Web 2.0, brugerinvolvering og sociale teknologier

Web 2.0, brugerinvolvering og sociale teknologier Lennart Björneborn Danmarks Biblioteksskole [email_address] KAF-kursus 24-27.3.2009

indhold ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],M.C. Escher: House of Stairs, 1951

[object Object],[object Object],Neil Postman, Technopoly , 1993

” The Web, the Semantic Web, the Web 2.0, and Social Networks are all manifestations of the success of the link.” - Hypertext 2009 Conference: www.ht2009.org

”… vi er på vej ind i linkenes tidsalder … The Link Age … Fremover vil man se links, relationer , som mere fundamentale.” - Nørretranders (2007). Civilisation 2.0 . s. 12

‘ memex ’ = ’memory extender’ Vannevar Bush: ’As we may think’ The Atlantic Monthly, juli 1945 videnskabelig kreativitet hæmmes fordi indekseringsmetoder ikke støtter forbindelser på tværs af klassifikationshierarkier ‘ trails ’ = hyperlinks, relationer mellem tekster – svarende til associationer i hjernen (Bush)

Ted Nelson, 1965 – ’ hypertext’

’ Libraries of the Future’ (Licklider, 1963) “et intermedie … der gennem et stik i væggen forbinder maskinen med et vidensunderstøttende offentligt netværk” ,[object Object],[object Object]

[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],Tim Berners-Lee CERN, 1989/1990 WWW = Internet + hypertext

PIM + social media ,[object Object]

PIM : Personal Info. Management Jones, William (2008). Keeping Found Things Found: The Study and Practice of Personal Information Management.

fra PIM til ’WIM’ og derimellem ,[object Object],Person Group Organization Society World P G O S W ’ OIM’ fx: CERN intranet ’ WIM’ fx: WWW ’ SIM’ fx: bibliotek.dk PIM fx: Bush ’Memex’ GIM fx: fællesmail © Björneborn WWW: P IM /G IM  O IM  W IM  L IM /S IM L Localization ’ LIM’ fx: wiki for byen Davis, Calif.

Ericsson Medialab Internet = computer -netværk

WWW = dokument -netværk www.cybergeography.org/atlas/

Adamic et al. (2003). A social network caught in the Web Web 2.0 = person -netværk ” networked individualism ” (Wellmann et al. 2003)

[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

web 2.0 = social software ,[object Object]

nyt brugerbegreb… ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

web 2.0 = ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],+ Me = Us

[object Object],[object Object],web 2.0 :

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:HNL_Wiki_Wiki_Bus.jpg ’ wiki-wiki’ = ’super quick’ (Hawaii) wiki = ’quick web’ – startet 1995

Jakob Voss : http://wm.sieheauch.de

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Size_of_Wikipedia

’ blogometrics’ Adamic & Glance (2005). The Political Blogosphere and the 2004 U.S. Election.

del.icio.us ‘ social tagging’ / ‘distributed classification’

[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

Millen et al. (2006). Dogear: social bookmarking in the enterprise [...]

web 2.0 = brugerskabte adfærdsspor ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],IBM Dogear = intranet 2.0 jf. Bush (1945): ’trails’

web 2.0 = social navigation (via andres adfærdsspor) ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

web 2.0 = ’social hypertext’ ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

[object Object],[object Object]

personal traces and social navigation in tag networks ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],© Björneborn ’ multi-reachability’ = many different paths from one node to another = ’small-world’ distances  serendipity nnn nnn nnn nnn nnn nnn nnn nnn nnn nnn

’ participation inequality’ ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],www.useit.com/alertbox/participation_inequality.html

Business Week 11.6.07 www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/07_24/b4038405.htm

deltagelses- ’stien’ http://blogs.forrester.com/groundswell/2007/04/forresters_new_.html

[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]

’ social affordances’ ,[object Object],(Smith 2007) (Adamic 2003)

[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],‘ Social Software Building Blocks’ (Smith 2007) http://nform.ca/publications/social-software-building-block jf. ‘sociability’ (Preece 2001)

’ Homo Ludens’ / ’Creative Man’ ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],http://www.librarything.com/thingology/2006/12/is-your- opac-fun-manifesto-of-sorts.php

Web 2.0, brugerinvolvering og sociale teknologier

Empfohlen

Empfohlen

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Was ist angesagt?

Was ist angesagt? (20)

Ähnlich wie Web 2.0, brugerinvolvering og sociale teknologier

Ähnlich wie Web 2.0, brugerinvolvering og sociale teknologier (20)

Mehr von Lennart Björneborn

Mehr von Lennart Björneborn (6)

Kürzlich hochgeladen

Kürzlich hochgeladen (20)

Web 2.0, brugerinvolvering og sociale teknologier