The document summarizes work done by Michael Postler and Craig Guenette on a process cooling water system from September 2009. It includes updating as-built drawings, analyzing the existing system for head losses, and making suggestions to improve efficiency. It also evaluates options for upgrading the system to handle increased flow, including replacing pumps and heat exchangers. The proposed design is analyzed and shown to reduce operating pressure from 130.9 psig to 95 psig.
1. Group: Facilities Services Department
Team Members: Michael Postler and Craig Guenette
Start Date: September 08, 2009
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED 1
2. The System
Commencement
As-Built Updates LPL
As-Built Updates FAB
Setup for Calculations
Existing Calculations
Existing Suggestions
Problems to be Solved
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
Solutions
New Design
New Pipe Routes
Proposals
Proposals (continued)
New Calculations
Selection
Questions?
2
3. What is Process Cooling Water?
What is this system used for?
How does it differ from Chilled Water?
Why is it advantageous?
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED 3
4. Initial assignment
Update As-Built drawings
Calculate existing head loss
Make design suggestions
New condition 250 GPM 330 GPM
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED 4
5. Briefed on the “potential” hazards in ML
Field surveyed in Lower Process Level
Updated As-Built drawings
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED 5
6. Coordinated a visit to the clean room
Field surveyed in upper process level
Updated As-Built drawings
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED 6
7. Assigned numerical values for equipment
Verified all pipe dimensions and pipe fittings
Documented all pressure and flow readings
at equipment
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED 7
9. Evaluated critical friction losses
Manipulated pipe diameters on spreadsheet
Suggestions were made to save head loss
Example: Existing LPL tool #34 has 260.7 ft.
of head loss (112.8 psig). With suggestions the
updated system will have 180.9 ft. of head loss
(78.3 psig). This suggestion will save 79.8 ft. of
head loss (34.5 psig).
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED 9
10. Losing 21 psig (102-81 psig) across filters
Discrepancy of 16 psig between the pressure
gauges and the controls system
In bay 11 - equipment would occasionally
shut down during operation
Cracked 45° elbow on riser 11
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED 10
11. Pressure analysis performed, controls –
calibration issue
After recalibration pump supply went from
102 psig to 86 psig
In bay 11 – there was not enough pressure
at the equipment and pump output pressure
was increased
The cracked 45° elbow on riser 11, will be
replaced during the next shutdown
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED 11
12. 250 GPM 330 GPM
Existing system HL = 302.4 ft. (130.9 psig)
requiring 65 HP
Existing pumps will not handle flow increase
Existing heat exchanger must be
modified/replaced
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED 12
13. Four different options for main headers
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED 13
14. Two main 4” headers off 5” SS Main
Filters to be moved to accommodate new
header design
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED 14
15. 28 Plates to be added to the Heat
Exchangers (65-93)
Pumps and motors on VFD to be replaced
Automatic air vents to be installed on all
risers
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED 15
17. Close coupled, stainless steel 40 HP pumps
Heat exchangers to be upgraded to 93
plates and reconditioned
Stainless steel suction diffuser and triple
duty valves
Relocation of filter housings with 20 micron
filters to be installed
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED 17