Science in the YouTube Age
•Download as PPT, PDF•
6 likes•4,757 views
The version with most of the material that was the version I should have used live - but not the version I did
Recommended
Recommended
More Related Content
What's hot
What's hot (20)
Similar to Science in the YouTube Age
Similar to Science in the YouTube Age (20)
More from Cameron Neylon
More from Cameron Neylon (20)
Recently uploaded
Recently uploaded (20)
Science in the YouTube Age
- 1. Science in the YouTube Age: How web based tools are enabling Open Research Cameron Neylon STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory http://openwetware.org/wiki/User:Cameron_Neylon http://friendfeed.com/cameronneylon
- 3. http://tinyurl.com/5ffpth http://twitter.com/cameronneylon
- 6. ‘ If I have seen further, it is by standing on the shoulders of giants…’ Isaac Newton
- 7. ‘ I never had an idea that couldn’t be improved by sharing it with as many people as possible…’ Bill Hooker – 3 Quarks Daily (2006) http://3quarksdaily.blogs.com/3quarksdaily/2006/10/the_future_of_s_1.html
- 8. Science is social Web 2.0 is social Science needs Web 2.0?
- 9. What am I thinking?
- 10. How do I justify this?
- 11. How do I do this?
- 12. What am I doing?
- 13. What does it mean?
- 14. Here be journals
- 15. What am I reading?
- 16. Who can help me?
- 17. Lets go out!
- 18. Best place to go?
- 19. How do I justify this?
- 20. Extract cash from parents
- 21. Coordination
- 25. What did the others do?
- 26. What was I thinking?!?
- 32. What am I doing?
- 34. http:// usefulchem.wikispaces.com What am I doing?
- 36. What am I thinking?
- 37. What does it mean? http:// www.zoology.ubc.ca/~redfieldindex.html What am I thinking?
- 38. What am I reading?
- 39. What am I reading?
- 40. http:// openwetware.org/wiki/Nxsib:community/papers What am I reading?
- 41. How do I do this?
- 42. How do I do this?
- 43. How do I do this?
- 44. Science is social Web 2.0 is social Science needs Web 2.0
- 45. Science is social Web 2.0 is social Science needs Web 2.0 … like a hole in the head
- 46. David Crotty (2008) Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Why Web2.0 is failing in Biology http://www.cshblogs.org/cshprotocols/2008/02/14/why-web-20-is-failing-in-biology/
- 48. Rich Apodaca (2007) Depth-First, Scientific Publication and the Seven Deadly Sins http://depth-first.com/articles/2007/05/14/scientific-publication-and-the-seven-deadly-sins
- 49. How do I justify this?
- 51. How do I do this?
- 53. Science is social Scientists are not (necessarily) social Web 2.0 fundamentally relies on openness Without a change in culture and rewards the benefits of Web 2.0 will not be realised
- 54. Lab notebook Blog Lab notebook Lab notebook
- 55. Lab notebook Blog Bookmarks Contacts Literature
- 56. Jeremy Frey, Andrew Milsted, Steve Wilson, Jenny Hale Jean-Claude Bradley, Jeremiah Faith, Michael Barton, Deepak Singh, Bill Hooker, Pedro Beltrao, Shirley Wu, Pawel Szczesny, Ricardo Vidal, Mat Todd, Antony Williams, Peter Murray-Rust, Bill Flanagan, Julius Lucks, John Cumbers, Liz Lyon, John Wilbanks, Simon Coles, Andy Powell, Timo Hannay, Dave de Roure… ‘ The Open Science Collective’ Acknowledgements