2. Agenda
Growth of Medicaid in the health care system
Growth of Managed Care within Medicaid
Aetna’ Footprint in Medicaid Managed Care
Implications of the Medicaid Managed Care Final Rule (Mega
Rule)
2
3. $5 $13 $26 $41 $74
$145 $203 $317 $409 $563 $742 $999
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025
Historical and Projected National Health
Expenditures by Payer
FY1970–2025
Medicaid and CHIP Medicare Private insurance
Other health insurance Other third party payers Out of pocket
Source: MACPAC 2016 analysis of Office of the Actuary (OACT), Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services 2015 National health
expenditures by type of service and source of funds: Calendar years 1960–2014
5. Increasing Role of Managed Care in Medicaid
54.7 million Medicaid
members in private
managed care (2016)
73% of Medicaid
beneficiaries in private
managed care (2016)
39 states use managed
care
6. States identify policy
objectives that aren’t
being met through fee
for service
• Pay for performance
• Value based payments
• Quality measurement
• Improve care
coordination
• Cost control
• Cost savings
States use managed care to accomplish
policy goals
8. Key Provisions of the “Mega Rule”
impacting managed care
Actuarial Soundness
Pass through payments
Network Adequacy
Provider Screening and Enrollment
Information for Enrollees
8
9. Goals of the CMS Managed Care Final Rule
Modernize CMS rules to fit current Medicaid Managed Care
practice.
• Consistency among state Medicaid managed care approaches
• Use Medicaid managed care to drive delivery system reforms and quality
improvement throughout the healthcare system
• Align CMS standards for Medicaid managed care with Medicare Advantage
and Marketplace plan requirements
• Make CMS oversight standards more consistent across states
9
Standardized State Flexibility
• Medical Loss Ratio and rate setting
• Appeals and grievances policies and
timelines
• Provider enrollment shifted to the
state level
• Encounter data and annual reports
• Network adequacy metrics and
definitions
• IMD and “in-lieu of” options
• Delivery system and payment
reforms
• State managed care quality strategy
10. Actuarial Soundness
Soundness requirements
• Any difference in rates cells or population must be due to risk based rating
factors and not requirements to pay providers higher rates.
• Each rate cell must have a specific rate. No rate ranges are allowed
• States can increase or decrease the certified capitation rate by 1.5%
without submitting a revised rate certification for CMS’ approval.
• Rate cells cannot be used to cross subsidize another rate cell.
• Rate trend factors must be developed from actual experience or a real
member population.
• Any incentive payments in MCO contracts cannot exceed 105% of the
capitation rate.
• Any hold backs in MCO contracts cannot exceed 5% of the capitation rate
10
11. Pass Through Payments
Pass-through payments are supplemental payments states direct
managed care plans to provide to specific providers; not directly
linked to services under the contract or outcomes
CMS has longstanding concerns with pass-through payments,
including their potential to limit plans’ ability to effectively
implement value-based purchasing
Final rule phases out states’ ability to use pass-through
payments
Hospitals provided with ten year transition (until 7/1/27)
Physicians and nursing facilities provided with a 5-year transition (until
July, 1 2022)
Exception for FQHC wrap-around payments required by law and
graduate medical education (GME) payments
11
12. Network Adequacy
States must develop and implement time and distance
standards for services covered including:
• Primary and specialty care (adult and pediatric)
• Behavioral health (adult and pediatric)
• OB/GYN
• pediatric dental
• Hospital
• Pharmacy
Must have standards for Medicaid managed long term services
and supports programs for providers who travel to the enrollee to
provide services;
Assess and certify the adequacy of MCO provider network at least
annually and when there is a substantial change to the program
design (such as adding a new population, benefits, or service
area).
12
13. 42 CFR 438.332, .340; Effective: Rating periods for contracts starting on or after 7/1/18
Provider Screening and Enrollment
All Medicaid providers – Fee for Service and Managed Care –
must be enrolled with the state
States are responsible for screening and enrollment may delegate to third
parties such as plans or fiscal intermediaries.
MCO network providers are not obligated to deliver services to FFS
beneficiaries
Plans may execute a provider agreement for up to 120 days pending the
outcome of the screening process
Rules apply
to CHIP
13
14. New Provider Directory Requirements
Additional information:
Provider’s group affiliation
Website address
Cultural and linguistic capabilities
Whether the provider’s facility is accessible for people with physical
disabilities
MCOs must update within 30 calendar days of receipt of changed provider
information.
Timeframes align with QHP and Medicare Advantage
New Member Handbook Requirements
• Provided in “prevalent” non-English languages
• Include auxiliary aids for deaf and blind individuals
• May be offered electronically on plan website and hard copy within 5
business days, without charge
• Instructions on how to obtain services from out-of-network providers
Information for Enrollees
14
15. Conclusions about the Mega Rule
Managed care is the dominant delivery system for Medicaid.
The Mega Rule modernizes governing practices, aligns with
Medicare Advantage and Marketplace, makes oversight more
consistent.
The rule impacts almost all areas of Medicaid operations—
both state programs and MCOs. That has a direct impact on
providers serving Medicaid members.
How much variation will happen state to state? What impact
will the next administration have?
15
Hinweis der Redaktion
Why the Mega Rule is a big deal. What problems were trying to be solved? What are the remaining issues and concerns?
Shows that the share of national spending taken by Medicaid has grow from about 7% in 1970 to 17% in 2015. Reflecting the level of expansion through the ACA and growth in the program overall.
Medicare spending also grows over time to get to almost 40% of health spending in public programs. Private, employer sponsored and other 3rd party payers make up around 50%. What’s shrunk is out of pocket costs as insurance coverage becomes more common.
Sources: For historical data: MACPAC 2016 analysis of Office of the Actuary (OACT), Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services 2015 National health expenditures by type of service and source of funds: Calendar years 1960–2014, https://www.cms.gov/Research-Statistics-Data-and-Systems/Statistics-Trends-and-Reports/NationalHealthExpendData/Downloads/NHE2014.zip. For projected data: MACPAC 2016 analysis of OACT 2016 National health expenditure (NHE) amounts by type of expenditure and source of funds
Medicaid isn’t evenly distributed. Its specific to covering kids and people in nursing homes.
So why have so many states transitioned their programs to managed care from the traditional fee for service model.
So why have states made the shift to managed care. Look at some of the policy initiatives that states are trying to address.
Initial rounds of managed care for parents and kids was to achieve some predictability and common approaches to care as seen in the commercial population.
Next phase was to help control or reduce costs during the great recession (although some of these trends predated the recession in 2003)
Now its an attempt to control costs for elderly and disabled populations and improve quality of care. Try to address high need, high cost members that tend to drive to drive the majority of costs for states. Chronic disease, long term services and supports, behavioral health needs.
AT the same time use managed care to drive pay for performance or value based types of care.
Tried to think about provisions that would have direct impacts on plans.
Have to think about implementation of the whole rule, but some requirements are more targeted on states.
payment levels are sufficient and appropriate for the anticipated utilization and populations, and reasonable administrative expenses;
• rates are documented in sufficient detail to assess their reasonableness; and
• rates are developed in a transparent and uniform way to ensure protection of public funds and beneficiary access to care.
Examples. have examples ready for these. The audience will be most interested in this.
Pathology
how is this different from now? Be careful not to say that providers must be enrolled. Only if they want to be in Medicaid FFS and vice versa. Providers don't HAVE to be in the program.
Medicaid is a huge and growing part of the health care environment, especially in states that expanded Medicaid to low income adults. Managed care is the predominant form of delivery for Medicaid members. This rule directly impacts the vast majority of Medicaid members.
Attempts to align Medicaid managed care with other federally regulated delivery systems. Makes sense, but there are still flexibilities in the mega rule and some rules that are left to the states. Still lots of variation and options for state flexibility.
The rule touches many areas of operations-have direct impacts on providers as they interact with Medicaid members, state programs, MCO network development staff, etc. If you serve Medicaid members, there will be some change in practice related to the rule.
Not everything is in the rule—implementation over time. How will the next administration influence the implementation of the rule.