SlideShare ist ein Scribd-Unternehmen logo
1 von 33
Downloaden Sie, um offline zu lesen
SUSY project



Argomarine conference
21st November 2012
BMT
Oil Spill Information System: OSIS
•  Spill trajectory and weathering prediction
   tool
•  Based on 25 years of laboratory work
   into oil spills
•  Validated against 18 sea trial spills (see
   picture) and real life incidents (Sea
   Empress, Rose Bay, Braer)
•  GIS-based, designed for use by spill
   responders and consultants
•  Contains >120 oil types, laboratory
   analysed for weathering and
   dispersibility
•  Underlying databases of oceanography
   and maps for rapid set-up
•  Works on laptop, PC and potential to
   operate on LAN or Internet
OSIS Outputs

                •  GIS-based outputs
                   showing slick
                   trajectory, spread and
                   contours of thickness
                   or dispersed
                   concentrations
                •  Status panels showing
                   spill volume, viscosity,
                   flash point
                •  Beaching locations 
                •  On screen graphs track
                   history of volumes,
                   viscosity, flash point
Shoal
•  An intelligent AUV team to monitor pollution in seaports and harbours.
•  Developments in AI, Robotics, Communications and Sensors.
•  Evaluation and Testing in Gijon.
Localisation and Commuiccation
Surfacing	
  system	
  for	
  ship	
  recovery	
  

                                     	
  
                                     	
  
                                     	
  



                                                     BALance
                                                                         ®

                                                     Technology Consulting
SUSY: Objectives
Concepts evaluated
The development of a combination of satellite booster technology with air
pressure systems and balloon technology to create a multi purpose modular
system for ship rescue purposes.




   Fishing
           ROPAX
          Deployable
       Internal Double 
   vessel
            Curtain
        salvage tool
    bottom installation
Technical Details / Work done in period 1
              DESCRIPTION OF TASK 2.3
ROPAX Curtain concept
          Technical Details / Work done in period 1
               Curtain Concept
                             DESCRIPTION OF TASK 2.3
                                            Curtain Concept
  Fitting arrangement
  Bars are envisioned to be rigidly attached to the inner structure of the ship
         Fitting arrangement
         Bars are envisioned to be rigidly attached to the inner structure of the ship
   bars

          bars


  Or be stored with the balloon on (or below) the car deck and be lifted as the balloon
  inflates
         Or be stored with the balloon on (or below) the car deck and be lifted as the balloon
         inflates                       Steel bars

                                              Steel bars                    balloon
                                        balloon                                   balloon
                                              balloon
Technical Details / Work done in period 1
                   DESCRIPTION OF TASK 2.3
 ROPAX Curtain concept
 Concept
                    Curtain
  Conclusion
•  Curtain doesn’t hold even
   with cables of 16mm even
     Curtain doesn’t hold
   with cables of 16 mm
   diameter. 
   diameter and plate material
   of steel.      
     Hydrostatic loads are way
   less than hydrodynamic
   loads.
     Textile thickness seems to
   be the most detrimental
   property      for   structural
   integrity
Marine Salvage Techniques 
      

	



         Floating crane
                   ROV




              Lifting bag
   Uncontrolled vertical acceleration



                                                               3
Salvage concept

•  HAZID analysis completed
•  Evaluation of shear forces and
   bending moments and corresponding
   fatigue damage thresholds
•  Live Testing.



Single Input Fuzzy
   Sliding Mode
Controller(SIFSMC)

ρg              1.017 kgm
             commanded target depth, even though the simulation
                                            Iyy           1481.31 kgm2                                                               0.03
             time is variable, it has a slight effect on the response
                                            Z w"
             values because of the sliding-mode controller - 15.7x As a
                                              &              action. 10
                                                                        -3
                                                                                                                                     0.02



             Sliding mode controller
             result, Figure 13 displays Z " different patterns – i.e.
                                            3
             reduction, maintenance and q
                                              &              - 0.41x10-3
                                              further reduction to zero                                                              0.01

             value – of the flow rate, as inM "
                                             Figure 8.
                                              w&             - 0.53x10-3                                                             0.00
                                                                                                                                            0        100        200      300    400     500      600    700   800   900    1000

   1000                   Variation in assent velocity
                                50      M q"
                                          &     - 0.79x10                                                 -3
                                                                                                                                            Variation in pitch angle
                                                                                                                                                       Time (s)

                                45
                                                30 m                                                                                Figure 5: Case 1 - Variation of ship ascent velocity
                                                40 m
                               0.09
am                              40
                                                50 m
                                            Some input physical and empirical parameters are given                                    0.0
                                                30 m
                               0.08
                                35          in 40 m 1 for the pontoon model. The inflation time of
                                                Table                                                                                                                                                               30 m
                                                                                                                                     -0.5
 e with                        0.07
                                            filling gas inside the balloons depends on the initial flow
                                                50 m                                                                                                                                                                40 m
                                30                                                                                                                                                                                  50 m
 period                                     rate whereas the breakout time of the pontoon from the                                   -1.0
                 z (m)




 of the                        0.06
                                25          seafloor is assumed to be 100 s. The latter would be
                                                                                                                                     -1.5
 within                         20          changed if the appropriate suction force model was
                               0.05
             w (m/s)




 ascent                                     considered. In the following, two cases of numerical




                                                                                                                     θ (deg.)
                                                                                                                                     -2.0
                                15
creases                        0.04
                                            simulations are considered for different target depths                                   -2.5
e pitch                         10
                                            being equal to 30, 40 and 50 m. In the first case, the
                               0.03
 s the                            5         initial flow rate is variable for different depths, whereas                              -3.0
ntroller                       0.02
                                            in the second case the initial flow rate is fixed. The latter
                                  0
  error.                              0     would 300 400 in500different numerical 1000
                                          100   200   result          600 700 800 900  simulation time
                                                                                                                                     -3.5
                               0.01
 by the
                                            depending on the sliding-mode control.
                                                             Time (s)                                                                -4.0
 gle to                        0.00
 ates of                       Figure 100 Case 2 300 400 500 ship vertical position
                                  0
                                      9: 200 - Variation of 600 700 800 900 1000                                                     -4.5
                                        4.1       CASE Time (s)
                                                        1: VARYING INITIAL FLOW RATE                                                        0       100         200      300    400      500     600    700   800   900    1000
hen the
                                                                                                                                                                                      Time (s)
                               Figure 5: Case 1 - Variation of ship ascent velocity
                                0.09                                                                                                                                                                                                   •   the app
                                       With 3 target (30, 40 and 50 m) depths, 3 different initial                                  0.0
                                                                                                                                       Figure 6: Case 1 - Variation of ship pitch angle
                                       flow m
                                           30
                                              rates (0.15, 0.1875 and 0.25 m3s-1, respectively) are                                                                                                                                        evalua
 given
 n from                         0.08
                                0.0        40 m                                                                                     -0.5
                                                                                                                                                                                                                    30 m

                                       considered such that the payload reaches the desired                                                                                                                         40 m               •   the eff
me t =
 (at of                                    50 m
                                                                               30 m                                                   0.0002                                                                        50 m
                                0.07
                               -0.5
                                       depths at the same time (about 1000 s). m
                                                                               40 The inflation time                                -1.0                                                                                                   howev
   flow
ces the
                                0.06                                           50 m
                                       of filling gas inside the balloons is suitably taken as 100,                                                               30 m                                                                     which
m the
0.25 to                        -1.0                                                                                                 -1.5                          40 m
                                       80 & 60 s respectively. The obtained vertical dynamic                                          0.0001                                                                                               as a Fu
 ld be
 der to                         0.05
                                                                                                                                                                  50 m
             θ (deg.)w (m/s)




                               -1.5                                                                                                                                                                                                    •   the ela
                                                                                                               q (rad/s) θ (deg.)


                                                                                                                                    -2.0
     was
nduced                                 responses (vertical trajectory, ascent velocity, pitch angle
                                0.04
                                       and pitch rate) and the variation of the control parameter                                                                                                                                          conditi
 ottom.
 erical                        -2.0                                                                                                 -2.5
                                       (i.e. the flow rate) are presented in Figures 4-7 and 8,
                                                                                                                                      0.0000                                                                                               variati
depthsa
 ains                           0.03
   target
                               -2.5
                                       respectively.                                                                                -3.0                                                                                                   pressu
e, the
ntroller
                                0.02                                                                                                                                                                                                       velocit
hereas                         -3.0
                                                 50                                                                                  -0.0001
                                                                                                                                    -3.5
ue. The                                                                                                                                                                                                                                •   the ev
  latter                        0.01
                                                              30 m
 to the
                               -3.5              45                                                                                 -4.0                                                                                                   mome
   time                                                       40 m
    relief
                                0.00
                               -4.0 0     100    40
                                                 200   300
                                                              50 m
                                                             400   500        600   700   800   900    1000
                                                                                                                                     -0.0002
                                                                                                                                    -4.5
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           thresho
                                                                                                                                         0          100         200     300     400     500      600    700   800   900    1000
   mode                                          35                Time (s)
                               -4.5
TE and
 g                                    0   100    200   300   400     500      600   700   800    900    1000                        -0.0003
                                                                                                                                                                                      Time (s)
 nt rate                                   30
                               Figure 10: Case 2 - Variation (s) ship ascent velocity
                                                              of                                                                                0         100     200     300     400     500     600   700   800   900    1000   5.       CONC
                                                        Time                                                                                    Figure 11: Case 2 - Variation of ship pitch angle
                                            m)
Results & Discussion
Results & Discussion   (Contd….)
For a safe and viable salvage operation, the ascent velocity and pitch angle
should be controlled by the combined use of an adaptive fuzzy sliding mode
controller and pressure relief valve 

 FSMCs shows 30 % of improvement in tracking performance over SMC. SIFSMC
is proved to be the preferred option among these controllers with less tuning
effort and computational time. 
Live testing soon
Double bottom concept
                                 DPAM – Method



   • Stress Intensity Factors evaluation
           • Bottom Damage – Grounding
           • Side and Deck Damages - Collision




   • Crack Propagation Equation
           • Resolution of a differential equation


   • Implementation : Octave script



                                                     4.9813 m
Double bottom Concept overview
              concept




  Prediction of structural integrity time as decision making tool.
  Optimisation of the loads to increase the Structure Integrity Time.
           • Ballasts
           • Tanks
           • Additional buoyancy due to SuSy balloon system
Double bottom concept




 	
  
        Double	
  Bo8om	
  Sec9on	
  –	
  both	
  balloons	
  packed	
  and	
  stored	
  
 
       Double	
  Bo8om	
  Sec9on	
  –	
  One	
  balloon	
  packed,	
  but	
  the	
  other	
  inflated.	
  
Description of Damage control cases applied to
                                 the damage vessel
    Loading case B1-
    100% Sagging of the                                          • Ballasting the
    Common Structural                                              double skin and
    Rules for Oil-Tankers.                             Ballast     hopper tanks
                                                                   opposite to the
                                                                   damaged ones.


                                                                      • Attachment
                                                 2nd   SuSy             points of SuSy
                            Damage                    Devices           devices on
                            Scenario             Case                   bulkheads.


                                                                  • Attachment
                                                                    points of SuSy
                                                        SuSy
       Rectangular damage                              Devices
                                                                    devices on both
       • 10m longitudinal                                           webs and
                                                                    bulkheads.
       • 5.5m above WL
       • 8.5m below WL




chool of Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering                                    Shipbuilding Technology Laboratory
Results




                  Remarks
   • Cases (a) & (b) similar stress
     distribution.
   • Case (a) slightly higher stress
     distribution on deck.
   • Case (c) lower stress distribution
     below damage area.



School of Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering             Shipbuilding Technology Laboratory
Double bottom concept

                                         Results




                      Remarks
• Cases (a) & (b) similar stress distribution.
• Case (c) lower stress distribution.
• Average stresses for case (c) more
  than 50% lower than cases (a) & (b)
Double bottom concept

•The application of SuSy devices on both bulkheads and webs compared to
ballasting, exhibits over 50% less average stresses, on hopper plating,
relevant longitudinal stiffeners and side skin, situated on the damaged side.


•Between the upper deck and upper section of damage, SuSy cases exhibits
slightly lower stress distribution than the cases where the SuSy devices are
applied. 
•Proper selection of attachment points for the SuSy devices is essential
regarding structural response of the damaged compartment
Double bottom concept
Design	
  update	
  




                                                                                • A"achment	
  lacing	
  set	
  to	
  the	
  
                                                                                maximum	
  length	
  to	
  reduce	
  the	
  
                                                                              balloon	
  movement	
  during	
  infla7on.	
  
                                                                           • Addi7onal	
  s7ffener	
  behind	
  clamping	
  
                                                                             bar	
  to	
  provide	
  mechanical	
  resistance	
  
                                                                                              against	
  slipping.	
  
                                                                           • Addi7onally	
  both	
  rubber	
  faces	
  will	
  be	
  
    • The	
  packed	
  balloon	
  will	
  be	
  geAng	
  longer,	
  
                                                                             buffed	
  to	
  improve	
  fric7on	
  inside	
  the	
  
                          but	
  more	
  slim.	
  
                                                                                               clamping	
  area.	
  
      • All	
  contact	
  areas	
  of	
  the	
  balloon	
  to	
  the	
  
                                                                           • The	
  thickness	
  of	
  the	
  clamping	
  bar	
  will	
  
     s7ffeners	
  will	
  be	
  reinforced	
  by	
  applying	
  a	
  
                                                                                 be	
  of	
  6mm	
  and	
  made	
  of	
  steel.	
  
                  second	
  layer	
  of	
  material.	
  
Thank you

bhodgson@bmtmail.com
                  http://www.su-sy.eu/

Dr. Benjamin Hodgson
Senior Research Scientist
BMT Group Ltd,
Goodrich House, 1 Waldegrave Road
Teddington, Middlesex, TW11 8LZ, UK
Tel:         +44 (0) 20-8614-4216
works and possible exchanges, it is highly unlikely that   Data of this basic maritime traffic picture is not clas-
  one single technical solution will fit each and every      sified and could be shared without any restrictions
  exchange of information within the CISE. For this          between all Communities provided the necessary
  reason the CISE architecture should be designed as         safeguards are put into place.
CISE & e-maritime
  Example of information layers (non-hierarchical)


                                    Common information sharing environment

      National authorities                                                                    Information layers



         Fishery control                                                                             VMS


        Maritime authority                                                                       SAFESEANET



             Defence                                                                             PT MARSUR



         Internal security                                                                        EUROSUR



       Information sharing                                                                     User-defined COP
Secretary of States Representative for 

Maritime Salvage and Intervention –
(SOSREP) 
oversee, control and if necessary to intervene and exercise “ultimate
command and control”, acting in the overriding interest of the United
Kingdom in salvage operations within UK waters involving vessels or
fixed platforms where there is significant risk of pollution.
 SOSREP should be:

• On site, able to act without delay 
•  Free to act without recourse to higher authority.

• The involvement of Ministers in operational decisions is not a practical
option. 
•  The “Trigger Point” for Intervention is when there is a significant threat
   of pollution to the UK’s pollution control zone, territorial waters or
   coastline. 
•  By not issuing a direction the SOSREP is adopting and approving the
   proposed course of action proposed by those dealing with the incident.
also the space in which inclusive and sustainable economic development takes place.




Oxfam donut




         Source: Oxfam. The 11 dimensions of the social foundation are illustrative and are based on
         governments’ priorities for Rio+20. The nine dimensions of the environmental ceiling are based on
         the planetary boundaries set out by Rockström et al (2009b)

Weitere ähnliche Inhalte

Andere mochten auch

ARGOMARINE final conference - EU presentation - Maurizio Maggiore
ARGOMARINE final conference - EU presentation - Maurizio MaggioreARGOMARINE final conference - EU presentation - Maurizio Maggiore
ARGOMARINE final conference - EU presentation - Maurizio MaggioreARGOMARINE
 
ARGOMARINE Final Conference - CMRE-NATO - Stefano Fioravanti, Alessandra Tesei
ARGOMARINE Final Conference - CMRE-NATO - Stefano Fioravanti, Alessandra TeseiARGOMARINE Final Conference - CMRE-NATO - Stefano Fioravanti, Alessandra Tesei
ARGOMARINE Final Conference - CMRE-NATO - Stefano Fioravanti, Alessandra TeseiARGOMARINE
 
ARGOMARINE final conference - Ministery of Environment presentation - Massimo...
ARGOMARINE final conference - Ministery of Environment presentation - Massimo...ARGOMARINE final conference - Ministery of Environment presentation - Massimo...
ARGOMARINE final conference - Ministery of Environment presentation - Massimo...ARGOMARINE
 
ARGOMARINE Final Conference - MEDESS-4MS Project Presentation - Michela De Do...
ARGOMARINE Final Conference - MEDESS-4MS Project Presentation - Michela De Do...ARGOMARINE Final Conference - MEDESS-4MS Project Presentation - Michela De Do...
ARGOMARINE Final Conference - MEDESS-4MS Project Presentation - Michela De Do...ARGOMARINE
 
ARGOMARINE Final Conference - SeaU presentation - C.F. Gianluca D'Agostino
ARGOMARINE Final Conference - SeaU presentation - C.F. Gianluca D'AgostinoARGOMARINE Final Conference - SeaU presentation - C.F. Gianluca D'Agostino
ARGOMARINE Final Conference - SeaU presentation - C.F. Gianluca D'AgostinoARGOMARINE
 
ARGOMARINE Final Conference Press Review
ARGOMARINE Final Conference Press ReviewARGOMARINE Final Conference Press Review
ARGOMARINE Final Conference Press ReviewARGOMARINE
 
ARGOMARINE Final Conference - MOMAR Presentation - B. Gozzini
ARGOMARINE Final Conference - MOMAR Presentation - B. GozziniARGOMARINE Final Conference - MOMAR Presentation - B. Gozzini
ARGOMARINE Final Conference - MOMAR Presentation - B. GozziniARGOMARINE
 
ARGOMARINE Final Conference - NERSC Presentation - Mohamed Babiker, Torill Hamre
ARGOMARINE Final Conference - NERSC Presentation - Mohamed Babiker, Torill HamreARGOMARINE Final Conference - NERSC Presentation - Mohamed Babiker, Torill Hamre
ARGOMARINE Final Conference - NERSC Presentation - Mohamed Babiker, Torill HamreARGOMARINE
 
ARGOMARINE final presentation - JRC Presentation - Guido Ferraro
ARGOMARINE final presentation - JRC Presentation - Guido FerraroARGOMARINE final presentation - JRC Presentation - Guido Ferraro
ARGOMARINE final presentation - JRC Presentation - Guido FerraroARGOMARINE
 
ARGOMARINE final conference - Open presentation - Giampiero Sammuri
ARGOMARINE final conference - Open presentation - Giampiero SammuriARGOMARINE final conference - Open presentation - Giampiero Sammuri
ARGOMARINE final conference - Open presentation - Giampiero SammuriARGOMARINE
 
ARGOMARINE final presentation - CRN presentation
ARGOMARINE final presentation - CRN presentationARGOMARINE final presentation - CRN presentation
ARGOMARINE final presentation - CRN presentationARGOMARINE
 
ARGOMARINE final conference - EGEMP presentation - Bjorn Baschek
ARGOMARINE final conference - EGEMP presentation - Bjorn BaschekARGOMARINE final conference - EGEMP presentation - Bjorn Baschek
ARGOMARINE final conference - EGEMP presentation - Bjorn BaschekARGOMARINE
 
Argomarine project
Argomarine projectArgomarine project
Argomarine projectARGOMARINE
 
ARGOMARINE Final Conference - Protezione Civile - Il Piano di Pronto Interven...
ARGOMARINE Final Conference - Protezione Civile - Il Piano di Pronto Interven...ARGOMARINE Final Conference - Protezione Civile - Il Piano di Pronto Interven...
ARGOMARINE Final Conference - Protezione Civile - Il Piano di Pronto Interven...ARGOMARINE
 

Andere mochten auch (14)

ARGOMARINE final conference - EU presentation - Maurizio Maggiore
ARGOMARINE final conference - EU presentation - Maurizio MaggioreARGOMARINE final conference - EU presentation - Maurizio Maggiore
ARGOMARINE final conference - EU presentation - Maurizio Maggiore
 
ARGOMARINE Final Conference - CMRE-NATO - Stefano Fioravanti, Alessandra Tesei
ARGOMARINE Final Conference - CMRE-NATO - Stefano Fioravanti, Alessandra TeseiARGOMARINE Final Conference - CMRE-NATO - Stefano Fioravanti, Alessandra Tesei
ARGOMARINE Final Conference - CMRE-NATO - Stefano Fioravanti, Alessandra Tesei
 
ARGOMARINE final conference - Ministery of Environment presentation - Massimo...
ARGOMARINE final conference - Ministery of Environment presentation - Massimo...ARGOMARINE final conference - Ministery of Environment presentation - Massimo...
ARGOMARINE final conference - Ministery of Environment presentation - Massimo...
 
ARGOMARINE Final Conference - MEDESS-4MS Project Presentation - Michela De Do...
ARGOMARINE Final Conference - MEDESS-4MS Project Presentation - Michela De Do...ARGOMARINE Final Conference - MEDESS-4MS Project Presentation - Michela De Do...
ARGOMARINE Final Conference - MEDESS-4MS Project Presentation - Michela De Do...
 
ARGOMARINE Final Conference - SeaU presentation - C.F. Gianluca D'Agostino
ARGOMARINE Final Conference - SeaU presentation - C.F. Gianluca D'AgostinoARGOMARINE Final Conference - SeaU presentation - C.F. Gianluca D'Agostino
ARGOMARINE Final Conference - SeaU presentation - C.F. Gianluca D'Agostino
 
ARGOMARINE Final Conference Press Review
ARGOMARINE Final Conference Press ReviewARGOMARINE Final Conference Press Review
ARGOMARINE Final Conference Press Review
 
ARGOMARINE Final Conference - MOMAR Presentation - B. Gozzini
ARGOMARINE Final Conference - MOMAR Presentation - B. GozziniARGOMARINE Final Conference - MOMAR Presentation - B. Gozzini
ARGOMARINE Final Conference - MOMAR Presentation - B. Gozzini
 
ARGOMARINE Final Conference - NERSC Presentation - Mohamed Babiker, Torill Hamre
ARGOMARINE Final Conference - NERSC Presentation - Mohamed Babiker, Torill HamreARGOMARINE Final Conference - NERSC Presentation - Mohamed Babiker, Torill Hamre
ARGOMARINE Final Conference - NERSC Presentation - Mohamed Babiker, Torill Hamre
 
ARGOMARINE final presentation - JRC Presentation - Guido Ferraro
ARGOMARINE final presentation - JRC Presentation - Guido FerraroARGOMARINE final presentation - JRC Presentation - Guido Ferraro
ARGOMARINE final presentation - JRC Presentation - Guido Ferraro
 
ARGOMARINE final conference - Open presentation - Giampiero Sammuri
ARGOMARINE final conference - Open presentation - Giampiero SammuriARGOMARINE final conference - Open presentation - Giampiero Sammuri
ARGOMARINE final conference - Open presentation - Giampiero Sammuri
 
ARGOMARINE final presentation - CRN presentation
ARGOMARINE final presentation - CRN presentationARGOMARINE final presentation - CRN presentation
ARGOMARINE final presentation - CRN presentation
 
ARGOMARINE final conference - EGEMP presentation - Bjorn Baschek
ARGOMARINE final conference - EGEMP presentation - Bjorn BaschekARGOMARINE final conference - EGEMP presentation - Bjorn Baschek
ARGOMARINE final conference - EGEMP presentation - Bjorn Baschek
 
Argomarine project
Argomarine projectArgomarine project
Argomarine project
 
ARGOMARINE Final Conference - Protezione Civile - Il Piano di Pronto Interven...
ARGOMARINE Final Conference - Protezione Civile - Il Piano di Pronto Interven...ARGOMARINE Final Conference - Protezione Civile - Il Piano di Pronto Interven...
ARGOMARINE Final Conference - Protezione Civile - Il Piano di Pronto Interven...
 

Ähnlich wie ARGOMARINE Final Conference - SUSY presentation -

Presentation of the OLF/NSA Davit-Launched Lifeboats Project
Presentation of the OLF/NSA Davit-Launched Lifeboats ProjectPresentation of the OLF/NSA Davit-Launched Lifeboats Project
Presentation of the OLF/NSA Davit-Launched Lifeboats ProjectOle Gabrielsen
 
Transocean offshore operation 2
Transocean   offshore operation 2Transocean   offshore operation 2
Transocean offshore operation 2Steffones K
 
Hydraulic jump location control
Hydraulic jump location control Hydraulic jump location control
Hydraulic jump location control siddharth upadhyay
 
Mathematical modeling and Experimental Determination of Grade intermixing tim...
Mathematical modeling and Experimental Determination of Grade intermixing tim...Mathematical modeling and Experimental Determination of Grade intermixing tim...
Mathematical modeling and Experimental Determination of Grade intermixing tim...Ankit Karwa
 
Computation of Hydrodynamic Characteristics of Ships using CFD
Computation of Hydrodynamic Characteristics of Ships using CFDComputation of Hydrodynamic Characteristics of Ships using CFD
Computation of Hydrodynamic Characteristics of Ships using CFDNabila Naz
 
Reliability design of fender systems5(h24.2.7)
Reliability design of fender systems5(h24.2.7)Reliability design of fender systems5(h24.2.7)
Reliability design of fender systems5(h24.2.7)Havnetekniskgruppe
 
Pianc hawser force for lock case study
Pianc hawser force for lock case studyPianc hawser force for lock case study
Pianc hawser force for lock case studyPRABIR DATTA
 
Pianc hawser force for lock case study
Pianc hawser force for lock case studyPianc hawser force for lock case study
Pianc hawser force for lock case studyPRABIR DATTA
 
Univ Of Zagreb Uglesic Prevention Of Flashover
Univ Of Zagreb Uglesic Prevention Of FlashoverUniv Of Zagreb Uglesic Prevention Of Flashover
Univ Of Zagreb Uglesic Prevention Of Flashovercorinne rocherieux
 
Tie-in Analysis Guideline Using ORCAFLEX_DKA_5
Tie-in Analysis Guideline Using ORCAFLEX_DKA_5Tie-in Analysis Guideline Using ORCAFLEX_DKA_5
Tie-in Analysis Guideline Using ORCAFLEX_DKA_5Dewintha Kania
 
International Journal of Engineering and Science Invention (IJESI)
International Journal of Engineering and Science Invention (IJESI)International Journal of Engineering and Science Invention (IJESI)
International Journal of Engineering and Science Invention (IJESI)inventionjournals
 
Restricting Hydraulic Jump Location Inside Stilling Basin for Maximum Energy ...
Restricting Hydraulic Jump Location Inside Stilling Basin for Maximum Energy ...Restricting Hydraulic Jump Location Inside Stilling Basin for Maximum Energy ...
Restricting Hydraulic Jump Location Inside Stilling Basin for Maximum Energy ...IRJET Journal
 
Final course project report
Final course project reportFinal course project report
Final course project reportKaggwa Abdul
 
Turning Sense in Dollars: Advances in HYdrualic Fracture Design within Full F...
Turning Sense in Dollars: Advances in HYdrualic Fracture Design within Full F...Turning Sense in Dollars: Advances in HYdrualic Fracture Design within Full F...
Turning Sense in Dollars: Advances in HYdrualic Fracture Design within Full F...Arif Khan
 

Ähnlich wie ARGOMARINE Final Conference - SUSY presentation - (20)

Presentation of the OLF/NSA Davit-Launched Lifeboats Project
Presentation of the OLF/NSA Davit-Launched Lifeboats ProjectPresentation of the OLF/NSA Davit-Launched Lifeboats Project
Presentation of the OLF/NSA Davit-Launched Lifeboats Project
 
Transocean offshore operation 2
Transocean   offshore operation 2Transocean   offshore operation 2
Transocean offshore operation 2
 
Steel Jacketed Rc Column
Steel Jacketed Rc ColumnSteel Jacketed Rc Column
Steel Jacketed Rc Column
 
Hydraulic jump location control
Hydraulic jump location control Hydraulic jump location control
Hydraulic jump location control
 
Mathematical modeling and Experimental Determination of Grade intermixing tim...
Mathematical modeling and Experimental Determination of Grade intermixing tim...Mathematical modeling and Experimental Determination of Grade intermixing tim...
Mathematical modeling and Experimental Determination of Grade intermixing tim...
 
Computation of Hydrodynamic Characteristics of Ships using CFD
Computation of Hydrodynamic Characteristics of Ships using CFDComputation of Hydrodynamic Characteristics of Ships using CFD
Computation of Hydrodynamic Characteristics of Ships using CFD
 
Reliability design of fender systems5(h24.2.7)
Reliability design of fender systems5(h24.2.7)Reliability design of fender systems5(h24.2.7)
Reliability design of fender systems5(h24.2.7)
 
Pianc hawser force for lock case study
Pianc hawser force for lock case studyPianc hawser force for lock case study
Pianc hawser force for lock case study
 
Pianc hawser force for lock case study
Pianc hawser force for lock case studyPianc hawser force for lock case study
Pianc hawser force for lock case study
 
Univ Of Zagreb Uglesic Prevention Of Flashover
Univ Of Zagreb Uglesic Prevention Of FlashoverUniv Of Zagreb Uglesic Prevention Of Flashover
Univ Of Zagreb Uglesic Prevention Of Flashover
 
Anchor Handling Stability
Anchor Handling StabilityAnchor Handling Stability
Anchor Handling Stability
 
Tie-in Analysis Guideline Using ORCAFLEX_DKA_5
Tie-in Analysis Guideline Using ORCAFLEX_DKA_5Tie-in Analysis Guideline Using ORCAFLEX_DKA_5
Tie-in Analysis Guideline Using ORCAFLEX_DKA_5
 
Elango doss-2009
Elango doss-2009Elango doss-2009
Elango doss-2009
 
International Journal of Engineering and Science Invention (IJESI)
International Journal of Engineering and Science Invention (IJESI)International Journal of Engineering and Science Invention (IJESI)
International Journal of Engineering and Science Invention (IJESI)
 
Cosan Ayan
Cosan AyanCosan Ayan
Cosan Ayan
 
Download
DownloadDownload
Download
 
Restricting Hydraulic Jump Location Inside Stilling Basin for Maximum Energy ...
Restricting Hydraulic Jump Location Inside Stilling Basin for Maximum Energy ...Restricting Hydraulic Jump Location Inside Stilling Basin for Maximum Energy ...
Restricting Hydraulic Jump Location Inside Stilling Basin for Maximum Energy ...
 
Final course project report
Final course project reportFinal course project report
Final course project report
 
Turning Sense in Dollars: Advances in HYdrualic Fracture Design within Full F...
Turning Sense in Dollars: Advances in HYdrualic Fracture Design within Full F...Turning Sense in Dollars: Advances in HYdrualic Fracture Design within Full F...
Turning Sense in Dollars: Advances in HYdrualic Fracture Design within Full F...
 
Prj2
Prj2Prj2
Prj2
 

Mehr von ARGOMARINE

ARGOMARINE Final Conference - NTUA Presentation - Vassilia Karathanassi, Pol ...
ARGOMARINE Final Conference - NTUA Presentation - Vassilia Karathanassi, Pol ...ARGOMARINE Final Conference - NTUA Presentation - Vassilia Karathanassi, Pol ...
ARGOMARINE Final Conference - NTUA Presentation - Vassilia Karathanassi, Pol ...ARGOMARINE
 
National Marine Park of Zakynthos Workshop on “Marine Pollution: Monitoring S...
National Marine Park of Zakynthos Workshop on “Marine Pollution: Monitoring S...National Marine Park of Zakynthos Workshop on “Marine Pollution: Monitoring S...
National Marine Park of Zakynthos Workshop on “Marine Pollution: Monitoring S...ARGOMARINE
 
Argo sentinel | press and social review
Argo sentinel | press and social reviewArgo sentinel | press and social review
Argo sentinel | press and social reviewARGOMARINE
 
National Maritime Park fo Zakynthos 2nd workshop press review
National Maritime Park fo Zakynthos 2nd workshop press reviewNational Maritime Park fo Zakynthos 2nd workshop press review
National Maritime Park fo Zakynthos 2nd workshop press reviewARGOMARINE
 
2nd Workshop program of the National Maritime Park of Zakynthos on ""Marine P...
2nd Workshop program of the National Maritime Park of Zakynthos on ""Marine P...2nd Workshop program of the National Maritime Park of Zakynthos on ""Marine P...
2nd Workshop program of the National Maritime Park of Zakynthos on ""Marine P...ARGOMARINE
 
ARGOMARINE presentation at EMD
ARGOMARINE presentation at EMDARGOMARINE presentation at EMD
ARGOMARINE presentation at EMDARGOMARINE
 
ARGOMARINE - Spring experiment and steering commettee #Elbatest
ARGOMARINE -  Spring experiment and steering commettee #ElbatestARGOMARINE -  Spring experiment and steering commettee #Elbatest
ARGOMARINE - Spring experiment and steering commettee #ElbatestARGOMARINE
 
Zakynthos meeting press review - December 2011
Zakynthos meeting press review - December 2011Zakynthos meeting press review - December 2011
Zakynthos meeting press review - December 2011ARGOMARINE
 
Giglio Test - Press Review 14-15/02/2012
Giglio Test - Press Review 14-15/02/2012Giglio Test - Press Review 14-15/02/2012
Giglio Test - Press Review 14-15/02/2012ARGOMARINE
 
PROGETTO ARGOMARINE
PROGETTO ARGOMARINEPROGETTO ARGOMARINE
PROGETTO ARGOMARINEARGOMARINE
 

Mehr von ARGOMARINE (10)

ARGOMARINE Final Conference - NTUA Presentation - Vassilia Karathanassi, Pol ...
ARGOMARINE Final Conference - NTUA Presentation - Vassilia Karathanassi, Pol ...ARGOMARINE Final Conference - NTUA Presentation - Vassilia Karathanassi, Pol ...
ARGOMARINE Final Conference - NTUA Presentation - Vassilia Karathanassi, Pol ...
 
National Marine Park of Zakynthos Workshop on “Marine Pollution: Monitoring S...
National Marine Park of Zakynthos Workshop on “Marine Pollution: Monitoring S...National Marine Park of Zakynthos Workshop on “Marine Pollution: Monitoring S...
National Marine Park of Zakynthos Workshop on “Marine Pollution: Monitoring S...
 
Argo sentinel | press and social review
Argo sentinel | press and social reviewArgo sentinel | press and social review
Argo sentinel | press and social review
 
National Maritime Park fo Zakynthos 2nd workshop press review
National Maritime Park fo Zakynthos 2nd workshop press reviewNational Maritime Park fo Zakynthos 2nd workshop press review
National Maritime Park fo Zakynthos 2nd workshop press review
 
2nd Workshop program of the National Maritime Park of Zakynthos on ""Marine P...
2nd Workshop program of the National Maritime Park of Zakynthos on ""Marine P...2nd Workshop program of the National Maritime Park of Zakynthos on ""Marine P...
2nd Workshop program of the National Maritime Park of Zakynthos on ""Marine P...
 
ARGOMARINE presentation at EMD
ARGOMARINE presentation at EMDARGOMARINE presentation at EMD
ARGOMARINE presentation at EMD
 
ARGOMARINE - Spring experiment and steering commettee #Elbatest
ARGOMARINE -  Spring experiment and steering commettee #ElbatestARGOMARINE -  Spring experiment and steering commettee #Elbatest
ARGOMARINE - Spring experiment and steering commettee #Elbatest
 
Zakynthos meeting press review - December 2011
Zakynthos meeting press review - December 2011Zakynthos meeting press review - December 2011
Zakynthos meeting press review - December 2011
 
Giglio Test - Press Review 14-15/02/2012
Giglio Test - Press Review 14-15/02/2012Giglio Test - Press Review 14-15/02/2012
Giglio Test - Press Review 14-15/02/2012
 
PROGETTO ARGOMARINE
PROGETTO ARGOMARINEPROGETTO ARGOMARINE
PROGETTO ARGOMARINE
 

ARGOMARINE Final Conference - SUSY presentation -

  • 2. BMT
  • 3. Oil Spill Information System: OSIS •  Spill trajectory and weathering prediction tool •  Based on 25 years of laboratory work into oil spills •  Validated against 18 sea trial spills (see picture) and real life incidents (Sea Empress, Rose Bay, Braer) •  GIS-based, designed for use by spill responders and consultants •  Contains >120 oil types, laboratory analysed for weathering and dispersibility •  Underlying databases of oceanography and maps for rapid set-up •  Works on laptop, PC and potential to operate on LAN or Internet
  • 4. OSIS Outputs •  GIS-based outputs showing slick trajectory, spread and contours of thickness or dispersed concentrations •  Status panels showing spill volume, viscosity, flash point •  Beaching locations •  On screen graphs track history of volumes, viscosity, flash point
  • 5. Shoal •  An intelligent AUV team to monitor pollution in seaports and harbours. •  Developments in AI, Robotics, Communications and Sensors. •  Evaluation and Testing in Gijon.
  • 7. Surfacing  system  for  ship  recovery         BALance ® Technology Consulting
  • 9. Concepts evaluated The development of a combination of satellite booster technology with air pressure systems and balloon technology to create a multi purpose modular system for ship rescue purposes. Fishing ROPAX Deployable Internal Double vessel Curtain salvage tool bottom installation
  • 10. Technical Details / Work done in period 1 DESCRIPTION OF TASK 2.3 ROPAX Curtain concept Technical Details / Work done in period 1 Curtain Concept DESCRIPTION OF TASK 2.3 Curtain Concept Fitting arrangement Bars are envisioned to be rigidly attached to the inner structure of the ship Fitting arrangement Bars are envisioned to be rigidly attached to the inner structure of the ship bars bars Or be stored with the balloon on (or below) the car deck and be lifted as the balloon inflates Or be stored with the balloon on (or below) the car deck and be lifted as the balloon inflates Steel bars Steel bars balloon balloon balloon balloon
  • 11. Technical Details / Work done in period 1 DESCRIPTION OF TASK 2.3 ROPAX Curtain concept Concept Curtain Conclusion •  Curtain doesn’t hold even with cables of 16mm even Curtain doesn’t hold with cables of 16 mm diameter. diameter and plate material of steel. Hydrostatic loads are way less than hydrodynamic loads. Textile thickness seems to be the most detrimental property for structural integrity
  • 12. Marine Salvage Techniques Floating crane ROV Lifting bag Uncontrolled vertical acceleration 3
  • 13. Salvage concept •  HAZID analysis completed •  Evaluation of shear forces and bending moments and corresponding fatigue damage thresholds •  Live Testing. Single Input Fuzzy Sliding Mode Controller(SIFSMC)

  • 14. ρg 1.017 kgm commanded target depth, even though the simulation Iyy 1481.31 kgm2 0.03 time is variable, it has a slight effect on the response Z w" values because of the sliding-mode controller - 15.7x As a & action. 10 -3 0.02 Sliding mode controller result, Figure 13 displays Z " different patterns – i.e. 3 reduction, maintenance and q & - 0.41x10-3 further reduction to zero 0.01 value – of the flow rate, as inM " Figure 8. w& - 0.53x10-3 0.00 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1000 Variation in assent velocity 50 M q" & - 0.79x10 -3 Variation in pitch angle Time (s) 45 30 m Figure 5: Case 1 - Variation of ship ascent velocity 40 m 0.09 am 40 50 m Some input physical and empirical parameters are given 0.0 30 m 0.08 35 in 40 m 1 for the pontoon model. The inflation time of Table 30 m -0.5 e with 0.07 filling gas inside the balloons depends on the initial flow 50 m 40 m 30 50 m period rate whereas the breakout time of the pontoon from the -1.0 z (m) of the 0.06 25 seafloor is assumed to be 100 s. The latter would be -1.5 within 20 changed if the appropriate suction force model was 0.05 w (m/s) ascent considered. In the following, two cases of numerical θ (deg.) -2.0 15 creases 0.04 simulations are considered for different target depths -2.5 e pitch 10 being equal to 30, 40 and 50 m. In the first case, the 0.03 s the 5 initial flow rate is variable for different depths, whereas -3.0 ntroller 0.02 in the second case the initial flow rate is fixed. The latter 0 error. 0 would 300 400 in500different numerical 1000 100 200 result 600 700 800 900 simulation time -3.5 0.01 by the depending on the sliding-mode control. Time (s) -4.0 gle to 0.00 ates of Figure 100 Case 2 300 400 500 ship vertical position 0 9: 200 - Variation of 600 700 800 900 1000 -4.5 4.1 CASE Time (s) 1: VARYING INITIAL FLOW RATE 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 hen the Time (s) Figure 5: Case 1 - Variation of ship ascent velocity 0.09 • the app With 3 target (30, 40 and 50 m) depths, 3 different initial 0.0 Figure 6: Case 1 - Variation of ship pitch angle flow m 30 rates (0.15, 0.1875 and 0.25 m3s-1, respectively) are evalua given n from 0.08 0.0 40 m -0.5 30 m considered such that the payload reaches the desired 40 m • the eff me t = (at of 50 m 30 m 0.0002 50 m 0.07 -0.5 depths at the same time (about 1000 s). m 40 The inflation time -1.0 howev flow ces the 0.06 50 m of filling gas inside the balloons is suitably taken as 100, 30 m which m the 0.25 to -1.0 -1.5 40 m 80 & 60 s respectively. The obtained vertical dynamic 0.0001 as a Fu ld be der to 0.05 50 m θ (deg.)w (m/s) -1.5 • the ela q (rad/s) θ (deg.) -2.0 was nduced responses (vertical trajectory, ascent velocity, pitch angle 0.04 and pitch rate) and the variation of the control parameter conditi ottom. erical -2.0 -2.5 (i.e. the flow rate) are presented in Figures 4-7 and 8, 0.0000 variati depthsa ains 0.03 target -2.5 respectively. -3.0 pressu e, the ntroller 0.02 velocit hereas -3.0 50 -0.0001 -3.5 ue. The • the ev latter 0.01 30 m to the -3.5 45 -4.0 mome time 40 m relief 0.00 -4.0 0 100 40 200 300 50 m 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 -0.0002 -4.5 thresho 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 mode 35 Time (s) -4.5 TE and g 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 -0.0003 Time (s) nt rate 30 Figure 10: Case 2 - Variation (s) ship ascent velocity of 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 5. CONC Time Figure 11: Case 2 - Variation of ship pitch angle m)
  • 16. Results & Discussion (Contd….)
  • 17. For a safe and viable salvage operation, the ascent velocity and pitch angle should be controlled by the combined use of an adaptive fuzzy sliding mode controller and pressure relief valve FSMCs shows 30 % of improvement in tracking performance over SMC. SIFSMC is proved to be the preferred option among these controllers with less tuning effort and computational time. Live testing soon
  • 18. Double bottom concept DPAM – Method • Stress Intensity Factors evaluation • Bottom Damage – Grounding • Side and Deck Damages - Collision • Crack Propagation Equation • Resolution of a differential equation • Implementation : Octave script 4.9813 m
  • 19. Double bottom Concept overview concept Prediction of structural integrity time as decision making tool. Optimisation of the loads to increase the Structure Integrity Time. • Ballasts • Tanks • Additional buoyancy due to SuSy balloon system
  • 20. Double bottom concept   Double  Bo8om  Sec9on  –  both  balloons  packed  and  stored  
  • 21.   Double  Bo8om  Sec9on  –  One  balloon  packed,  but  the  other  inflated.  
  • 22. Description of Damage control cases applied to the damage vessel Loading case B1- 100% Sagging of the • Ballasting the Common Structural double skin and Rules for Oil-Tankers. Ballast hopper tanks opposite to the damaged ones. • Attachment 2nd SuSy points of SuSy Damage Devices devices on Scenario Case bulkheads. • Attachment points of SuSy SuSy Rectangular damage Devices devices on both • 10m longitudinal webs and bulkheads. • 5.5m above WL • 8.5m below WL chool of Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering Shipbuilding Technology Laboratory
  • 23. Results Remarks • Cases (a) & (b) similar stress distribution. • Case (a) slightly higher stress distribution on deck. • Case (c) lower stress distribution below damage area. School of Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering Shipbuilding Technology Laboratory
  • 24. Double bottom concept Results Remarks • Cases (a) & (b) similar stress distribution. • Case (c) lower stress distribution. • Average stresses for case (c) more than 50% lower than cases (a) & (b)
  • 25. Double bottom concept •The application of SuSy devices on both bulkheads and webs compared to ballasting, exhibits over 50% less average stresses, on hopper plating, relevant longitudinal stiffeners and side skin, situated on the damaged side.
 •Between the upper deck and upper section of damage, SuSy cases exhibits slightly lower stress distribution than the cases where the SuSy devices are applied. •Proper selection of attachment points for the SuSy devices is essential regarding structural response of the damaged compartment
  • 27.
  • 28.
  • 29. Design  update   • A"achment  lacing  set  to  the   maximum  length  to  reduce  the   balloon  movement  during  infla7on.   • Addi7onal  s7ffener  behind  clamping   bar  to  provide  mechanical  resistance   against  slipping.   • Addi7onally  both  rubber  faces  will  be   • The  packed  balloon  will  be  geAng  longer,   buffed  to  improve  fric7on  inside  the   but  more  slim.   clamping  area.   • All  contact  areas  of  the  balloon  to  the   • The  thickness  of  the  clamping  bar  will   s7ffeners  will  be  reinforced  by  applying  a   be  of  6mm  and  made  of  steel.   second  layer  of  material.  
  • 30. Thank you bhodgson@bmtmail.com http://www.su-sy.eu/ Dr. Benjamin Hodgson Senior Research Scientist BMT Group Ltd, Goodrich House, 1 Waldegrave Road Teddington, Middlesex, TW11 8LZ, UK Tel:         +44 (0) 20-8614-4216
  • 31. works and possible exchanges, it is highly unlikely that Data of this basic maritime traffic picture is not clas- one single technical solution will fit each and every sified and could be shared without any restrictions exchange of information within the CISE. For this between all Communities provided the necessary reason the CISE architecture should be designed as safeguards are put into place. CISE & e-maritime Example of information layers (non-hierarchical) Common information sharing environment National authorities Information layers Fishery control VMS Maritime authority SAFESEANET Defence PT MARSUR Internal security EUROSUR Information sharing User-defined COP
  • 32. Secretary of States Representative for 
 Maritime Salvage and Intervention – (SOSREP) oversee, control and if necessary to intervene and exercise “ultimate command and control”, acting in the overriding interest of the United Kingdom in salvage operations within UK waters involving vessels or fixed platforms where there is significant risk of pollution. SOSREP should be: • On site, able to act without delay •  Free to act without recourse to higher authority. • The involvement of Ministers in operational decisions is not a practical option. •  The “Trigger Point” for Intervention is when there is a significant threat of pollution to the UK’s pollution control zone, territorial waters or coastline. •  By not issuing a direction the SOSREP is adopting and approving the proposed course of action proposed by those dealing with the incident.
  • 33. also the space in which inclusive and sustainable economic development takes place. Oxfam donut Source: Oxfam. The 11 dimensions of the social foundation are illustrative and are based on governments’ priorities for Rio+20. The nine dimensions of the environmental ceiling are based on the planetary boundaries set out by Rockström et al (2009b)