This interactive workshop introduces participants to several key theories from social psychology and sociology in order to demonstrate how science can be used to design engaging social media applications and campaigns.
The content is presented in a simple format that makes key linkages between our daily social lives and the social world in social media. During the workshop, participants have a chance to learn a number of theories, see examples of how they play out online, and then join a group analysis on the social psychology employed by a number of social media sites and mobile apps.
Questions Answered:
1. What are some of the most popular theories from social psychology that I can leverage to build more persuasive social applications or run more engaging social media campaigns?
2. What’s social influence and how can it help me? How about six-degrees of separation? And what about the strengths of weak ties?
3. Where did all this hype about “influencers” come from and what’s up with the obsession over social metrics? Are they real or just marketing hype?
4. Is it true that all the top websites in the world are driven by social algorithms?
5. What’s the difference between interpersonal persuasion and social influence?
Based on this top paper from a world leading scientific journal: http://www.jmir.org/2011/1/e17/
Architecture case study India Habitat Centre, Delhi.pdf
Social Psychology of Social Media
1. Social Psychology of
Social Media
Brian Cugelman, PhD
Online strategy and research consultant
@cugelman
Ryerson University
Toronto, Canada
25 Feb 2012
2. AGENDA
1. We're Social Animals, However We Connect
2. Digital Persuasion Equation
3. Eight Spheres of Digital Influence
4. Social Contexts, Offline & Online, Private & Public
5. In-depth Look at Sphere Eight: Social Context
6. Leveraging Social Context Factors for Social Design
7. Crowdsourced Analysis
2
5. SHIFTING VIEWS ON THE INTERNET & SOCIAL
RELATIONSHIPS
Before 2006 Beyond 2006
• Internet keeps people at • Pew Study, The Strength of
home, away from friends and Internet Ties shows the net
family enhances social relations
• The Internet is destroying • Texting helps long-distance
relationships couples stay connected
(sexting too)
• Using the Internet is anti-
social • Mobile phones for teens are
not phones anymore, they're a
social lifeline
5
6. A QUICK POLL
• Have you ever donated to a cause, because the
organization needed a bit more money to reach
their funding goal?
• Have you ever purchased a product because of
top star ratings? How about one star?
• Have you ever changed your views on an issue
because of an online discussion?
6
10. DIGITAL PERSUASION EQUATION
Click
+ + + Here =
Motivation Ability & Persuasive Trigger Change
Efficacy Experiences
(8 spheres of digital
influence)
10
11. CHANGE + + +
Click
Here =
Motivation Ability & Persuasive
Efficacy Trigger Change
Experiences
• Agreeing to something - Saying “yes”
• Buying more widgets
• Increasing support for a social cause
• Losing trust in a politician
• Deciding to quit smoking
11
12. HOW CHANGE Click
+ + + =
HAPPENS Motivation Ability & Persuasive
Here
Trigger Change
Efficacy Experiences
Beliefs Attitudes Behaviours
Not necessarily in this order.
Behaviour can shape attitudes, and attitudes can shape beliefs.
12
13. MOTIVATION + + +
Click
Here =
Motivation Ability & Persuasive
Efficacy Trigger Change
Experiences
Value proposition
(-) Demotivaror:
Costs, disincentives,
barriers, effort
(+) Motivator:
Goals, carrots,
benefit, drivers
Behaviour is more likely when
motivators outweigh demotivators
13
14. ABILITY & Click
+ + + =
EFFICACY Motivation Ability & Persuasive
Here
Trigger Change
Efficacy Experiences
Ability or self-efficacy dictate what you
will and won't do
Ability Self-efficacy
What you can or What you believe
can't do you can or can't do
Skill Confidence
Learned helplessness
14
15. TRIGGER Click
+ + + =
(COVERT) Motivation Ability & Persuasive
Here
Trigger Change
Efficacy Experiences
Triggering chickens Triggering humans
with recordings of with recordings of
chicks chirping people laughing
(canned laughter)
Chicken acts friendly People laugh longer and
towards a threat harder, even at bad jokes
Trigger. Reaction.
15
16. TRIGGER Click
+ + + =
(OVERT) Motivation Ability & Persuasive
Here
Trigger Change
Efficacy Experiences
Call to action (CTA)
Act now while Prompt
quantities last.
Request
Offer
Proposal
Download your Sales pitch
free report
You were poked by Bob.
Click Here Poke Bob back!
"Wow! That shirt makes you look
20 years younger. Would you like
to pay by cash or credit?"
Click on this link now!
18. PERSUASIVE + + +
Click
Here =
COMMUNICATION Motivation Ability &
Efficacy
Persuasive
Experiences
Trigger Change
MODEL
This system can integrate hundreds of influence components,
but we'll just focus on the eight spheres.
Cugelman, B., Thelwall, M., & Dawes, P. (2009). Communication-Based Influence
Components Model. Paper presented at the Persuasive 2009, Claremont.
19. 1. SOURCE
What it is: Key principles:
•The person, organization, •Appealing to source
or group behind a website, credibility boosts
social media profile, ad, or persuasiveness
message
•Build on the three
components of credibility:
1. Expertise
2. Trustworthiness
3. Visual appeal
19
20. WHICH PHOTO CAN INCREASE
TEXT CREDIBILITY?
No photo
NGUYEN, H. & MASTHOFF, J. (2007) Is it me or what I say? Source image and persuasion. Persuasive 07. Springer.
21. CREDIBILITY AND IMAGERY
Photo Goodwill Trust
High credibility Higher Higher
No photo Middle Middle
Low credibility Lower Lower
Readers perceptions of text credibility
is influenced by photo credibility
Don't underestimate the contribution of visuals
towards perceived credibility
21
22. Featured by X, Y, Z.
Low credibility websites can borrow credibility from higher credibility sources.
22
23. 2. MESSAGE ENCODING AND
DECODING
What it is: Key principles:
•How you express an idea •How you express
and how the person something can strengthen
interprets it or weaken what you say
•Expression can be spoken, •Encode messages so the
written, symbolic audience can rapidly
understand them
23
26. 3. MEDIA CHANNEL
What it is: Key principles:
•The various media used to •Select the media channels
express something most suited to your target
audience
•Eg. Written words, spoken
dialogue, photos, video, •Make it easy for them
interactive websites, email engage with the media
26
28. 4. AUDIENCE
What it is: Key principles:
•The person or organization •Understand your
you are trying to engage audiences' motivations and
and influence psychological hot buttons
•It comprises their •Frame interaction around
demographics, traits, and motivations and leverage
psychology hot buttons
28
29. HOW THE PSYCHOLOGY OF 30 HEALTH CHANGING
WEBSITES INFLUENCES USERS' BEHAVIOUR
d
CUGELMAN, B., THELWALL, M., & DAWES, P. (2011) Online interventions for social marketing health
behavior change campaigns: A meta-analysis of psychological architectures and adherence factors.
Journal of Medical Internet Research, 13(1), e17.
http://www.jmir.org/2011/1/e17/
29
30. 5. FEEDBACK ENCODING AND
DECODING
What it is: Key principles:
•How the audience •Automate data collection
expresses and transmits whenever possible
their feedback to you, and
how you interpret it •Incentivize requests for
user information
•Some of this is contributed
voluntarily, but most is •Just get what you need
encoded automatically initially, then incentive
data collection over time
30
33. 6. FEEDBACK MESSAGE
What it is: Key principles:
•The information an •Leverage user data to
audience shares with the tailor personalized and
source that is used to tailor relevant messages
messages
•In other words, any data •Mine trends among
collected about a user that populations to build
is processed and acted processes that help
upon individuals
•This is the foundation for
relationship building
33
36. 7. INTERVENTION MESSAGE
What it is: Key principles:
•What you express or do •Build your messages
around your audiences'
•In other words, the motivation, make it easy,
tangible communication or and leverage persuasion
action you express to an
audience •Research will help you
identify the influence
components that matter
36
37. 8. SOCIAL CONTEXT
What it is: Key principles:
•The social environment in •Demonstrate group
which a relationship occurs behaviour to leverage social
norms and pressures
•This includes society,
whether virtual or "real" •Play on our competitive
nature and scarcity
The rest of this presentation
will only look at this sphere.
37
39. SOCIAL CONTEXTS
Offline Online
Classroom E-learning platform
Shouting out to people on the street Twitter
Sharing thoughts with friends during
Sharing thoughts Facebook
a night out
Academic conference networking Email discussion group
39
40. PRIVATE AND PUBLIC SPACES
Private
Controlled Public
Access
Twitter
Facebook
SMS (txting) Lined in
Discussion group
Email
40
41. PRIVATE VS. PUBLIC CONCERNS
With a group of In a large complex
Living alone on a
close & trusted social environment
desert island
friends (school or work)
Care about your
Probably not Possibly Probably
looks?
Worry about your Probably not
Possibly Probably
social status?
Care what others
Possibly Possibly Probably
think?
Willingness to say
whatever you Probably Probably not
think?
41
42. SURVEILLANCE:
MAKING PRIVATE MOMENTS PUBLIC
Research bias Crime prevention
Socially desirable Deterrence
answers
Surfing the net
Employability
at work
Never posting
Cautious about
anything that could Cameras | Internet usage
the sites we visit tracking | Friends posting &
harm our reputation tagging your photo on Facebook.
70% of employers have rejected Surveillance moves us from a
applicants due to online information. private to a public social context.
42
44. CHANGE AGENTS:
INTERPERSONAL & SOCIAL INFLUENCE
Interpersonal influence Social proof
The persuasive experience resulting from The principle that we determine what's
one-on-one interaction. correct by following what other people
show to be correct.
44
45. HAVE YOU EVER BEEN
PERSUADED OF SOMETHING
BECAUSE OF SOCIAL PROOF?
45
46. SOCIAL PROOF EXAMPLES
• A 10 out of 10 star produce is rated 500 times.
No doubt, it must be amazing.
• A nightclub forces people to line-up outside for
hours. If they're enduring that to get in, it must
be great.
• The "most popular" download software must be
the "best".
46
47. SOCIAL PROOF AND DONATIONS
Opaque: people Empty: people Primed: Starter
can't see the don't see the social tips show people
social norm norm in action what to do
Donations Donations Donations
www.socialmediacafe.ca www.socialmediacafe.ca www.socialmediacafe.ca
$1.50 $50 +
47
55. SOCIAL NETWORK ANALYSIS AND INFLUENCE
Common influence metrics
•Degree Centrality
•Closeness
•Betweenness
•Coreness 55
56. TOP WEBSITES ARE SOCIAL OR USE SOCIAL
ALGORITHMS
1. Google (Search)
2. Facebook (Social media)
3. YouTube (Social media)
4. Yahoo! (Search) •5 Search
5. Windows Live (Search)
6. Baidu.com (Search)
•5 Social media
7. Wikipedia (Social media)
8. Blogger.com (Social media)
9. Twitter (Social media)
10. QQ.COM (Search) Based on Alexa ranking retrieved 12 Oct 2010
56
57. THESAME RECOMMENDATION CAN SPREAD AS
TRUSTED ADVICE OR SPAM
Trusted Dishonest
recommendation marketing spam
I don't like
spam!
or
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=anwy2MPT5RE
57
58. CREDIBILITY ASSESSMENT AND ACTIVE TRUST
Credibility How recommendations
perception are regarded
1. Advice from a
trusted expert High Valuable advice
2. Advice from a Promising, but
trusted person, but Medium not fully
not an expert trustworthy
3. Advice from an
unknown source Low Marketing spam
A study on how source credibility and trust relate to user behaviour: Cugelman, B., Thelwall, M. & Dawes, P. (2009) The
dimensions of website credibility and their relation to active trust and behavioural impact. Communications of the Association for
Information Systems. http://wlv.openrepository.com/wlv/bitstream/2436/85974/4/Cugelman_2009_website_credibility.pdf
58
59. SPAMMING REDUCES DIFFUSION
Dishonest spamming techniques undermine viral diffusion
Differential Adaptive Diffusion: Understanding Diversity
and Learning Whom to Trust in Viral Marketing
59
62. SCARCITY
People assign more value to
things that are less available.
“I don’t want
to belong to
any club that
will accept
people like me
as a member.”
Groucho Marx
62
64. FROM SUPPER TO SOCIAL INFLUENCE
Burger and fries Chicken Burger Chicken Salad
Bun
Beef patty
Chicken breast
Fries
Salad
64
65. FROM SUPPER TO SOCIAL INFLUENCE
Beliefs Attitudes Behaviours
Pay influencers to push
your idea
Testimonials from
trusted experts
Show how popular it is
Incentivize personal
affiliate marketing
Make it rare and time
bound
65
66. PSYCHOLOGICAL ARCHITECTURE OF SOCIAL INFLUENCE
Above the surface
• What you see and experience
• The total effect
Below the surface
• Social proof
• Modelling behaviour
• Influencer endorsement
• Viral spread leveraging
social trust
• Scarcity
66
67. BEWARE OF UNETHICAL ABUSES OF SOCIAL
INFLUENCE
• Fake positive testimonials
• Fake negative ratings of competitor products
• Tricking people into inviting their friends to join
social networks
• Affiliate marketing portals that masquerade as
impartial and honest advisors
• An important email from a fried, which is really
a virus exploiting your social trust
67
74. THE SCIENCE BEHIND THIS PRESENTATION
This presentation is based on a multi-year study of online influence,
that was published in the world's leading scientific journal
on eHealth, mHealth and medical informatics.
Get the study here:
http://www.jmir.org/2011/1/e17/
74
75. Brian Cugelman, PhD
Online strategy and research consultant
Want to leverage psychology to
make your websites, campaigns,
or digital products more engaging
and persuasive? Get in touch.
www.alterspark.com
@AlterSpark alterspark alterspark alterspark
75
Hinweis der Redaktion
The Spread of Obesity in a Large Social Network over 32 YearsNicholas A. Christakis, M.D., Ph.D., M.P.H., and James H. Fowler, Ph.D.A person’s chances of becoming obese increased by 57% (95%) if he or she had a friend who became obese in a given interval. Among pairs of adult siblings, if one sibling became obese, the chance that the other would become obese increased by 40% (95%). If one spouse became obese, the likelihood that the other spouse would become obese increased by 37% (95%).yellow denotes an obese person (body-mass index, ≥30) green denotes a nonobese person
Call to action (CTA)PromptRequestOfferProposalSales pitch
RhetoricWriting style/clarityFramingPsychology of graphic design/layout (human perception)User Experience (UX), usability, information architectureEyeball tracking and web heat maps guidelinesTunnelling (and providing clear sequences)ReductionOne time vs multiple interactions (relationships)Foot-in-the-door techniqueDoor-in-the-face technique
AudioTextPicturesVideoMulti-media
TailoringPersonalizationProvide feedback on performanceAdaptation/content matching
TailoringPersonal influence (Kats and Lazerfeld)Diffusion of innovations(Rogers)Social network analysis metrics (centrality, betweeness, etc..)Strength of weak ties (Granovetter)Six-degrees of separation Viral spreadSocial influences (social norms) Environmental context and resources (Environmental constraints)Moral appealsScaricity Social proofConsistency and commitmentPersonalizationProvide feedback on performanceAdaptation/content matching
Degree CentralityThis is a straight measure of the number of links to a node; it is based on the principle that the node with the most links must be the most important. As a limitation, this measure does not factor in the importance of network positioning, nor being connected to other well connected nodes. Consequently, degree centrality is considered a good, but limited measure and normally supplemented by other metrics.ClosenessIn some cases an actor may have many connections, but may be connected to a disconnected sub-network. This is sort of like being the tallest midget. To overcome this limitation, closeness measures how close one node is to all others. In other words, closeness measures how many hops a node must travel to reach all other nodes, and the node with the highest closeness is the best connected.BetweennessIn some cases, a person does not need to be well connected to everyone in a network to be influential, nor do they need to be connected to well connected persons; rather, they just need to be positioned between persons who don't know each other. Betweenness measures a node's brokerage position, between disconnected nodes. In other words, it measures how well a given node is able to connect disconnected nodes, and benefit from their ignorance. This is the match makers measure.CorenessThe inner circle, in-group, the elite--these are all terms that describe groups of individuals who are core to a given network or organization. They're the ones with access to information and who exert the most influence within networks. Capturing this notion, coreness is a measure that represents a core/periphery analysis which aims to break networks into the ‘in group' and ‘out group'.