer G Peer H Peer I Peer J Adjusted Capital Efficiency Ratio $60.26 $50.15 $33.57 $32.26 $23.23 $22.82 $21.14 $19.57 $19.39 $18.42 $7.17 $0.00 $10.00 $20.00 $30.00 $40.00 $50.00 $60.00 Peer J Peer H Peer I Peer F Peer D Peer A Peer B Peer E Peer G DNR Peer C Adjusted 3-Year Finding & Development Cost ($/BOE)(2) (1) Peer Group includes BRY,CLR,CXO,OAS,PXD,PXP,RRC,SD,SM,WLL. Includes historical data only, excludes impact of CCA acquisition that closed on 3/27/13. (2) Three years ended 12/32/2012, and includes Encore Acquisition in 2010. calculated as total capital expenditures divided by net reserve additions, including changes in future development costs and change in unevaluated properties. (3) Includes 3 year average DD&A for CO2 properties of $0.82 per BOE (4) Trailing twelve months EBITDA ended 12/31/2012.
  • 18. 18 CO2 EOR – Superior Economics(1) EOR Bakken Gulf Coast Model Averages 575,000 BOE / Well $9.6 Million / Well 20% Royalty NYMEX oil price $90.00 $90.00 Finding & development cost: Field Infrastructure 9.00 4.50 21.00 --- Total capital per BOE $13.50 $21.00 Average operating cost over life 25.00 8.00 Average historic NYMEX differentials 1.25 10.00 Estimated gross margin $50.25 $51.00 Estimated Internal Rate of Return 39% 27% Return on investment 4.4x 2.7x (1) Updated as of 12/31/11 which does not include Thompson or Webster.
  • 19. 19 0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Production(Bbls/d) Years Gulf CoastEOR Field Bakken CO2 EOR – Superior Production Profile Capital Spending per Year Based on EOR Spending Pattern Year $MM 1 83 2 83 3 60 4 60 5 68 6 52 7 52 8 52 9 45 Total $555 Note: Assumes 700 BOEPD initial 30 day rate for Bakken wells. Production(BOEPD) Projected Production Profile with Same Capital Spending
  • 20. 2020 CO2 EOR – Compelling Economics (1) Source: KeyBanc as of March 2013. Defined as the threshold WTI oil price necessary to generate a 20% before-tax rate of return. Calculations reflect current type curve and basis differential of each play. Excludes acreage acquisition cost. (2) Internal estimate for indicative large CO2 EOR development project in the Gulf Coast Region. Assumes a $5 basis premium. Excludes property acquisition cost. $50 $63 $64 $65 $68 $70 $74 $76 $83 $83 $87 $0 $10 $20 $30 $40 $50 $60 $70 $80 $90 $100 WTI Breakeven Price for a 20% Before-Tax Rate of Return ($ per Bbl)(1)
  • 21. 2121 CO2 Supply to Support Gulf Coast Growth Note: Forecast based on internal management estimates and includes fields currently owned. Actual results may vary. 0 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 1,400 1,600 1,800 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 CO2Volumes,MMCFPD JACKSON DOME PROVED RESERVES ~6.1 TCF Estimated as of 12/31/2012 JACKSON DOME RISKED DRILLING PROGRAM ANTHROPOGENIC SUPPLY- Executed Agreements with Future Construction Additional CO2 Potential (not reflected in graph) Probable & Possible Reserves: ~3 TCF Improved Recovery of Proved Reserves: ~0.8 TCF Recycle: ~3 TCF
  • 22. 22 Gulf Coast Industrial Partners Air Products • Port Arthur, Texas • Hydrogen Plant • Capture Date: 1Q 2013 • Quantity: ~50 MMcf/d PCS Nitrogen • Geismar, Louisiana • Ammonia Products • Capture Date: ~2Q 2013 • Quantity: ~25 MMcf/d Mississippi Power – (Under Construction) • Kemper County, MS • Gasifier • Capture Date: ~2014 • Quantity: ~115 MMcf/d Lake Charles Cogeneration(1) • Lake Charles, Louisiana • Petroleum Coke to Methanol Plant • Capture Date: ~2018 • Quantity: >200 MMcf/d Ammonia Plant(1) • Near Green Pipeline • Capture Date: ~1Q 2016 • Quantity: ~85 MMcf/d Chemical Plant(1) • Near Green Pipeline • Capture Date: ~2020 • Quantity: ~200 MMcf/d Currently Producing or Under Construction Future Construction (currently planned or proposed)
  • 23. CO2 Supply to Support Rocky Mountain Growth 23 LaBarge Area ● Estimated Field Size: 750 Square Miles ● Estimated 100 TCF of CO2 Recoverable Riley Ridge – Denbury Operated ● 100% WI in 9,700 acre Riley Ridge Federal Unit ● 33% WI in ~28,000 acre Horseshoe Unit ● Estimated 2.2 TCF CO2 proved reserves Shute Creek – XOM Operated ● Denbury has acquired 1/3 of XOM’s CO2 reserves ● Based on XOM’s current plant capacity and availability, Denbury could receive up to ~115 MMcfpd of CO2 from the plant ● Estimated 0.3 TCF CO2 proved reserves LaBarge Area(1) 416 BCF Nat Gas 12.0 BCF Helium 3.5 TCF CO2 1) Proved reserves as of 12/31/2012 Composition of Produced Gas Stream: ~65% CO2; ~19% Natural Gas; ~5% Hydrogen Sulfide; <1% Helium, and other gasses
  • 24. 24 Strong Financial Position ● ~$900 million availability under credit facility on 12/31/12 Debt to Capitalization (12/31/12) 38% Debt $1.6 billion borrowing base Unused Credit Facility 100% + (12/31/12) Cash(1) ~ $100 million 56% (1) As of 12/31/12, our cash and cash equivalents totaled ~$100 million. At 12/31/12, ~$1.05 billion in restricted cash remained deposited with a qualified intermediary designated for the recently announced acquisition of CCA, which closed at the end of March 2013.
  • 25. 2013 Summary Guidance(1) CO2 Pipelines $110MM Tertiary Floods $540MM All Other $150 MM CO2 Sources $200MM 2013 Capital Budget – $1.0 Billion(2) 2013 Production Estimate (1) See slide 3 for full disclosure of forward-looking statements. (2) Excludes capitalized exploration, capitalized interest and capitalized pre-production EOR startup costs, estimated at $150 million. (3) Includes impact of CCA acquisition that closed on 3/27/13. See slide 52 for more details. (4) Total stock purchased since October 2011 is 34.6 million shares at about $15 per share, as of 2/20/13. (5) Including capitalized exploration, capitalized interest and capitalized pre-production EOR startup costs, estimated at $150 million. ~$250 million remains under current stock repurchase authorization. Stock re-purchased to date increases production per share ~9%(4) 25 We estimate the 2013 capital program(5) to be more than self-funded at ~low to mid $90’s NYMEX WTI crude oil price. Operating area 2012 (BOE/d) 2013E (BOE/d) 2013E Growth Tertiary Oil Fields 35,206 36,500- 39,500 4-12% Non-Tertiary Oil Fields 21,636 24,500 CCA Acquisition(3) --- 7,700 Total Estimated Production 56,842 68,700- 71,700 21-26%
  • 26. 26 Hedges Protect Against Downside in Near-Term(1) (1) Figures and averages as of 4/10/13. (2) All crude oil derivative contracts are based on West Texas Intermediate (WTI) NYMEX price basis. (3) Averages are volume weighted. Crude Oil (2) 2013 2014 2015 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 4th Quarter 1st Half 2nd Half 1st Quarter Volumes hedged (Bbls/d) 56,000 56,000 54,000 56,000 54,000 20,000 Principal price floors ~$80 ~$80 $80 $80 $80 ~$80 Principal price ceilings(3) ~$109 ~$109 ~$118 ~$102 ~$98 ~$98
  • 27. 2727 A Decade of CO2 EOR Production Growth(1) -200 300 800 1,300 1,800 2,300 0 20,000 40,000 60,000 80,000 100,000 120,000 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022E EstimatedCO2EORCapital Budget($MM) EstimatedCO2EORProduction (Bbls/d) 100,000 35,206 ● Bell Creek ● Webster ● Hartzog Draw ● Conroe ● Cedar Creek Anticline ● Thompson Expected Peak CO2 EOR Cap-Ex (1) 2013 and future forecasted capital expenditures and production may differ materially from actual results. Does not include recently announced incremental CCA acquisition. See slide 3 for full disclosure of forward-looking statements. Anticipating Average Annual Percentage Growth Rate in the Low Teens
  • 28. 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013E 2014E 2015E 2016E CumulativeFreeCashFlow($MM) Cumulative Gulf Coast Tertiary Free Cash Flows (1) 2828 CO2 EOR – Proven Free Cash Flow Generator (1) Calculated from actual historical operating cash flow (revenues less operating expenses) less capital expenditures and currently projected operating income and capital expenditures in 2012 and beyond using a flat $90 NYMEX crude oil price. Includes Jackson Dome and Pipeline expenditures in Gulf Coast, and also includes recently closed acquisition of Webster. See slide 3 for full disclosure of forward-looking statements. +/- $1.7 Billion First Year of Free Cash Flow
  • 29. 2929 Estimated CO2 EOR Peak Production Rates Operating Area First Production Estimated Peak Production Rate (Net MBOE/d) Expected Peak Year Produced to date(1) (MMBOE) Proved Remaining(1) (MMBOE) Potential Remaining(2) (MMBOE)< 5 5-10 10-15 15-20 > 20 Mature Area 1999 2010 54 54 70 Tinsley 2008 2012-14 9 28 9 Heidelberg 2009 2018-20 3 35 6 Delhi 2010 2015-17 3 25 8 Oyster Bayou 2012 2015-17 <1 14 11 Hastings 2012 2018-20 1 45 24 Bell Creek 2013 2019-21 --- --- 30 Webster 2015 2022-25 --- --- 68 Hartzog Draw 2016 2021-23 --- --- 25 Conroe 2017 2033-35 --- --- 130 Cedar Creek Anticline(3) 2017 2023-27(3) --- --- 200(3) Thompson 2019 2025-27 --- --- 45 Expected year of first tertiary production. (1) Tertiary oil production and reserves as of 12/31/2012 (2) Based on internal estimates of reserve recovery, using mid-points of ranges. (3) Does not include impact of CCA acquisition that closed on 3/27/13. Potential tertiary reserves for CCA acquisition are currently estimated at 60-80 MMBOE.
  • 30. 30 • Significant strategic advantage in CO2 EOR • Well defined and focused long-term growth strategy • Highest operating margin and capital efficiency in peer group • Substantial free cash flow generation from CO2 EOR after up- front investment in infrastructure IN SUMMARY: A Different Kind of Oil Company Leading CO2 Enhanced Oil Recovery Company in the U.S. with a Unique Profile
  • 31. 3131 Corporate Information Corporate Headquarters Denbury Resources Inc. 5320 Legacy Drive Plano, Texas 75024 Ph: (972) 673-2000 Fax: (972) 673-2150 denbury.com Contact Information Phil Rykhoek President & CEO (972) 673-2000 Mark Allen Senior VP & CFO (972) 673-2000 Jack Collins Executive Director, Investor Relations (972) 673-2028 jack.collins@denbury.com
  • 33. 33 Why is CO2 EOR our core focus? ● High Confidence of Oil Target  Nearly 70 million barrels produced by Denbury to date  Net upward adjustments to reserves-to-date ● CO2 Flooding Recovers Oil (CO2 ♥’s Crude Oil)  First CO2 EOR production was in 1972  Over 1.5 billion barrels produced to date in the US(1)  Current estimated production in the US is ~284 MBbls/d(2) ● A Very Repeatable Process with a lot of Running Room  Up to 10 Billion Barrels Recoverable with CO2 EOR in our two operating areas  Over 900 Million Barrels of CO2 EOR potential in our portfolio today (1) Oil & Gas Journal, Dec. 7, 2009 (2) Oil & Gas Journal, July 2, 2012
  • 34. 34 CO2 EOR is a Proven Process Significant CO2 Suppliers by Region Gulf Coast Region • Jackson Dome, MS (Denbury Resources) Permian Basin Region • Bravo Dome, NM (Kinder Morgan, Occidental) • McElmo Dome, CO (ExxonMobil, Kinder Morgan) • Sheep Mountain, CO (ExxonMobil, Occidental) Rockies Region • Riley Ridge, WY (Denbury Resources) • LaBarge, WY (ExxonMobil, Denbury Resources) • Lost Cabin, WY (ConocoPhillips) Canada • Dakota Gasification – Anthropogenic (Cenovus, Apache) Significant CO2 EOR Operators by Region Gulf Coast Region • Denbury Resources Permian Basin Region • Occidental • Kinder Morgan • Whiting Rockies Region • Denbury Resources • Anadarko Canada • Cenovus • Apache Jackson Dome Bravo Dome Riley Ridge & LaBarge Lost Cabin DGC McElmo Dome Significant CO2 Source - 50 100 150 200 250 300 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 MBbls/d CO2 EOR Oil Production by Region Gulf Coast/Other Mid-Continent Rocky Mountains Permian Basin
  • 35. 35 CO2 Operations: Oil Recovery Process CO2 PIPELINE - from Jackson Dome CO2 moves through formation mixing with oil droplets, expanding them and moving them to producing wells. INJECTION WELL - Injects CO2 in dense phase PRODUCTION WELLS Produce oil, water and CO2 (CO2 is recycled) Model for Oil Recovery Using CO2 is +/- 17% of Original Oil in Place (Based on Little Creek) Primary recovery = +/- 20% Secondary recovery (waterfloods) = +/- 18% Tertiary (CO2) = +/- 17% Oil Formation
  • 36. 36 CO2 EOR – Proven Value Creation Investments – Inception-to-12/31/2012 ($) Billions Gulf Coast EOR Fields $3.0 Gulf Coast CO2 Sources & Pipelines 2.0 Less Undeveloped: EOR Fields 0.1 CO2 Pipelines 0.2 (0.3) Net Investment-to-Date – Proved Properties 4.7 Inception-to-Date Net Revenues 4.1 Net Cash flow (0.6) PV10 of proved EOR at 12/31/2012 6.8 Value Created $6.2
  • 37. 37 Denbury vs. Peer Group Trading Multiples Source: KeyBanc – Net Asset Values (NAVs) based on YE11 proved reserves and KeyBanc price deck with balance sheet adjustments to reflect latest 10Q; January 2013. Peer Group includes CLR, CXO, FST, NFX, PXD, RRC, SD, SM, WLL, XEC - 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 0% 50% 100% 150% 200% 250% 300% 350% 400% 450% P/CFPS P/ Proved NAV
  • 38. Plateau Incline (Yrs) Plateau (Yrs) Decline (Yrs) Large Fields 6 6.5 30 Average Fields 4.5 5.5 25 Small Fields 4 5 20 ProductionRate CO2 EOR Generalized Type Curve 38
  • 39. 39 Capital Spending Range for CO2 Floods 39 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 1 2 3 4 5 %ofTotalCapital Year
  • 40. 40 • We attempt to balance development expenditures with free cash flow • In contrast to shale plays, a reduction in EOR capital spending will not immediately impact EOR production growth • Our newer EOR projects have many years of production growth with fairly low capital expenditures • It is relatively easy to slow the development pace of EOR projects - most Rocky Mountain EOR infrastructure development could be delayed if necessary • No lease expiration issues and limited capital commitments on EOR projects • We can hold production flat over the next several years using 50% or less of our 2013 forecasted capital expenditures Capital Spending Flexibility in Low Oil Price Environment Unique characteristics of CO2 EOR provides significant capital flexibility
  • 41. 41 Proved Reserve Changes Estimated Proved Reserves (MMBOE) Estimated PV10 ($Billion) SEC Proved Reserves 12/31/11 462 $10.6 New CO2 Floods (Oyster Bayou & Hastings) 57 Extensions & Discoveries and Improved Recovery 29 Acquisitions (Thompson, Hartzog & Webster) 28 Divestitures (Non-Core Assets & Bakken area assets) (124) Estimated 2012 Production (26) Price Effect(1) (7) Other Estimated Revisions (10) SEC Proved Reserves 12/31/12 409 $9.9 Pending COP CCA Acquisition ~42 1.1 Estimated Pro-Forma Proved Reserves ~451 $11.0 (1) Primarily due to lower natural gas prices.
  • 42. 42 Production by Area (BOE/d)(1) Operating area 1Q12 2Q12 3Q12 4Q12 2012 2013E Tertiary Oil Fields 33,257 35,208 34,786 37,550 35,206 36,500 – 39,500 Texas Non-Tertiary 3,674 4,573 5,173 5,513 4,737 6,300 Other Gulf Coast Non-Tertiary 5,854 5,401 4,538 4,880 5,165 4,300 Cedar Creek Anticline 8,496 8,535 8,490 8,493 8,503 8,500 Other Rockies Non-Tertiary 3,204 3,060 3,037 3,616 3,231 5,400 Incremental Cedar Creek Anticline(2) --- --- --- --- --- 7,700 Total Continuing Production 54,485 56,777 56,024 60,052 56,842 68,700 – 71,700 Bakken Area 15,285 15,503 16,752 10,064 14,395 ~94% Oil Gulf Coast Non-Core Properties 1,054 --- --- --- 262 Paradox Basin Properties 708 57 --- --- 190 Total Production 71,532 72,337 72,776 70,116 71,689 (1) See slide 3 for full disclosure of forward-looking statements. (2) Assumes recently announced CCA acquisition closes at the end of the first quarter of 2013. See slide 13 for more details.
  • 43. 43 Tertiary Production by Field Average Daily Production (BOE/d) Field 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 1Q12 2Q12 3Q12 4Q12 Brookhaven 2,826 3,416 3,429 3,255 2,692 3,014 2,779 2,460 2,520 Little Creek Area 1,683 1,502 1,805 1,561 1,091 1,216 1,131 1,021 999 Mallalieu Area 5,686 4,107 3,377 2,693 2,338 2,585 2,461 2,181 2,127 McComb Area 1,901 2,391 2,342 1,997 1,785 1,746 1,902 1,769 1,722 Lockhart Crossing 186 804 1,397 1,465 1,176 1,284 1,313 1,039 1,072 Martinville 865 877 720 462 507 551 480 476 522 Eucutta 3,109 3,985 3,495 3,121 2,868 3,090 2,870 2,782 2,730 Soso 2,111 2,834 3,065 2,347 1,989 2,063 1,947 1,923 2,021 Heidelberg --- 651 2,454 3,448 3,763 3,583 3,823 3,716 3,930 Tinsley 1,010 3,328 5,584 6,743 7,947 7,297 8,168 8,153 8,166 Cranfield --- 448 911 1,123 1,159 1,152 1,094 1,119 1,269 Delhi --- --- 483 2,739 4,315 4,181 4,023 3,813 5,237 Hastings --- --- --- --- 2,188 618 1,913 2,794 3,409 Oyster Bayou --- --- --- 5 1,388 877 1,304 1,540 1,826 Total Tertiary Production 19,377 24,343 29,062 30,959 35,206 33,257 35,208 34,786 37,550
  • 44. 44 Analysis of Tertiary Operating Costs Correlation w/Oil 3Q10 $/BOE 4Q10 $/BOE 1Q11 $/BOE 2Q11 $/BOE 3Q11 $/BOE 4Q11 $/BOE 1Q12 $/BOE 2Q12 $/BOE 3Q12 $/BOE 4Q12 $/BOE CO2 Costs Direct $4.52 $5.38 $5.39 $5.43 $4.87 $4.53 $5.76 $5.14 $4.96 $5.21 Power & Fuel Partially 6.03 5.76 6.12 6.17 6.24 6.71 6.71 6.69 6.69 5.98 Labor & Overhead None 3.70 3.43 3.94 3.77 3.85 3.90 4.59 4.64 4.74 4.57 Equipment Rental None 1.93 1.79 2.20 1.52 2.28 2.38 2.30 0.15 0.08 0.15 Chemicals Partially 1.73 1.67 1.62 1.44 1.80 1.67 1.63 1.27 1.46 1.59 Workovers Partially 2.78 2.36 3.75 2.53 3.44 2.68 3.43 3.01 3.68 3.30 Other None 1.68 1.34 1.91 2.01 2.43 1.72 2.32 2.05 1.89 1.79 Total $22.37 $21.73 $24.93 $22.87 $24.91 $23.59 $26.74 $22.95 $23.50 $22.59 NYMEX Oil Price $76.09 $85.16 $94.26 $102.58 $89.60 $93.93 $102.89 $93.49 $92.29 $88.18
  • 45. 45 Pro Forma Bakken Transaction 4Q 2012 Pro Forma(1) Production (BOE/d) 70,116 60,052 % Oil Production 93% 95% NYMEX Oil Price Differential ($/Bbl) $9.43 $11.65 LOE/BOE $21.61 $24.33 Operating Margin/BOE(2) $65.33 $66.07 DD&A/BOE(3) $18.20 ~$19.00 to ~$21.00 Bakken Area Cash Flow ($MM) YTD 12/31/2012 Operating Cash Flow(4) $300 Capital Expenditures (430) Net ($130) (1) Pro forma for recently closed Bakken sale, does not include Webster or Hartzog Draw. Also does not include recently announced CCA acquisition. (2) Calculated as oil, natural gas, and related product sales less production and ad valorem taxes and LOE. (3) Preliminary estimate, subject to change materially. (4) Cash flow from operations before working capital reflecting only results from the portion of 4Q before sale of Bakken assets.
  • 46. 46 NYMEX Differential Summary Crude Oil Differentials 3Q10 4Q10 1Q11 2Q11 3Q11 4Q11 1Q12 2Q12 3Q12 4Q12 Tertiary Oil Fields $0.66 $0.90 $4.33 $9.69 $14.84 $19.44 $9.80 $13.60 $10.61 $15.57 Mississippi (7.59) (8.02) (4.50) 1.32 7.25 6.98 2.44 8.63 2.48 10.82 Texas (3.67) (4.33) (4.29) (3.46) 1.19 12.29 1.77 5.38 5.46 13.10 Cedar Creek Anticline (5.70) (5.01) (3.27) 1.25 0.85 (0.29) (9.89) (7.44) (9.26) (0.23) Bakken Area Assets (1) (11.41) (13.24) (11.67) (9.61) (5.67) (8.45) (16.96) (20.07) (16.32) (5.35) Other Rockies (10.88) (11.64) (12.04) (6.25) (6.25) (8.11) (16.30) (16.67) (14.42) (6.57) Denbury Totals ($3.86) ($3.90) ($0.59) $3.72 $7.25 $9.14 ($0.37) $2.14 $0.80 $9.43 (1) Represents certain Bakken area assets sold at the end of Nov. 2012.
  • 47. $75 $85 $95 $105 $115 $125 $135 Jan-12 Feb-12 Mar-12 Apr-12 May-12 Jun-12 Jul-12 Aug-12 Sep-12 Oct-12 Nov-12 Dec-12 Jan-13 Feb-13 WTI BRENT LLS 47 Tracking Oil Prices WTI NYMEX Brent Light Louisiana Sweet ● We currently sell ~45% of our oil production based on LLS index price, ~25% based on various other indexes, most of which have also improved relative to WTI, but to a lesser degree
  • 48. 48 Crude Oil Hedge Detail (1) All crude oil derivative contracts are based on West Texas Intermediate (WTI) NYMEX price basis. (2) Averages are volume weighted 2013 Crude Oil Hedges (BOPD)(1) Average(2) Ceiling Instrument Volume Floor Ceiling Low High Q1 Collars 6,000 70.00 109.67 106.50 113.00 9,000 80.00 105.14 102.25 106.50 40,000 80.00 108.41 108.00 109.60 Q2 Collars 4,000 75.00 118.25 115.00 121.50 10,000 80.00 105.65 104.50 106.50 42,000 80.00 108.40 108.00 109.60 Q3 Collars 4,000 75.00 126.80 120.50 133.10 12,000 80.00 105.58 104.50 106.50 40,000 80.00 108.46 108.00 109.60 Q4 Collars 16,000 80.00 103.39 102.25 105.00 20,000 80.00 120.66 120.00 121.50 18,000 80.00 126.63 126.00 127.50 2014 Crude Oil Hedges (BOPD)(1) Average(2) Ceiling Instrument Volume Floor Ceiling Low High 1H Collars 6,000 80.00 97.22 96.55 97.60 16,000 80.00 102.43 101.60 102.70 24,000 80.00 103.32 103.00 103.90 6,000 80.00 104.23 104.10 104.50 2H Collars 20,000 80.00 96.77 96.55 96.90 16,000 80.00 97.36 97.00 97.75 12,000 80.00 98.74 98.60 98.80 2015 Crude Oil Hedges (BOPD)(1) Average(2) Ceiling Instrument Volume Floor Ceiling Low High Q1 Collars 20,000 80.00 98.33 96.00 100.90
  • 49. ($MM) 12/31/12 Pro forma for debt offering 12/31/12 Cash and cash equivalents(1) $99 $99 Bank credit facility(2) (Borrowing base of $1.6 billion, matures May 2016) 700 209 9.75% Sr. Sub Notes due 2016 (Callable March 2013 at 104.875% of par) 413 --- 9.50% Sr. Sub Notes due 2016 (Callable May 2013 at 104.75% of par) 234 --- 8.25% Sr. Sub Notes due 2020 (Callable February 2015 at 104.125% of par) 996 996 6.375% Sr. Sub Notes due 2021 (Callable August 2016 at 103.188% of par) 400 400 4.625% Sr. Sub Notes due 2023 (Callable January 2018 at 102.313% of par) --- 1,200 Other Encore Sr. Sub Notes 4 4 Genesis pipeline financings / other capital leases 357 357 Total long-term debt(3) $3,104 $3,166 Equity 5,115 5,115 Total capitalization $8,219 $8,281 Annualized 4Q12 Adjusted cash flow from operations(4) $1,431 $1,431 Net Debt to Annualized 4Q12 Adjusted cash flow from operations(4) 2.1x 2.1x Net Debt to Annualized 4Q12 EBITDA(4) 1.9x 1.9x Debt to total capitalization 38% 38% Strong Financial Position (1) As of 12/31/12, our cash and cash equivalents totaled ~$100 million. At 12/31/12, ~$1.05 billion in restricted cash remained deposited with a qualified intermediary designated for the acquisition of CCA, which closed at the end of March 2013. (2) As of 12/31/12, we had ~$700 million of borrowings outstanding under our $1.6 billion bank credit facility. (3) Excludes current portion of capital lease obligations and pipeline financings totaling $36.6 million. (4) A non-GAAP measure; please visit our website for a full reconciliation. Represents historical amounts not adjusted for the Bakken Exchange Transaction or recent CCA acquisition. Adjusted cash flow from operations excludes current taxes related to the Bakken Exchange Transaction in Q4 2012 of approximately $42 million. Record low yield for non- investment grade sub. notes offering 49