SlideShare ist ein Scribd-Unternehmen logo
1 von 3
Downloaden Sie, um offline zu lesen
COMISIÓN COLOMBIANA DE JURISTAS                                                                    Con el apoyo de:
                              Organización no gubernamental con estatus consultivo ante la ONU
                  Filial de la Comisión Internacional de Juristas (Ginebra) y de la Comisión Andina de Juristas (Lima)
                                                                                                                           UNIÓN EUROPEA
                         PERSONERÍA JURÍDICA: RESOLUCIÓN 1060, AGOSTO DE 1988 DE LA ALCALDÍA MAYOR DE BOGOTÁ



              Bulletin No 33: Series on the rights of the victims and the application of Law 975*

    Social programs and humanitarian assistance do not substitute for the reparation of the
                                          victims

This past December 4th, the Constitutional Court issued Sentence C-1199 of 2008, through which it
declared unconstitutional Paragraph 2 of Article 47 of Law 975 of 2005, which stipulated that:
  Social services provided by the government to the victims in conformity with the norms and laws
in force, are part of reparation and rehabilitation. The Court adopted this decision on the
occasion of an unconstitutionality suit against several provisions of the law of justice and peace
filed by the non-governmental organization, DeJusticia.

In its ruling, the Constitutional Court concludes that the above-mentioned norm is unconstitutional
for two reasons. In the first place, the Court starts out from the recognition of conceptual and
juridical differences among three institutions: social programs (social policies for the effective
guarantee of economic, social, and cultural rights), humanitarian assistance, and comprehensive
reparation of the victims of human rights violations:

        With regard to this topic, the Court begins by recognizing the conceptual separation
       that exists between the government s social services, humanitarian assistance in case
       of disasters (regardless of their origin), and the reparation of the victims of human
       rights violations. Indeed, as the actors involved maintain, and is accepted by all the
       intervening parties, we are dealing with obligations and actions that are clearly
       distinguishable in what concerns their source, their frequency, their recipient, their
       duration, and various other aspects. Likewise, the Court accepts that, for these same
       reasons, none of such actions can replace another to the point of justifying the denial of
       any specific obligation owed by the State to any specific person on the basis of having
       provided another or other benefits having different sources and purposes. 1

Secondly, the Court considers that the norm object of the suit generated confusion among the three
types of measures mentioned, which would result in, for example, due reparation to the victims
being curtailed because social services are being provided by the State. In this sense, the Court
warns that under this law some victims could obtain no amount or benefit at all by way of
reparation (or, paradoxically, could even end up owing the State) because of the social services of
which they may have been beneficiaries. To the Court, this situation would cause detriment to the
victims right to comprehensive reparation and is constitutionally unacceptable in a context of
transitional justice.

Several reasons lead us to highlight the importance of the Constitutional Court s decision. Indeed,
through this decision the Constitutional Court begins to draw a more precise line between the
formulation and implementation of social programs aimed at overcoming poverty and the
satisfaction of economic, social, and cultural rights, humanitarian assistance, and formulas for the
reparation of victims of human rights violations. This presupposes acknowledging the autonomy of

*
  The present publication has been prepared with the support of the European Union and its content is the sole
responsibility of the Colombian Commission of Jurists. In no way should it be thought to reflect the point of view of the
European Union.
1
  Constitutional Court, Sentence C-1199 of 2008, M.P.: Nilson Pinilla Pinilla.


                       Calle 72 Nº 12-65 piso 7 PBX: (571) 3768200 (571) 3434710 Fax: (571) 3768230
                                    Email: ccj@coljuristas.org Website: www.coljuristas.org
                                                       Bogotá, Colombia
the right of the victims to comprehensive reparation and the specific nature of the measures that the
State must take to guarantee it. Reparation has as at its origin the harm caused to the victim, and in
consequence its extent and materialization depend on the type of harm the victim has suffered.
Furthermore, although there is a material dimension to reparation, there is also (in contrast to social
programs and humanitarian assistance) a symbolic dimension to reparation that must be satisfied,
since the harm that leads to reparation most often is irreparable.

Likewise, the Court s sentence leads us to warn about the risks of adopting as formulas for
reparation traditional mechanisms and procedures that were designed to deal with situations that do
not correspond to the circumstances of the victims of human rights violations. 2 Indeed, as the Court
points out, the benefits derived from social programs must be granted to all persons, without
distinction or condition as part of the solidarity of the State with the neediest, and as the fulfillment
of economic, social, and cultural rights, and therefore they cannot replace the specific mechanisms
that must be put in place for the reparation of human rights violations. Thus, the benefits derived
from social programs must not be perceived by the victims as measures of reparation of the violence
they have suffered, but rather as benefits they receive as a result of their condition as citizens.
Similarly with the humanitarian assistance that aims to take care of the most pressing needs of the
victims of calamitous situations (victims of the armed conflict or simply of natural disasters) but
that does not aim to restore their rights, which constitutes one of the objectives of reparation of
human rights violations. Thus, the construction of social citizenry through an effective guarantee of
economic, social, and cultural rights and humanitarian assistance of victims of emergency situations
cannot be mixed up with reparation measures for those who have been the victims of human rights
violations.

The clearest example of how the confusion created by the norm in Law 975 of 2005 would affect
the right to comprehensive reparation is the case of the victims of forced internal displacement.
Indeed, according to the norm declared unconstitutional, all benefits derived from social programs
in which the displaced could be included (Families in Action, Together Network, Women Savers in
Action, Food Security Network, family and housing subsidies), and humanitarian assistance
measures (geared to help, assist, and protect the displaced population and to take care of their needs
for food, personal hygiene, provisions, cooking utensils, medical and psychological attention,
emergency transportation and transitory housing under decent conditions3) could have been deduced
from the reparation that the displaced population has a right to. Thus, the norm declared
unconstitutional would have attributed reparation effects to measures that, it must be said, have not
even fulfilled the purpose for which they were created in the first place (the enjoyment of economic,
social, and cultural rights by the entire population, progressively overcoming poverty, and
assistance to victims in emergency situations) and about which all kinds of concerns have been
expressed, since, generally, they lack a rights perspective and are limited to conditioned cash
handouts. 4
2
  Precisely one of the flaws pointed out by the Constitutional Court in its judicial decree 218 of 2006 is the lack of
specificity of the policy of assistance to the displaced population in its different manifestations. Constitutional Court,
judicial ruling 218 of 2006, M.P.: Manuel José Cepeda Espinosa.
3
  Article 15 of Law 387 of 1997, through which measures are adopted for the prevention of forced displacement; the
care, protection, consolidation, and socioeconomic stabilization of the internally displaced population in the Republic of
Colombia.
4
  A balance of the state s measures with relation to the displaced population can be found in Judicial Ruling 008 of 2009
by the Constitutional Court . M.P.: Manuel José Cepeda Espinosa. The distinction between humanitarian assistance and
reparation had already been drawn by the Constitutional Court in the Declaration on the rights of every person victim of
forced displacement, included in Sentence T-025 of 2004. Constitutional Court, Sentence T-025 of 2004, M.P.: Manuel
José Cepeda Espinosa.




                                                                                                                        2
Fortunately, the Constitutional Court corrected this flaw in Law 975 of 2005 considering that the
inclusion of social services as part of reparation and rehabilitation was contrary to the effective
enjoyment by the victims of their fundamental right to comprehensive reparation for the crimes
committed by the beneficiaries of the law of justice and peace.



Bogotá, March 11, 2009.

For further information, please contact: Gustavo Gallón Giraldo, Director CCJ (Tel. 571-376 8200, ext.
115).




                                                                                                    3

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Ähnlich wie Social programs and humanitarian assistance do not substitute for the reparation of the victims

Jamaica - Ministry of Justice Victims Charter
Jamaica - Ministry of Justice Victims CharterJamaica - Ministry of Justice Victims Charter
Jamaica - Ministry of Justice Victims CharterRodje Malcolm
 
The approval of the Optional Protocol of the International Covenant on Econom...
The approval of the Optional Protocol of the International Covenant on Econom...The approval of the Optional Protocol of the International Covenant on Econom...
The approval of the Optional Protocol of the International Covenant on Econom...Comisión Colombiana de Juristas
 
Government threatens imprisonment for up to 18 years for victims who do not s...
Government threatens imprisonment for up to 18 years for victims who do not s...Government threatens imprisonment for up to 18 years for victims who do not s...
Government threatens imprisonment for up to 18 years for victims who do not s...Comisión Colombiana de Juristas
 
No Longer a Purely Political Question: Challenging the Austerity Approach Thr...
No Longer a Purely Political Question: Challenging the Austerity Approach Thr...No Longer a Purely Political Question: Challenging the Austerity Approach Thr...
No Longer a Purely Political Question: Challenging the Austerity Approach Thr...Gabriel Armas-Cardona
 
THE PROTECTION OF ECONOMIC, SOCIAL AND CULTURAL RIGHTS POST-CONFLICT
THE PROTECTION OF ECONOMIC, SOCIAL AND CULTURAL RIGHTS POST-CONFLICT THE PROTECTION OF ECONOMIC, SOCIAL AND CULTURAL RIGHTS POST-CONFLICT
THE PROTECTION OF ECONOMIC, SOCIAL AND CULTURAL RIGHTS POST-CONFLICT Dr Lendy Spires
 
The Supreme Court turns the victims into silent witnesses at the legal procee...
The Supreme Court turns the victims into silent witnesses at the legal procee...The Supreme Court turns the victims into silent witnesses at the legal procee...
The Supreme Court turns the victims into silent witnesses at the legal procee...Comisión Colombiana de Juristas
 
The Provisional Executive Acts Cited In The“Lava Jato Operation” Will Continu...
The Provisional Executive Acts Cited In The“Lava Jato Operation” Will Continu...The Provisional Executive Acts Cited In The“Lava Jato Operation” Will Continu...
The Provisional Executive Acts Cited In The“Lava Jato Operation” Will Continu...inventionjournals
 
Maintenance Order - Urgent 2015 - Aagius1 in Verdana
Maintenance Order - Urgent 2015 - Aagius1 in VerdanaMaintenance Order - Urgent 2015 - Aagius1 in Verdana
Maintenance Order - Urgent 2015 - Aagius1 in VerdanaAnne Agius
 
Maintenance Order - Urgent 2015 - Aagius1 in Verdana
Maintenance Order - Urgent 2015 - Aagius1 in VerdanaMaintenance Order - Urgent 2015 - Aagius1 in Verdana
Maintenance Order - Urgent 2015 - Aagius1 in VerdanaTRENTESTA
 
The Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities A Study on Banglad...
The Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities  A Study on Banglad...The Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities  A Study on Banglad...
The Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities A Study on Banglad...Md. Golam Mostafa
 
The CCJ Calls on the Prosecutor General’s Office to Modify the Adopted Proced...
The CCJ Calls on the Prosecutor General’s Office to Modify the Adopted Proced...The CCJ Calls on the Prosecutor General’s Office to Modify the Adopted Proced...
The CCJ Calls on the Prosecutor General’s Office to Modify the Adopted Proced...Comisión Colombiana de Juristas
 
COMPENSATORY JURISPRUDENCE
COMPENSATORY JURISPRUDENCECOMPENSATORY JURISPRUDENCE
COMPENSATORY JURISPRUDENCERahul Gaur
 
Convention against torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment
Convention against torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatmentConvention against torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment
Convention against torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatmentKarlos Svoboda
 
Ratification of the Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Econom...
Ratification of the Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Econom...Ratification of the Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Econom...
Ratification of the Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Econom...UNDP Moldova
 

Ähnlich wie Social programs and humanitarian assistance do not substitute for the reparation of the victims (20)

Jamaica - Ministry of Justice Victims Charter
Jamaica - Ministry of Justice Victims CharterJamaica - Ministry of Justice Victims Charter
Jamaica - Ministry of Justice Victims Charter
 
With no guarantee of the right to reparation
With no guarantee of the right to reparationWith no guarantee of the right to reparation
With no guarantee of the right to reparation
 
The approval of the Optional Protocol of the International Covenant on Econom...
The approval of the Optional Protocol of the International Covenant on Econom...The approval of the Optional Protocol of the International Covenant on Econom...
The approval of the Optional Protocol of the International Covenant on Econom...
 
Government threatens imprisonment for up to 18 years for victims who do not s...
Government threatens imprisonment for up to 18 years for victims who do not s...Government threatens imprisonment for up to 18 years for victims who do not s...
Government threatens imprisonment for up to 18 years for victims who do not s...
 
Without peace and without justice
Without peace and without justiceWithout peace and without justice
Without peace and without justice
 
No Longer a Purely Political Question: Challenging the Austerity Approach Thr...
No Longer a Purely Political Question: Challenging the Austerity Approach Thr...No Longer a Purely Political Question: Challenging the Austerity Approach Thr...
No Longer a Purely Political Question: Challenging the Austerity Approach Thr...
 
THE PROTECTION OF ECONOMIC, SOCIAL AND CULTURAL RIGHTS POST-CONFLICT
THE PROTECTION OF ECONOMIC, SOCIAL AND CULTURAL RIGHTS POST-CONFLICT THE PROTECTION OF ECONOMIC, SOCIAL AND CULTURAL RIGHTS POST-CONFLICT
THE PROTECTION OF ECONOMIC, SOCIAL AND CULTURAL RIGHTS POST-CONFLICT
 
The Supreme Court turns the victims into silent witnesses at the legal procee...
The Supreme Court turns the victims into silent witnesses at the legal procee...The Supreme Court turns the victims into silent witnesses at the legal procee...
The Supreme Court turns the victims into silent witnesses at the legal procee...
 
Without any guarantee of the right to truth
Without any guarantee of the right to truthWithout any guarantee of the right to truth
Without any guarantee of the right to truth
 
The Provisional Executive Acts Cited In The“Lava Jato Operation” Will Continu...
The Provisional Executive Acts Cited In The“Lava Jato Operation” Will Continu...The Provisional Executive Acts Cited In The“Lava Jato Operation” Will Continu...
The Provisional Executive Acts Cited In The“Lava Jato Operation” Will Continu...
 
Maintenance Order - Urgent 2015 - Aagius1 in Verdana
Maintenance Order - Urgent 2015 - Aagius1 in VerdanaMaintenance Order - Urgent 2015 - Aagius1 in Verdana
Maintenance Order - Urgent 2015 - Aagius1 in Verdana
 
Maintenance Order - Urgent 2015 - Aagius1 in Verdana
Maintenance Order - Urgent 2015 - Aagius1 in VerdanaMaintenance Order - Urgent 2015 - Aagius1 in Verdana
Maintenance Order - Urgent 2015 - Aagius1 in Verdana
 
ADR in Service of Human Rights
ADR in Service of Human RightsADR in Service of Human Rights
ADR in Service of Human Rights
 
Healthcare Is A Fundamental Right Essay
Healthcare Is A Fundamental Right EssayHealthcare Is A Fundamental Right Essay
Healthcare Is A Fundamental Right Essay
 
THESIS FINAL CONTENT
THESIS FINAL CONTENTTHESIS FINAL CONTENT
THESIS FINAL CONTENT
 
The Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities A Study on Banglad...
The Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities  A Study on Banglad...The Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities  A Study on Banglad...
The Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities A Study on Banglad...
 
The CCJ Calls on the Prosecutor General’s Office to Modify the Adopted Proced...
The CCJ Calls on the Prosecutor General’s Office to Modify the Adopted Proced...The CCJ Calls on the Prosecutor General’s Office to Modify the Adopted Proced...
The CCJ Calls on the Prosecutor General’s Office to Modify the Adopted Proced...
 
COMPENSATORY JURISPRUDENCE
COMPENSATORY JURISPRUDENCECOMPENSATORY JURISPRUDENCE
COMPENSATORY JURISPRUDENCE
 
Convention against torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment
Convention against torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatmentConvention against torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment
Convention against torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment
 
Ratification of the Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Econom...
Ratification of the Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Econom...Ratification of the Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Econom...
Ratification of the Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Econom...
 

Mehr von Comisión Colombiana de Juristas

Intervention during the General Debate, 11th Session of the Assembly of State...
Intervention during the General Debate, 11th Session of the Assembly of State...Intervention during the General Debate, 11th Session of the Assembly of State...
Intervention during the General Debate, 11th Session of the Assembly of State...Comisión Colombiana de Juristas
 
Intervención en el Debate General, 11° período de sesiones de la Asamblea de ...
Intervención en el Debate General, 11° período de sesiones de la Asamblea de ...Intervención en el Debate General, 11° período de sesiones de la Asamblea de ...
Intervención en el Debate General, 11° período de sesiones de la Asamblea de ...Comisión Colombiana de Juristas
 
Justicia penal militar conocería de violaciones de DDHH que ya estén siendo i...
Justicia penal militar conocería de violaciones de DDHH que ya estén siendo i...Justicia penal militar conocería de violaciones de DDHH que ya estén siendo i...
Justicia penal militar conocería de violaciones de DDHH que ya estén siendo i...Comisión Colombiana de Juristas
 
Observaciones al proyecto de reforma constitucional sobre fuero penal militar
Observaciones al proyecto de reforma constitucional sobre fuero penal militarObservaciones al proyecto de reforma constitucional sobre fuero penal militar
Observaciones al proyecto de reforma constitucional sobre fuero penal militarComisión Colombiana de Juristas
 
Informe sobre la implementación de las medidas de restitución de tierras de l...
Informe sobre la implementación de las medidas de restitución de tierras de l...Informe sobre la implementación de las medidas de restitución de tierras de l...
Informe sobre la implementación de las medidas de restitución de tierras de l...Comisión Colombiana de Juristas
 
Institutional Profile of the Colombian Commission of Jurists
Institutional Profile of the Colombian Commission of JuristsInstitutional Profile of the Colombian Commission of Jurists
Institutional Profile of the Colombian Commission of JuristsComisión Colombiana de Juristas
 
Perfil institucional de la Comisión Colombiana de Juristas
Perfil institucional de la Comisión Colombiana de JuristasPerfil institucional de la Comisión Colombiana de Juristas
Perfil institucional de la Comisión Colombiana de JuristasComisión Colombiana de Juristas
 
Tema: puntos 3 & 5, Informe del Relator Especial sobre los derechos de los pu...
Tema: puntos 3 & 5, Informe del Relator Especial sobre los derechos de los pu...Tema: puntos 3 & 5, Informe del Relator Especial sobre los derechos de los pu...
Tema: puntos 3 & 5, Informe del Relator Especial sobre los derechos de los pu...Comisión Colombiana de Juristas
 
Responsabilidad penal del superior jerárquico y crímenes internacionales
Responsabilidad penal del superior jerárquico y crímenes internacionalesResponsabilidad penal del superior jerárquico y crímenes internacionales
Responsabilidad penal del superior jerárquico y crímenes internacionalesComisión Colombiana de Juristas
 
Tema 2 de la agenda, Discurso de apertura presentado por la Alta Comisionada ...
Tema 2 de la agenda, Discurso de apertura presentado por la Alta Comisionada ...Tema 2 de la agenda, Discurso de apertura presentado por la Alta Comisionada ...
Tema 2 de la agenda, Discurso de apertura presentado por la Alta Comisionada ...Comisión Colombiana de Juristas
 
Es hora de defender el Sistema Interamericano de Derechos Humanos - Declaraci...
Es hora de defender el Sistema Interamericano de Derechos Humanos - Declaraci...Es hora de defender el Sistema Interamericano de Derechos Humanos - Declaraci...
Es hora de defender el Sistema Interamericano de Derechos Humanos - Declaraci...Comisión Colombiana de Juristas
 
Es hora de defender el Sistema Interamericano de Derechos Humanos
Es hora de defender el Sistema Interamericano de Derechos HumanosEs hora de defender el Sistema Interamericano de Derechos Humanos
Es hora de defender el Sistema Interamericano de Derechos HumanosComisión Colombiana de Juristas
 
20º período de sesiones, Consejo de Derechos Humanos de Naciones Unidas, 19 d...
20º período de sesiones, Consejo de Derechos Humanos de Naciones Unidas, 19 d...20º período de sesiones, Consejo de Derechos Humanos de Naciones Unidas, 19 d...
20º período de sesiones, Consejo de Derechos Humanos de Naciones Unidas, 19 d...Comisión Colombiana de Juristas
 
Actualización del informe de seguimiento a las recomendaciones 9, 14 y 16 del...
Actualización del informe de seguimiento a las recomendaciones 9, 14 y 16 del...Actualización del informe de seguimiento a las recomendaciones 9, 14 y 16 del...
Actualización del informe de seguimiento a las recomendaciones 9, 14 y 16 del...Comisión Colombiana de Juristas
 
Actualización del informe de seguimiento a las recomendaciones 9, 14 y 16 del...
Actualización del informe de seguimiento a las recomendaciones 9, 14 y 16 del...Actualización del informe de seguimiento a las recomendaciones 9, 14 y 16 del...
Actualización del informe de seguimiento a las recomendaciones 9, 14 y 16 del...Comisión Colombiana de Juristas
 

Mehr von Comisión Colombiana de Juristas (20)

Intervention during the General Debate, 11th Session of the Assembly of State...
Intervention during the General Debate, 11th Session of the Assembly of State...Intervention during the General Debate, 11th Session of the Assembly of State...
Intervention during the General Debate, 11th Session of the Assembly of State...
 
Intervención en el Debate General, 11° período de sesiones de la Asamblea de ...
Intervención en el Debate General, 11° período de sesiones de la Asamblea de ...Intervención en el Debate General, 11° período de sesiones de la Asamblea de ...
Intervención en el Debate General, 11° período de sesiones de la Asamblea de ...
 
Justicia penal militar conocería de violaciones de DDHH que ya estén siendo i...
Justicia penal militar conocería de violaciones de DDHH que ya estén siendo i...Justicia penal militar conocería de violaciones de DDHH que ya estén siendo i...
Justicia penal militar conocería de violaciones de DDHH que ya estén siendo i...
 
Observaciones al proyecto de reforma constitucional sobre fuero penal militar
Observaciones al proyecto de reforma constitucional sobre fuero penal militarObservaciones al proyecto de reforma constitucional sobre fuero penal militar
Observaciones al proyecto de reforma constitucional sobre fuero penal militar
 
Informe sobre la implementación de las medidas de restitución de tierras de l...
Informe sobre la implementación de las medidas de restitución de tierras de l...Informe sobre la implementación de las medidas de restitución de tierras de l...
Informe sobre la implementación de las medidas de restitución de tierras de l...
 
Derecho a la verdad y derecho internacional
Derecho a la verdad y derecho internacionalDerecho a la verdad y derecho internacional
Derecho a la verdad y derecho internacional
 
Institutional Profile of the Colombian Commission of Jurists
Institutional Profile of the Colombian Commission of JuristsInstitutional Profile of the Colombian Commission of Jurists
Institutional Profile of the Colombian Commission of Jurists
 
Perfil institucional de la Comisión Colombiana de Juristas
Perfil institucional de la Comisión Colombiana de JuristasPerfil institucional de la Comisión Colombiana de Juristas
Perfil institucional de la Comisión Colombiana de Juristas
 
Fiscalía debe investigar y acusar a militares implicados
Fiscalía debe investigar y acusar a militares implicadosFiscalía debe investigar y acusar a militares implicados
Fiscalía debe investigar y acusar a militares implicados
 
Impugnacion fallo tutela Rafael Nieto Navia
Impugnacion fallo tutela Rafael Nieto NaviaImpugnacion fallo tutela Rafael Nieto Navia
Impugnacion fallo tutela Rafael Nieto Navia
 
Tema: puntos 3 & 5, Informe del Relator Especial sobre los derechos de los pu...
Tema: puntos 3 & 5, Informe del Relator Especial sobre los derechos de los pu...Tema: puntos 3 & 5, Informe del Relator Especial sobre los derechos de los pu...
Tema: puntos 3 & 5, Informe del Relator Especial sobre los derechos de los pu...
 
Responsabilidad penal del superior jerárquico y crímenes internacionales
Responsabilidad penal del superior jerárquico y crímenes internacionalesResponsabilidad penal del superior jerárquico y crímenes internacionales
Responsabilidad penal del superior jerárquico y crímenes internacionales
 
Tema 2 de la agenda, Discurso de apertura presentado por la Alta Comisionada ...
Tema 2 de la agenda, Discurso de apertura presentado por la Alta Comisionada ...Tema 2 de la agenda, Discurso de apertura presentado por la Alta Comisionada ...
Tema 2 de la agenda, Discurso de apertura presentado por la Alta Comisionada ...
 
Es hora de defender el Sistema Interamericano de Derechos Humanos - Declaraci...
Es hora de defender el Sistema Interamericano de Derechos Humanos - Declaraci...Es hora de defender el Sistema Interamericano de Derechos Humanos - Declaraci...
Es hora de defender el Sistema Interamericano de Derechos Humanos - Declaraci...
 
Es hora de defender el Sistema Interamericano de Derechos Humanos
Es hora de defender el Sistema Interamericano de Derechos HumanosEs hora de defender el Sistema Interamericano de Derechos Humanos
Es hora de defender el Sistema Interamericano de Derechos Humanos
 
Alarmante reforma al fuero penal militar
Alarmante reforma al fuero penal militarAlarmante reforma al fuero penal militar
Alarmante reforma al fuero penal militar
 
Imperceptiblemente nos encerraron
Imperceptiblemente nos encerraronImperceptiblemente nos encerraron
Imperceptiblemente nos encerraron
 
20º período de sesiones, Consejo de Derechos Humanos de Naciones Unidas, 19 d...
20º período de sesiones, Consejo de Derechos Humanos de Naciones Unidas, 19 d...20º período de sesiones, Consejo de Derechos Humanos de Naciones Unidas, 19 d...
20º período de sesiones, Consejo de Derechos Humanos de Naciones Unidas, 19 d...
 
Actualización del informe de seguimiento a las recomendaciones 9, 14 y 16 del...
Actualización del informe de seguimiento a las recomendaciones 9, 14 y 16 del...Actualización del informe de seguimiento a las recomendaciones 9, 14 y 16 del...
Actualización del informe de seguimiento a las recomendaciones 9, 14 y 16 del...
 
Actualización del informe de seguimiento a las recomendaciones 9, 14 y 16 del...
Actualización del informe de seguimiento a las recomendaciones 9, 14 y 16 del...Actualización del informe de seguimiento a las recomendaciones 9, 14 y 16 del...
Actualización del informe de seguimiento a las recomendaciones 9, 14 y 16 del...
 

Social programs and humanitarian assistance do not substitute for the reparation of the victims

  • 1. COMISIÓN COLOMBIANA DE JURISTAS Con el apoyo de: Organización no gubernamental con estatus consultivo ante la ONU Filial de la Comisión Internacional de Juristas (Ginebra) y de la Comisión Andina de Juristas (Lima) UNIÓN EUROPEA PERSONERÍA JURÍDICA: RESOLUCIÓN 1060, AGOSTO DE 1988 DE LA ALCALDÍA MAYOR DE BOGOTÁ Bulletin No 33: Series on the rights of the victims and the application of Law 975* Social programs and humanitarian assistance do not substitute for the reparation of the victims This past December 4th, the Constitutional Court issued Sentence C-1199 of 2008, through which it declared unconstitutional Paragraph 2 of Article 47 of Law 975 of 2005, which stipulated that: Social services provided by the government to the victims in conformity with the norms and laws in force, are part of reparation and rehabilitation. The Court adopted this decision on the occasion of an unconstitutionality suit against several provisions of the law of justice and peace filed by the non-governmental organization, DeJusticia. In its ruling, the Constitutional Court concludes that the above-mentioned norm is unconstitutional for two reasons. In the first place, the Court starts out from the recognition of conceptual and juridical differences among three institutions: social programs (social policies for the effective guarantee of economic, social, and cultural rights), humanitarian assistance, and comprehensive reparation of the victims of human rights violations: With regard to this topic, the Court begins by recognizing the conceptual separation that exists between the government s social services, humanitarian assistance in case of disasters (regardless of their origin), and the reparation of the victims of human rights violations. Indeed, as the actors involved maintain, and is accepted by all the intervening parties, we are dealing with obligations and actions that are clearly distinguishable in what concerns their source, their frequency, their recipient, their duration, and various other aspects. Likewise, the Court accepts that, for these same reasons, none of such actions can replace another to the point of justifying the denial of any specific obligation owed by the State to any specific person on the basis of having provided another or other benefits having different sources and purposes. 1 Secondly, the Court considers that the norm object of the suit generated confusion among the three types of measures mentioned, which would result in, for example, due reparation to the victims being curtailed because social services are being provided by the State. In this sense, the Court warns that under this law some victims could obtain no amount or benefit at all by way of reparation (or, paradoxically, could even end up owing the State) because of the social services of which they may have been beneficiaries. To the Court, this situation would cause detriment to the victims right to comprehensive reparation and is constitutionally unacceptable in a context of transitional justice. Several reasons lead us to highlight the importance of the Constitutional Court s decision. Indeed, through this decision the Constitutional Court begins to draw a more precise line between the formulation and implementation of social programs aimed at overcoming poverty and the satisfaction of economic, social, and cultural rights, humanitarian assistance, and formulas for the reparation of victims of human rights violations. This presupposes acknowledging the autonomy of * The present publication has been prepared with the support of the European Union and its content is the sole responsibility of the Colombian Commission of Jurists. In no way should it be thought to reflect the point of view of the European Union. 1 Constitutional Court, Sentence C-1199 of 2008, M.P.: Nilson Pinilla Pinilla. Calle 72 Nº 12-65 piso 7 PBX: (571) 3768200 (571) 3434710 Fax: (571) 3768230 Email: ccj@coljuristas.org Website: www.coljuristas.org Bogotá, Colombia
  • 2. the right of the victims to comprehensive reparation and the specific nature of the measures that the State must take to guarantee it. Reparation has as at its origin the harm caused to the victim, and in consequence its extent and materialization depend on the type of harm the victim has suffered. Furthermore, although there is a material dimension to reparation, there is also (in contrast to social programs and humanitarian assistance) a symbolic dimension to reparation that must be satisfied, since the harm that leads to reparation most often is irreparable. Likewise, the Court s sentence leads us to warn about the risks of adopting as formulas for reparation traditional mechanisms and procedures that were designed to deal with situations that do not correspond to the circumstances of the victims of human rights violations. 2 Indeed, as the Court points out, the benefits derived from social programs must be granted to all persons, without distinction or condition as part of the solidarity of the State with the neediest, and as the fulfillment of economic, social, and cultural rights, and therefore they cannot replace the specific mechanisms that must be put in place for the reparation of human rights violations. Thus, the benefits derived from social programs must not be perceived by the victims as measures of reparation of the violence they have suffered, but rather as benefits they receive as a result of their condition as citizens. Similarly with the humanitarian assistance that aims to take care of the most pressing needs of the victims of calamitous situations (victims of the armed conflict or simply of natural disasters) but that does not aim to restore their rights, which constitutes one of the objectives of reparation of human rights violations. Thus, the construction of social citizenry through an effective guarantee of economic, social, and cultural rights and humanitarian assistance of victims of emergency situations cannot be mixed up with reparation measures for those who have been the victims of human rights violations. The clearest example of how the confusion created by the norm in Law 975 of 2005 would affect the right to comprehensive reparation is the case of the victims of forced internal displacement. Indeed, according to the norm declared unconstitutional, all benefits derived from social programs in which the displaced could be included (Families in Action, Together Network, Women Savers in Action, Food Security Network, family and housing subsidies), and humanitarian assistance measures (geared to help, assist, and protect the displaced population and to take care of their needs for food, personal hygiene, provisions, cooking utensils, medical and psychological attention, emergency transportation and transitory housing under decent conditions3) could have been deduced from the reparation that the displaced population has a right to. Thus, the norm declared unconstitutional would have attributed reparation effects to measures that, it must be said, have not even fulfilled the purpose for which they were created in the first place (the enjoyment of economic, social, and cultural rights by the entire population, progressively overcoming poverty, and assistance to victims in emergency situations) and about which all kinds of concerns have been expressed, since, generally, they lack a rights perspective and are limited to conditioned cash handouts. 4 2 Precisely one of the flaws pointed out by the Constitutional Court in its judicial decree 218 of 2006 is the lack of specificity of the policy of assistance to the displaced population in its different manifestations. Constitutional Court, judicial ruling 218 of 2006, M.P.: Manuel José Cepeda Espinosa. 3 Article 15 of Law 387 of 1997, through which measures are adopted for the prevention of forced displacement; the care, protection, consolidation, and socioeconomic stabilization of the internally displaced population in the Republic of Colombia. 4 A balance of the state s measures with relation to the displaced population can be found in Judicial Ruling 008 of 2009 by the Constitutional Court . M.P.: Manuel José Cepeda Espinosa. The distinction between humanitarian assistance and reparation had already been drawn by the Constitutional Court in the Declaration on the rights of every person victim of forced displacement, included in Sentence T-025 of 2004. Constitutional Court, Sentence T-025 of 2004, M.P.: Manuel José Cepeda Espinosa. 2
  • 3. Fortunately, the Constitutional Court corrected this flaw in Law 975 of 2005 considering that the inclusion of social services as part of reparation and rehabilitation was contrary to the effective enjoyment by the victims of their fundamental right to comprehensive reparation for the crimes committed by the beneficiaries of the law of justice and peace. Bogotá, March 11, 2009. For further information, please contact: Gustavo Gallón Giraldo, Director CCJ (Tel. 571-376 8200, ext. 115). 3