SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 14
Public Knowledge Project:
From Open Source to Community
            Source
     Barbara Hui, California Digital Library
 Brian Owen, Simon Fraser University Library
   Alec Smecher, Public Knowledge Project
Outline
•   Community & Sustainability (Brian)
•   Open Monograph Press (Alec)
•   Development partner perspective (Barbara)
•   OJS & OMP Usability assessment (Barbara)
Open Source Community Source
•   Direction & coordination
•   Financial & in-kind commitments
•   Organization & Governance
•   Transparency
•   Scheduling & Milestones
Some Challenges
• Multiple development teams
• Virtual collaboration
• Development practices: coding, review &
  integration, testing, documentation, release
• Local vs. community priorities
Sponsors, Partners & Sustainability
• Sponsors: 2 Platinum; 9 Gold; 7 Silver; 9 Bronze
• Traditional OS contributions: Freie Universität Berlin

Development Partners:
• OMP Early Adopter: Univ. of Pittsburgh
• Marketing, Wordpress, Usability: UBC
• Support Forum: OCUL & Scholars Portal
• UI/Usability & OJS: CDL & UBC
PKP Software: Releases
Open Monograph Press
• First new workflow design in (5?) years
• Opportunity to pioneer new structures
   • Flexible roles
   • Multiple-file reviews
   • User interface
• 1.0b launched in September
• Adoption; stabilization;
  incubation; post-production
Rust Never Sleeps
OJS lines of code (from ohloh.net)
Strategic / The Future
• New Development Areas:
  •   Open, dynamic publishing platform
  •   Social networking integration & content enrichment
  •   Indexing & discovery facilitation
  •   Research data integration & generation
The PKP Partnership and
            eScholarship’s future
• Access to community based enhancements/solutions, e.g.
   – Data publishing modules
   – New peer review mechanisms and methodologies

• Potential solutions to growing requests from UC
  researchers
   – Conference support -- Open Conference Systems (OCS)
   – Monograph publishing -- Open Monograph Press (OMP)
   • Non-PDF-based publishing support
The PKP Partnership and
       eScholarship’s future (cont'd)
• Exponentially increased collaboration possibilities for
  tackling emerging publishing and repository needs

• Opportunities to integrate valuable CDL technologies into a
  widely used platform (e.g. EZID)
OJS & OMP Usability Assessment
• What
  • Improve the OJS and OMP user experience
  • User-centered assessment and redesign process
• Who
  • Assessment:
     • CDL will focus on OJS
     • University of British Columbia will focus on OMP
  • Implementation:
     • developers from PKP, CDL, UBC (and elsewhere?), in
       collaboration with CDL and UBC UI/UX teams
Usability Assessment (cont'd)
• Challenges
   • Effective communication
   • Multiple work cultures
   • Multiple timelines
   • Collaborative, open development
• Opportunities
   • Shared expertise, experience, perspective, hours in the
     day
   • More robust results
   • Work with cool colleagues at other cool institutions!
Questions?

                Thanks!

Barbara Hui     barbara.hui@ucop.edu
Brian Owen      brian_owen@sfu.ca
Alec Smecher    alec@smecher.bc.ca

More Related Content

Similar to Public Knowledge Project

OER Authoring and Delivery Platforms
OER Authoring and Delivery PlatformsOER Authoring and Delivery Platforms
OER Authoring and Delivery PlatformsUna Daly
 
Online Journal Management using Open Journal Systems (OJS)
Online Journal Management using Open Journal Systems (OJS)Online Journal Management using Open Journal Systems (OJS)
Online Journal Management using Open Journal Systems (OJS)Ina Smith
 
ufsojs-161024084446 (1).pdf
ufsojs-161024084446 (1).pdfufsojs-161024084446 (1).pdf
ufsojs-161024084446 (1).pdfTeshome Oljira
 
Open Source Design Pattern Library, Spreading Communities Thick: Open Source ...
Open Source Design Pattern Library, Spreading Communities Thick: Open Source ...Open Source Design Pattern Library, Spreading Communities Thick: Open Source ...
Open Source Design Pattern Library, Spreading Communities Thick: Open Source ...Allison Bloodworth
 
Community-Source Development and Technical Services Librarians
Community-Source Development and Technical Services LibrariansCommunity-Source Development and Technical Services Librarians
Community-Source Development and Technical Services LibrariansBeth Picknally Camden
 
The Open to Open Access (O2OA) project, Miggie Pickton, University of Northam...
The Open to Open Access (O2OA) project, Miggie Pickton, University of Northam...The Open to Open Access (O2OA) project, Miggie Pickton, University of Northam...
The Open to Open Access (O2OA) project, Miggie Pickton, University of Northam...Repository Fringe
 
Ocls 4th annual breakfast 2016
Ocls 4th annual breakfast 2016Ocls 4th annual breakfast 2016
Ocls 4th annual breakfast 2016Jan Dawson
 
‘The Establishment and Development of UCD Library’s Research Services Unit:Su...
‘The Establishment and Development of UCD Library’s Research Services Unit:Su...‘The Establishment and Development of UCD Library’s Research Services Unit:Su...
‘The Establishment and Development of UCD Library’s Research Services Unit:Su...CONUL Conference
 
Peer Review on the Move from Closed to Open
Peer Review on the Move from Closed to OpenPeer Review on the Move from Closed to Open
Peer Review on the Move from Closed to OpenOpenAIRE
 
Data-Informed Decision Making for Libraries - Athenaeum21
Data-Informed Decision Making for Libraries - Athenaeum21Data-Informed Decision Making for Libraries - Athenaeum21
Data-Informed Decision Making for Libraries - Athenaeum21Megan Hurst
 
Data-Informed Decision Making for Digital Resources
Data-Informed Decision Making for Digital ResourcesData-Informed Decision Making for Digital Resources
Data-Informed Decision Making for Digital ResourcesChristine Madsen
 
Open access, universities as publishers - Jisc Digital Festival 2015
Open access, universities as publishers - Jisc Digital Festival 2015Open access, universities as publishers - Jisc Digital Festival 2015
Open access, universities as publishers - Jisc Digital Festival 2015Jisc
 
Integration and Filtering: Creating visibility across library resources using...
Integration and Filtering: Creating visibility across library resources using...Integration and Filtering: Creating visibility across library resources using...
Integration and Filtering: Creating visibility across library resources using...Emmanuel E C
 
Creating visibilitythroughngl final
Creating visibilitythroughngl finalCreating visibilitythroughngl final
Creating visibilitythroughngl finalEmmanuel E C
 
Kuali OLE: Enabling Choices for Libraries
Kuali OLE: Enabling Choices for LibrariesKuali OLE: Enabling Choices for Libraries
Kuali OLE: Enabling Choices for LibrariesRobert H. McDonald
 
Institutional repositories
Institutional repositoriesInstitutional repositories
Institutional repositoriesTor Loney
 

Similar to Public Knowledge Project (20)

Open Books at Berkeley: Implementing a Campus-Wide Publishing Platform
Open Books at Berkeley: Implementing a Campus-Wide Publishing PlatformOpen Books at Berkeley: Implementing a Campus-Wide Publishing Platform
Open Books at Berkeley: Implementing a Campus-Wide Publishing Platform
 
OER Authoring and Delivery Platforms
OER Authoring and Delivery PlatformsOER Authoring and Delivery Platforms
OER Authoring and Delivery Platforms
 
Online Journal Management using Open Journal Systems (OJS)
Online Journal Management using Open Journal Systems (OJS)Online Journal Management using Open Journal Systems (OJS)
Online Journal Management using Open Journal Systems (OJS)
 
ufsojs-161024084446 (1).pdf
ufsojs-161024084446 (1).pdfufsojs-161024084446 (1).pdf
ufsojs-161024084446 (1).pdf
 
Elpub2014 final presentation
Elpub2014 final presentationElpub2014 final presentation
Elpub2014 final presentation
 
Open Source Design Pattern Library, Spreading Communities Thick: Open Source ...
Open Source Design Pattern Library, Spreading Communities Thick: Open Source ...Open Source Design Pattern Library, Spreading Communities Thick: Open Source ...
Open Source Design Pattern Library, Spreading Communities Thick: Open Source ...
 
Community-Source Development and Technical Services Librarians
Community-Source Development and Technical Services LibrariansCommunity-Source Development and Technical Services Librarians
Community-Source Development and Technical Services Librarians
 
The Open to Open Access (O2OA) project, Miggie Pickton, University of Northam...
The Open to Open Access (O2OA) project, Miggie Pickton, University of Northam...The Open to Open Access (O2OA) project, Miggie Pickton, University of Northam...
The Open to Open Access (O2OA) project, Miggie Pickton, University of Northam...
 
Do MOOCs need a special instructional design?
Do MOOCs need a special instructional design?Do MOOCs need a special instructional design?
Do MOOCs need a special instructional design?
 
Ocls 4th annual breakfast 2016
Ocls 4th annual breakfast 2016Ocls 4th annual breakfast 2016
Ocls 4th annual breakfast 2016
 
NISO Virtual Conference: Web-Scale Discovery Services: Transforming Access to...
NISO Virtual Conference: Web-Scale Discovery Services: Transforming Access to...NISO Virtual Conference: Web-Scale Discovery Services: Transforming Access to...
NISO Virtual Conference: Web-Scale Discovery Services: Transforming Access to...
 
‘The Establishment and Development of UCD Library’s Research Services Unit:Su...
‘The Establishment and Development of UCD Library’s Research Services Unit:Su...‘The Establishment and Development of UCD Library’s Research Services Unit:Su...
‘The Establishment and Development of UCD Library’s Research Services Unit:Su...
 
Peer Review on the Move from Closed to Open
Peer Review on the Move from Closed to OpenPeer Review on the Move from Closed to Open
Peer Review on the Move from Closed to Open
 
Data-Informed Decision Making for Libraries - Athenaeum21
Data-Informed Decision Making for Libraries - Athenaeum21Data-Informed Decision Making for Libraries - Athenaeum21
Data-Informed Decision Making for Libraries - Athenaeum21
 
Data-Informed Decision Making for Digital Resources
Data-Informed Decision Making for Digital ResourcesData-Informed Decision Making for Digital Resources
Data-Informed Decision Making for Digital Resources
 
Open access, universities as publishers - Jisc Digital Festival 2015
Open access, universities as publishers - Jisc Digital Festival 2015Open access, universities as publishers - Jisc Digital Festival 2015
Open access, universities as publishers - Jisc Digital Festival 2015
 
Integration and Filtering: Creating visibility across library resources using...
Integration and Filtering: Creating visibility across library resources using...Integration and Filtering: Creating visibility across library resources using...
Integration and Filtering: Creating visibility across library resources using...
 
Creating visibilitythroughngl final
Creating visibilitythroughngl finalCreating visibilitythroughngl final
Creating visibilitythroughngl final
 
Kuali OLE: Enabling Choices for Libraries
Kuali OLE: Enabling Choices for LibrariesKuali OLE: Enabling Choices for Libraries
Kuali OLE: Enabling Choices for Libraries
 
Institutional repositories
Institutional repositoriesInstitutional repositories
Institutional repositories
 

More from DLFCLIR

Participatory Digital Library
Participatory Digital LibraryParticipatory Digital Library
Participatory Digital LibraryDLFCLIR
 
Collaborative Service Models: Building Support for Digital Scholarship
Collaborative Service Models: Building Support for Digital ScholarshipCollaborative Service Models: Building Support for Digital Scholarship
Collaborative Service Models: Building Support for Digital ScholarshipDLFCLIR
 
Sustaining ArchivesSpace
Sustaining ArchivesSpaceSustaining ArchivesSpace
Sustaining ArchivesSpaceDLFCLIR
 
From Projects to... Services
From Projects to... ServicesFrom Projects to... Services
From Projects to... ServicesDLFCLIR
 
Dlf 2011UDFR-a-semantic-registry-for-format-representation-information-v1
Dlf 2011UDFR-a-semantic-registry-for-format-representation-information-v1Dlf 2011UDFR-a-semantic-registry-for-format-representation-information-v1
Dlf 2011UDFR-a-semantic-registry-for-format-representation-information-v1DLFCLIR
 
Katherine Kott Slides for DLF PM Group 2011
Katherine Kott Slides for DLF PM Group 2011Katherine Kott Slides for DLF PM Group 2011
Katherine Kott Slides for DLF PM Group 2011DLFCLIR
 
Charter Nonstarter by Eric Stedfeld, NYU
Charter Nonstarter by Eric Stedfeld, NYUCharter Nonstarter by Eric Stedfeld, NYU
Charter Nonstarter by Eric Stedfeld, NYUDLFCLIR
 
Hypatia for dlf 2011
Hypatia for dlf 2011Hypatia for dlf 2011
Hypatia for dlf 2011DLFCLIR
 

More from DLFCLIR (8)

Participatory Digital Library
Participatory Digital LibraryParticipatory Digital Library
Participatory Digital Library
 
Collaborative Service Models: Building Support for Digital Scholarship
Collaborative Service Models: Building Support for Digital ScholarshipCollaborative Service Models: Building Support for Digital Scholarship
Collaborative Service Models: Building Support for Digital Scholarship
 
Sustaining ArchivesSpace
Sustaining ArchivesSpaceSustaining ArchivesSpace
Sustaining ArchivesSpace
 
From Projects to... Services
From Projects to... ServicesFrom Projects to... Services
From Projects to... Services
 
Dlf 2011UDFR-a-semantic-registry-for-format-representation-information-v1
Dlf 2011UDFR-a-semantic-registry-for-format-representation-information-v1Dlf 2011UDFR-a-semantic-registry-for-format-representation-information-v1
Dlf 2011UDFR-a-semantic-registry-for-format-representation-information-v1
 
Katherine Kott Slides for DLF PM Group 2011
Katherine Kott Slides for DLF PM Group 2011Katherine Kott Slides for DLF PM Group 2011
Katherine Kott Slides for DLF PM Group 2011
 
Charter Nonstarter by Eric Stedfeld, NYU
Charter Nonstarter by Eric Stedfeld, NYUCharter Nonstarter by Eric Stedfeld, NYU
Charter Nonstarter by Eric Stedfeld, NYU
 
Hypatia for dlf 2011
Hypatia for dlf 2011Hypatia for dlf 2011
Hypatia for dlf 2011
 

Public Knowledge Project

  • 1. Public Knowledge Project: From Open Source to Community Source Barbara Hui, California Digital Library Brian Owen, Simon Fraser University Library Alec Smecher, Public Knowledge Project
  • 2. Outline • Community & Sustainability (Brian) • Open Monograph Press (Alec) • Development partner perspective (Barbara) • OJS & OMP Usability assessment (Barbara)
  • 3. Open Source Community Source • Direction & coordination • Financial & in-kind commitments • Organization & Governance • Transparency • Scheduling & Milestones
  • 4. Some Challenges • Multiple development teams • Virtual collaboration • Development practices: coding, review & integration, testing, documentation, release • Local vs. community priorities
  • 5. Sponsors, Partners & Sustainability • Sponsors: 2 Platinum; 9 Gold; 7 Silver; 9 Bronze • Traditional OS contributions: Freie Universität Berlin Development Partners: • OMP Early Adopter: Univ. of Pittsburgh • Marketing, Wordpress, Usability: UBC • Support Forum: OCUL & Scholars Portal • UI/Usability & OJS: CDL & UBC
  • 7. Open Monograph Press • First new workflow design in (5?) years • Opportunity to pioneer new structures • Flexible roles • Multiple-file reviews • User interface • 1.0b launched in September • Adoption; stabilization; incubation; post-production
  • 8. Rust Never Sleeps OJS lines of code (from ohloh.net)
  • 9. Strategic / The Future • New Development Areas: • Open, dynamic publishing platform • Social networking integration & content enrichment • Indexing & discovery facilitation • Research data integration & generation
  • 10. The PKP Partnership and eScholarship’s future • Access to community based enhancements/solutions, e.g. – Data publishing modules – New peer review mechanisms and methodologies • Potential solutions to growing requests from UC researchers – Conference support -- Open Conference Systems (OCS) – Monograph publishing -- Open Monograph Press (OMP) • Non-PDF-based publishing support
  • 11. The PKP Partnership and eScholarship’s future (cont'd) • Exponentially increased collaboration possibilities for tackling emerging publishing and repository needs • Opportunities to integrate valuable CDL technologies into a widely used platform (e.g. EZID)
  • 12. OJS & OMP Usability Assessment • What • Improve the OJS and OMP user experience • User-centered assessment and redesign process • Who • Assessment: • CDL will focus on OJS • University of British Columbia will focus on OMP • Implementation: • developers from PKP, CDL, UBC (and elsewhere?), in collaboration with CDL and UBC UI/UX teams
  • 13. Usability Assessment (cont'd) • Challenges • Effective communication • Multiple work cultures • Multiple timelines • Collaborative, open development • Opportunities • Shared expertise, experience, perspective, hours in the day • More robust results • Work with cool colleagues at other cool institutions!
  • 14. Questions? Thanks! Barbara Hui barbara.hui@ucop.edu Brian Owen brian_owen@sfu.ca Alec Smecher alec@smecher.bc.ca

Editor's Notes

  1. Traditional OS models don’t work well for niche applications: smaller community, often limited technical resources, OS business models not as applicable, etc. Mention Kuali Foundation, Brad Wheeler
  2. multiple development teams: already sufficient exp. with other comm.based OJS partners, e.g. Free University Berlin virtual collaboration: has always been the norm for core PKP team development practices: this dialogue has already commenced, e.g. transition to GIT local vs. community: huge potential for benefits, i.e. expertise core team doesn’t possess; re-architecting goal to modularize may allow more flexibility
  3. multiple development teams: already sufficient exp. with other comm.based OJS partners, e.g. Free University Berlin virtual collaboration: has always been the norm for core PKP team development practices: this dialogue has already commenced, e.g. transition to GIT local vs. community: huge potential for benefits, i.e. expertise core team doesn’t possess; re-architecting goal to modularize may allow more flexibility
  4. Dedicated development & support for all PKP modules Interoperability w. other related platforms, e.g. IRs DA1 - Open Dynamic Publishing Platform To allow for customizable implementation from a web library of modules for assembling more efficient publishing platforms involving traditional and innovative forms of scholarly communication: a) Modularization of the workflow stages in article processing and publishing.. b) Definable user roles to suit needs of different communities. c) More efficient modal interface and navigation design throughout. d) Output flexibility capable of serving up content on multiple platforms. DA2 - Social Networking Integration and Content Enrichment To enable the tracking, as well as the extension, of research ’ s reach and impact, in ways that will assist in establishing value and authority of content: a) System for assembling article-level statistics and metric based on traditional measures of citations as well as social networking and media measures. b) Plugin capacities for third-party content-management tools such as Mendeley and Zotero. c) Social networking notification tools. DA3 - Indexing and Discovery Facilitation To increase the efficiency with which research is discovered, reviewed, and utilized, as well as supporting data-mining: a) Tools to support structured tagging (XML) of (i) all content elements to enable indexing and data-mining of research methodologies, statistical techniques, captions, etc. and (ii) bibliographies for correction, improved citational accuracy, and linking out. b) Improved metadata production and quality control for published content, with author disambiguation, works cited, etc. c) Support for enhanced PDF production of published content, including metadata, linkouts, and features that keep content part of the dynamic web. DA4 - Research Data Integration and Generation To advance the use and analysis of published research through a sharing of the associated data-sets for published studies and for opening the research itself to studies through data-mining and other techniques: a) System tools for linking research data sets to articles (e.g., Dataverse). b) System tools for analysis of datasets (e.g., data visualization). c) Demonstration articles in sciences, social sciences, and humanities with well-integrated and well-structured data-sets and associated analysis tools.
  5. --PKP partnership presents an opportunity to extend and grow eScholarship that wouldn’t be feasible otherwise. --PKP partnership also allows CDL to contribute back development work done over past 1.5 years (in addition to possible integration of CDL services like EZID)
  6. --First example of major CDL contribution in capacity as development partners, in collaboration with another partner institution