1. Achieving Information Fluency
Via Inquiry-Based Learning
To Increase Engagement in
Building Affective and Cognitive Information Skills
LIS 665 Teaching Information Technology Literacy
Spring 2013
University of Hawaii
2. Framework for 21st Century Learning
http://www.p21.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=254&Itemid=11
2
LIS 665 Teaching Information Technology Literacy Nahl 2013
3. Information Fluency
Information Fluency is the optimal
outcome when critical thinking skills are
combined with information literacy and ICT
skills.
Digital Information Literacy is defined as
the skillful use of information within digital
environments.
3
LIS 665 Teaching Information Technology Literacy Nahl 2013
4. The Significance of
Context and Immersion
Acquiring knowledge in the context in which it
will be used facilitates recall and application
of skills and concepts learned.
(Gijselaers, 1996)
Objective: Engage students in solving real-
world problems in order to develop critical
thinking and problem-solving skills.
4
LIS 665 Teaching Information Technology Literacy Nahl 2013
6. 21st Century Information Fluency http://21cif.com/rkit/newRkit/gettingstarted.html
Digital Information Fluency http://21cif.com/rkit/core_competencies.html
Turning Questions Into Queries
http://21cif.com/resources/features/leadarticle_v1_n0.html
6
LIS 665 Teaching Information Technology Literacy Nahl 2013
7. The Search Process http://21cif.com/tutorials/micro/mm/searchprocess/index.htm
7 l
LIS 665 Teaching Information Technology Literacy Nahl 2013
9. Active Learning Models
Relation between
inquiry-based
learning (IBL),
problem-based
learning (PBL) and
case-based learning
(CBL)
(adapted from Spronken-Smith, R. A., Jennings, J.,
Robertson, J., Mein Smith, P. Vincent, G., Wake, G.
(2000). The Research-Teaching Link at Canterbury.,
2008)
9
LIS 665 Teaching Information Technology Literacy Nahl 2013
10. IBL Basics
10 Model of the inquiry process (Justice et al., 2002:19)
LIS 665 Teaching Information Technology Literacy Nahl 2013
11. Instructor Roles
Curriculum designer
Tutor-Facilitator
Resource
Evaluator
Objective: Involve instructors in multiple roles
as scaffolding to student learning.
11
LIS 665 Teaching Information Technology Literacy Nahl 2013
12. Effective IBL Instruction
Anengaging social
issue:
Reflection for, in, on action
Research
Discussion
Interpretation, Meaning,
Significance
Analysis of relationships
Explanation, justification of
results, give evidence
12
LIS 665 Teaching Information Technology Literacy Nahl 2013
14. Effective PBL Problems
Require collaboration with peers
Relevant to students
Complex and open-ended
Require researching information
No one solution or path to solution
14
LIS 665 Teaching Information Technology Literacy Nahl 2013
15. PBL Principles
1. Learning is student-centered
2. Learning occurs in collaborative environments
3. Instructors act as facilitators called tutors
4. Problems are a stimulus for learning
Objectives: Put students in the position of
creating solutions to real-word problems in
order to teach them how to create knowledge,
depend on each other for input, and develop
15
critical thinking skills.
LIS 665 Teaching Information Technology Literacy Nahl 2013
16. PBL Process:
Self-Directed Learning
1. Present the problem first and only
2. Students work together to analyze the problem
3. Students brainstorm ideas
4. Students list facts from prior knowledge
5. Students generate questions they need to
answer
6. Each student selects one question to research
7. Each student develops a plan of action
16
LIS 665 Teaching Information Technology Literacy Nahl 2013
17. Self-Directed Learning
8. Tutors assist at every step
9. Action Plans => library & Web research plans
10. Use a variety of source formats
11. Students report new information to group
12. Students review progress
13. Revise hypotheses (questions)
14. Research any new questions
17
LIS 665 Teaching Information Technology Literacy Nahl 2013
18. Evaluation Process
Students achieve final solution
Students do peer assessment
Students do self-assessment
Tutor does student assessment
Objective: Involve all participants in
assessment to reinforce a sense of
accountability for learning and for helping
others to learn, as evidenced by the quality
of the problem solving process and its
products.
18
LIS 665 Teaching Information Technology Literacy Nahl 2013
19. PBL & IBL Resources
PBL Clearing House: a searchable database of
problems tried by others
http://www.udel.edu/pbl/
Background and sample PBL and IBL Problems
http://www.udel.edu/pbl/problems/
http://www.fhs.mcmaster.ca/pbls/writing/contents.htm
http://cte.umdnj.edu/active_learning/active_pbl.cfm
http://iub.edu/~pbltec/wordpressj/jacobs-educator-program/inqui
19
LIS 665 Teaching Information Technology Literacy Nahl 2013
20. Exercise: Map Activities
to ACS Outcomes
Select one active learning exercise and map it onto your ACS
Outcomes to show how it demonstrates students have
learned from your lesson.
Map a draft Active Learning Exercise to your PIs and ACS Outcomes.
Make sure it incorporates Active Learning Principles
(pp. 18-19)
Identify the evidence it will produce to demonstrate students have
learned new knowledge and skills, attitude change, or completed an
assignment.
SAOAC includes criteria, outcome/evidence measures
(pp. 9 & 12)
Audit all exercises to ensure they map to all of your ACS Outcomes.
20 20
LIS 665 Teaching Information Technology Literacy Nahl 2013
21. Exercise: Usability Testing of
Active Learning Exercises
Usability testing cross-team match-ups (Share documents
& materials now)
Identity Team 1 (Driving) Sharrese with
Google Team 4 (Driving) Susan & Arianna
Identity Team 1 (Driving) online Liz & Jerome with
Google Team 4 (Driving) DeHanza
Identity Team 2 (Marriage) Kapena & Rachel with
Google Team 5 (Cyber Psychology) Lee & Alex
Identity Team 3 (Cyber Psychology) Roberta, Zoia & Adam with
Google Team 5 (Cyber Psychology) Rita
21
LIS 665 Teaching Information Technology Literacy Nahl 2013
Nahl 2013
22. Exercise: Usability Testing of
Active Learning Exercises
Teams test your actual activities with
members from another Team.
1. Select one exercise to test.
2. Introduce it as you would online to the psychology class.
3. Avoid chat during the test, really act as if these are your students
and test it for real, stay in character.
4. Run through the procedures you planned.
5. Team members observe the usability test.
6. Provide feedback for revising the activity.
7. Repeat with another activity until all are tested.
Revise the exercises based on reviews and
discussion.
22
LIS 665 Teaching Information Technology Literacy Nahl 2013
Nahl 2013
23. Next Week
Ch 7 Authentic Assessment
Radcliff et al. Ch 11 Performance Assessments
Rosen
Hillyer et al.
Identity Teams final materials, evaluation
instruments, and working links
Google Teams final drafts of materials and links
23
LIS 665 Teaching Information Technology Literacy Nahl 2013
Editor's Notes
LIS 665 Teaching Information Technology Literacy The affective domain governs behavior through myriad affections, including: values, attitudes, likes & dislikes, preferences, interests, self-confidence degree of commitment , sense of accomplishment, conflict, voluntary choice, priorities, goal setting, happiness, joy, frustration, desire for mastery, etc.
The Framework presents a holistic view of 21st century teaching and learning that combines a discrete focus on 21st century student outcomes (a blending of specific skills, content knowledge, expertise and literacies) with innovative support systems to help students master the multi-dimensional abilities required of them in the 21st century. The key elements of 21st century learning are represented in the graphic and descriptions below. The graphic represents both 21st century skills student outcomes (as represented by the arches of the rainbow) and 21st century skills support systems (as represented by the pools at the bottom). Core Subjects and 21st Century Themes- disciplines plus global awareness, health literacy, financial literacy, etc. 2. Learning and Innovation Skills Creativity and Innovation Critical Thinking and Problem Solving Communication and Collaboration 3. Information, Media and Technology Skills Information Literacy Media Literacy ICT Literacy 4. Life and Career Skills LIS 665 Teaching Information Technology Literacy
LIS 665 Teaching Information Technology Literacy In his talk at the CIL 2010 conference David Schroeter, a strategic council member of the Partnership for 21st Century Learning, said that we are no longer dealing with an information highway, but rather we are floating in an information ocean. He questioned whether our students can navigate the waters of the depths of the Internet. He also questioned if they will be ready to enter the work force when they leave school. According to Schroeter, employers are no longer looking for basic competencies; they assume that graduates have those. Employers are now looking for evidence that potential hires are critical thinkers, creative and innovative, excellent communicators,and fluent with information technology. Most non-routine jobs have been outsourced to countries where labor is cheaper, meaning that tomorrow ’s employees need to be able to adapt and learn constantly.
LIS 665 Teaching Information Technology Literacy Began in medical schools 1969, only recently in other disciplines. Constructivist learning theory, students construct knowledge via interaction
LIS 665 Teaching Information Technology Literacy
Joyce Valenza ’s site for 21at Century learners LIS 665 Teaching Information Technology Literacy
Process models LIS 665 Teaching Information Technology Literacy
LIS 665 Teaching Information Technology Literacy
IBL, PBL and CBL fall in the realm of active learning; PBL is a subset of IBL and CBL is a subset of PBL LIS 665 Teaching Information Technology Literacy
LIS 665 Teaching Information Technology Literacy
LIS 665 Teaching Information Technology Literacy Experts who: Guide with out leading and assist without directing Select, structure and write problems that address lesson objectives and reflect real-life issues. Presenting the problem, Asking challenging questions Probing for understanding, Making resources available Encouraging self-evaluation Provide resources, clarify confusing concepts, encourage students to verify everything in other sources Monitor progress, evaluate effectiveness of problem, quality of students ’ performance/products
LIS 665 Teaching Information Technology Literacy It is the American educator and philosopher John Dewey (1859-1952), however, who was largely responsible for promoting ‘learning by doing’ (Dewey, 1933). Influenced by Dewey, inquiry-based learning was adopted by many school teachers in the 1970s and began to appear about the same time in tertiary institutions. Active reflection techniques—before the search, after the results, etc.
LIS 665 Teaching Information Technology Literacy Assumes students will be motivated to learn when problems simulate complex, real-world, personally relevant situations. Creates a new framework for learning allowing students to take greater responsibility for their learning
LIS 665 Teaching Information Technology Literacy Often a form of service learning. E.g., Current events, pop culture, students ’ life, field of study, lab problems, line of work, application of concepts to everyday life.
LIS 665 Teaching Information Technology Literacy Students are encouraged to become actively engaged in learning and to be responsible for their learning and that of others in the group. Students work in groups of 5-10 and build teamwork skills in the process of solving problems together Teachers do not lecture, but guide students in the process of discovery, inquiry, analysis, and reporting. Problems are vehicles for the development of problem-solving skills. Students learn by trying to solve problems without one right answer. Formative: All types : worksheets, workbooks, quizzes, search logs or journals, ratings, open-ended feedback, action exercises, scenarios, rubrics (student or instructor or both) Validates needs assessment Helps identify Provides opportunities to practice Summative: final exam, quiz, post-test, course evaluation Reflect back, sum-up, review, rate and state value of accomplishments in class Have students rate their participation and effort in the process
LIS 665 Teaching Information Technology Literacy Like the Jigsaw method used by Dave. Present the problem first, in the absence of any concepts or information, no text, no lectures, no searches “ You are interested in purchasing a new vehicle. What should your annual salary be to afford the car you want? ” [a math problem] The difference between having enough money and being able to afford it Students work together to determine what information they already have and what information they need to learn Students brainstorm ideas for solutions (hypotheses) after gathering information Tutors pose questions, answer student questions How could we convert this to a research problem statement?
LIS 665 Teaching Information Technology Literacy Like in-class Design and Research Methods Workshops Current periodicals: car buying guides, Consumer Reports, Motor Trend, Kelly Blue Book, auto loan calculator site
LIS 665 Teaching Information Technology Literacy Build-in Reflective practice
LIS 665 Teaching Information Technology Literacy Systems analysis approach to problem-solving, what impacts what?