This document summarizes a CPED (Council for the Principal Preparation Education Doctorate) convening. It acknowledges various contributors to CPED including Richard DeLisi from Rutgers University and the CPED Executive Committee. It also acknowledges the 30+ CPED institutions that provided bridge funding and participating institutions. The document discusses that CPED convenings are a signature activity of the Carnegie Foundation and involve coming together in a mix of pedagogies and unstructured conversations. It outlines some of the working principles and design concepts of CPED. Finally, it provides information on the recent CPED convening at Rutgers University in 2013 and some recent developments and challenges for education in the United States.
Unraveling Hypertext_ Analyzing Postmodern Elements in Literature.pptx
October 2013 convening overview
1. Acknowledgements to Richard DeLisi and Rutgers
University
Acknowledgements to CPED Executive Committee
(and their Program Design)
Acknowledgements to Transition Board for Guidance
and Advice
Richard Delisi, Rutgers
Sandra Robinson, Central Florida
Claire Cavallero, CSU Fullerton
David Rock, Mississippi
Jon Engelhardt, Baylor
Acknowledgement to 30+ CPED Institutions that
Provided Bridge Funding
Acknowledgements to CPED Participating Institutions
2. CPED Bi-annual Convenings
Signature activity of Carnegie Foundation programs
Central feature=coming together
Multiple Voices
Mix of Pedagogies
Idea Centered
CPED
Convening
Unstructured
Conversations
Critical Friends
High Expectations
6. Recent Developments for US Education
Schools
Industry of
Mediocrity
Common
Core
NEG
REG
RES
PEC
T
Feder
al
Role
Philanthrophic
Influence
NCTQ
Report,
USN&WR
Corporate
Investments
RTT/i3/,
NCLB
Waivers,
1st in the
World
AFT,
CCSSO &
NASBE
Studies
Budget/Fisca
l Challenges
“Sequestratio
n”
Austerity
Where To?
7. Challenges for American Higher
Education
Obama RT3 – Credits to Competencies & Changing the Time
for the Traditional 4-Year Baccalaureate Degree
Obama Ranking and Funding Strategy – Premier Football
Disruptive Innovations – Promoting MOOCs (Coursera/edX)
An Emphasis on Quality Performance Indicators – TCD, Job
Placement, Job Performance, Costs and ROI
Decoupling Fed Financial Eligibility from Inst’l Accreditation
(Promoting Alt Providers)
Reinventing Inst’l and Specialized Accreditation - Emphasizing
Performance
Doing So in a Time of Decreased Federal Funding for Education
9. Mission and Purpose of
CPED
Distinguish
and
Differentiate
Redesign
and
Improve
• Professionalism
• Stewardship
• Wisdom of Practice
• Partnership &
Collaboration
• Recognition
• Guiding Shulman Ideas
• Principles & Critical
Friends
• Improvement Science
10. Transition Board of Directors
Claire Cavaliaro
Richard DeLisi
Jon Englehardt
Sandra Robinson
David Rock
David Imig, Ex Officio
Jill Perry, Ex Officio
Olga Welch
Donna Wiseman
11. Role and Purpose of Transition
Board
Oversight and Fiduciary
Responsibility
Guidance and Advice on
Organization and Transition
Signatures to 501(c) (3) Documents
Promotion and Outreach to
CADREI, CSU-Deans, CGS, UCEA,
etc.
14. “Thanks!”
Executive Committee
Val Storey, Univ of Central Florida
Susan Wunder, Univ of Nebraska
Debby Zambo, Arizona State Univ
Sharon Brown-Welty, CSU Fresno
Grant Hayes, Univ of Central Florida
Steven Staples, William and Mary
Rick McCown, Duquesne Univ
Kristina Hesbol, Univ of Denver(formerly Illinois State Univ)
Chris Ray, North Dakota State Univ
Mark Roberge, San Francisco State Univ
Matt Militello, North Carolina State Univ
Charlene Trovato, Univ of Pittsburgh
Amy Dolan Wells, Univ of Mississippi
Hinweis der Redaktion
Bridge funds pledges from 41 of 56 institutionsExpansion– introduce Kristina, Recognize Rec Committee, recruiting membersFIPSE:
One can see these goals or themes emerging in policymaking for higher education in the US. The Obama Administration is writing legislation that would drammatically reshape the form and function of postsecondary education by encouraging more private providers to participate and by radically reshaping student funding eligibility to permit more students doing online learning to participate. Inherent in these proposals is an emphasis on student performance (often on the job and after college) and new ways of measuring learning (getting rid of a system that relies on time – 50 minute classes, 15 week semesters, 120 credits earned over four years of academic study) and moving to a system in which student learning is highly personalized with students earning “performance badges” at their own pace and in their own time. Everywhere there is the goal of finding high quality alternatives to current high cost delivery models.